Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Temporal Policy Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.03902 v1 pith:I4YU5LSX submitted 2025-01-07 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords temporallearningactionsefosexplanationsfuturepolicydecomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the explainability of Reinforcement Learning (RL) policies from a temporal perspective, focusing on the sequence of future outcomes associated with individual actions. In RL, value functions compress information about rewards collected across multiple trajectories and over an infinite horizon, allowing a compact form of knowledge representation. However, this compression obscures the temporal details inherent in sequential decision-making, presenting a key challenge for interpretability. We present Temporal Policy Decomposition (TPD), a novel explainability approach that explains individual RL actions in terms of their Expected Future Outcome (EFO). These explanations decompose generalized value functions into a sequence of EFOs, one for each time step up to a prediction horizon of interest, revealing insights into when specific outcomes are expected to occur. We leverage fixed-horizon temporal difference learning to devise an off-policy method for learning EFOs for both optimal and suboptimal actions, enabling contrastive explanations consisting of EFOs for different state-action pairs. Our experiments demonstrate that TPD generates accurate explanations that (i) clarify the policy's future strategy and anticipated trajectory for a given action and (ii) improve understanding of the reward composition, facilitating fine-tuning of the reward function to align with human expectations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Verification-Guided Falsification for Safe RL via Explainable Abstraction and Risk-Aware Exploration

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid safe-RL framework combining explainable abstraction, formal model checking, and risk-guided search reports more diverse policy failures, but its headline PAC guarantee largely restates its own assumptions.

Pith tools