Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

False Information on Web and Social Media: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.08559 v1 pith:I7JKLLPS submitted 2018-04-23 cs.SI cs.CLcs.CYcs.DL

classification cs.SIcs.CLcs.CYcs.DL
keywords falseinformationresearchsocialalgorithmsdeceivingdetectionimpact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

False information can be created and spread easily through the web and social media platforms, resulting in widespread real-world impact. Characterizing how false information proliferates on social platforms and why it succeeds in deceiving readers are critical to develop efficient detection algorithms and tools for early detection. A recent surge of research in this area has aimed to address the key issues using methods based on feature engineering, graph mining, and information modeling. Majority of the research has primarily focused on two broad categories of false information: opinion-based (e.g., fake reviews), and fact-based (e.g., false news and hoaxes). Therefore, in this work, we present a comprehensive survey spanning diverse aspects of false information, namely (i) the actors involved in spreading false information, (ii) rationale behind successfully deceiving readers, (iii) quantifying the impact of false information, (iv) measuring its characteristics across different dimensions, and finally, (iv) algorithms developed to detect false information. In doing so, we create a unified framework to describe these recent methods and highlight a number of important directions for future research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Identity Deepfake Threats to Biometric Authentication Systems: Public and Expert Perspectives

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A UK-based mixed-methods study finds a wide gap between public trust in biometrics and expert concern about deepfake spoofing, and proposes a tri-layer mitigation framework.

  2. A Survey on False Information Detection: From A Perspective of Propagation on Social Networks

    cs.SI 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes propagation-based false information detection into homogeneous and heterogeneous categories, summarizing datasets, methods, and future directions.

  3. The Mass, Fake News, and Cognition Security

    cs.CY 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper defines Cognition Security (CogSec) as a multidisciplinary field studying cognitive impacts of fake news and outlines research challenges, techniques, and future directions.

Pith tools