Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Section Weights for Multi-Label Document Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15402 v1 pith:IARG2AGB submitted 2023-11-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords classificationmulti-labeldocumentsectionweightsachievesarticlesarxiv
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-label document classification is a traditional task in NLP. Compared to single-label classification, each document can be assigned multiple classes. This problem is crucially important in various domains, such as tagging scientific articles. Documents are often structured into several sections such as abstract and title. Current approaches treat different sections equally for multi-label classification. We argue that this is not a realistic assumption, leading to sub-optimal results. Instead, we propose a new method called Learning Section Weights (LSW), leveraging the contribution of each distinct section for multi-label classification. Via multiple feed-forward layers, LSW learns to assign weights to each section of, and incorporate the weights in the prediction. We demonstrate our approach on scientific articles. Experimental results on public (arXiv) and private (Elsevier) datasets confirm the superiority of LSW, compared to state-of-the-art multi-label document classification methods. In particular, LSW achieves a 1.3% improvement in terms of macro averaged F1-score while it achieves 1.3% in terms of macro averaged recall on the publicly available arXiv dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Large Language Models Serve as Effective Classifiers for Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification of Scientific Documents at Industrial Scale?

    cs.AI 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A retrieval plus zero-shot LLM pipeline is reported to give 94.3% SME-approval accuracy on SSRN hierarchical multi-label classification, versus 61.5% for fine-tuned SPECTER2, with no retraining.

Pith tools