Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Is Multilingual BERT Fluent in Language Generation?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.03806 v1 pith:HZ7NLA2Y submitted 2019-10-09 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords modellanguagemultilingualbertgenerationlanguagesabilityfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The multilingual BERT model is trained on 104 languages and meant to serve as a universal language model and tool for encoding sentences. We explore how well the model performs on several languages across several tasks: a diagnostic classification probing the embeddings for a particular syntactic property, a cloze task testing the language modelling ability to fill in gaps in a sentence, and a natural language generation task testing for the ability to produce coherent text fitting a given context. We find that the currently available multilingual BERT model is clearly inferior to the monolingual counterparts, and cannot in many cases serve as a substitute for a well-trained monolingual model. We find that the English and German models perform well at generation, whereas the multilingual model is lacking, in particular, for Nordic languages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools