Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Effective Training Data Synthesis for Improving MLLM Chart Understanding

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Synthetic charts, built modularly and visually diversified, can teach open-source multimodal models to read real-world plots far better than the 30–50% accuracy range they typically reach.

desk verdict The submission is not the paper: the full text is LightSwitch (a relighting paper), so the ECD chart-understanding claims rest entirely on an abstract with no numbers, methods, or results. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06492 v1 pith:IEJG6HMD submitted 2025-08-08 cs.CV cs.CL

Yuwei Yang , Zeyu Zhang , Yunzhong Hou , Zhuowan Li , Gaowen Liu , Ali Payani , Yuan-Sen Ting , Liang Zheng This is my paper
classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords chartunderstandingmultimodallargelanguagemodelssyntheticdatasynthesispipelinefine-tuningvisualdiversificationECDscientificplots
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the reason synthetic chart data has not helped multimodal models generalize to real charts is that the synthetic charts were too similar to each other and too unlike real figures. It proposes a five-step pipeline that separates data from function generation for single plots, makes multi-subplot figures by conditioning later subplots on earlier ones, diversifies visual details, filters low-quality images, and generates question-answer pairs with GPT-4o. The resulting dataset, ECD, contains 10k+ chart images and 300k+ QA pairs across 25 topics and 250+ chart type combinations. The central claim is that this modularization and visual diversification consistently improves various multimodal large language models on both real-world and synthetic test sets. If true, the pipeline is a reusable recipe for closing the synthetic-to-real gap in chart understanding.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ECD dataset and its five-step synthesis pipeline. The load-bearing design choice is modularity: separating the data (the plot's underlying numbers and categories) from the function (the chart's visual form) allows independent variation of content and appearance. For multi-subplot figures, later subplots are generated conditioned on earlier ones, producing coherent complex layouts. Visual diversification widens the range of styles, colors, and clutter, and a filtering step removes low-quality or unrealistic figures. QA pairs are generated last, from the known data and chart structure, which lets the pipeline scale to 300k+ question-answer pairs without manual annotat

What would settle it

Take a held-out collection of real scientific plots from sources not used in ECD training, fine-tune an open-source MLLM on ECD, and compare its accuracy against a same-scale synthetic dataset built without visual diversification and modularity. If the ECD-trained model does not beat that baseline on the real-world plots, or if gains appear only on synthetic test sets, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that modularizing chart generation and diversifying visual details directly improves chart understanding in multimodal large language models. Prior synthetic chart datasets failed because they were not sufficiently similar to real charts, so fine-tuning on them did not transfer well. ECD is built by a five-step pipeline: separate data and function creation for a single plot, condition later subplots on earlier ones for multi-subplot figures, visually diversify the generated figures, filter low-quality data, and generate QA pairs with GPT-4o. The paper reports that fine-tuning several open-source MLLMs on ECD consistently improves their accuracy on a range of real-world and s

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the visual diversification and modularity in ECD actually close the synthetic-to-real gap, so that improvements measured on the paper's test sets transfer to the real-world distribution of charts that models will encounter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fine-tuning open-source MLLMs on ECD can push chart-understanding accuracy from the 30–50% range to substantially higher scores on real-world benchmarks.
  • The modular separation of data and function means new chart types or topics can be added to the pipeline without regenerating existing data.
  • Conditioning multi-subplot figures on earlier subplots enables realistic, visually complex figures that prior synthetic datasets lacked.
  • GPT-4o-generated QA pairs derived from known chart structure can be produced at scale, enabling 300k+ training questions from just 10k charts.
  • The pipeline itself, not just the dataset, is a reusable recipe for other structured-visual reasoning tasks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modularity-and-diversification principle may transfer to other visually structured domains, such as diagrams, maps, or GUI screenshots, where synthetic data also struggles to match real-world clutter.
  • The paper's consistent gains across models suggest that visual diversity could matter more than raw data volume for chart reasoning, which a direct ablation of size versus diversity could test.
  • The claim that gains transfer to the real-world chart distribution is asserted rather than demonstrated; a held-out set of never-seen real journals or dashboards would settle it.
  • Because QA pairs are generated from known chart structure, the dataset could be extended to generate reasoning chains or explanations, not just questions and answers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript (arXiv:2508.06492) is purported to present ECD, a five-step synthetic data pipeline for improving MLLM chart understanding, with 10k+ chart images, 300k+ QA pairs, and consistent performance gains across multiple MLLMs. However, the full text provided is an entirely different paper, 'LightSwitch: Multi-view Relighting with Material-guided Diffusion' (arXiv:2508.06494), which describes a relighting diffusion framework and contains no mention of chart understanding, ECD, data synthesis, MLLM fine-tuning, or any of the claimed experiments. The abstract and body are therefore mismatched, and the central empirical claim is unsupported by any methodology, results, or analysis in the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If the abstract's claims were substantiated, the contribution would be practically important: a modular, visually diversified synthetic data recipe with demonstrated gains on real-world chart benchmarks would offer a reusable path to improve open-source MLLMs beyond the reported 30–50% accuracy range. However, because the full text omits the entire pipeline description, dataset details, fine-tuning protocol, evaluation benchmarks, and quantitative results, the scientific significance cannot be assessed from this submission. The paper as provided is not a coherent article on the claimed topic.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (Sections 1–6, Tables 1–6)] The abstract announces a five-step ECD pipeline for chart understanding, but the full text is a relighting paper (LightSwitch). There is no section describing the ECD pipeline, no dataset statistics beyond the abstract, no QA generation details, no list of MLLMs, no fine-tuning protocol, no evaluation benchmarks, and no experimental results. The central claim is thus entirely unsupported by the body of the manuscript. This is a verification blocker, not a stylistic issue.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'ECD consistently improves the performance of various MLLMs on a range of real-world and synthetic test sets.' No numbers, baselines, benchmark names, error bars, or statistical significance are reported anywhere in the provided text. The claimed improvement is unverifiable and cannot be reproduced or evaluated.
  3. [Manuscript coherence (title/arXiv ID vs. body)] The manuscript's label (arXiv:2508.06492), title, and abstract all refer to chart understanding, while the body text is arXiv:2508.06494, 'LightSwitch: Multi-view Relighting with Material-guided Diffusion.' The reference list also pertains entirely to relighting, with no references to chart understanding or MLLMs. This mismatch is not a minor typo; it makes the submission internally inconsistent and prevents any meaningful review of the claimed contribution.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Manuscript metadata] If the correct body text was accidentally substituted, the authors should resubmit the correct manuscript. Otherwise, the abstract's claims remain unverifiable.
  2. [Full text (references)] All references in the full text concern relighting, 3D reconstruction, and inverse rendering; none concern chart understanding or multimodal language models, further confirming that the body does not correspond to the abstract.
  3. [Abstract (GitHub link)] The abstract mentions a GitHub repository for code, data, and models, but the full text contains no such link or any discussion of the dataset release.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be identified because the supplied full text is an unrelated relighting paper; the ECD methodology and evaluations are absent.

full rationale

The abstract of arXiv:2508.06492 claims that modularizing chart generation and diversifying visual details improves MLLM chart understanding, and that ECD consistently improves models on real-world and synthetic test sets. However, the supplied full text is not that paper: it is arXiv:2508.06494, "LightSwitch: Multi-view Relighting with Material-guided Diffusion", and contains no ECD pipeline, no training protocol, no list of MLLMs, no benchmark results, and no equations that constitute a derivation. For a circularity finding I would need to quote a specific reduction (e.g., a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a quantity defined in terms of the target, or a load-bearing self-citation). No such step appears in the record. The abstract's causal claim is empirical and falsifiable, and the full text provides no basis to assert that the synthetic test sets are generated by ECD itself or that any result is forced by construction. I flag the full-text mismatch as a verification blocker and omitted support, but per the hard rules, missing evidence is not circularity. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three domain assumptions stated or implied by the abstract but not demonstrated there: synthetic-to-real transfer, GPT-4o QA quality, and the validity of the evaluation protocol. The pipeline's hand-chosen settings (diversification strategy, filter threshold, QA prompt protocol) act as free parameters in the recipe. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • visual diversification strategy (style, layout, chart-type combinations)
    The abstract asserts diversification of visual details as a key ingredient but does not specify the mutation/perturbation parameters or how much diversity is needed; chosen by hand.
  • low-quality filter threshold
    Step four 'filter out low quality data' implies a quality criterion and cutoff chosen by the authors, unquantified in the abstract.
  • GPT-4o QA prompt and generation protocol
    All 300k+ QA pairs are produced by GPT-4o; prompt design and validation protocol are not described in the abstract.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Synthetic charts with diversified visual details transfer to real-world chart benchmarks.
    The paper's core bet, stated in the abstract: prior work failed due to 'inadequate similarity to the real charts', and diversification is asserted to close this gap. If false, the central claim fails even if the pipeline works as described.
  • domain assumption GPT-4o-generated QA pairs are correct and useful as fine-tuning targets.
    All 300k+ QA pairs are generated by GPT-4o; the abstract does not report a human or algorithmic validation pass.
  • domain assumption Standard MLLM fine-tuning on the dataset yields measurable benchmark gains.
    The claim 'consistently improves the performance of various MLLMs' is presented without numbers in the abstract; evaluation protocol and baseline comparability are not visible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective Training Data Synthesis for Improving MLLM Chart Understanding." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IEJG6HMD

@misc{pith2026250806492,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective Training Data Synthesis for Improving MLLM Chart Understanding},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IEJG6HMD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06492}
}
read the original abstract

Being able to effectively read scientific plots, or chart understanding, is a central part toward building effective agents for science. However, existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs), especially open-source ones, are still falling behind with a typical success rate of 30%-50% on challenging benchmarks. Previous studies on fine-tuning MLLMs with synthetic charts are often restricted by their inadequate similarity to the real charts, which could compromise model training and performance on complex real-world charts. In this study, we show that modularizing chart generation and diversifying visual details improves chart understanding capabilities. In particular, we design a five-step data synthesis pipeline, where we separate data and function creation for single plot generation, condition the generation of later subplots on earlier ones for multi-subplot figures, visually diversify the generated figures, filter out low quality data, and finally generate the question-answer (QA) pairs with GPT-4o. This approach allows us to streamline the generation of fine-tuning datasets and introduce the effective chart dataset (ECD), which contains 10k+ chart images and 300k+ QA pairs, covering 25 topics and featuring 250+ chart type combinations with high visual complexity. We show that ECD consistently improves the performance of various MLLMs on a range of real-world and synthetic test sets. Code, data and models are available at: https://github.com/yuweiyang-anu/ECD.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ChartREG++: Towards Benchmarking and Improving Chart Referring Expression Grounding under Diverse referring clues and Multi-Target Referring

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ChartREG++ creates a new multi-target chart grounding benchmark with diverse cues and a code-driven synthesis pipeline for accurate masks, yielding a model that outperforms baselines and generalizes to real ChartQA charts.

  2. ChartREG++: Towards Benchmarking and Improving Chart Referring Expression Grounding under Diverse referring clues and Multi-Target Referring

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    ChartREG++ benchmark for multi-target chart referring expression grounding with diverse clues plus a plotting-code synthesis pipeline for accurate masks that improves model performance.

  3. ChartVerse: Scaling Chart Reasoning via Reliable Programmatic Synthesis from Scratch

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ChartVerse uses Rollout Posterior Entropy and truth-anchored inverse QA synthesis to produce 640K high-quality chart reasoning samples, training an 8B model that surpasses its 30B teacher.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Barron, Jia-Bin Huang, Pratul P

    Hadi Alzayer, Philipp Henzler, Jonathan T. Barron, Jia-Bin Huang, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Dor Verbin. Generative multiview relighting for 3d reconstruction under extreme il- lumination variation. In CVPR, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. In CVPR, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Zip-nerf: Anti-aliased grid- based neural radiance fields. In ICCV, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Bar- ron, Ce Liu, and Hendrik P.A

    Mark Boss, Raphael Braun, Varun Jampani, Jonathan T. Bar- ron, Ce Liu, and Hendrik P.A. Lensch. Nerd: Neural re- flectance decomposition from image collections. In ICCV,

    work page

  5. [5]

    Barron, and Hendrik P.A

    Mark Boss, Varun Jampani, Raphael Braun, Ce Liu, Jonathan T. Barron, and Hendrik P.A. Lensch. Neural-pil: Neural pre-integrated lighting for reflectance decomposition. In NeurIPS, 2021. 2, 7

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Physically-based shading at disney

    Brent Burley and Walt Disney Animation Studios. Physically-based shading at disney. In SIGGRAPH,

    work page

  7. [7]

    Mvsplat360: Feed-forward 360 scene synthesis from sparse views

    Yuedong Chen, Chuanxia Zheng, Haofei Xu, Bohan Zhuang, Andrea Vedaldi, Tat-Jen Cham, and Jianfei Cai. Mvsplat360: Feed-forward 360 scene synthesis from sparse views. In NeurIPS, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects

    Matt Deitke, Dustin Schwenk, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Oscar Michel, Eli VanderBilt, Ludwig Schmidt, Kiana Ehsani, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Ali Farhadi. Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects. In CVPR, 2023. 5

    work page 2023

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Relightvid: Temporal-consistent diffusion model for video relighting

    Ye Fang, Zeyi Sun, Shangzhan Zhang, Tong Wu, Yinghao Xu, Pan Zhang, Jiaqi Wang, Gordon Wetzstein, and Dahua Lin. Relightvid: Temporal-consistent diffusion model for video relighting. arXiv, 2025. 2

    2025

  2. [10]

    Relightable 3d gaussian: Real-time point cloud relighting with brdf decomposition and ray trac- ing

    Jian Gao, Chun Gu, Youtian Lin, Hao Zhu, Xun Cao, Li Zhang, and Yao Yao. Relightable 3d gaussian: Real-time point cloud relighting with brdf decomposition and ray trac- ing. In ECCV, 2024. 2, 8

    2024

  3. [11]

    Learning to predict indoor illumi- nation from a single image

    Marc-Andr ´e Gardner, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Ersin Yumer, Xi- aohui Shen, Emiliano Gambaretto, Christian Gagn ´e, and Jean-Franc ¸ois Lalonde. Learning to predict indoor illumi- nation from a single image. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 2017. 5

    2017

  4. [12]

    Shape, Light, and Material Decomposition from Images us- ing Monte Carlo Rendering and Denoising

    Jon Hasselgren, Nikolai Hofmann, and Jacob Munkberg. Shape, Light, and Material Decomposition from Images us- ing Monte Carlo Rendering and Denoising. In NeurIPS,

  5. [13]

    2d gaussian splatting for geometrically ac- curate radiance fields

    Binbin Huang, Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Andreas Geiger, and Shenghua Gao. 2d gaussian splatting for geometrically ac- curate radiance fields. In SIGGRAPH, 2024. 2

    2024

  6. [14]

    Ma- terial anything: Generating materials for any 3d object via diffusion

    Xin Huang, Tengfei Wang, Ziwei Liu, and Qing Wang. Ma- terial anything: Generating materials for any 3d object via diffusion. In CVPR, 2025. 5

    2025

  7. [15]

    Mitsuba 3 renderer, 2022

    Wenzel Jakob, S ´ebastien Speierer, Nicolas Roussel, Merlin Nimier-David, Delio Vicini, Tizian Zeltner, Baptiste Nicolet, Miguel Crespo, Vincent Leroy, and Ziyi Zhang. Mitsuba 3 renderer, 2022. https://mitsuba-renderer.org. 7

    2022

  8. [16]

    Tensoir: Tensorial inverse rendering

    Haian Jin, Isabella Liu, Peijia Xu, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Song- fang Han, Sai Bi, Xiaowei Zhou, Zexiang Xu, and Hao Su. Tensoir: Tensorial inverse rendering. In CVPR, 2023. 2, 7, 8

    2023

  9. [17]

    Neu- ral gaffer: Relighting any object via diffusion

    Haian Jin, Yuan Li, Fujun Luan, Yuanbo Xiangli, Sai Bi, Kai Zhang, Zexiang Xu, Jin Sun, and Noah Snavely. Neu- ral gaffer: Relighting any object via diffusion. In NeurIPS,

  10. [18]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 2023. 1, 2, 5

    2023

  11. [19]

    In- trinsic image diffusion for indoor single-view material esti- mation

    Peter Kocsis, Vincent Sitzmann, and Matthias Nießner. In- trinsic image diffusion for indoor single-view material esti- mation. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  12. [20]

    Neroic: Neural rendering of objects from online image collections

    Zhengfei Kuang, Kyle Olszewski, Menglei Chai, Zeng Huang, Panos Achlioptas, and Sergey Tulyakov. Neroic: Neural rendering of objects from online image collections. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 2022. 7

    2022

  13. [21]

    Diffusion- renderer: Neural inverse and forward rendering with video diffusion models

    Ruofan Liang, Zan Gojcic, Huan Ling, Jacob Munkberg, Jon Hasselgren, Zhi-Hao Lin, Jun Gao, Alexander Keller, Nan- dita Vijaykumar, Sanja Fidler, and Zian Wang. Diffusion- renderer: Neural inverse and forward rendering with video diffusion models. CVPR, 2025. 2

    2025

  14. [22]

    Gs-ir: 3d gaussian splatting for inverse rendering

    Zhihao Liang, Qi Zhang, Ying Feng, Ying Shan, and Kui Jia. Gs-ir: 3d gaussian splatting for inverse rendering. In CVPR,

  15. [23]

    Materialfusion: Enhancing inverse rendering with material diffusion priors

    Yehonathan Litman, Or Patashnik, Kangle Deng, Aviral Agrawal, Rushikesh Zawar, Fernando De la Torre, and Shub- ham Tulsiani. Materialfusion: Enhancing inverse rendering with material diffusion priors. In 3DV, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8

    2025

  16. [24]

    One-2-3-45++: Fast single image to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion

    Minghua Liu, Ruoxi Shi, Linghao Chen, Zhuoyang Zhang, Chao Xu, Xinyue Wei, Hansheng Chen, Chong Zeng, Ji- ayuan Gu, and Hao Su. One-2-3-45++: Fast single image to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  17. [25]

    Wonder3d: Sin- gle image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion

    Xiaoxiao Long, Yuan-Chen Guo, Cheng Lin, Yuan Liu, Zhiyang Dou, Lingjie Liu, Yuexin Ma, Song-Hai Zhang, Marc Habermann, Christian Theobalt, et al. Wonder3d: Sin- gle image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion. In CVPR,

  18. [26]

    3dgsr: Implicit surface reconstruction with 3d gaussian splat- ting

    Xiaoyang Lyu, Yang-Tian Sun, Yi-Hua Huang, Xiuzhe Wu, Ziyi Yang, Yilun Chen, Jiangmiao Pang, and Xiaojuan Qi. 3dgsr: Implicit surface reconstruction with 3d gaussian splat- ting. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 2024. 2

    2024

  19. [27]

    Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. In ECCV, 2020. 1, 2, 6

    2020

  20. [28]

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding

    Thomas M ¨uller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexan- der Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 2022. 2

    2022

  21. [29]

    Extracting Triangular 3D Models, Materials, and Light- ing From Images

    Jacob Munkberg, Jon Hasselgren, Tianchang Shen, Jun Gao, Wenzheng Chen, Alex Evans, Thomas M¨uller, and Sanja Fi- dler. Extracting Triangular 3D Models, Materials, and Light- ing From Images. In CVPR, 2022. 2, 7

    2022

  22. [30]

    High-resolution image syn- thesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image syn- thesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2022. 3

    2022

  23. [31]

    Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models. In ICLR, 2021. 4

    2021

  24. [32]

    Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d gen- eration

    Yichun Shi, Peng Wang, Jianglong Ye, Mai Long, Kejie Li, and Xiao Yang. Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d gen- eration. In ICLR, 2024. 4

    2024

  25. [33]

    Srinivasan, Boyang Deng, Xiuming Zhang, Matthew Tancik, Ben Mildenhall, and Jonathan T

    Pratul P. Srinivasan, Boyang Deng, Xiuming Zhang, Matthew Tancik, Ben Mildenhall, and Jonathan T. Barron. Nerv: Neural reflectance and visibility fields for relighting and view synthesis. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    2021

  26. [34]

    Richter, Shenlong Wang, and Germ ´an Ros

    Benjamin Ummenhofer, Sanskar Agrawal, Rene Sep ´ulveda, Yixing Lao, Kai Zhang, Tianhang Cheng, Stephan R. Richter, Shenlong Wang, and Germ ´an Ros. Objects with lighting: A real-world dataset for evaluating reconstruction and rendering for object relighting. In 3DV, 2024. 7

    2024

  27. [35]

    Nerf-casting: Improved view-dependent appearance with consistent reflections

    Dor Verbin, Pratul P Srinivasan, Peter Hedman, Ben Milden- hall, Benjamin Attal, Richard Szeliski, and Jonathan T Bar- ron. Nerf-casting: Improved view-dependent appearance with consistent reflections. In SIGGRAPH Asia, 2024. 2

    2024

  28. [36]

    Sv3d: Novel multi-view syn- thesis and 3d generation from a single image using latent video diffusion

    Vikram V oleti, Chun-Han Yao, Mark Boss, Adam Letts, David Pankratz, Dmitry Tochilkin, Christian Laforte, Robin Rombach, and Varun Jampani. Sv3d: Novel multi-view syn- thesis and 3d generation from a single image using latent video diffusion. In ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  29. [37]

    Imagedream: Image-prompt multi-view diffusion for 3d generation

    Peng Wang and Yichun Shi. Imagedream: Image-prompt multi-view diffusion for 3d generation. arXiv, 2023. 4

    2023

  30. [38]

    Neus: Learning neural implicit surfaces by volume rendering for multi-view reconstruction

    Peng Wang, Lingjie Liu, Yuan Liu, Christian Theobalt, Taku Komura, and Wenping Wang. Neus: Learning neural implicit surfaces by volume rendering for multi-view reconstruction. In NeurIPS, 2021. 7

    2021

  31. [39]

    Reconfusion: 3d reconstruction with diffusion priors

    Rundi Wu, Ben Mildenhall, Philipp Henzler, Keunhong Park, Ruiqi Gao, Daniel Watson, Pratul P Srinivasan, Dor Verbin, Jonathan T Barron, Ben Poole, et al. Reconfusion: 3d reconstruction with diffusion priors. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  32. [40]

    Chen Xi, Peng Sida, Yang Dongchen, Liu Yuan, Pan Bowen, Lv Chengfei, and Zhou. Xiaowei. Intrinsicanything: Learn- ing diffusion priors for inverse rendering under unknown il- lumination. In ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  33. [41]

    Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased rendering

    Zhiwen Yan, Weng Fei Low, Yu Chen, and Gim Hee Lee. Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased rendering. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  34. [42]

    Dilightnet: Fine-grained light- ing control for diffusion-based image generation

    Chong Zeng, Yue Dong, Pieter Peers, Youkang Kong, Hongzhi Wu, and Xin Tong. Dilightnet: Fine-grained light- ing control for diffusion-based image generation. In SIG- GRAPH, 2024. 2, 5, 6

    2024

  35. [43]

    PhySG: Inverse rendering with spherical gaussians for physics-based material editing and relighting

    Kai Zhang, Fujun Luan, Qianqian Wang, Kavita Bala, and Noah Snavely. PhySG: Inverse rendering with spherical gaussians for physics-based material editing and relighting. In CVPR, 2021. 7

    2021

  36. [44]

    Relitlrm: Generative relightable radiance for large reconstruction models

    Tianyuan Zhang, Zhengfei Kuang, Haian Jin, Zexiang Xu, Sai Bi, Hao Tan, He Zhang, Yiwei Hu, Milos Hasan, William T Freeman, et al. Relitlrm: Generative relightable radiance for large reconstruction models. In ICLR, 2025. 2

    2025

  37. [45]

    Ner- factor: Neural factorization of shape and reflectance under an unknown illumination

    Xiuming Zhang, Pratul P Srinivasan, Boyang Deng, Paul De- bevec, William T Freeman, and Jonathan T Barron. Ner- factor: Neural factorization of shape and reflectance under an unknown illumination. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 2021. 2, 7

    2021

  38. [46]

    Modeling indirect illumination for inverse rendering

    Yuanqing Zhang, Jiaming Sun, Xingyi He, Huan Fu, Rongfei Jia, and Xiaowei Zhou. Modeling indirect illumination for inverse rendering. In CVPR, 2022. 2, 7

    2022

  39. [47]

    Srinivasan, Dor Verbin, Keunhong Park, Ricardo Martin Brualla, and Philipp Henzler

    Xiaoming Zhao, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Dor Verbin, Keunhong Park, Ricardo Martin Brualla, and Philipp Henzler. IllumiN- eRF: 3D Relighting Without Inverse Rendering. InNeurIPS,

  40. [48]

    Bigs: Bidirectional gaussian primitives for re- lightable 3d gaussian splatting

    Liu Zhenyuan, Yu Guo, Xinyuan Li, Bernd Bickel, and Ran Zhang. Bigs: Bidirectional gaussian primitives for re- lightable 3d gaussian splatting. In 3DV, 2025. 2

    2025

  41. [49]

    Sparsefusion: Dis- tilling view-conditioned diffusion for 3d reconstruction

    Zhizhuo Zhou and Shubham Tulsiani. Sparsefusion: Dis- tilling view-conditioned diffusion for 3d reconstruction. In CVPR, 2023. 2 LightSwitch: Multi-view Relighting with Material-guided Diffusion Supplementary Material Relighting Method PSNR-L ↑ PSNR-H ↑ SSIM ↑ LPIPS ↓ LightSwi...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Additional Visualizations We show additional visualizations of LightSwitch’s 2D and 3D relighting on BlenderVault 2D data as well as NeRF- Synthetic in Figs. 8-11

  43. [51]

    LightSwitch was trained in three stages using 8 RTX A6000 GPUs, first by finetuning for single view for 20K iterations on 256 ×256 data with a batch size of 512

    Additional Details Training. LightSwitch was trained in three stages using 8 RTX A6000 GPUs, first by finetuning for single view for 20K iterations on 256 ×256 data with a batch size of 512. An AdamW 8-bit optimizer was used with a learning rate of 5e − 5. For the second multi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.