REVIEW 1 cited by
MeDiaQA: A Question Answering Dataset on Medical Dialogues
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we introduce MeDiaQA, a novel question answering(QA) dataset, which constructed on real online Medical Dialogues. It contains 22k multiple-choice questions annotated by human for over 11k dialogues with 120k utterances between patients and doctors, covering 150 specialties of diseases, which are collected from haodf.com and dxy.com. MeDiaQA is the first QA dataset where reasoning over medical dialogues, especially their quantitative contents. The dataset has the potential to test the computing, reasoning and understanding ability of models across multi-turn dialogues, which is challenging compared with the existing datasets. To address the challenges, we design MeDia-BERT, and it achieves 64.3% accuracy, while human performance of 93% accuracy, which indicates that there still remains a large room for improvement.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HealthBranches: Synthesizing Clinically-Grounded Question Answering Datasets via Decision Pathways
A semi-automated pipeline turns clinical decision trees into 4,063 medical Q&A pairs with explicit reasoning paths, and early LLM benchmarks show models improve when given those paths.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.