REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Section Weights for Multi-Label Document Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multi-label document classification is a traditional task in NLP. Compared to single-label classification, each document can be assigned multiple classes. This problem is crucially important in various domains, such as tagging scientific articles. Documents are often structured into several sections such as abstract and title. Current approaches treat different sections equally for multi-label classification. We argue that this is not a realistic assumption, leading to sub-optimal results. Instead, we propose a new method called Learning Section Weights (LSW), leveraging the contribution of each distinct section for multi-label classification. Via multiple feed-forward layers, LSW learns to assign weights to each section of, and incorporate the weights in the prediction. We demonstrate our approach on scientific articles. Experimental results on public (arXiv) and private (Elsevier) datasets confirm the superiority of LSW, compared to state-of-the-art multi-label document classification methods. In particular, LSW achieves a 1.3% improvement in terms of macro averaged F1-score while it achieves 1.3% in terms of macro averaged recall on the publicly available arXiv dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can Large Language Models Serve as Effective Classifiers for Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification of Scientific Documents at Industrial Scale?
A retrieval plus zero-shot LLM pipeline is reported to give 94.3% SME-approval accuracy on SSRN hierarchical multi-label classification, versus 61.5% for fine-tuned SPECTER2, with no retraining.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.