REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we present a thorough evaluation of the efficacy of knowledge distillation and its dependence on student and teacher architectures. Starting with the observation that more accurate teachers often don't make good teachers, we attempt to tease apart the factors that affect knowledge distillation performance. We find crucially that larger models do not often make better teachers. We show that this is a consequence of mismatched capacity, and that small students are unable to mimic large teachers. We find typical ways of circumventing this (such as performing a sequence of knowledge distillation steps) to be ineffective. Finally, we show that this effect can be mitigated by stopping the teacher's training early. Our results generalize across datasets and models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Distilled Pretraining: A modern lens of Data, In-Context Learning and Test-Time Scaling
Distilled pretraining improves test-time scaling via generation diversity but impairs induction-head-based in-context learning, with the trade-off explained by a bigram model analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.