Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Incorporating device characterization into security proofs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.15383 v2 pith:I6MVRXBD submitted 2025-08-21 quant-ph

Incorporating device characterization into security proofs

classification quant-ph
keywords securitymodelproceduresproofssomecharacterizationdevicesparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Typical security proofs for quantum key distribution (QKD) rely on having some model for the devices, with the security guarantees implicitly relying on the values of various parameters of the model, such as dark count rates or detector efficiencies. Hence to deploy QKD in practice, we must establish how to certify or characterize the model parameters of a manufacturer's QKD devices. We present a rigorous framework for analyzing such procedures, laying out concrete requirements for both the security proofs and the certification or characterization procedures. In doing so, we describe various forms of conclusions that can and cannot be validly drawn from such procedures, addressing some potential misconceptions. We also discuss connections to composable security frameworks and some technical aspects that remain to be resolved in that direction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.