Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifier

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16802 v4 pith:IDLC3WUP submitted 2024-05-27 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoningautopsvtextbfverificationmodeltextscannotationsanswers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we propose a novel method named \textbf{Auto}mated \textbf{P}rocess-\textbf{S}upervised \textbf{V}erifier (\textbf{\textsc{AutoPSV}}) to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by automatically annotating the reasoning steps. \textsc{AutoPSV} begins by training a verification model on the correctness of final answers, enabling it to generate automatic process annotations. This verification model assigns a confidence score to each reasoning step, indicating the probability of arriving at the correct final answer from that point onward. We detect relative changes in the verification's confidence scores across reasoning steps to automatically annotate the reasoning process, enabling error detection even in scenarios where ground truth answers are unavailable. This alleviates the need for numerous manual annotations or the high computational costs associated with model-induced annotation approaches. We experimentally validate that the step-level confidence changes learned by the verification model trained on the final answer correctness can effectively identify errors in the reasoning steps. We demonstrate that the verification model, when trained on process annotations generated by \textsc{AutoPSV}, exhibits improved performance in selecting correct answers from multiple LLM-generated outputs. Notably, we achieve substantial improvements across five datasets in mathematics and commonsense reasoning. The source code of \textsc{AutoPSV} is available at \url{https://github.com/rookie-joe/AutoPSV}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SCOPE: Compress Mathematical Reasoning Steps for Efficient Automated Process Annotation

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SCOPE compresses sampled math reasoning traces into a prefix tree of AST-normalized code steps, yielding PRM training labels at O(N) cost and improving Best-of-N and ProcessBench scores over automated baselines.

  2. A Simple "Try Again" Can Elicit Multi-Turn LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-turn RL with only unary 'try again' feedback improves multi-turn reasoning accuracy by up to 14% while preserving single-turn performance.

Pith tools