Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 9 cited by

It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-$c$ BCFT Ensemble

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the Ryu-Takayanagi entropy-area formula from the statistical, ETH-like properties of large-c CFT data, including phase transitions.

desk verdict The paper gives a serious, technically rich extension of the large-c ensemble program to BCFT and multi-interval RT, but the central claim of proving RT for an individual CFT is conditional on an unproven self-averaging assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20385 v2 pith:IEBGVGWD submitted 2025-05-26 hep-th gr-qc

Hao Geng , Ling-Yan Hung , Yikun Jiang This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 81T4083C57 PACS 11.25.Tq04.60.Kz
keywords Ryu-TakayanagiformulaAdS3/CFT2boundaryconformalfieldtheorylarge-censembleeigenstatethermalizationhypothesisreplicawormholesentanglemententropyholographictensornetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) formula of 3D gravity can be derived directly from the dual two-dimensional conformal field theory, without assuming the holographic dictionary beyond the equivalence itself. The input is the universal large-central-charge statistics of heavy conformal data: bulk OPE coefficients, boundary OPE coefficients, and spectral densities are treated as Gaussian random variables, which the paper identifies as a generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. Averaging the replica path integral over this ensemble produces competing channels whose saddle points are geodesics, so the entanglement entropy becomes a minimum over channel lengths, and the standard $c = 3/(2G_N)$ relation turns lengths into areas $A/(4G_N)$. The same machinery yields a simple derivation of multi-interval vacuum entanglement, a holographic random tensor network built from BCFT data, and CFT signatures of replica wormholes. If the paper is right, the semiclassical bulk geometry of these states is an emergent consequence of ETH-like statistics rather than an independent input.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the large-$c$ (B)CFT ensemble: a statistical model in which heavy bulk OPE coefficients, boundary OPE coefficients, and boundary-operator-expansion coefficients are Gaussian random variables with mean zero and variances set by the Liouville three-point structure constant $C_0$, while the density of heavy boundary states is $g_a g_b \rho_0(P)$. Under this average a replica partition function reduces to a sum over Gaussian contraction patterns, each pattern giving a conformal block that exponentiates as $e^{-(c/6) f}$ at large $c$. The connection to Liouville theory with ZZ boundary conditions maps the saddle points of the momentum integrals to geodesic lengths in an emergent hyperbolic surface. Cardy boundaries placed on small holes regulate interval endpoints and are shrunk to zero size, and the powers of the boundary $g$-factors track the topology of the associated end-of-the-world branes, distinguishing connected from disconnected bulk saddles.

What would settle it

Compute the two-interval Rényi-2 entropy in the vacuum of a specific large-$c$ CFT using exact conformal data, without ensemble averaging, and compare it with the min-geodesic prediction of the large-$c$ BCFT ensemble. If the difference is a power of $c$ rather than exponentially small, the ensemble does not represent individual holographic CFTs, and the claimed derivation of the RT formula from ETH statistics fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the RT formula for generic boundary subregions, including the phase transition between competing minimal surfaces, is obtained directly from the CFT in the high-temperature regime. Starting from states prepared by Euclidean path integrals on hyperbolic Riemann surfaces with Cardy boundaries, the paper expands each replica partition function in (B)CFT conformal blocks and then performs Gaussian averaging over the heavy OPE data of the large-c (B)CFT ensemble. The dominant contraction channels give the competing phases of the entropy; using the exponential form of conformal blocks at large c and the connection between the averaged ensemble and Liouville theory with ZZ boundary conditions, each channel evaluates to $\frac{c}{6}$ times a geodesic length. The entropy is the minimum of these lengths, and with the standard $c = 3/(2G_N)$ relation this is exactly $A/(4G_N)$. The paper states that this proves the RT formula in AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$ for general bipartitions of a large class of entangled CFT states with connected geometric dual, and it identifies the same contraction data as algebraic signatures of replica wormholes: cycles that support the identity block are shrinkable into the bulk, and powers of boundary $g$-factors match the Euler characteristics of brane topologies.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Gaussian statistics of heavy (B)CFT OPE coefficients specified in Eqs. (3.3), (3.7), and (3.10) accurately represent every individual holographic CFT in the high-temperature regime, with corrections exponentially small in $c$; the paper asserts this smallness but gives no proof or quantitative estimate for a concrete CFT.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any bipartition of a large class of entangled states of multiple CFTs and BCFTs with connected dual geometries, entanglement entropy equals a minimum over geodesic lengths, so the RT formula follows from CFT data alone.
  • Multi-interval entanglement entropy in the vacuum of a single CFT follows by shrinking small Cardy-boundary holes to zero size, reproducing the known answers with a simpler regulator than earlier derivations.
  • The averaged CFT path integral gives the first holographic random tensor network whose tensors are BCFT structure coefficients; it reproduces minimal-surface areas, the multi-interval phase structure, and a non-flat Rényi spectrum.
  • Replica wormholes are detectable algebraically: shrinkable identity-block cycles, specific Gaussian contraction channels, and powers of the $g$-factors distinguish wormhole saddles from Hawking saddles.
  • The large-$c$ limit of holographic CFTs realizes the 'It from ETH' paradigm, with semiclassical spacetime geometry emerging from eigenstate-thermalization statistics of heavy states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Gaussian ensemble correctly represents individual holographic CFTs, a natural extension is that analogous entropy formulas in higher dimensions would follow from a suitable higher-dimensional ETH for operator product data, a step the paper notes is still open.
  • The paper's contrast between identity-module and heavy-state derivations implies a sharp consistency check: in 2D the two routes must agree order by order in $1/c$, and locating their first disagreement would delimit when ETH rather than the vacuum block is the operative mechanism.
  • The claimed fidelity of the tensor network invites a numerical test: build the BCFT tensor network for a solvable large-$c$ theory, compute two-interval Rényi entropies at finite refinement, and check convergence to the min-geodesic prediction as the triangulation is refined.
  • The contractible-cycle criterion for replica wormholes could become a general diagnostic for island formation in any BCFT model, independent of the specific brane dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the large-c CFT ensemble of [21] to a 'large-c BCFT ensemble' with Gaussian statistics for bulk OPE coefficients (Eq. (3.3)), boundary OPE coefficients (Eq. (3.7)), and bulk-to-boundary OPE coefficients (Eq. (3.10)). It then computes Rényi entropies for the thermofield double state of two BCFTs (Sec. 4), for an entangled state of three BCFTs (Sec. 5.1), and for an entangled BCFT+CFT state (Sec. 5.2), obtaining answers of the form S = min(geodesic length combinations) that match bulk RT calculations in multi-boundary black holes with Karch-Randall branes. The paper applies these results to derive the multi-interval entanglement entropy of a CFT vacuum state by shrinking Cardy boundaries to zero size (Sec. 6.1), to propose a holographic random tensor network (Sec. 6.2), and to identify algebraic signatures of replica wormholes (Sec. 6.3). The central claim is that the RT formula for general bipartitions follows directly from universal ETH-like CFT data, summarized as 'It from ETH.'

Significance. If the Gaussian statistics of Eqs. (3.3), (3.7), and (3.10) accurately describe individual holographic CFTs, the construction is a significant step: it derives RT phases from explicit CFT replica contractions, avoids assuming replica symmetry of the bulk path integral, reproduces the g-factor/Euler-characteristic dependence of brane topologies, and offers a concrete algebraic diagnostic for replica wormholes. The building-block calculations in Secs. 4, 5.1, and 5.2 are internally consistent and match the bulk geodesic results, which is a genuine strength. However, the significance is conditional: the ensemble average is not shown to be self-averaging for a single CFT, and the claimed 'proof' of the RT formula for individual CFTs is therefore not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3 and Sec. 6.4, Eqs. (3.3), (3.7), (3.10)] The Gaussian statistics of the OPE coefficients are assumed rather than derived, and the text states on p. 17 that 'corrections are exponentially small in the examples we study in the large-c limit' without providing an estimate or bound. Since the subsequent replicas computations (e.g., Eq. (5.40)) compute ensemble-averaged quantities that are then interpreted in Sec. 7 as a proof of the RT formula for individual holographic CFTs, the scaling of the non-Gaussian corrections is load-bearing. The variance of the averaged replica partition function is controlled by connected higher moments of the OPE coefficients, whose large-c behavior is not established here and is deferred to companion works [22, 23, 102]. The paper should either supply a quantitative estimate of these corrections (for instance, the variance of Z_n / Z_1^n) or explicitly state that the result is an ensemble-level statement.
  2. [Sec. 5.3 and Sec. 6.1.2] The extension from the three-party and BCFT+CFT building blocks to 'general situations' and to multi-interval vacuum entanglement is presented as a sketch: Sec. 5.3 says the answer follows by 'cutting and gluing' building blocks, and Sec. 6.1.2 says the multi-interval result 'straightforwardly follows' from the coordinate transforms. No replica computation is shown for an arbitrary number of intervals in which all Gaussian contraction channels are enumerated and shown to be in one-to-one correspondence with the RT surfaces, nor is there a check that additional 'mixed' contraction channels are subleading. Without this enumeration, the claimed proof of the multi-interval RT formula and its phase structure is incomplete.
  3. [Sec. 5.1.3, Eqs. (5.31)-(5.39)] The saddle-point evaluation assumes the large-c exponentiation of the BCFT conformal blocks and, through Eq. (2.25), linearity in n of the exponent. These properties are not demonstrated for the doubled-manifold blocks with boundaries and brane insertions; the paper cites the Liouville-theory correspondence from earlier work. The derivation of S = min(...) depends on the n-dependence of both phases (the g-factor powers alone, e.g., g_c^{2-n} in Eq. (5.37), do not fix the conformal block's n-dependence), so this gap is load-bearing for the claimed phase structure.
  4. [Sec. 7 and Abstract] The statement that the paper 'proved the RT formula in AdS3/CFT2 for general bipartitions of a large class of entangled CFT states' overstates the conditional nature of the argument. The computations establish that the ensemble-averaged Rényi entropies are given by the minimum of the relevant geodesic lengths under the Gaussian assumption, but they do not demonstrate typicality for a particular holographic CFT, nor do they control the corrections discussed in Sec. 3 and Sec. 6.4. The claim should be softened to a derivation within the large-c ensemble or supplemented with the missing typicality estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3] The ensemble average is denoted by an overline but no precise probability space or measure is specified; please define the measure with respect to which Eqs. (3.3), (3.7), and (3.10) hold.
  2. [Figures 42 and 43] The captions of Figures 42 and 43 are identical, both reading 'one contraction pattern'; the captions should distinguish the diagonal (Hawking) contraction and the off-diagonal (wormhole) contraction.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos, including 'pahse' (Sec. 5.1.3), 'disucssion' (Sec. 4.3), and 'upgrated' (Sec. 6.2.2); these should be corrected.
  4. [Eq. (5.23)] The notation S_ab = S_{ca ∪ bc} is ambiguous because the subscript 'ca∪bc' could be read as a single bipartition label; please clarify that it denotes the complement of ab in the three-party state.
  5. [Sec. 6.1.2] The text first says the method 'yields exact results without requiring any ensemble averaging' for general CFTs and then states that the multi-interval formula 'crucially relies on the statistics of the large-c BCFT ensemble'; please clarify which of the two statements applies to which quantity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The core replica averaging is self-contained, but the Liouville-to-geodesic dictionary that turns the averaged partition function into RT lengths is imported from overlapping-authors prior work; the claim to have proved RT for an individual CFT is additionally conditional on an unproven Gaussian ensemble ansatz.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (2.27)-(2.33); invoked again in Sec. 5.1.3, Eqs. (5.33)-(5.40)]
    "From the relationship with the Liouville theory, the above partition function equals the Liouville partition function on a pair of pants, i.e. the bulk τ_E=0 slice of the AdS3 three boundary black hole geometry, with ZZ boundary conditions imposed on these boundaries [21, 49]. Using results in the Liouville theory [4, 61–64], the saddle point of the P_i integral gives the geodesic length L_A = 2πγ*_1 in this bulk τ_E=0 slice."

    The decisive step that converts the averaged CFT replica block into geodesic lengths and hence into S_A = min(c/6 L_A, c/6(L_B+L_C)) is the identification of the averaged partition function with the Liouville ZZ partition function on the bulk slice. This identification is cited to [21] and [49], whose authors overlap with the present paper ([21] is Bao, Geng and Jiang; [49] is Chua and Jiang). In particular, [21] is the same group's derivation of exactly this RT formula for multi-boundary black holes without Cardy boundaries. The new BCFT computations in Sec. 5 repeatedly invoke 'the connection with Liouville theory and the saddle-point approximation' rather than re-deriving the geodesic dictionary, so the central geometric input is inherited from prior overlapping-authors work.

full rationale

Most of the paper's replica computation is self-contained in the following sense: once the Gaussian statistics of heavy OPE and BOE coefficients are postulated (Eqs. (3.3), (3.7), (3.10)), the averaged Rényi partition functions are evaluated by Gaussian contraction and large-c conformal-block exponentiation, and the entropy follows by differentiating in n. The RT formula is not assumed in those steps, and no parameter is fitted to the final area expression. The main circularity burden is the load-bearing Liouville dictionary imported from [21,49] (with overlapping authorship), which turns the averaged partition function into hyperbolic geodesic lengths; the paper's extension to Cardy boundaries repeats this dictionary rather than establishing it from scratch. Separately, the large-c (B)CFT ensemble itself is a proposed universal ansatz: the paper states that corrections to the Gaussian data are 'exponentially small' but defers the estimate to companion works [22,23,102], so the claimed proof for an individual holographic CFT is conditional on unverified self-averaging. These are genuine caveats, but they are not by-construction equivalences or fitted-parameter renaming; hence the score is 4 rather than 6 or above.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on a small number of statistical axioms and background results. No parameters are fitted to the target answers; the physical inputs are g-factors, temperatures, and interval lengths. The main burden is the Gaussian ensemble assumption and the transfer from ensemble averages to individual CFTs.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Heavy OPE, boundary OPE, and BOE coefficients obey Gaussian statistics (Eqs. (3.3), (3.7), (3.10)).
    Proposed, not proven, for holographic CFTs at large c; used to perform the Gaussian contractions that produce the RT phases.
  • domain assumption Corrections to the universal ensemble data are exponentially small for individual CFTs.
    Needed to equate ensemble-averaged entropies with actual CFT entropies; asserted in Sec. 3 and Sec. 6.4 without proof.
  • standard math Large-c conformal blocks exponentiate and are evaluated by saddle point (Zamolodchikov recursion).
    Used in Secs. 2.4, 5.1.3, 5.2.3 to turn replica partition functions into exponentials of geodesic lengths.
  • domain assumption The averaged CFT partition function equals the Liouville partition function with ZZ boundaries (refs. [21,49]).
    This correspondence identifies saddle-point momenta with bulk geodesic lengths; it is taken as an input from prior work rather than derived here.
  • domain assumption High-temperature regime where heavy states dominate and light and vacuum blocks are negligible.
    Restricts all computations; used to justify Cardy density and to suppress vacuum contributions.
  • domain assumption Small Cardy holes are dominated by the vacuum Ishibashi state up to g-factors (Eq. (2.39)), and g-factors can be absorbed into the UV cutoff.
    Central to the multi-interval vacuum entanglement derivation in Sec. 6.1.
  • standard math Brown-Henneaux central charge relation c = 3/(2 G_N).
    Standard AdS3/CFT2 input used to convert CFT results of the form (c/6) times geodesic length into Area/(4 G_N).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-$c$ BCFT Ensemble." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IEBGVGWD

@misc{pith2026250520385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-$c$ BCFT Ensemble},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IEBGVGWD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20385}
}
abstract

We provide a derivation of the Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) formula in 3D gravity for generic boundary subregion--including RT surface phase transitions--directly from the dual two-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT). Our approach relies on the universal statistics of the algebraic conformal data and the large-$c$ behavior of conformal blocks with Cardy boundaries involved. We observe the emergence of 3D multi-boundary black holes with Karch-Randall branes from entangled states of any number of CFT's with and without Cardy boundaries. The RT formula is obtained directly from the CFT in the high-temperature regime. Two direct applications are: $\textbf{1)}$ A simple derivation of the multi-interval entanglement entropy for the vacuum state of a single CFT; $\textbf{2)}$ A CFT-based detection of the emergence of replica wormholes in the context of entanglement islands and black hole microstate counting. Our framework yields the first holographic random tensor network that faithfully captures the entanglement structure of holographic CFTs. These results imply that bulk spacetime geometries indeed emerge from the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) in the dual field theory in the large-$c$ limi--a paradigm we refer to as $\textit{It from ETH}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Holographic Learning from Fermionic Spectra: Application to Strange Metal Phenomenology

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Neural ODEs learn that normalized low-T cuprate PLL spectra are well described by conformal-to-AdS2 black holes with nearly vanishing gauge potential, while thermodynamics remain invisible to the massless probe.

  2. A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Semiclassical pure AdS3 gravity states, labelled by fixed-area geodesic networks, are mapped to CFT2 primary states whose wavefunctions are networks of OPE coefficients.

  3. Emergent $\text{AdS}_{d+1}$ Geometry from Functional Renormalization Group via Bulk Metric Reconstruction

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper claims an FRG derivation of emergent AdS geometry for the O(N) vector model, but the derivation's key step contradicts its own equations.

  4. The many facets of a hyperbolic tetrahedron: open and closed triangulations of 3d gravity

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open Virasoro TQFT equals fixed-length/angle 3d gravity path integrals on compact regions and yields the CTV–scalar Virasoro relation via open-closed duality.

  5. On the stabilizer complexity of Hawking radiation

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the PSSY model, the Wigner negativity (stabilizer magic) of Hawking radiation is O(1) before the Page time and grows as sqrt(2/pi) exp((S_max - S_2)/2) afterward; a similar formula is proposed for holographic state...

  6. Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS$_3$

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The fixed-angle gravitational path integral in AdS3 equals a Conformal Turaev-Viro partition function, the fixed-length path integral equals a Virasoro TQFT amplitude squared, and the semiclassical geometries are buil...

  7. Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Conformal Turaev-Viro theory is a triangulation-based dual to Virasoro TQFT whose partition function equals the modular S-transform of |Z_Vir|^2.

  8. The Baby Universe is Fine and the CFT Knows It: On Holography for Closed Universes

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A closed universe in AdS/CFT is not ruled out by recent SWAP-test arguments; the one-dimensional Hilbert space seen from the CFT is external indistinguishability, and CFT data can reconstruct the closed universe's geometry.

  9. Building an AdS/BCFT Josephson junction within Horndeski gravity

    hep-th 2025-10 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    AdS/BCFT with Horndeski gravity is claimed to yield Josephson junctions whose phase and current depend on the Horndeski couplings, but the condensate and critical temperature are put in by hand.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 9 Pith papers

  1. [21]

    N. Bao, H. Geng and Y. Jiang,Ryu-Takayanagi Formula for Multi-Boundary Black Holes from 2D Large-c CFT Ensemble,2504.12388

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [2]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,1303.6955

    T. Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,1303.6955

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Faulkner,The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT,1303.7221

    T. Faulkner,The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT,1303.7221

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    Collier, Y

    S. Collier, Y. Gobeil, H. Maxfield and E. Perlmutter,Quantum Regge Trajectories and the Virasoro Analytic Bootstrap,JHEP05(2019) 212 [1811.05710]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [7]

    Collier, A

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT 2, JHEP07(2020) 074 [1912.00222]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 144 references
  1. [8]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,JHEP12(2022) 069 [2203.06511]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Ponsot and J

    B. Ponsot and J. Teschner,Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group, hep-th/9911110

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Ponsot and J

    B. Ponsot and J. Teschner,Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefficients for a continuous series of representations of U(q)(sl(2,R)),Commun. Math. Phys.224(2001) 613 [math/0007097]

    2001 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    2006 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

    2006 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys

    R.M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R3427 [gr-qc/9307038]. – 61 –

    1993 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Jacobson, G

    T. Jacobson, G. Kang and R.C. Myers,On black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6587 [gr-qc/9312023]

    1994 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Solodukhin,Entanglement entropy of black holes,Living Rev

    S.N. Solodukhin,Entanglement entropy of black holes,Living Rev. Rel.14(2011) 8 [1104.3712]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Camps,Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity,JHEP03(2014) 070 [1310.6659]

    J. Camps,Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity,JHEP03(2014) 070 [1310.6659]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Dong,Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity,JHEP01(2014) 044 [1310.5713]

    X. Dong,Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity,JHEP01(2014) 044 [1310.5713]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Generalized gravitational entropy,JHEP08(2013) 090 [1304.4926]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP11(2013) 074 [1307.2892]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [20]

    X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani,Deriving covariant holographic entanglement,JHEP11 (2016) 028 [1607.07506]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    D. Wang, Z. Wang and Z. Wei,Wormholes with Ends of the World,2504.12278

  15. [23]

    L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and B.-X. Lao,Universal Structures and Emergent Geometry from Large-c BCFT Ensemble,2504.21660

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Kusuki,Semiclassical gravity from averaged boundaries in two-dimensional boundary conformal field theories,Phys

    Y. Kusuki,Semiclassical gravity from averaged boundaries in two-dimensional boundary conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 066020 [2206.03035]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall,Locally localized gravity,JHEP05(2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156]

    2001 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall,Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT’s on branes with boundaries,JHEP06(2001) 063 [hep-th/0105132]

    2001 arXiv

  19. [27]

    H. Geng, S. L¨ ust, R.K. Mishra and D. Wakeham,Holographic BCFTs and Communicating Black Holes,JHEP08(2021) 003 [2104.07039]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Geng,Aspects of AdS 2 quantum gravity and the Karch-Randall braneworld,JHEP09(2022) 024 [2206.11277]

    H. Geng,Aspects of AdS 2 quantum gravity and the Karch-Randall braneworld,JHEP09(2022) 024 [2206.11277]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hartman, C.A

    T. Hartman, C.A. Keller and B. Stoica,Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,JHEP09(2014) 118 [1405.5137]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ohmori and Y

    K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa,Physics at the entangling surface,J. Stat. Mech.1504(2015) P04010 [1406.4167]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Chen, L.-Y

    L. Chen, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and B.-X. Lao,Deriving the non-perturbative gravitational dual of quantum Liouville theory from BCFT operator algebra,2403.03179

  24. [32]

    Hung and Y

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Jiang,Building up quantum spacetimes with BCFT Legos,2404.00877

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bao, L.-Y

    N. Bao, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and Z. Liu,QG from SymQRG: AdS 3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow,2412.12045

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Swingle,Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,Phys

    B. Swingle,Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 065007 [0905.1317]

    2012 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Pastawski, B

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill,Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,JHEP06(2015) 149 [1503.06237]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang,Holographic duality from random tensor networks,JHEP11(2016) 009 [1601.01694]. – 62 –

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Srednicki,Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,Phys

    M. Srednicki,Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,Phys. Rev. E50(1994) [cond-mat/9403051]

    1994 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Deutsch,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 082001

    J.M. Deutsch,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 082001

    2018

  31. [39]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 164001 [2006.05499]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Lashkari, A

    N. Lashkari, A. Dymarsky and H. Liu,Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis in Conformal Field Theory,J. Stat. Mech.1803(2018) 033101 [1610.00302]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Geng,Replica wormholes and entanglement islands in the Karch-Randall braneworld,JHEP01 (2025) 063 [2405.14872]

    H. Geng,Replica wormholes and entanglement islands in the Karch-Randall braneworld,JHEP01 (2025) 063 [2405.14872]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Penington, S.H

    G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP03(2022) 205 [1911.11977]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 011024 [2212.02447]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Geng and Y

    H. Geng and Y. Jiang,Microscopic origin of the entropy of single-sided black holes,JHEP04(2025) 133 [2409.12219]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S.F. Ross,Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 185015 [1406.2663]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fujita, T

    M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni,Aspects of AdS/BCFT,JHEP11(2011) 043 [1108.5152]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Skenderis and B.C

    K. Skenderis and B.C. van Rees,Holography and wormholes in 2+1 dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.301(2011) 583 [0912.2090]

    2011 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Chua and Y

    W.Z. Chua and Y. Jiang,Hartle-Hawking state and its factorization in 3d gravity,JHEP03(2024) 135 [2309.05126]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Brill,Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,Phys

    D.R. Brill,Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4133 [gr-qc/9511022]

    1996 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Brill,Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,Lect

    D. Brill,Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,Lect. Notes Phys.537(2000) 143 [gr-qc/9904083]

    2000 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Caceres, A

    E. Caceres, A. Kundu, A.K. Patra and S. Shashi,A Killing Vector Treatment of Multiboundary Wormholes,JHEP02(2020) 149 [1912.08793]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cardy,Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,Nucl

    J.L. Cardy,Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,Nucl. Phys. B 270(1986) 186

    1986

  46. [54]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska,Non-Gaussianities in the statistical distribution of heavy OPE coefficients and wormholes,JHEP06(2022) 116 [2110.14649]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Anous, A

    T. Anous, A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska,OPE statistics from higher-point crossing,JHEP06 (2022) 102 [2112.09143]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, D.L. Jafferis, P. Nayak and J. Sonner,Approximate CFTs and random tensor models,JHEP09(2024) 163 [2308.03829]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Dorn and H.J

    H. Dorn and H.J. Otto,Two and three point functions in Liouville theory,Nucl. Phys. B429(1994) 375 [hep-th/9403141]

    1994 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory,Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 577 [hep-th/9506136]. – 63 –

    1996 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Liouville field theory on a pseudosphere, hep-th/0101152

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Hawking and D.N

    S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page,Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

    1983

  53. [61]

    Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theor

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theor. Math. Phys.73(1987) 1088

    1987

  54. [62]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and M. Piatek,Classical geometry from the quantum Liouville theory,Nucl. Phys. B724(2005) 529 [hep-th/0504204]

    2005 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Harlow, J

    D. Harlow, J. Maltz and E. Witten,Analytic Continuation of Liouville Theory,JHEP12(2011) 071 [1108.4417]

    2011 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Chandra and T

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman,Toward random tensor networks and holographic codes in CFT,JHEP 05(2023) 109 [2302.02446]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

    1986

  58. [66]

    Maldacena and A

    J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger,AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,JHEP12 (1998) 005 [hep-th/9804085]

    1998 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

    1977

  60. [68]

    Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory,hep-th/0411189

    J.L. Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory,hep-th/0411189

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Gaberdiel,D-branes from conformal field theory,Fortsch

    M.R. Gaberdiel,D-branes from conformal field theory,Fortsch. Phys.50(2002) 783 [hep-th/0201113]

    2002 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Recknagel and V

    A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus,Boundary Conformal Field Theory and the Worldsheet Approach to D-Branes, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (11, 2013), 10.1017/CBO9780511806476

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    Saleur,Lectures on nonperturbative field theory and quantum impurity problems,cond-mat/9812110

    H. Saleur,Lectures on nonperturbative field theory and quantum impurity problems,cond-mat/9812110

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Affleck,Quantum impurity problems in condensed matter physics, 2009

    I. Affleck,Quantum impurity problems in condensed matter physics, 2009

    2009

  65. [73]

    Rozali, J

    M. Rozali, J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham,Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes,JHEP05(2020) 004 [1910.12836]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149 [1908.10996]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Chen, R.C

    H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor,Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,JHEP10(2020) 166 [2006.04851]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Chen, R.C

    H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor,Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane,JHEP12(2020) 025 [2010.00018]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Geng and A

    H. Geng and A. Karch,Massive islands,JHEP09(2020) 121 [2006.02438]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Sully, M

    J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk and D. Wakeham,BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2021) 167 [2004.13088]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Anous, M

    T. Anous, M. Meineri, P. Pelliconi and J. Sonner,Sailing past the End of the World and discovering the Island,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 075 [2202.11718]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys

    T. Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 101602 [1105.5165]

    2011 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Affleck and A.W.W

    I. Affleck and A.W.W. Ludwig,Universal noninteger ’ground state degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 161. – 64 –

    1991

  74. [82]

    Brehm and I

    E.M. Brehm and I. Runkel,Lattice models from CFT on surfaces with holes: I. Torus partition function via two lattice cells,J. Phys. A55(2022) 235001 [2112.01563]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [83]

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al.,Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity from the Karch-Randall Braneworld,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 231601 [2206.04695]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Numasawa and I

    T. Numasawa and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in boundary CFT 2,JHEP08 (2022) 156 [2202.01633]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Kusuki,Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP03(2022) 161 [2112.10984]

    Y. Kusuki,Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP03(2022) 161 [2112.10984]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Cardy and D.C

    J.L. Cardy and D.C. Lewellen,Bulk and boundary operators in conformal field theory,Physics Letters B259(1991) 274

    1991

  79. [87]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. De Boer, P. Nayak and J. Sonner,Charged eigenstate thermalization, Euclidean wormholes and global symmetries in quantum gravity,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 059 [2012.07875]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Altland, D

    A. Altland, D. Bagrets, P. Nayak, J. Sonner and M. Vielma,From operator statistics to wormholes, Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) 033259 [2105.12129]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Altland, B

    A. Altland, B. Post, J. Sonner, J. van der Heijden and E.P. Verlinde,Quantum chaos in 2D gravity, SciPost Phys.15(2023) 064 [2204.07583]

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Jafferis, D.K

    D.L. Jafferis, D.K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov and J. Sonner,Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 066015 [2209.02131]

    2023 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Jafferis, D.K

    D.L. Jafferis, D.K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov and J. Sonner,Matrix Models for Eigenstate Thermalization,Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 031033 [2209.02130]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Jafferis, L

    D.L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg and G. Wong,3d Gravity as a random ensemble,2407.02649

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce and A.C. Wall,Holographic Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT, 1902.10157

    1902 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Sasieta,Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2023) 158 [2211.11794]

    M. Sasieta,Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2023) 158 [2211.11794]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Climent, R

    A. Climent, R. Emparan, J.M. Magan, M. Sasieta and A. Vilar L´ opez,Universal construction of black hole microstates,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 086024 [2401.08775]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang,Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT,SciPost Phys.15 (2023) 151 [2304.13650]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Cardy and E

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.1612(2016) 123103 [1608.01283]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Kusuki and Z

    Y. Kusuki and Z. Wei,AdS/BCFT from conformal bootstrap: construction of gravity with branes and particles,JHEP01(2023) 108 [2210.03107]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 443 [hep-th/9403108]

    1994 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152]

    2004 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,J. Phys. A42(2009) 504005 [0905.4013]

    2009 arXiv

  94. [102]

    L.-Y. Hung, H. Geng and Y. Jiang. In preparation

  95. [103]

    Vidal,Entanglement Renormalization,Phys

    G. Vidal,Entanglement Renormalization,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 220405 [cond-mat/0512165]. – 65 –

    2007 arXiv

  96. [104]

    L. Chen, K. Ji, H. Zhang, C. Shen, R. Wang, X. Zeng et al.,CFTD from TQFTD+1 via Holographic Tensor Network, and Precision Discretization of CFT2,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 041033 [2210.12127]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Cheng, L

    G. Cheng, L. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and L.-Y. Hung,Precision Reconstruction of Rational Conformal Field Theory from Exact Fixed-Point Tensor Network,Phys. Rev. X15(2025) 011073 [2311.18005]

    2025 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Hung and G

    L.Y. Hung and G. Wong,Entanglement branes and factorization in conformal field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 026012 [1912.11201]

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions, Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353 [hep-th/0204148]

    2002 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Moore and N

    G.W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys. 123(1989) 177

    1989

  101. [109]

    Ponzano and T.E

    G. Ponzano and T.E. Regge,Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients,

  102. [110]

    in preparation

    A.Almheiri, R.Ding, H.Lin, B.Liu and H.Verlinde. in preparation

  103. [111]

    Ope and the black hole information paradox

    H. Verlinde, “Ope and the black hole information paradox.” talk at the conferenceGravitational Emergence in AdS/CFT, BIRS, October 2021. Video available at https://www.birs.ca

    2021

  104. [112]

    Verstraete and J.I

    F. Verstraete and J.I. Cirac,Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions,cond-mat/0407066

    arXiv

  105. [113]

    Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    J.M. Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    2003 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2323 [1005.3035]

    2010 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind,Cool horizons for entangled black holes,Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 781 [1306.0533]

    2013 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit,1809.01197

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit,1809.01197

    arXiv

  109. [117]

    Milsted and G

    A. Milsted and G. Vidal,Tensor networks as path integral geometry,1807.02501

    arXiv

  110. [118]

    Caputa, N

    P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe,Anti-de Sitter Space from Optimization of Path Integrals in Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 071602 [1703.00456]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Caputa, N

    P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe,Liouville Action as Path-Integral Complexity: From Continuous Tensor Networks to AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2017) 097 [1706.07056]

    2017 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002 [1905.08255]

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002 [1905.08255]

    2020 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063 [1905.08762]

    2019 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena,Islands outside the horizon,1910.11077

    1910 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Chandra and T

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman,Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT,JHEP10(2023) 030 [2206.03414]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Chandra,Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs,JHEP04(2024) 051 [2305.07183]

    J. Chandra,Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs,JHEP04(2024) 051 [2305.07183]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Kourkoulou and J

    I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena,Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-AdS 2 gravity,1707.02325

    arXiv

  118. [126]

    Goel, H.T

    A. Goel, H.T. Lam, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Expanding the Black Hole Interior: Partially Entangled Thermal States in SYK,JHEP02(2019) 156 [1807.03916]. – 66 –

    2019 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow,Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation,JHEP 08(2020) 032 [1910.00972]

    2020 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Saad,Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity,1910.10311

    P. Saad,Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity,1910.10311

    1910 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Stanford,More quantum noise from wormholes,2008.08570

    D. Stanford,More quantum noise from wormholes,2008.08570

    2008 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Pollack, M

    J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully and D. Wakeham,Eigenstate Thermalization and Disorder Averaging in Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 021601 [2002.02971]

    2020 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Anous, T

    T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai and J. Sonner,Black Hole Collapse in the 1/c Expansion,JHEP07 (2016) 123 [1603.04856]

    2016 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Benjamin, J

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri and D. Simmons-Duffin,Universal asymptotics for high energy CFT data,JHEP03(2024) 115 [2306.08031]

    2024 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Banerjee, J

    S. Banerjee, J. Erdmenger and J. Karl,Non-Locality induces Isometry and Factorisation in Holography,2411.09616

    arXiv

  126. [134]

    Liu and S.J

    H. Liu and S.J. Suh,Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 011601 [1305.7244]

    2014 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Liu and S.J

    H. Liu and S.J. Suh,Entanglement growth during thermalization in holographic systems,Phys. Rev. D 89(2014) 066012 [1311.1200]

    2014 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Hartman and J

    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena,Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP05(2013) 014 [1303.1080]

    2013 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Casini, H

    H. Casini, H. Liu and M. Mezei,Spread of entanglement and causality,JHEP07(2016) 077 [1509.05044]

    2016 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Mezei and D

    M. Mezei and D. Stanford,On entanglement spreading in chaotic systems,JHEP05(2017) 065 [1608.05101]

    2017 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. Vardhan,Void Formation in Operator Growth, Entanglement, and Unitarity,JHEP03 (2021) 159 [1912.08918]

    2021 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. Vardhan,A dynamical mechanism for the Page curve from quantum chaos,JHEP03 (2021) 088 [2002.05734]

    2021 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. Vardhan,Entanglement Entropies of Equilibrated Pure States in Quantum Many-Body Systems and Gravity,PRX Quantum2(2021) 010344 [2008.01089]

    2021 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP05(2011) 036 [1102.0440]

    2011 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Blanco, H

    D.D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung and R.C. Myers,Relative Entropy and Holography,JHEP08 (2013) 060 [1305.3182]

    2013 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Bernamonti, F

    A. Bernamonti, F. Galli, R.C. Myers and I.A. Reyes,R´ enyi second laws for black holes,JHEP10 (2024) 177 [2407.01753]. – 67 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.