Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Grounding by Trying: LLMs with Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23214 v2 pith:HYLCUSLT submitted 2024-10-30 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords llmsleretqueriessearchunderlineimprovelearningreinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The hallucinations of large language models (LLMs) are increasingly mitigated by allowing LLMs to search for information and to ground their answers in real sources. Unfortunately, LLMs often struggle with posing the right search queries, especially when dealing with complex or otherwise indirect topics. Observing that LLMs can learn to search for relevant facts by $\textit{trying}$ different queries and learning to up-weight queries that successfully produce relevant results, we introduce $\underline{Le}$arning to $\underline{Re}$trieve by $\underline{T}$rying (LeReT), a reinforcement learning framework that explores search queries and uses preference-based optimization to improve their quality. LeReT can improve the absolute retrieval accuracy by up to 29% and the downstream generator evaluations by 17%. The simplicity and flexibility of LeReT allows it to be applied to arbitrary off-the-shelf retrievers and makes it a promising technique for improving general LLM pipelines. Project website: http://sherylhsu.com/LeReT/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Adaptive Rewards Hurt: Causal Probing and the Switching-Stability Dilemma in LLM-Guided LEO Satellite Scheduling

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Near-constant reward weights outperform carefully tuned dynamic weights in PPO LEO beam scheduling because weight switching restarts value-function convergence.

  2. Harnessing the Power of Reinforcement Learning for Language-Model-Based Information Retriever via Query-Document Co-Augmentation

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A bidirectional RL framework jointly optimizes LLM query and document augmentation and improves retrieval accuracy on BEIR benchmarks beyond query-only rewriting.

  3. Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes LLM-powered deep research agents into static versus dynamic workflows and single versus multi agent architectures, and reviews their benchmarks and open challenges.

Pith tools