Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Integrated effect of the cosmic space magnetic field on the acceleration noise of the TQ gravitational wave detection program

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Magnetic-field-induced acceleration noise on TianQin's test mass stays below the mission requirement, peaking at ratio 0.7591.

desk verdict A useful TianQin-specific magnetic noise budget built on TA16, but the Lorentz-force term leans on a LISA orbital speed that doesn't fit TianQin, and a few load-bearing parameters are never assigned values. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03562 v1 pith:HWQ5BGWA submitted 2025-09-03 gr-qc astro-ph.HEphysics.space-ph

Cheng-Long Yu , Jin Yan , Lin Ji , Wen-Ke Shi , Yi Zhang , Run-Qiu Liu , Hong-Qing Huo This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEphysics.space-ph
keywords TianQingravitationalwavedetectionaccelerationnoisetestmassmagneticfieldLorentzforcemagnetosphericTA16model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

TianQin's test masses must fall almost perfectly freely to sense gravitational waves, so every force on them needs to be quantified. This paper asks whether the magnetic field along TianQin's 100,000-km orbit, including its gradients and the Lorentz force on the charged test mass, adds acceleration noise that exceeds the detector's budget. Using the TA16 empirical magnetosphere model over two solar cycles (1997-2021), it simulates the field and field-gradient spectra on the orbit and converts them into acceleration noise. It reports the magnetic contribution reaches about 1e-16 m s^-2 Hz^-1/2 and at most 0.7591 times the TianQin requirement, so the magnetic environment fits within the free-fall noise budget.

What carries the argument

The central object is the TA16 model, an empirical magnetosphere model that represents Earth's field through toroidal and poloidal scalar potentials expanded in radial basis functions; the paper uses it to generate spectra of the magnetic field and its gradient along TianQin's orbit, refining gradients with fourth-order central differences and Richardson extrapolation. Two noise formulas carry the argument: Eq. (10), which converts field and gradient power spectral densities into acceleration noise from the test mass's residual and induced magnetic moments, and Eq. (13), which converts the field spectrum into Lorentz-force acceleration noise using the test mass's charge and spacecraft speed.

What would settle it

Re-evaluate Eq. (13) with TianQin's orbital speed, about 1.9e3 m/s, in place of the 3e4 m/s value in Table 1: if the budget ratio beta stays below 1, the conclusion holds with a wider margin; if it exceeds 1, the claim fails. An in-situ magnetometer on a 100,000-km geocentric orbit measuring field and gradient spectra, with the same charge and susceptibility parameters, would settle whether the TA16-interpolated spectra over- or underestimate the noise near the frequencies where beta peaks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the TA16 empirical magnetosphere model for 1997-2021, the paper's central claim is that the total acceleration noise from residual and induced magnetic-moment coupling plus the Lorentz force on TianQin's charged test mass stays below the TianQin requirement curve over 1e-5 to 0.1 Hz, with the maximum ratio beta reaching 0.7591. Direct field-moment coupling and the Lorentz force are comparable in size and much larger than field-gradient coupling; the solar-maximum period is noisier than the minimum but still compliant. The resulting roughly 1e-16 m s^-2 Hz^-1/2 level makes magnetic noise an important term in the budget rather than a violating one.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the spacecraft speed relative to the external magnetic field is 3e4 m/s, a value taken from a LISA charge-noise study; TianQin's 100,000-km orbit moves at about 1.9e3 m/s, so if the relevant speed is the orbital speed, the Lorentz-force noise term is overestimated by roughly an order of magnitude.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The magnetic field does not, by this model, push TianQin's test-mass free-fall noise above the requirement curve in the 1e-5 to 0.1 Hz band.
  • Design effort on magnetic noise can concentrate on charge control and magnetic cleanliness of the test mass, since field-moment coupling and the Lorentz force dominate while field-gradient coupling is minor.
  • Solar-cycle variation enters the noise budget: the solar-maximum period yields higher magnetic acceleration noise than the minimum, but both remain compliant.
  • Extending the magnetic-noise spectrum to 0.1 Hz, beyond earlier magnetic-noise estimates for TianQin, still leaves the integrated noise under the requirement in the higher-frequency part.
  • The roughly 1e-16 m s^-2 Hz^-1/2 level means magnetic field noise should be included in TianQin's total noise model, but it is not the limiting term.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the spacecraft speed in Eq. (13) is replaced by TianQin's actual orbital speed (about 1.9e3 m/s) instead of the 3e4 m/s value taken from the cited charge-noise work, the Lorentz-force noise drops by roughly an order of magnitude, widening the reported margin.
  • Editorial inference: because TA16's radial-basis grid ends about one Earth radius inside the modeled orbit, the field and gradient values there are extrapolated; an in-situ magnetometer on a TianQin-like orbit would directly test the spectral shapes that set beta.
  • Editorial inference: the model's 5-minute native time resolution, interpolated to 1 second, produces the high-frequency oscillations in the PSD plots, so the numerical character of the 0.01-0.1 Hz tail should be confirmed before relying on it.
  • Editorial inference: the susceptibility and residual-moment parameters are taken from the test-mass calibration study cited in the paper; TianQin-specific materials with different magnetic properties would move the beta maximum, making part of the margin contingent on those material values.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper evaluates the acceleration noise on TianQin test masses due to the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field. Using the Tsyganenko TA16 empirical model, the authors generate magnetic-field and field-gradient time series along a nominal 100,000 km TianQin orbit over 1997-2021, then compute three noise channels: residual magnetic-moment coupling, induced-moment/field-gradient coupling, and Lorentz force on the charged test mass. The resulting acceleration amplitude spectral densities are compared with a TianQin requirement curve, giving maximum ratios β = 0.4839 for the magnetic/gradient terms alone and β = 0.7591 for the total including the Lorentz force. The authors conclude that the magnetic environment does not violate the free-fall noise budget, that the magnetic-field and Lorentz-force noises are of similar size and are larger than the magnetic-gradient noise, and that the total acceleration noise reaches roughly 10^-16 m s^-2 Hz^-1/2. They also compare solar-maximum and solar-minimum periods.

Significance. If the quantitative issues are resolved, this would be a useful contribution to the TianQin noise budget: it applies a data-driven magnetospheric model over two solar cycles, separates the physical mechanisms, and compares against a stated requirement curve. The core qualitative conclusion—that the modeled magnetic noise lies below the TianQin requirement—is likely robust because the main uncertainty enters in the conservative direction. The paper is therefore not merely an exercise in curve plotting; it provides a concrete, falsifiable estimate of a noise contribution that must be accounted for in the TianQin mission design. However, several load-bearing numerical inputs need to be corrected or justified before the reported magnitudes and component hierarchy can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2.1–§2.2.2, Eqs. (9)–(13), Table 1] The Lorentz-force acceleration noise is made linearly proportional to (η vSC + vPM), with vSC = 3×10^4 m/s taken from the LISA study [29]. For TianQin's 100,000 km, 3.9-day geocentric orbit the spacecraft orbital speed is ~1.9×10^3 m/s; even if the magnetospheric field co-rotates with Earth at 15.5 R_E, the relative speed is ~7×10^3 m/s, not 3×10^4 m/s. The LISA value is appropriate for a heliocentric orbit. Hence the Lorentz acceleration ASD in Eq. (13) is overestimated by roughly a factor of 4–16. This directly affects the total β=0.7591 in §3.1, the peak Lorentz noise level quoted as 1×10^-15 m s^-2 Hz^-1/2, and the abstract's claim that the noise 'reaches the magnitude of 10^-16' and that Lorentz noise is 'relatively higher'. The below-requirement safety conclusion may survive because the error is conservative, but the quantitative claims and component ordering must be recomputed wit
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (16)] The shielding leakage coefficient η appears in Eqs. (9), (10), and (11)–(13) and multiplies every noise term, but no value is provided in Table 1 or elsewhere in the text. All reported acceleration ASDs and β ratios depend on this parameter (linearly in the ASD expression, quadratically in the PSD). If the author intended η=1 as a conservative no-shielding assumption, that should be stated; if a finite shielding factor is intended, it must be specified. Without this value, the calculations are not reproducible and the reported absolute magnitudes are conditional on an unspecified parameter.
  3. [§2.3, §3.1] The TianQin requirement curve used to define β is misstated. Eq. (16) reads S_a,TQ = 1 × (1+(fc1/f)^2)^(1/2)(1+(f/fc2)^4)^(1/2) f·m·s^-2·Hz^-1/2, and the text gives 'fc1 = 0.5mHz, fc1 = 0.5mHz' instead of specifying both fc1 and fc2. In addition, the prefactor '1' should be the 1×10^-15 m s^-2 Hz^-1/2 level quoted in Section 1; as written, the prefactor and the extra 'f' make the equation dimensionally inconsistent. Since β is the ratio of the computed noise to this curve, an incorrect or misprinted requirement curve changes all numerical β values and undercuts the quantitative comparison. Please correct the formula and state explicitly the values of fc1, fc2, and the prefactor.
  4. [§2.3, §3.1] The TA16 model output has a 5-minute resolution, corresponding to a Nyquist frequency of ~1.7 mHz. The authors interpolate the time series to 1 s with splines in order to extend the spectrum to 0.1 Hz. This means that the PSDs and all derived acceleration-noise spectra above a few mHz—including the 'middle and high frequency band' results and the 0.01–0.1 Hz range highlighted in the introduction—are artifacts of the interpolation kernel, not physical magnetospheric fluctuations. The authors themselves note oscillatory behavior in the high-frequency PSD (Fig. 1, §3.2). The claim that the frequency range is extended 'without information loss' is therefore not justified. Either use a physical model or a conservative envelope for high-frequency magnetic fluctuations, or restrict the quantitative claims to frequencies below the original Nyquist frequency.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The residual magnetic moments Mx, My, Mz and susceptibility χ are taken from the LISA Pathfinder calibration paper [28]. The paper should explicitly state that these are surrogate values for the TianQin test mass, and, ideally, include a brief sensitivity analysis; as written, the reader may assume they are TianQin-specific measured values.
  2. [§2.2.2] The formula for vPM, vPM = 10π f^{3/2} m/s, is imported from LISA reference [29] without derivation or comment. Its units and frequency dependence look unusual, and its validity for TianQin's inertial sensor and frequency band (10^-5 to 0.1 Hz) should be justified.
  3. [Throughout] There are multiple typographical and language issues: 'fc1' is repeated in Eq. (16) text; 'celestial organ' appears instead of 'orbit'; 'sunspot book' instead of 'sunspot number'; 'M' vs 'm' for test mass is inconsistent (Table 1 uses 'M', equations use 'm'); the phrase 'acceleration integrated noise' is vague. A careful English and notation pass is needed.
  4. [§2.1, §3.2] The discussion of the TA16 model is detailed but the relationship between the RBF grid up to 14.5 R_E and the TianQin orbit at ~15.5 R_E is only briefly justified. The sentence in §3.2 saying the extrapolation distance is 1 R_E compared to a 3 R_E node spacing is reasonable but would benefit from a quantitative uncertainty estimate for the extrapolated field magnitude.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the calculation is a forward application of external empirical models and literature parameters to an external benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a forward modeling calculation. It takes the TA16 magnetospheric model as an external empirical input, computes magnetic field and gradient power spectral densities along the TianQin orbit, and inserts those spectra into standard acceleration-noise formulas (Eqs. 10 and 13) with parameter values taken from cited literature (LISA Pathfinder and LISA studies). No parameter is fitted to the TianQin noise requirement or to the output acceleration-noise spectrum. The final comparison against the TianQin requirement is made through an externally specified noise curve (Eq. 16), and the reported β is a ratio of independently computed noise to that requirement. The prior TianQin studies cited (Su et al.) are used as context and comparison, not as a load-bearing authority for the present result. The potential issue that vSC = 3×10^4 m/s is taken from a LISA heliocentric study and may not match TianQin's geocentric orbital speed is a quantitative correctness concern, not a circularity: it affects the magnitude of the Lorentz noise estimate but does not make the prediction equivalent to the input by construction. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation borrows all material parameters and the background magnetic field model from external literature. It additionally relies on at least two unquantified parameters (eta and V) and one parameter scaled for the wrong mission (vSC). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • vSC (spacecraft speed relative to magnetic field) = 3 x 10^4 m/s
    Taken from LISA reference [29] in Table 1; not matched to TianQin's geocentric orbital speed (~1.9 x 10^3 m/s), which inflates the Lorentz-force noise estimate.
  • eta (magnetic shielding leakage coefficient) = not stated
    Introduced in Eq. 9 but never assigned a value in Table 1 or the text; the numerical results implicitly assume a value, and all noise terms scale with it.
  • V (test mass volume) = not listed
    Appears in Eqs. 4, 6, and 10 as chi V, but the volume is not given in Table 1, so the magnitude of the induced-moment noise cannot be reproduced.
  • Q (test mass charge) = 1 x 10^-12 C
    Taken from LISA gravitational reference sensor literature; TianQin's charge management state and residual charge may differ.
  • Mx, My, Mz (residual magnetic moments) = 0.140, 0.178, 0.095 nA m^2
    Values from LISA Pathfinder calibration [28], not measured for TianQin test masses.
  • chi (magnetic susceptibility) = -3.3723 x 10^-5
    From LISA Pathfinder test mass material [28]; TianQin test mass material may have a different susceptibility.
  • vPM formula = 10 pi f^(3/2) m/s
    Taken from LISA charge-noise model [29]; used in Eq. 13 for the test mass motion relative to the spacecraft.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TA16 model remains valid at 15.5 Re, about 1 Re beyond its outermost RBF grid (3.3 to 14.5 Re).
    Section 3.2 argues the extrapolation is small compared with the 3 Re node spacing, but the model was not trained there.
  • domain assumption Spline interpolation from 5-minute samples to 1-second samples preserves spectral content up to 0.1 Hz.
    Section 2.3 states interpolation to 1 s so that 0.1 Hz is reached, but resampling artifacts and aliasing are not quantified; the authors note high-frequency oscillations in the PSD.
  • domain assumption The test mass can be treated as a uniform dipole and fields can be volume-averaged.
    Section 2.2.1 and Section 3.2; the authors acknowledge that shape effects are ignored and argue only the magnitude, not the order, would change.
  • domain assumption Stationarity and homogeneity allow the force variance to be converted into power spectral densities with Eq. 10.
    Section 2.2.1 invokes 'reasonable assumptions, homogeneity and stability' before writing Eq. 10.
  • domain assumption The magnetic-field and magnetic-field-gradient noise contributions are independent and can be summed without cross-spectral terms.
    Eq. 10 separates S_Bx and S_gradBx contributions with no cross term; the paper does not justify this separation for the sensitive-axis projections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrated effect of the cosmic space magnetic field on the acceleration noise of the TQ gravitational wave detection program." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HWQ5BGWA

@misc{pith2026250903562,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrated effect of the cosmic space magnetic field on the acceleration noise of the TQ gravitational wave detection program},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HWQ5BGWA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03562}
}
abstract

The TianQin(TQ) program is to deploy three satellites that can form an equilateral triangle in about 100,000 km Earth orbit to capture gravitational wave signals in the low-frequency band. In order to ensure accurate capture, noise needs to be analyzed and compensated. In this paper, we model and analyze the acceleration noise generated by the test mass affected by the magnetic field in space. In this paper, we use the Tsyganenko model as the background magnetic field of the TQ orbit, calculate the magnetic field and magnetic field gradient of the satellite orbit from 1997 to 2023, analyze the acceleration noise due to the coupling of the residual magnetic moment, the induced magnetic moment with the magnetic field in space and the acceleration noise due to the Lorentz force, and calculate the acceleration integrated noise of the influence of the magnetic field on the test mass from the power spectral densities of the modeled magnetic field and the magnetic field gradient. The acceleration integrated noise of the magnetic field influence on the test mass is calculated from the power spectral density of the magnetic field and the magnetic field gradient obtained by the model. Through the simulation study, the acceleration of the test mass induced by the magnetic field in the space of the TQ orbit reaches the magnitude of $10^{-16}ms^{-1}Hz^{-1/2}$, which is an important source of the influencing noise. The acceleration noise induced by the magnetic field and the Lorentz force is relatively higher than that induced by the magnetic field gradient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03562 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Power spectral density of the three components of the magnetic field calculated by TA16 and the synthesized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Power spectral density of the magnetic field gradient tensor in the orbit where the TQ program is located, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Power spectral densities of the magnetic field and magnetic field gradient in the sensitive axis on the celestial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Acceleration noise due to coupling of the magnetic field and magnetic field gradient in the direction of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Acceleration noise spectrum resulting from the coupling of the Lorentz force with the space magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Acceleration noise spectrum generated by all noise terms associated with the space magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Variation curve of sunspot number with time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Acceleration noise spectra generated by the space magnetic field corresponding to the period of extreme solar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Charge induced acceleration noise in the lisa gravitational reference sensor

    Timothy J Sumner, Guido Mueller, John W Conklin, Peter J Wass, and Daniel Hollington. Charge induced acceleration noise in the lisa gravitational reference sensor. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 37(4):045010, jan 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Overall discussion on the key problems of a space-borne laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna

    Ziren Luo, Min Zhang, and Gang Jin. Overall discussion on the key problems of a space-borne laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna. Chinese Science Bulletin, 64(24):2468–2474, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Advanced ligo

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, J Aasi, B P Abbott, R Abbott, et al. Advanced ligo. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(7):074001, mar 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, et al. Gwtc-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs. Phys. Rev. X, 9:031040, Sep 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Overview of kagra: Detector design and construction history

    T Akutsu, M Ando, K Arai, et al. Overview of kagra: Detector design and construction history. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A101, 08 2020

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Auclair, D

    P. Auclair, D. Bacon, T. Baker, et al. Cosmology with the laser interferometer space antenna. Living Reviews in Relativity, 26(5), 2023. Received: 19 April 2022; Accepted: 13 June 2023; Published: 28 August 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Detection of astrophysical gravitational wave sources by tianqin and lisa.SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 67(5):259511, 2024

    Alejandro Torres-Orjuela, Shun-Jia Huang, Zheng-Cheng Liang, Shuai Liu, Hai-Tian Wang, Chang-Qing Ye, Yi-Ming Hu, and Jianwei Mei. Detection of astrophysical gravitational wave sources by tianqin and lisa.SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 67(5):259511, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources

    Wen-Hong Ruan, Zong-Kuan Guo, Rong-Gen Cai, and Yuan-Zhong Zhang. Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 35(17):2050075, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 30 references
  1. [8]

    Current status of space gravitational wave antenna decigo and b-decigo

    Seiji Kawamura, Masaki Ando, Naoki Seto, et al. Current status of space gravitational wave antenna decigo and b-decigo. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A105, 02 2021

    2021

  2. [9]

    Core payload of the space gravitational wave observatory: Inertial sensor and its critical technologies

    Shaoxin Wang, Dongxu Liu, Xuan Zhan, Peng Dong, Jia Shen, Juan Wang, Ruihong Gao, Weichuan Guo, Peng Xu, Keqi Qi, and Ziren Luo. Core payload of the space gravitational wave observatory: Inertial sensor and its critical technologies. Sensors, 24(23), 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Effects of the space plasma density oscillation on the interspacecraft laser ranging for tianqin gravitational wave observatory

    Ling-Feng Lu, Wei Su, Xuefeng Zhang, Zhao-Guo He, Hui-Zong Duan, Yuan-Ze Jiang, and Hsien-Chi Yeh. Effects of the space plasma density oscillation on the interspacecraft laser ranging for tianqin gravitational wave observatory. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , ...

    2021

  4. [11]

    Stern, and Nikolai A

    Mauricio Peredo, David P. Stern, and Nikolai A. Tsyganenko. Are existing magnetospheric models excessively stretched? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 98(A9):15343–15354, 1993

    1993

  5. [12]

    Tsyganenko

    N.A. Tsyganenko. A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet. Planetary and Space Science, 37(1):5–20, 1989

    1989

  6. [13]

    Y . Gong, J. Luo, and B. Wang. Concepts and status of chinese space gravitational wave detection projects.Nature Astronomy, 5:881–889, 2021. Received: 05 April 2021; Accepted: 28 July 2021; Published: 15 September 2021

    2021

  7. [14]

    Wei Su, Yan Wang, Chen Zhou, Lingfeng Lu, Ze-Bing Zhou, T. M. Li, Tong Shi, Xin-Chun Hu, Ming-Yue Zhou, Ming Wang, Hsien-Chi Yeh, Han Wang, and P. F. Chen. Analyses of laser propagation noises for tianqin gravitational wave observatory based on the global magnetosphere mhd sim...

    2021

  8. [15]

    Tianqin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    Jun Luo, Li-Sheng Chen, Hui-Zong Duan, Yun-Gui Gong, Shoucun Hu, Jianghui Ji, Qi Liu, Jianwei Mei, Vadim Milyukov, Mikhail Sazhin, Cheng-Gang Shao, Viktor T Toth, Hai-Bo Tu, Yamin Wang, Yan Wang, Hsien-Chi Yeh, Ming-Sheng Zhan, Yonghe Zhang, Vladimir Zharov, and Ze-Bing Zhou. ...

    2016

  9. [16]

    The tianqin project: Current progress on science and technology

    Jianwei Mei, Yan-Zheng Bai, Jiahui Bao, et al. The tianqin project: Current progress on science and technology. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A107, 08 2020. 13

    2021

  10. [17]

    Analyses of residual accelerations for tianqin based on the global mhd simulation

    Wei Su, Yan Wang, Ze-Bing Zhou, Yan-Zheng Bai, Yang Guo, Chen Zhou, Tom Lee, Ming Wang, Ming-Yue Zhou, Tong Shi, Hang Yin, and Bu-Tian Zhang. Analyses of residual accelerations for tianqin based on the global mhd simulation. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 37(18):185017, aug 2020

    2020

  11. [18]

    Wei Su, Ze-Bing Zhou, Yan Wang, Chen Zhou, P. F. Chen, Wei Hong, J. H. Peng, Yun Yang, and Y . W. Ni. Evaluating residual acceleration noise for the tianqin gravitational waves observatory with an empirical magnetic field model. Phys. Rev. D, 108:103030, Nov 2023

    2023

  12. [19]

    N. A. Tsyganenko and V . A. Andreeva. An empirical rbf model of the magnetosphere parameterized by inter- planetary and ground-based drivers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 121(11):10,786–10,802, 2016

    2016

  13. [20]

    V . K. Milyukov. Tianqin space-based gravitational wave detector: Key technologies and current state of implemen- tation. Astronomical Reports, 64:1067–1077, 2020. Received: 15 June 2020; Revised: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 30 June 2020; Published: 30 December 2020

    2020

  14. [21]

    David P. Stern. Representation of magnetic fields in space. Reviews of Geophysics, 14(2):199–214, 1976

    1976

  15. [22]

    Richmond

    Ingrid Cnossen and Arthur D. Richmond. How changes in the tilt angle of the geomagnetic dipole affect the coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere system. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 117(A10), 2012

    2012

  16. [23]

    Tsyganenko

    N.A. Tsyganenko. Global quantitative models of the geomagnetic field in the cislunar magnetosphere for different disturbance levels. Planetary and Space Science , 35(11):1347–1358, 1987

    1987

  17. [24]

    N. A. Tsyganenko. A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 1. mathematical structure. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 107(A8):SMP 12–1–SMP 12–15, 2002

    2002

  18. [25]

    N. A. Tsyganenko. A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 2. parameterization and fitting to observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 107(A8):SMP 10–1–SMP 10–17, 2002

    2002

  19. [26]

    N. A. Tsyganenko and V . A. Andreeva. A forecasting model of the magnetosphere driven by an optimal solar wind coupling function. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 120(10):8401–8425, 2015

    2015

  20. [27]

    Borodkova, J.B

    N.L. Borodkova, J.B. Liu, Z.H. Huang, and G.N. Zastenker. Geosynchronous magnetic field response to the large and fast solar wind dynamic pressure change. Advances in Space Research, 41(8):1220–1225, 2008

    2008

  21. [28]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, et al. Calibrating the system dynamics of lisa pathfinder.Phys. Rev. D, 97:122002, Jun 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Hongyin Li, Yanchong Liu, Chengrui Wang, Y . Bai, L. Liu, S. Wu, S. Qu, D. Tan, H. Yin, Z. Li, S. Yang, and Z. Zhou. Preliminary design considerations and progress of the tianqin inertial sensor. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 60(Suppl. 1), 2021. 14

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.