Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 64 references

A Hybrid Anyon-Otto thermal machine

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A four-stroke engine on the 1D anyon Hubbard model converts exclusion statistics into work; with weak interactions and at least half filling, work peaks at an intermediate statistical angle, not the bosonic or pseudo-fermionic endpoints.

desk verdict Interesting anyon-Otto cycle with clean numerics, but the main 'advantage' figure excludes the cost of changing statistics; that needs fixing before the quantitative claim stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21768 v3 pith:ID5VKAI4 submitted 2025-08-29 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Mohit Lal Bera , Joyce Kwan , Armando Pérez , Miguel A. García-March , Ravindra Chhajlany , Tobias Grass , Maciej Lewenstein , Utso Bhattacharya
show 1 more author
Sourav Bhattacharjee
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords anyonHubbardmodelquantumOttocyclethermalmachineanyonicstatisticslow-temperatureworkextractionPauliengineopticallatticeanyons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a four-stroke hybrid anyon-Otto (HAO) cycle for the one-dimensional anyon Hubbard model, in which the statistical parameter θ is tuned during the thermalization strokes, analogous to the Pauli engine's bosonization/fermionization strokes. Its central claim is that in the weakly interacting limit (U ≪ J) at low temperature and with at least half filling, the work output per particle is maximized at an intermediate statistical angle 0 < θ* < π, rather than at the bosonic (θ=0) or pseudo-fermionic (θ=π) extremes. The mechanism is that the ground-state energy cost of switching on the interaction is smallest at intermediate θ, because the density-dependent hopping phase suppresses double occupancy most effectively there. In the non-interacting limit, work grows monotonically with θ and peaks at the pseudo-fermionic endpoint; the paper also reports an "inverse accelerator" operating mode whose apparent second-law violation disappears when the work of changing θ is properly accounted for. If the claims hold, interacting anyons would offer a genuine low-temperature thermodynamic advantage over both bosons and pseudo-fermions, and the existing experimental realization of the anyon Hubbard model would make the predictions testable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the anyon Hubbard model, a bosonic lattice model with a density-dependent hopping phase θ that interpolates between bosonic (θ=0) and pseudo-fermionic (θ=π) statistics. The HAO cycle uses two unitary strokes (ramping λ=J or U) and two thermalization strokes during which θ is changed in contact with heat baths. The load-bearing quantity is the anyon energy—the excess low-temperature energy produced by exclusion statistics, analogous to Pauli energy—together with the first-order perturbation correction Eper = ⟨ψ0|Hint|ψ0⟩ to the non-interacting ground-state energy; this correction's θ-dependence explains the intermediate-θ peak. The reconciliation formula ΔB(A)=Tr[ρ2(1)(H

What would settle it

Compute the cycle work W' = W − ΔA − ΔB (Eq. 7) for the interacting case U≪J with N≥L/2, and check whether W' still has an interior maximum in θ. If the interior peak disappears, the claimed anyonic advantage is an artifact of the θ-ramp being classified as heat. Alternatively, measure the on-site double-occupancy probability P(n=2) in an optical-lattice realization of the anyon Hubbard model as a function of θ: the paper's mechanism predicts a dip at intermediate θ, and its absence would falsify the explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the core discovery is that interactions and anyonic statistics cooperate to improve the HAO cycle's low-temperature work output. For U=0, W/N increases monotonically with θ1 and is largest in the pseudo-fermionic limit θ1→π, because the anyon energy built up during the anyonization stroke grows with θ. When a weak interaction U2 is switched on during the expansion stroke (with U1=0, J fixed), the change in ground-state energy ΔEG is minimized at intermediate θ for N≥L/2; since W is defined with a negative sign relative to this energy change, W peaks at θ*=θ*(U2) strictly between 0 and π. The paper traces this to a lower probability of double or higher occupancy at i

Load-bearing premise

The central work-output comparison treats the energy cost of changing the statistical parameter θ during the two thermalization strokes as heat, not work; the paper itself redefines work in Eq. (7) to include that cost when reconciling with the second law, and if the same correction is applied to the interacting regime the interior peak may shrink or vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At low temperature, the HAO engine can produce finite work even when both baths are cold, because the anyon energy acts as a quantum-statistical fuel.
  • In the weakly interacting regime at N≥L/2, tuning θ to an intermediate value gives more work per particle than either the bosonic or pseudo-fermionic endpoint.
  • The apparent inverse accelerator mode is an artifact of classifying θ-ramp energy as heat; with the corrected accounting, the second law is restored and an engine regime with enhanced maximum efficiency appears for θ1≥2.2.
  • Since the 1D anyon Hubbard model has been realized in optical lattices, the predicted θ-dependence of work and of double-occupancy probabilities is experimentally accessible.
  • The filling threshold N≥L/2 indicates the effect is tied to interaction-induced density correlations rather than single-particle band structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the θ-ramp work is charged to the work reservoir throughout the interacting regime, the intermediate-θ peak in W may be reduced or shifted; whether a net advantage survives exact work bookkeeping is a question the paper leaves open for the interacting case.
  • The same double-occupancy suppression mechanism should also shape other figures of merit—efficiency at finite power, coefficient of performance as a refrigerator, and entropy production—so similar intermediate-θ extrema may appear there.
  • The prediction could be tested directly by measuring the on-site occupation probability P(nj=2) as a function of θ in a realized 1D anyon gas; the dip at intermediate θ is the microscopic signature behind the work peak.
  • The N≥L/2 threshold suggests the advantage is a filling-dependent correlation effect; at lower fillings, the monotonic trend toward pseudo-fermionic statistics should reappear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a four-stroke hybrid anyon-Otto (HAO) cycle for the 1D anyon Hubbard model, in which the statistical angle θ is changed during the two thermalization strokes and the energy change associated with that change is booked as heat (Eqs. 4 and 6). For U=0 and low bath temperatures, exact diagonalization shows that the work output W increases monotonically with θ, approaching a maximum in the pseudo-fermionic limit. For weak interactions U2>0 with U1=0, the same exact-diagonalization approach reports that W/NU2 is maximized at an intermediate statistical angle for N ≥ L/2. The authors explain this via a first-order perturbation argument: the interaction-energy cost is smallest at intermediate θ because double-occupancy probability is suppressed there. They also reconcile the apparent second-law violation of the low-temperature inverse-accelerator mode by redefining work as W' = W − ΔA − ΔB (Eq. 7), and report enhanced maximum efficiency for high θ in the non-interacting case.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper demonstrates a nontrivial synergy between anyonic statistics and interactions in a quantum thermal machine, which would be a genuinely new thermodynamic effect. The numerical work is transparent and parameter-free: the exact-diagonalization results are direct solutions of the stated model, and the first-order perturbation explanation is supported by the collapse of the data in Fig. 4(b). The paper is also honest about the ambiguous role of the θ-ramp work, explicitly discussing the second-law issue and proposing Eq. (7). The main significance is conditional on resolving whether the intermediate-θ advantage survives under a consistent accounting of the work cost of changing θ.

major comments (2)
  1. [§Weak interaction U ≪ J, Fig. 4(a), Eq. (7)] The central claim that W is maximized at intermediate θ uses W = W12 + W21, in which the energy change during the θ-ramp sub-strokes is booked as heat (Eq. 4). The paper's own reconciliation defines W' = W − ΔA − ΔB (Eq. 7) as the work when the θ-ramps are charged to the work reservoir. For the interacting protocol (U1=0, θ2=0, U2>0), ΔB = Tr[ρ2(H(0,U2) − H(θ1,U2))] is nonzero and θ-dependent because the density-dependent hopping in Eq. (1) depends on θ. Moreover, ΔB is evaluated in exactly the state whose energy difference produces the intermediate peak. The non-interacting reconciliation in Fig. 6 does not cover U2>0. The authors should recompute Fig. 4(a) with W' and report the fate of the intermediate-θ peak; without this, the abstract's 'greater quantum thermodynamic advantage' claim is not established.
  2. [§Weak interaction U ≪ J, τ→∞ assumption] The interacting work strokes are assumed to be perfectly adiabatic (τ→∞), with the assertion that non-adiabatic excitations 'do not change results qualitatively'. For U1=0, the initial Hamiltonian is non-interacting and gapless at low temperature for the system sizes used, so the adiabatic limit is not guaranteed to be well-defined. Without finite-τ data or a gap analysis along the ramp, the ED curves in Fig. 4 may not represent the claimed quasi-static limit. Since Fig. 4 is the central numerical result, this assumption requires support, e.g., finite-τ calculations or an estimate of the many-body gap along the U-ramp.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract vs. main text] The abstract promises 'we also outline an experimental protocol to realize the HAO cycle', but no such protocol section appears in the text; the final discussion only cites existing experimental realizations [47,57,58].
  2. [Eq. (7)] The notation W′12(21) = W12(21) − ΔB(A) is introduced only in the reconciliation section. For clarity, the authors should apply it explicitly to the interacting protocol and state whether Fig. 4 changes.
  3. [Introduction] Typo: 'refgrigerator' should be 'refrigerator'.
  4. [Fig. 6(d)] The y-axis label 'max' is incomplete; it should be η_max or equivalent.
  5. [General] The term 'anyon energy' is used as an analogue of the Pauli energy but is never defined. A formula, e.g., the ground-state energy difference between different θ values at fixed particle number, would make the resource explicit.
  6. [Fig. 4(a)] The y-axis label W/NU2 and the text 'scaled with U2' may be misread as implying W ∝ U2^2. Please clarify the scaling convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are direct numerical solutions of a stated model with no fitted parameters and no equation whose definition contains the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims—monotonic work increase with θ in the non-interacting limit and an intermediate-θ work peak for weak interactions—are obtained by exact diagonalization/numerical evaluation of the anyon Hubbard model, Eqs. (1)-(2), using the stroke definitions Eqs. (3)-(6). No parameter is fitted to the target result: the first-order perturbation expression E_per = ⟨ψ0|H_int|ψ0⟩ (Fig. 4b) is an independent check, not an input to the numerics, and the argument about double-occupancy probabilities is a physical explanation checked against the computed ground states. The only self-citation is ref. [57], an experimental realization of 1D anyons co-authored by J. Kwan; it is used only to support experimental feasibility, not to justify the thermodynamic results, and it is externally falsifiable evidence rather than a self-referential premise. The reader's concern that the main work W excludes the θ-ramp work, so that the intermediate-θ peak might vanish under the W' accounting of Eq. (7), is a legitimate modeling-choice and robustness issue, but it is not circularity: the paper explicitly defines both bookkeeping conventions and uses Eq. (7) in the reconciliation section; the omission of a W' version of Fig. 4 is an incompleteness/risk, not a reduction by construction. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-called-prediction, or uniqueness-imported-from-authors pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central results are computed by exact diagonalization of a standard model with fixed parameters; there are no fitted coefficients. The main assumptions are the standard thermalization and adiabatic idealizations of quantum Otto cycles, plus the paper-specific convention of counting theta-ramp energy as heat. The 'anyon energy' is a resource introduced by bookkeeping, not an independently evidenced new entity.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 1D anyon Hubbard model (Eq. 2) with anyonic commutation relations describes the relevant physics, and its equilibrium states are Gibbs states at the bath temperatures.
    The model and the thermalization strokes to Gibbs states are standard assumptions inherited from prior literature; the paper cites the model's experimental realization (refs 47, 57, 58).
  • ad hoc to paper For the interacting work strokes, the ramps are performed adiabatically (tau to infinity), and non-adiabatic excitations are claimed not to change results qualitatively.
    Stated in the 'Weak interaction U << J' section without proof or supporting data; the Hamiltonian does not commute with itself at different U.
  • ad hoc to paper The energy change during the theta-changing strokes is counted as heat rather than work (Eqs. 4 and 6).
    This convention is explicit and is later revised in Eq. 7; it underlies the inverse-accelerator mode and the W used in Fig. 4.
  • domain assumption The low-temperature work output can be approximated by ground-state energy differences, with thermal effects negligible at TA=TB=0.1.
    Used in the perturbation explanation of Fig. 4(b); T=0.1 is not deep in the ground state relative to J=1, but the authors treat it as low temperature.
  • standard math First-order perturbation theory in U (E_per = <psi0|Hint|psi0>) approximates the ground-state energy shift of the interacting anyon model.
    Standard perturbation theory, valid for U << J; the paper uses it only to explain the numerical ED result, not as the proof.
invented entities (1)
  • anyon energy
    purpose: A bookkeeping energy resource analogous to Pauli energy, defined as the ground-state energy difference due to anyonic exclusion statistics; it is the low-temperature source of work in the HAO cycle.
    The paper defines it conceptually but gives no independent falsifiable handle outside the model's own energy spectrum; it is a derived quantity, not a new physical particle or force.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Hybrid Anyon-Otto thermal machine." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ID5VKAI4

@misc{pith2026250821768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Hybrid Anyon-Otto thermal machine},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ID5VKAI4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21768}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a four-stroke quantum thermal machine based on the 1D anyon Hubbard model, which is capable of extracting the excess energy arising from anyon exclusion statistics at low temperature into finite work. Defining a hybrid anyon-Otto (HAO) cycle, we find that the low-temperature work, in the absence of any interactions, is maximized in the pseudo-fermionic limit, where the anyons most closely resemble free fermions. However, when weak interactions are introduced, the work output is no longer maximized at the bosonic or pseudo-fermionic extremes but instead peaks at intermediate statistical angles. This clearly demonstrates that interactions and anyonic statistics conspire non-trivially to enhance performance, with interacting anyons offering greater quantum thermodynamic advantage than either bosons or pseudo-fermions, in this regime. Furthermore, we also outline an experimental protocol to realize the HAO cycle using ultracold atoms in an optical lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the HAO cycle. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Work output W ((a) and (d)), and heat exchanged with the baths QA ((b) and (e)) and QB ((c) and (f)), in the HAO cycle as a function of the bath temperatures TA and TB. The top panel corresponds to the standard Otto cycle with θ1 = θ2 = 0, showing the three possible working modes - engine(E), refrigerator (R) and accelerator (A). The bottom panel shows the emergence of the inverse accelerator mode (IA) in the low te… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Work output per particle in the non-interacting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Low temperature (TA = TB = 0.1) work output per particle (scaled with U2) in the presence of finite interaction U2 ̸= 0 as a function of θ1. On approaching the weakly interacting limit U2 ≪ J, the work output exhibits a non-monotonic behavior with θ1 when N ≥ L/2. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Probability P(nj ) of nj particles (bosons) occupy￾ing the j th site in the chain in the ground state. The plots are obtained numerically for L = 8, N = 4, J = 1.0 and U = 0. limit θ ∗ = π. To understand the above results, we first note that the dependence of W on θ1 a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a)-(c) Operation modes in the non-interacting limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The system evolves unitarily to a state ρ2 = U † 12(τ )ρ1U12(τ ) during this time inter- val

    Unitary expansion : ( λ1 → λ2, isolated) - The Hamiltonian parameter is ramped from λ1 to λ2 over a time τ. The system evolves unitarily to a state ρ2 = U † 12(τ )ρ1U12(τ ) during this time inter- val. The change in the energy expectation value is thus associated with work performed, W12 = − h Tr (ρ2H(θ1, λ2)) − Tr (ρ1H(θ1, λ1)) i . (3)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Note that the two sub-strokes can be carried out simultaneously provided that the phase parameter is changed over a time interval much shorter than the thermalization time-scale

    Thermalization B : (θ1 → θ2, contact with heat bath) - This stroke consists of two sub-strokes – the phase parameter is tuned from θ1 to θ2 fol- lowed by thermalization with a heat bath of tem- perature TB. Note that the two sub-strokes can be carried out simultaneously provided that the phase parameter is changed over a time interval much shorter than th...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Unitary compression: (λ2 → λ1, isolated) - As in the case of the unitary expansion stroke, the system evolves unitarily to ρ4 = U † 21(τ )ρ3U21(τ ) and the change in the energy expectation value corresponds to work performedW21, W21 = − h Tr (ρ4H(θ2, λ1)) − Tr (ρ3H(θ2, λ2)) i . (5)

    work page

  4. [4]

    European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR

    Thermalization A : (θ2 → θ1, contact with heat bath) - In the final stroke, the phase parameter is restored to its initial value θ1 and the subse- quent thermalization with heat bath at tempera- ture TA restores the system back to its initial state 4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 W/N L = 8, U = 0, 2 = 0 TA = 0.2, TB = 0.4 TA = ...

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Kosloff and A

    R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrig- erators: Continuous devices, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 65, 365 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Bhattacharjee and A

    S. Bhattacharjee and A. Dutta, Quantum thermal ma- chines and batteries, The European Physical Journal B 94, 239 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    A. ¨U. C. Hardal and¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, Superradiant quantum heat engine, Scientific Reports5, 12953 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    P. A. Camati, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Coher- ence effects in the performance of the quantum otto heat engine, Phys. Rev. A99, 062103 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, G. S. Agarwal, and H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence, Science299, 862 (2003)

    2003

  2. [10]

    Roßnagel, O

    J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Nanoscale heat engine beyond the carnot limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 030602 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Manzano, F

    G. Manzano, F. Galve, R. Zambrini, and J. M. R. Par- rondo, Entropy production and thermodynamic power of the squeezed thermal reservoir, Phys. Rev. E93, 052120 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Klaers, S

    J. Klaers, S. Faelt, A. Imamoglu, and E. Togan, Squeezed thermal reservoirs as a resource for a nanomechanical en- gine beyond the carnot limit, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031044 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Niedenzu, V

    W. Niedenzu, V. Mukherjee, A. Ghosh, A. G. Kofman, andG.Kurizki,Quantumengineefficiencyboundbeyond the second law of thermodynamics, Nature Communica- tions 9, 165 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    T. Ray, S. Mondal, A. Bhattacharyya, A. Ghoshal, D. Rakshit, and U. Sen, Kerr-type nonlinear baths enhance cooling in quantum refrigerators (2023), arXiv:2311.10499 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bhattacharyya, A

    A. Bhattacharyya, A. Ghoshal, and U. Sen, Transient effects in quantum refrigerators with finite environments, Phys. Rev. A111, 012209 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Campisi and R

    M. Campisi and R. Fazio, The power of a critical heat engine, Nature Communications7, 11895 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Campisi and R

    M. Campisi and R. Fazio, Dissipation, correlation and lags in heat engines, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49, 345002 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Hartmann, V

    A. Hartmann, V. Mukherjee, W. Niedenzu, and W. Lech- ner, Many-body quantum heat engines with shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023145 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    R. B. S, V. Mukherjee, U. Divakaran, and A. del Campo, Universal finite-time thermodynamics of many- body quantum machines from kibble-zurek scaling, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043247 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    G.Piccitto, M.Campisi,andD.Rossini,Theisingcritical quantum otto engine, New Journal of Physics24, 103023 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Solfanelli, G

    A. Solfanelli, G. Giachetti, M. Campisi, S. Ruffo, and N. Defenu, Quantum heat engine with long-range advan- tages, New Journal of Physics25, 033030 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    V. R. Arezzo, D. Rossini, and G. Piccitto, Many-body quantum heat engines based on free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B109, 224309 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Mukherjee and U

    V. Mukherjee and U. Divakaran, The promises and chal- lenges of many-body quantum technologies: A focus on quantum engines, Nature Communications15, 3170 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Brollo, A

    A. Brollo, A. del Campo, and A. Bastianello, Univer- sal efficiency boost in prethermal quantum heat engines (2025), arXiv:2504.02044 [quant-ph]

    2025

  17. [25]

    von Lindenfels, O

    D. von Lindenfels, O. Gr¨ ab, C. T. Schmiegelow, V. Kaushal, J. Schulz, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Spin heat en- ginecoupledtoaharmonic-oscillatorflywheel,Phys.Rev. Lett. 123, 080602 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Gluza, J

    M. Gluza, J. a. Sabino, N. H. Ng, G. Vitagliano, M. Pez- zutto, Y. Omar, I. Mazets, M. Huber, J. Schmiedmayer, and J. Eisert, Quantum field thermal machines, PRX Quantum 2, 030310 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    J. Koch, K. Menon, E. Cuestas, S. Barbosa, E. Lutz, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and A. Widera, A quantum engine in the bec–bcs crossover, Nature621, 723 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    M. A. Aamir, P. Jamet Suria, J. A. Mar´in Guzm´ an, C. Castillo-Moreno, J. M. Epstein, N. Yunger Halpern, and S. Gasparinetti, Thermally driven quantum refriger- ator autonomously resets a superconducting qubit, Na- ture Physics 21, 318 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Uusn¨ akki, T

    T. Uusn¨ akki, T. M¨ orstedt, W. Teixeira, M. Rasola, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Experimental realization of a quantum heat engine based on dissipation-engineered supercon- ducting circuits (2025), arXiv:2502.20143 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    N. M. Myers and S. Deffner, Bosons outperform fermions: The thermodynamic advantage of symmetry, Phys. Rev. E 101, 012110 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Watanabe, B

    G. Watanabe, B. P. Venkatesh, P. Talkner, M.-J. Hwang, and A. del Campo, Quantum statistical enhancement of the collective performance of multiple bosonic engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 210603 (2020). 9

    2020

  24. [32]

    L. d. S. Souza, G. Manzano, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Col- lective effects on the performance and stability of quan- tum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E106, 014143 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    N. M. Myers, F. J. Pe˜ na, O. Negrete, P. Vargas, G. D. Chiara, and S. Deffner, Boosting engine performance with bose–einstein condensation, New Journal of Physics 24, 025001 (2022), focus on Microscopic Engines and Re- frigerators: Theory and Experiments from Classical to Quantum

    2022

  26. [34]

    Sur and A

    S. Sur and A. Ghosh, Quantum advantage of ther- mal machines with bose and fermi gases, Entropy 25, 10.3390/e25020372 (2023)

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Kundu, Exact solution of double delta-function bose gas through an interacting anyon gas, Physical Review Letters 83, 1275–1278 (1999)

    A. Kundu, Exact solution of double delta-function bose gas through an interacting anyon gas, Physical Review Letters 83, 1275–1278 (1999)

    1999

  28. [36]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    Stern, Anyons and the quantum hall effect—a peda- gogical review, Annals of Physics323, 204 (2008), jan- uary Special Issue 2008

    A. Stern, Anyons and the quantum hall effect—a peda- gogical review, Annals of Physics323, 204 (2008), jan- uary Special Issue 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Camp- bell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Jo- hansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, A. Rans- ford, M. Rowe, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, M. Foss-Feig, A. Vishwanath, and H. Dreyer, Non-abelian topologi- cal or...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Zhang, P

    G. Zhang, P. Glidic, F. Pierre, I. Gornyi, and Y. Gefen, Fractional-statistics-induced entanglement fromandreev-liketunneling,NatureCommunications 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-61869-w (2025)

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    J. Kim, H. Dev, A. Shaer, R. Kumar, A. Ilin, A. Haug, S. Iskoz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. F. Mross, A. Stern, and Y. Ronen, Aharonov-bohm interference in even-denominator fractional quantum hall states (2024), arXiv:2412.19886 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024

  33. [41]

    Ghosh, M

    B. Ghosh, M. Labendik, V. Umansky, M. Heiblum, and D. F. Mross, Coherent bunching of anyons and dissocia- tion in an interference experiment, Nature642, 922–927 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Yutushui, M

    M. Yutushui, M. Hermanns, and D. F. Mross, Non- abelian phases from the condensation of abelian anyons, Physical Review Letters135, 10.1103/3yvl-4hws (2025)

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    T. Graß, B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, N. Baldelli, U. Bhattacharya, and M. Lewenstein, Fractional angular momentum and anyon statistics of impurities in laughlin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 136801 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Baldelli, B

    N. Baldelli, B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, U. Bhattacharya, M. Lewen- stein, and T. Graß, Tracing non-abelian anyons via im- purity particles, Phys. Rev. B104, 035133 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Wang and K

    Z. Wang and K. R. A. Hazzard, Particle exchange statis- ticsbeyondfermionsandbosons,Nature 637,314(2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Mostaan, N

    N. Mostaan, N. Goldman, A.˙Imamo˘ glu, and F. Grusdt, Anyon-trions in atomically thin semiconductor het- erostructures (2025), arXiv:2507.08933 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    2025

  39. [47]

    N. M. Myers and S. Deffner, Thermodynamics of sta- tistical anyons, PRX Quantum 2, 10.1103/prxquan- tum.2.040312 (2021)

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    H. S. Mani, R. N, and V. V. Sreedhar, Quantum ther- modynamics of small systems: The anyonic otto engine (2024), arXiv:2401.07177 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    H. S. Mani, N. Ramadas, and V. V. Sreedhar, The any- onic quantum carnot engine (2025), arXiv:2504.20596 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Dunlop, A

    J. Dunlop, A. Tejero, M. Skotiniotis, and D. Manzano, Thermodynamics of hamiltonian anyons with applica- tions to quantum heat engines (2025), arXiv:2502.19019 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Keilmann, S

    T. Keilmann, S. Lanzmich, I. McCulloch, and M. Roncaglia, Statistically induced phase transitions and anyons in 1d optical lattices, Nature Communications2, 361 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Longhi and G

    S. Longhi and G. Della Valle, Anyons in one-dimensional lattices: a photonic realization, Optics Letters37, 2160 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Greschner and L

    S. Greschner and L. Santos, Anyon hubbard model in one-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 053002 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    G. Tang, S. Eggert, and A. Pelster, Ground-state proper- ties of anyons in a one-dimensional lattice, New Journal of Physics 17, 123016 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Arcila-Forero, R

    J. Arcila-Forero, R. Franco, and J. Silva-Valencia, Den- sity matrix renormalization group study of the anyon- hubbard model, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 687, 012064 (2016)

    2016

  48. [57]

    Zhang, D.-W

    G.-Q. Zhang, D.-W. Zhang, Z. Li, Z. D. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Statistically related many-body localization in the one-dimensional anyon hubbard model, Physical Review B 102, 10.1103/physrevb.102.054204 (2020)

    2020 doi

  49. [58]

    Bartolomei, M

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, Frac- tional statistics in anyon collisions, Science368, 173–177 (2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    Posske, Bosonic continuum theory of one- dimensional lattice anyons, Physical Review Letters126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.163201 (2021)

    M.Bonkhoff, K.J¨ agering, S.Eggert, A.Pelster, M.Thor- wart, and T. Posske, Bosonic continuum theory of one- dimensional lattice anyons, Physical Review Letters126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.163201 (2021)

    2021 doi

  51. [60]

    Bonkhoff, S

    M. Bonkhoff, S. B. J¨ ager, I. Schneider, A. Pelster, and S. Eggert, Coherence properties of the repulsive anyon- hubbard dimer, Physical Review B 108, 10.1103/phys- revb.108.155134 (2023)

    2023 doi

  52. [61]

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner, Realization of one-dimensional anyons with arbi- trary statistical phase, Science 386, 1055 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adi3252

    2024 doi

  53. [62]

    S. Dhar, B. Wang, M. Horvath, A. Vashisht, Y. Zeng, M. B. Zvonarev, N. Goldman, Y. Guo, M. Landini, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas, Nature642, 53 (2025)

    2025

  54. [63]

    B. Wang, A. Vashisht, Y. Guo, S. Dhar, M. Lan- dini, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and N. Goldman, Anyonization of bosons in one dimension: an effective swap model (2025), arXiv:2504.21208

    2025 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Bonkhoff, K

    M. Bonkhoff, K. J¨ agering, S. Hu, A. Pelster, S. Eggert, and I. Schneider, Anyonic phase transitions in the 1d ex- tended hubbard model with fractional statistics, Physical Review Letters 135, 10.1103/7n1c-vq2p (2025). 10

    2025 doi

  56. [65]

    Theel, M

    F. Theel, M. Bonkhoff, P. Schmelcher, T. Posske, and N. L. Harshman, Chirally protected state manipulation by tuning one-dimensional statistics, Physical Review Letters 135, 10.1103/kzf6-yx24 (2025)

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.