REVIEW 1 cited by
Error per single-qubit gate below 10⁻⁴ in a superconducting qubit
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Error per single-qubit gate below 10⁻⁴ in a superconducting qubit
read the original abstract
Implementing arbitrary single-qubit gates with near perfect fidelity is among the most fundamental requirements in gate-based quantum information processing. In this work, we fabric a transmon qubit with long coherence times and demonstrate single-qubit gates with the average gate error below $10^{-4}$, i.e. $(7.42\pm0.04)\times10^{-5}$ by randomized benchmarking (RB). To understand the error sources, we experimentally obtain an error budget, consisting of the decoherence errors lower bounded by $(4.62\pm0.04)\times10^{-5}$ and the leakage rate per gate of $(1.16\pm0.04)\times10^{-5}$. Moreover, we reconstruct the process matrices for the single-qubit gates by the gate set tomography (GST), with which we simulate RB sequences and obtain single-qubit fedlities consistent with experimental results. We also observe non-Markovian behavior in the experiment of long-sequence GST, which may provide guidance for further calibration. The demonstration extends the upper limit that the average fidelity of single-qubit gates can reach in a transmon-qubit system, and thus can be an essential step towards practical and reliable quantum computation in the near future.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Physics-Informed Neuro-Fuzzy Framework for Quantum Error Attribution
An ANFIS classifier with a Bhattacharyya-distance veto reports 89.5% effective accuracy separating quantum hardware noise from software bugs, but its main features presuppose the ground-truth circuit and its veto thre...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.