REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning Attention-based Embeddings for Relation Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The recent proliferation of knowledge graphs (KGs) coupled with incomplete or partial information, in the form of missing relations (links) between entities, has fueled a lot of research on knowledge base completion (also known as relation prediction). Several recent works suggest that convolutional neural network (CNN) based models generate richer and more expressive feature embeddings and hence also perform well on relation prediction. However, we observe that these KG embeddings treat triples independently and thus fail to cover the complex and hidden information that is inherently implicit in the local neighborhood surrounding a triple. To this effect, our paper proposes a novel attention based feature embedding that captures both entity and relation features in any given entity's neighborhood. Additionally, we also encapsulate relation clusters and multihop relations in our model. Our empirical study offers insights into the efficacy of our attention based model and we show marked performance gains in comparison to state of the art methods on all datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Two-dimensional Taxonomy for N-ary Knowledge Representation Learning Methods
A survey of n-ary knowledge representation learning methods proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy based on modeling technique and entity role/position awareness.
-
Graph Collaborative Attention Network for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
GCAT is presented as a new graph attention model for knowledge graph link prediction, but its equations are those of KBGAT and its reported benchmark numbers do not support the stated performance claims.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.