Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 37 references

ICAS: IP Adapter and ControlNet-based Attention Structure for Multi-Subject Style Transfer Optimization

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ICAS claims that combining a frozen IP-Adapter style path, ControlNet structure control, and cyclically injected content embeddings preserves multiple subjects' identities during style transfer without large stylized datasets or inversion.

desk verdict The paper's headline contribution—partial fine-tuning of the content branch—is never actually tested in its own experiments, which fall back to a pre-trained IP-Adapter plus ControlNet; the remaining evidence is qualitative figures and a 20-person user study without statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.13224 v1 pith:I4A6ING5 submitted 2025-04-17 cs.CV cs.AI

Fuwei Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords styletransfermulti-subjectgenerationdiffusionmodelsIP-AdapterControlNetcontentembeddinggatingmechanismstructurepreservation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that multi-subject style transfer can be done without retraining the diffusion model or running expensive inversion, by combining a frozen IP-Adapter style-injection path with a ControlNet structure-preservation branch and a cyclic multi-content embedding mechanism. The proposed framework, ICAS, adds a gating term to the style cross-attention so style strength adapts to content, injects structure residuals at scale $\gamma=0.7$, and optionally fine-tunes only the content injection sub-block. The author argues this preserves each subject's identity and the global layout while transferring color, texture, and atmosphere, and that it beats adapter-based and data-intensive baselines in structure preservation, style consistency, and inference efficiency. The stakes are practical: a low-compute recipe for multi-subject stylization in real-world settings with limited data.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the two-branch injection into U-Net attention: the Style Injection Module reuses IP-Adapter's pre-trained cross-attention with a gating term to blend style keys and values into the content query, and the Structure Preservation Module adds a ControlNet-derived residual map $R_S = \phi(F_S)$ scaled by $\gamma$ to U-Net features. A third piece, the cyclic multi-subject content embedding list, repeatedly injects several encodings of the content image so each subject receives its own attention signal. Together these carry the argument: style comes from the frozen adapter, layout from the ControlNet residual, and subject identity from multiple content embeddings.

What would settle it

Run ICAS twice on the same held-out multi-subject set, once with the content cross-attention branch updated and once with it frozen, and compare per-subject identity preservation. If the two outputs are indistinguishable, partial fine-tuning is not load-bearing; if the frozen version loses or merges subjects, then the paper's claim that all reported experiments used the pre-trained adapter without fine-tuning is inconsistent with the method it proposes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that decoupling style and structure and injecting them through separate adapter branches lets a pre-trained diffusion model perform multi-subject style transfer with only minimal, selective parameter updates. The style injection output is $F_{sim} = \alpha A_R + (1-\alpha)Q + g$, where a sigmoid gate $g$ modulates style contribution based on content-style similarity, and the structure branch adds $\gamma R_S$ to U-Net features at selected blocks. The paper reports that with $\gamma=0.7$, ICAS preserves multiple subjects better than InstantStyle, StyleShot, and the original IP-Adapter, and that a 20-participant user study gives ICAS the highest mean scores on style fidelity, subject clarity, and overall aesthetic. It further states that freezing the style path and updating only content-related parameters achieves the best balance of quality and computational overhead.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim assumes that a pre-trained IP-Adapter's style-only path, combined with ControlNet at scale 0.7 and cyclically injected content embeddings, generalizes to arbitrary multi-subject inputs; if the partial fine-tuning of the content branch is genuinely required, then the reported experiments, which say they used no fine-tuning, do not test the proposed method.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multi-subject style transfer can be performed without inversion or large stylized datasets, using a frozen pre-trained style adapter plus a structure control branch.
  • Freezing the style path while lightly updating only the content cross-attention preserves pre-trained style knowledge and adapts to multi-subject content at minimal parameter cost.
  • Cyclically injecting multiple content embeddings into the content path keeps individual subjects from being merged, occluded, or lost in the background.
  • A ControlNet conditioning scale around $\gamma=0.7$ balances geometry preservation and style richness across the tested multi-subject scenes.
  • In the reported small user study, ICAS scores higher than original IP-Adapter and InstantStyle on style fidelity, subject clarity, and overall aesthetics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the statement that all experiments used the pre-trained IP-Adapter without further fine-tuning is taken literally, then the partial content-branch fine-tuning module is not actually tested by the reported results, and the observed gains would come entirely from the frozen style path, ControlNet at $\gamma=0.7$, and cyclic content embeddings.
  • Because the ablation describes the gating term as possibly 'solely a scale parameter in the code,' the gating mechanism may be functionally equivalent to IP-Adapter's existing strength adjustment; a direct test would compare ICAS against IP-Adapter with matched per-subject scales on the same content set.
  • The cyclic multi-content embedding recipe could generalize to other adapter-based multi-subject generation tasks, such as multi-person personalization or story illustration, where encoding each subject multiple times through augmentation or segmentation and alternating injections may improve identity preservation.
  • The $\gamma=0.7$ sweet spot suggests that structure scale and style strength interact, so a natural extension would be a joint calibration or a learned schedule for $\gamma$ conditioned on the number of subjects and the complexity of the scene.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ICAS, a framework for multi-subject style transfer that combines a pre-trained IP-Adapter (for style injection) with a ControlNet branch (for structural conditioning), and introduces a gating mechanism plus a cyclic multi-content embedding strategy. The stated contribution is a lightweight partial fine-tuning scheme that updates only the content injection branch while freezing the style path. The authors claim superior performance over baselines such as InstantStyle, StyleShot, and IP-Adapter, supported by qualitative comparisons and a 20-participant user study.

Significance. If the method worked as described and were properly evaluated, the direction of combining IP-Adapter and ControlNet for multi-subject style transfer with minimal fine-tuning could be of interest to the community. The paper also addresses a practical need: efficient style transfer without inversion or large stylized datasets. However, the current manuscript does not validate these claims: the experiments do not implement the proposed partial fine-tuning, the reported quantitative evidence is a user study without statistical support, and the method description contains internal contradictions and an ill-defined gating equation. The potential significance is therefore not realized in the present form.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section IV-A] Section IV-A states that 'all subsequent experiments (Section IV) are conducted with the pre-trained IP-Adapter without further fine-tuning.' This directly contradicts the central contribution described in Section III-A and Section IV-C, which is partial fine-tuning of the content injection branch. Consequently, Figures 2, 4, 6 and Table 1 evaluate a system that omits the proposed fine-tuning. The 'Content-Only (Ours)' condition in the ablation study of Section IV-C is therefore never actually realized in the reported results; the 'No-Finetune' condition is the de facto evaluated system. This means the central claim that ICAS outperforms baselines is not supported by the experiments.
  2. [Table 1] The user study in Section IV-D reports only mean scores from 20 participants, with no standard deviations, confidence intervals, or significance tests. The differences between ICAS and InstantStyle on Style Fidelity are 4.32 versus 4.22, which is likely within inter-rater variability. Without per-participant or per-task variance, and without any statistical test (e.g., paired t-test or Wilcoxon), the conclusion that 'ICAS consistently outperforms' is not justified.
  3. [Section III-B, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) defines F_sim = α·A_R + (1−α)·Q + g, where A_R and Q are N×d matrices and g is defined in Eq. (3) as a d-dimensional vector via g = σ(Wg(e_C·e_R) + bg). The addition of a d-vector to an N×d matrix is undefined without specifying broadcasting; if broadcast over the N dimension, every spatial token receives the identical bias, which is not an 'adaptive' per-token gate. If g is intended to be per-token, Eq. (3) cannot produce an N-dimensional vector because e_C·e_R is a global similarity. This makes the core gating mechanism ill-defined, and the claim that it provides 'fine-grained modulation of style strength' is not supported.
  4. [Section III-A and Section IV-C] The paper is internally inconsistent about whether fine-tuning is required. Section III-A calls ICAS a 'lightweight and tuning-free method' but then immediately states that 'we only update a small content injection sub-block.' Section IV-C claims that the Content-Only partial fine-tuning strategy is superior to No-Finetune, yet Section IV-A says all experiments used the pre-trained adapter without fine-tuning. The reader cannot determine whether the proposed method requires training or not, and the experimental results are consistent only with the no-fine-tuning interpretation. This ambiguity undermines the reproducibility of the method.
  5. [Section IV-C] The ablation studies in Section IV-C repeatedly refer to quantitative measures such as 'subject-level matching score' and 'FID / style match / subject fidelity,' but no numerical values are reported anywhere in the paper. The conclusions of the ablations are based solely on qualitative figures (Figures 3 and 4) with no error bars or quantitative backing. Consequently, the claim of 'comprehensive ablation experiments' is overstated; the evidence is anecdotal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The paper contains numerous typos and inconsistent terminology: 'criss-cross attention' should be 'cross-attention,' 'iPadAdapter' in the Figure 2 caption should be 'IP-Adapter,' 'Evol ving' in Section II-C should be 'Evolving,' 'Instantstyle' should be 'InstantStyle,' and 'Styleshot' should be 'StyleShot.'
  2. [Section IV-A] The phrase 'The Base Model Setup. The Base Model Setup.' is duplicated in the 'Base Model Setup' paragraph. This appears to be an editing error.
  3. [Section III-B] Equation (4) introduces a scalar α that is described as 'user-controllable,' but the paper does not specify how α is set in the experiments or whether it is learned. The relationship between the gating parameters (Wg, bg) and α is not clarified.
  4. [Section III-C] The structure preservation module is described as a 'residual map' added to U-Net features with a scaling parameter γ. The paper does not define the spatial dimensions of R_S or how the projection ϕ is parameterized, making it difficult to reproduce the implementation.
  5. [Section IV-B] In the comparison with state-of-the-art methods, the paper states that baselines' weights are 'manually adjusted to maintain consistent intensity sensitivity.' No details are given about how this adjustment was performed, which weakens the fairness of the comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; the method is a modular composition of external components, and the evaluation gap around omitted fine-tuning is a missing-support issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper contains no derivation chain in which a claimed result is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The method is a modular composition of external components: IP-Adapter (ref. [26]) for style injection, ControlNet ([24]) for structure, a sigmoid gating term (Eqs. 3-4), and cyclic injection of multiple content embeddings. None of these components is defined in terms of the evaluation metrics, and no parameter is fitted to the reported success criteria and then renamed as a prediction. The gating equation and the choice of gamma=0.7 are ad hoc design choices validated by qualitative ablations, not circular reductions. The only self-referential aspect is an evaluation gap: Section IV-A states 'all subsequent experiments (Section IV) are conducted with the pre-trained IP-Adapter without further fine-tuning,' even though the proposed contribution is partial fine-tuning of the content branch (Section III-A and Section IV-A, 'Partial Finetuning on Content Branch'). Consequently Figures 2, 4, 6 and Table 1 appear to evaluate the no-fine-tune variant rather than the proposed fine-tuned ICAS, so the claim that ICAS 'achieves superior performance' is not directly supported by tests of the proposed training strategy. This is a missing-support / internal-consistency problem, not a circularity, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework is an assembly of published components (IP-Adapter, ControlNet, attention), so the additional inventory is limited to a few learnable parameters and two manually chosen scales. None of the learnable parameters are released, and the structure scale is fit to the test subset.

free parameters (5)
  • gating parameters Wg, bg = not reported
    Learnable parameters in Eq. (3) used to modulate style injection; values and training data not provided.
  • content cross-attention weights (num_control_attn) = not reported
    Weights of the content-injection sub-block updated in the Content-Only training variant; neither the dataset nor the final weights are released.
  • structure scale γ = 0.7
    Set in Eq. (6) by choosing from {0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8} based on qualitative inspection of a subset of test images, i.e., tuned on the test set.
  • style strength α = not specified
    User-controllable scalar in Eq. (4); no default value or guidance provided.
  • λgate regularizer = not specified ('small')
    Weight for the gating regularizer introduced in the training scheme; value and schedule not given.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Pre-trained IP-Adapter style path and ControlNet remain effective when combined in the ICAS configuration
    The whole method in Sections III-B and III-C reuses these pretrained components without re-deriving or validating their compatibility.
  • domain assumption The 20-participant user study is a reliable measure of style fidelity, subject clarity, and overall aesthetics
    Section IV-D treats mean scores as decisive evidence, but no inter-rater agreement or statistical test is reported.
  • standard math Standard cross-attention (Eq. 2) and sigmoid operation (Eq. 3) behave as expected in the diffusion U-Net
    No new mathematical machinery is introduced beyond known attention.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ICAS: IP Adapter and ControlNet-based Attention Structure for Multi-Subject Style Transfer Optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I4A6ING5

@misc{pith2026250413224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ICAS: IP Adapter and ControlNet-based Attention Structure for Multi-Subject Style Transfer Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I4A6ING5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.13224}
}
read the original abstract

Generating multi-subject stylized images remains a significant challenge due to the ambiguity in defining style attributes (e.g., color, texture, atmosphere, and structure) and the difficulty in consistently applying them across multiple subjects. Although recent diffusion-based text-to-image models have achieved remarkable progress, existing methods typically rely on computationally expensive inversion procedures or large-scale stylized datasets. Moreover, these methods often struggle with maintaining multi-subject semantic fidelity and are limited by high inference costs. To address these limitations, we propose ICAS (IP-Adapter and ControlNet-based Attention Structure), a novel framework for efficient and controllable multi-subject style transfer. Instead of full-model tuning, ICAS adaptively fine-tunes only the content injection branch of a pre-trained diffusion model, thereby preserving identity-specific semantics while enhancing style controllability. By combining IP-Adapter for adaptive style injection with ControlNet for structural conditioning, our framework ensures faithful global layout preservation alongside accurate local style synthesis. Furthermore, ICAS introduces a cyclic multi-subject content embedding mechanism, which enables effective style transfer under limited-data settings without the need for extensive stylized corpora. Extensive experiments show that ICAS achieves superior performance in structure preservation, style consistency, and inference efficiency, establishing a new paradigm for multi-subject style transfer in real-world applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.13224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIGURE 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the performance of each method on dif￾ferent types of sample images. Although all methods achieve some degree of style transfer, there are some key differences: • InstantStyle uses a similar cue injection technique as IPAdapter, but can have difficulty distinguishing smaller subjects if the style texture is very detailed, and there is still some degree of recognition error for multiple subjects. While InstantS… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIGURE 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIGURE 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y . Jing, Y . Y ang, Z. Feng, J. Y e, Y . Y u, and M. Song, ‘‘Neural style transfer: A review,’’ IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics , vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3365–3385, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Y . Deng, F. Tang, W. Dong, W. Sun, F. Huang, and C. Xu, ‘‘Arbitrary style transfer via multi-adaptation network,’’ in Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia , 2020, pp. 2719–2727

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Shen and J

    F. Shen and J. Tang, ‘‘Imagpose: A unified conditional framework for pose- guided person generation,’’ in The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    F. Shen, X. Jiang, X. He, H. Y e, C. Wang, X. Du, Z. Li, and J. Tang, ‘‘Imagdressing-v1: Customizable virtual dressing,’’arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12705, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    F. Shen, C. Wang, J. Gao, Q. Guo, J. Dang, J. Tang, and T.-S. Chua, ‘‘Long- term talkingface generation via motion-prior conditional diffusion model,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09533, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, ‘‘Denoising diffusion implicit models,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Tumanyan, M

    N. Tumanyan, M. Geyer, S. Bagon, and T. Dekel, ‘‘Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 1921–1930

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Chung, S

    J. Chung, S. Hyun, and J.-P . Heo, ‘‘Style injection in diffusion: A training- free approach for adapting large-scale diffusion models for style transfer,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pat- tern recognition, 2024, pp. 8795–8805

    work page 2024

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Mokady, A

    R. Mokady, A. Hertz, K. Aberman, Y . Pritch, and D. Cohen-Or, ‘‘Null- text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 6038–6047

    2023

  2. [10]

    H. Wang, M. Spinelli, Q. Wang, X. Bai, Z. Qin, and A. Chen, ‘‘Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02733, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    V . Shah, N. Ruiz, F. Cole, E. Lu, S. Lazebnik, Y . Li, and V . Jampani, ‘‘Zi- plora: Any subject in any style by effectively merging loras,’’ in European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 422–438

    2024

  4. [12]

    Frenkel, Y

    Y . Frenkel, Y . Vinker, A. Shamir, and D. Cohen-Or, ‘‘Implicit style-content separation using b-lora,’’ in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2024, pp. 181–198

    2024

  5. [13]

    J. Gao, Y . Liu, Y . Sun, Y . Tang, Y . Zeng, K. Chen, and C. Zhao, ‘‘Styleshot: A snapshot on any style,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01414, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    F. Shen, H. Y e, S. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Han, and W. Y ang, ‘‘Boosting consistency in story visualization with rich-contextual conditional diffu- sion models,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02482, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    F. Shen, H. Y e, J. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Han, and W. Y ang, ‘‘Advancing pose- guided image synthesis with progressive conditional diffusion models,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06313, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dhariwal and A

    P . Dhariwal and A. Nichol, ‘‘Diffusion models beat gans on image syn- thesis,’’ Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Ramesh, P

    A. Ramesh, P . Dhariwal, A. Nichol, C. Chu, and M. Chen, ‘‘Hierarchi- cal text-conditional image generation with clip latents,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 3, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Nichol, P

    A. Nichol, P . Dhariwal, A. Ramesh, P . Shyam, P . Mishkin, B. McGrew, I. Sutskever, and M. Chen, ‘‘Glide: Towards photorealistic image gen- eration and editing with text-guided diffusion models,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Raffel, N

    C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y . Zhou, W. Li, and P . J. Liu, ‘‘Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,’’ Journal of machine learning research , vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    W. Chen, H. Hu, C. Saharia, and W. W. Cohen, ‘‘Re-imagen: Retrieval- augmented text-to-image generator,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14491 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Rombach, A

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P . Esser, and B. Ommer, ‘‘High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2022, pp. 10 684–10 695

    2022

  14. [22]

    Podell, Z

    D. Podell, Z. English, K. Lacey, A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, J. Müller, J. Penna, and R. Rombach, ‘‘Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Huang, D

    L. Huang, D. Chen, Y . Liu, Y . Shen, D. Zhao, and J. Zhou, ‘‘Composer: Creative and controllable image synthesis with composable conditions,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09778, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Zhang, N

    Y . Zhang, N. Huang, F. Tang, H. Huang, C. Ma, W. Dong, and C. Xu, ‘‘Inversion-based style transfer with diffusion models,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2023, pp. 10 146–10 156

    2023

  17. [25]

    C. Mou, X. Wang, L. Xie, Y . Wu, J. Zhang, Z. Qi, and Y . Shan, ‘‘T2i- adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text- to-image diffusion models,’’ in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 38, no. 5, 2024, pp. 4296–4304

    2024

  18. [26]

    H. Y e, J. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Han, and W. Y ang, ‘‘Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    L. A. Gatys, A. S. Ecker, and M. Bethge, ‘‘Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 2414–2423

    2016

  20. [28]

    D. Chen, L. Y uan, J. Liao, N. Y u, and G. Hua, ‘‘Stylebank: An explicit representation for neural image style transfer,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017, pp. 1897– 1906

    2017

  21. [29]

    Dumoulin, J

    V . Dumoulin, J. Shlens, and M. Kudlur, ‘‘A learned representation for artistic style,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.07629, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Huang and S

    X. Huang and S. Belongie, ‘‘Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization,’’ inProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , 2017, pp. 1501–1510

    2017

  23. [31]

    H. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Zuo, A. Li, W. Xing, D. Lu et al., ‘‘Artistic style transfer with internal-external learning and contrastive learning,’’ Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 26 561– 26 573, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Hertz, A

    A. Hertz, A. V oynov, S. Fruchter, and D. Cohen-Or, ‘‘Style aligned image generation via shared attention,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 4775–4785. VOLUME 4, 2025 9 F. Liu: ICAS: IP-Adapter and ControlNet-b...

    2024

  25. [33]

    X. Wu, Z. Hu, L. Sheng, and D. Xu, ‘‘Styleformer: Real-time arbitrary style transfer via parametric style composition,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 14 618– 14 627

    2021

  26. [34]

    Y . Deng, F. Tang, W. Dong, C. Ma, X. Pan, L. Wang, and C. Xu, ‘‘Stytr2: Image style transfer with transformers,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2022, pp. 11 326– 11 336

    2022

  27. [35]

    T. Qi, S. Fang, Y . Wu, H. Xie, J. Liu, L. Chen, Q. He, and Y . Zhang, ‘‘Deadiff: An efficient stylization diffusion model with disentangled rep- resentations,’’ in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 8693–8702

    2024

  28. [36]

    Z. Wang, X. Wang, L. Xie, Z. Qi, Y . Shan, W. Wang, and P . Luo, ‘‘Styleadapter: A unified stylized image generation model,’’arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01770, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Jeong, J

    J. Jeong, J. Kim, Y . Choi, G. Lee, and Y . Uh, ‘‘Visual style prompting with swapping self-attention,’’ arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12974, 2024. 10 VOLUME 4, 2025

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.