Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comments on 'Fast and scalable search of whole-slide images via self-supervised deep learning'

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.08297 v4 pith:I7BO2OJJ submitted 2023-04-07 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords searchself-supervisedchenconcernsdeepfastimageimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Chen et al. [Chen2022] recently published the article 'Fast and scalable search of whole-slide images via self-supervised deep learning' in Nature Biomedical Engineering. The authors call their method 'self-supervised image search for histology', short SISH. We express our concerns that SISH is an incremental modification of Yottixel, has used MinMax binarization but does not cite the original works, and is based on a misnomer 'self-supervised image search'. As well, we point to several other concerns regarding experiments and comparisons performed by Chen et al.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools