REVIEW 1 cited by
Reward Tampering Problems and Solutions in Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Influence Diagram Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Can humans get arbitrarily capable reinforcement learning (RL) agents to do their bidding? Or will sufficiently capable RL agents always find ways to bypass their intended objectives by shortcutting their reward signal? This question impacts how far RL can be scaled, and whether alternative paradigms must be developed in order to build safe artificial general intelligence. In this paper, we study when an RL agent has an instrumental goal to tamper with its reward process, and describe design principles that prevent instrumental goals for two different types of reward tampering (reward function tampering and RF-input tampering). Combined, the design principles can prevent both types of reward tampering from being instrumental goals. The analysis benefits from causal influence diagrams to provide intuitive yet precise formalizations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
RIVAL: Reinforcement Learning with Iterative and Adversarial Optimization for Machine Translation
RIVAL iteratively re-trains a reward model adversarially against the current translator and adds a BLEU-predicting head, improving in-domain WMT and subtitle translation over SFT baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.