Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Theoretical Framework for Learning from Quantum Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.06406 v1 pith:I7OGXO44 submitted 2021-07-13 quant-ph cs.DScs.ITmath.IT

classification quant-phcs.DScs.ITmath.IT
keywords quantumdatalearninginformationclassesclassicaldensityframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over decades traditional information theory of source and channel coding advances toward learning and effective extraction of information from data. We propose to go one step further and offer a theoretical foundation for learning classical patterns from quantum data. However, there are several roadblocks to lay the groundwork for such a generalization. First, classical data must be replaced by a density operator over a Hilbert space. Hence, deviated from problems such as state tomography, our samples are i.i.d density operators. The second challenge is even more profound since we must realize that our only interaction with a quantum state is through a measurement which -- due to no-cloning quantum postulate -- loses information after measuring it. With this in mind, we present a quantum counterpart of the well-known PAC framework. Based on that, we propose a quantum analogous of the ERM algorithm for learning measurement hypothesis classes. Then, we establish upper bounds on the quantum sample complexity quantum concept classes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Learning with Tunable Loss Functions

    quant-ph 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Proposes QTERM for quantum process learning, but the proof rests on an incorrect equality E[e^{γY}] = e^{γE[Y]} for measurement bits, invalidating the sample complexity and PAC claims.

Pith tools