Nonreciprocal transition between two nondegenerate energy levels

Ai-Xi Chen; Hui Wang; Xun-Wei Xu; Yan-Jun Zhao; Yu-xi Liu

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 68 references

Nonreciprocal transition between two nondegenerate energy levels

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A cyclic three-level atom can make a transition between two nondegenerate levels one-way by combining synthetic magnetic flux with a fast-decaying auxiliary level, and the effect can route single photons.

desk verdict A modest but sound scheme for nonreciprocal transitions between discrete levels; the core idea works, but the perfect-isolation claim rests on an under-specified adiabatic approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08323 v1 pith:IF2GL72U submitted 2019-08-22 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics

Xun-Wei Xu , Yan-Jun Zhao , Hui Wang , Ai-Xi Chen , Yu-xi Liu This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics

keywords nonreciprocaltransitionsyntheticmagneticfluxreservoirengineeringcyclicthree-levelatomadiabaticeliminationsingle-photontransportcoupled-resonatorwaveguidenondegenerateenergylevels

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that stimulated emission and absorption between two nondegenerate levels need not be equal. It proposes a cyclic three-level atom in which the two target levels are coupled both by a coherent drive and by a fast-decaying auxiliary level; after eliminating the auxiliary level, the effective couplings $J_{ab}$ and $J_{ba}$ have different phases and can be tuned independently. At a total loop phase of $\pi/2$ or $-\pi/2$, with matched drive strengths, one coupling vanishes exactly, making the transition one-way. If true, this gives a generic, reconfigurable atomic building block for nonreciprocal devices, and the paper demonstrates it with a single-photon directional transporter between two waveguide arrays.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective non-Hermitian two-level Hamiltonian obtained by adiabatically eliminating the fast-decaying auxiliary level $|c\rangle$. Its off-diagonal terms $J_{ab}$ and $J_{ba}$ each combine a coherent contribution $\Omega_{ab} e^{\pm i\Phi}$ with a dissipative contribution $-i\Omega_{ca}\Omega_{cb}(\gamma_c - i\Delta_{cb})/(\gamma_c^2+\Delta_{cb}^2)$; the synthetic flux $\Phi$ is the gauge-invariant sum of the three drive phases around the cyclic loop. Varying $\Phi$ changes the relative phase of the coherent and dissipative paths, and at $\Phi=\pm\pi/2$ with matched amplitudes the two contributions cancel in one off-diagonal term, leaving a strictly one-way coupling.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the full three-level Schrödinger equations without setting $\dot{C}=0$, using the paper's resonant parameters ($\gamma_c=100\Omega_{ab}$, $\Omega_{ca}=\Omega_{cb}=10\Omega_{ab}$, $\Phi=\pi/2$, $\Omega_{ab}=\Omega_{ca}\Omega_{cb}/\gamma_c$), and compute the two transition probabilities. If the ratio of the two probabilities falls far short of the predicted roughly $10^6$ isolation, or if the blocked-direction probability grows appreciably over time, the adiabatic-elimination assumption is the failure point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a cyclic three-level atom driven by three coherent fields, with $|c\rangle$ decaying much faster than $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$, adiabatic elimination yields an effective two-level Hamiltonian $H_{\rm eff} = (\Delta_a - i\Gamma_a)|a\rangle\langle a| + (\Delta_b - i\Gamma_b)|b\rangle\langle b| + J_{ab}|a\rangle\langle b| + J_{ba}|b\rangle\langle a|$. The coupling coefficients are $J_{ab} = \Omega_{ab} e^{i\Phi} - i\Omega_{ca}\Omega_{cb}(\gamma_c - i\Delta_{cb})/(\gamma_c^2+\Delta_{cb}^2)$ and $J_{ba} = \Omega_{ab} e^{-i\Phi} - i\Omega_{ca}\Omega_{cb}(\gamma_c - i\Delta_{cb})/(\gamma_c^2+\Delta_{cb}^2)$. On resonance, setting $\Phi=\pi/2$ and $\Omega_{ab}=\Omega_{ca}\Omega_{cb}/\gamma_c$ makes $J_{ab}=0$ while $J_{ba}\neq 0$, so the $|b\rangle\rightarrow|a\rangle$ amplitude is suppressed; $\Phi=-\pi/2$ makes $J_{ba}=0$ and selects the opposite direction. The paper then places this effective two-level system between two semi-infinite coupled-resonator waveguides and derives conditions under which a single photon is perfectly transmitted in one direction ($I_{ba}=1$) and blocked in the other ($I_{ab}=0$).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fast-decaying auxiliary level can be eliminated adiabatically; the paper only ensures $\gamma_c \gg \gamma_a,\gamma_b$, but the elimination also needs $\gamma_c$ to dominate the drive strengths and detunings, and the numerical example uses $\gamma_c/\Omega_{ca}=10$, which is only moderately large.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At the cancellation point, transitions in the blocked direction are suppressed by orders of magnitude: the paper reports isolation above $10^6$ in the numerical example at short times.
In the waveguide setup, with $|J_{ba}|=2\Gamma$ and $g^2=\Gamma\xi$, a single photon can be transmitted perfectly from one waveguide to the other in one direction while the reverse flow is zero.
The operating bandwidth of the perfect nonreciprocal transport is controlled by the ratio $\xi/\Gamma$ and is widest at $\xi=\Gamma/2$, with a maximum full width at half maximum $\Delta k_{\max}\approx 0.81\pi$.
Because the two levels need not be degenerate, the mechanism is not restricted to a special level structure and can be applied to generic atomic or artificial-atom transitions.
Reversing the sign of the synthetic flux $\Phi$ reverses the allowed direction, so the same device can be switched between forward and backward operation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same interference-cancellation mechanism should work in any system where a coherent coupling and a dissipative coupling share a controllable relative phase; the cyclic three-level atom is one realization, and the principle likely extends to phononic, optomechanical, and circuit-QED settings.
Because the perfect one-way condition relies on adiabatic elimination, the practical isolation will be limited by next-order corrections; a direct comparison of full three-level dynamics with the effective model would quantify that floor.
The paper mentions avoiding echo formation in quantum memory; a testable extension would place a nonreciprocal transition at a memory interface so that retrieval pulses cannot re-excite the storage level.
The derived bandwidth maximum $\Delta k_{\max}\approx 0.81\pi$ at $\xi=\Gamma/2$ suggests a design rule for future atom-mediated directional routers: match the waveguide band curvature to the atomic decay rate.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

Read the Xu et al. paper on nonreciprocal transitions. My take: it's a solid, incremental proposal that generalizes the Metelmann-Clerk reservoir-engineering trick from continuous photonic modes to discrete atomic levels. The mechanism is clear, the supplement is explicit, and the proposed single-photon transporter is a sensible application. Nothing here is revolutionary, but it is a legitimate new result: nobody had pointed out that you can make the effective coupling between two nondegenerate levels one-way by combining synthetic flux with a fast-decaying auxiliary level.

What's good: the effective Hamiltonian derivation is transparent, the condition Jab=0 at Φ=π/2 follows straightforwardly, and the scattering-flow analytics in the supplement are consistent with the plotted numerics. The paper also gives two realistic implementations (NV centers, superconducting circuits), which strengthens it.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. First, the adiabatic elimination is under-justified. The supplement only says γc ≫ γa, γb, but the fast level must also be eliminated relative to the drive strengths: you need γc ≫ Ω_ca, Ω_cb and small Ω²/γc. At the parameters in Fig. 2, γc/Ω_ca = 10, so the corrections are of order 10⁻². That means Jab is not exactly zero at Φ=π/2; it's small but finite, and the plotted isolation of 10⁶ is an approximation. The central effect likely survives—strong isolation of order 10⁵–10⁶ still appears in a more careful treatment—but the paper states exact one-way coupling without a numerical check of the full three-level equations. That should be fixed before publication.

Second, there's a labeling slip in the transition probabilities. They define Tba(t)=|⟨a|U(t)|b⟩|² and Tab(t)=|⟨b|U(t)|a⟩|², then say these are the probabilities for |a⟩→|b⟩ and |b⟩→|a⟩. The subscripts are reversed relative to the text. Easy fix, but as written it's confusing.

Third, the Einstein-coefficient framing is a bit of an overreach. Stimulated emission and absorption coefficients in Einstein's theory are defined for a different physical regime; showing asymmetric coherent couplings in an open system doesn't directly revise that equality. It's fine as motivation, but the claim should be softened.

Who is this for? People working on nonreciprocal quantum devices and atom-waveguide interfaces. It deserves a serious referee—the physics is plausible and the analytics are mostly there. I'd send it to review with a request for an exact numerical check and the small fixes above.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generic mechanism for achieving a nonreciprocal transition between two nondegenerate energy levels, combining a coherent coupling and a dissipative coupling produced by reservoir engineering. The concrete realization is a cyclic three-level atom with a fast-decaying auxiliary level, where a synthetic magnetic flux Φ and a balance condition Ω_ab = Ω_caΩ_cb/γ_c make one of the effective couplings J_ab, J_ba vanish at Φ = ±π/2. The paper also designs a single-photon nonreciprocal transporter based on two semi-infinite coupled-resonator waveguides coupled to a ∇-type three-level atom, and derives analytic conditions for perfect nonreciprocal scattering. The central derivation is an effective non-Hermitian two-level Hamiltonian obtained by adiabatic elimination of the auxiliary level, with explicit expressions for the effective detunings, decay rates, and couplings.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a simple and fairly general route to atom-mediated nonreciprocal devices, extending the synthetic-magnetism plus reservoir-engineering paradigm from photon/phonon transport to transitions between internal energy levels. The analytical expressions for the effective couplings and the scattering-flow conditions are explicit and internally structured, and the perfect one-way condition is not assumed but derived from a concrete Hamiltonian. The proposal for a single-photon nonreciprocal transporter with analytic conditions (k = π/2, g² = Γξ, |J_ba| = 2Γ) is a concrete falsifiable prediction. The main risks are the quantitative validity of the adiabatic elimination in the plotted parameter regime and a recurring ambiguity in the direction conventions for transition probabilities.

major comments (2)

[Nonreciprocal transition with cyclic three-level transition (after Eq. (4), Figs. 2–3)] The definitions of T_ba(t) and T_ab(t) are inconsistent with the text that assigns them to transitions |a>→|b> and |b>→|a>. The formulas T_ba(t) ≡ |⟨a|U(t)|b⟩|² and T_ab(t) ≡ |⟨b|U(t)|a⟩|² imply that T_ba is the probability of starting in |b> and ending in |a> (i.e., |b>→|a>), while T_ab is the probability of |a>→|b>. The statements 'T_ab(t) ≪ T_ba(t) for Φ=π/2' and 'I(t) > 10⁶ for Φ=−π/2' are only correct under the opposite assignment. The same direction ambiguity appears in the general model around Eq. (1), where the coefficient of |a><b| is said to give |a>→|b> even though that operator maps |b> to |a>. Because the direction of the nonreciprocal transition is the central result, this convention error must be corrected and the figure labels/captions checked accordingly.
[Supplement, Adiabatic Elimination (Eq. S7); main-text Eq. (4)] The stated adiabatic-elimination condition γ_c ≫ max{γ_a,γ_b} is not sufficient to justify the effective Hamiltonian (4) and the exact condition J_ab=0 at Φ=π/2. A Markovian elimination of |c> also requires γ_c ≫ Ω_ca, Ω_cb, |Δ_cb| and γ_c ≫ Ω_ca²/γ_c, Ω_cb²/γ_c. In the Fig. 2 parameters γ_c/Ω_ca = 10, so corrections of order (Ω_ca/γ_c)² are not negligible a priori, and the exact zero of J_ab is a property of the effective model only. The paper should either state the stronger condition or, if the plotted transition probabilities are obtained by integrating the full three-level equations (S4)–(S6), state this explicitly and report the exact numerical isolation. Without this, the claim of a 'perfect' one-way transition is stronger than the analysis supports.

minor comments (6)

[Title] The title contains a spacing typo: 'energ y' should read 'energy'.
[Introduction] There are minor wording errors: 'verity of physical systems' should be 'variety of physical systems', and 'the the scattering flow' has a duplicated article.
[Eq. (3) and Supplement around Eq. (S2)] The synthetic flux Φ is defined as φ_ab+φ_bc+φ_ca in the main text but as φ_ab+φ_cb+φ_ca in the Supplement. Since φ_bc and φ_cb refer to Hermitian-conjugate coupling operators, the definitions should be aligned to avoid confusion about the loop phase.
[Fig. 5 caption] The Fig. 5 caption uses 'φ=π/2' while the text uses Φ for the synthetic flux; the symbols should be made consistent.
[Supplementary Material reference] The placeholder reference 'See Supplementary Material at http://xxx' should be replaced with the actual journal/arXiv URL.
[Eq. (6)] The symbol '~Heff' is used without explaining whether the tilde is a deliberate part of the notation (e.g., indicating an operator with units of frequency) or a typographical artifact.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nonreciprocal transition is derived from an explicit three-level Hamiltonian, not fitted or assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is derived, not assumed. Starting from the bare cyclic three-level Hamiltonian in Eqs. (2)-(3), the authors adiabatically eliminate the fast-decaying level |c⟩ in the Supplement (Eqs. S4-S10) and obtain the effective couplings J_ab and J_ba. The perfect one-way condition, Φ=π/2 with Ω_ab=Ω_caΩ_cb/γ_c, is then an algebraic consequence: at Δ_cb=0 and Φ=π/2 one has J_ab=Ω_ab e^{iπ/2}-iΩ_caΩ_cb/γ_c=iΩ_ab-iΩ_caΩ_cb/γ_c=0, while J_ba=-iΩ_ab-iΩ_caΩ_cb/γ_c≠0. No parameter is fitted to an external data set and then renamed a prediction; the parameter choice is explicitly stated and the vanishing coupling follows from the derived formula. The single-photon transport section similarly solves the scattering problem from the effective Hamiltonian and derives the perfect-transport conditions (J_ab=0, |J_ba|=2Γ, g^2=Γξ) analytically. The self-citations present (e.g., Refs. [55]-[56] for the scattering-flow formalism and Ref. [3] for reservoir-engineering nonreciprocity) are either external prior work or standard methodological tools; they are not used as an unverified load-bearing substitute for the derivation, which is self-contained in the paper and its Supplement. The one substantive concern—that the stated adiabatic-elimination condition γ_c≫max{γ_a,γ_b} is not by itself quantitatively sufficient near the plotted parameters (γ_c/Ω_ca=10)—is a question of approximation validity and numerical accuracy, not of circularity. The derivation does not reduce to its inputs by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces; the nonreciprocal transition is a consequence of known reservoir engineering and synthetic magnetism applied to a few-level atom. The free parameters are the tunable phases and coupling strengths chosen to enforce the desired perfect one-way conditions, not fitted data.

free parameters (3)

Synthetic magnetic flux Φ = π/2 (for Jab=0); -π/2 for the opposite direction
Chosen by hand to achieve perfect one-way transition; the paper shows the coupling asymmetry varies with Φ and vanishes at Φ=0.
Driving amplitude relation Ω_ab = Ω_caΩ_cb/γ_c = In simulations Ω_ca=Ω_cb=10Ω_ab and γ_c=100Ω_ab
Chosen so the coherent and dissipative contributions to J_ab (or J_ba) cancel exactly.
Transporter perfect-transfer conditions |J_ba|=2Γ and g²=Γξ with k=π/2 = Derived analytic conditions; no numerical fit
Chosen to make the scattering flow I_ba=1 and I_ab=0 in the single-photon router.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The auxiliary level |c⟩ has Markovian decay much faster than the other levels (γ_c ≫ γ_a, γ_b), allowing adiabatic elimination by setting Ċ=0.
Main text: 'the decay of the level |c⟩ is much faster than the other two levels, i.e., γ_c ≫ max{γ_a,γ_b}'; Supplement Eq. (S7). A stronger condition (γ_c large compared to the drive strengths) is silently assumed.
domain assumption Three coherent driving fields with frequencies satisfying ν_ab = ν_cb - ν_ca, so the closed-loop phase Φ is gauge-invariant.
Main text states this condition; it enables the synthetic magnetic flux.
standard math Rotating wave approximation (RWA) is valid for all three drivings.
Used implicitly in writing H1 with positive frequency terms only.
domain assumption In the transporter, the waveguides are semi-infinite and the single-photon sector is described by the non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian with loss terms; scattering flow computed from the time-independent Schrödinger equation.
Supplement Eqs. (S11)-(S17).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonreciprocal transition between two nondegenerate energy levels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IF2GL72U

@misc{pith2026190808323,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonreciprocal transition between two nondegenerate energy levels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IF2GL72U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08323}
}

read the original abstract

Stimulated emission and absorption are two fundamental processes of light-matter interaction, and the coefficients of the two processes should be equal in general. However, we will describe a generic method to realize significant difference between the stimulated emission and absorption coefficients of two nondegenerate energy levels, which we refer to as nonreciprocal transition. As a simple implementation, a cyclic three-level atom system, comprising two nondegenerate energy levels and one auxiliary energy level, is employed to show nonreciprocal transition via a combination of synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering. Moreover, a single-photon nonreciprocal transporter is proposed using two one dimensional semi-infinite coupled-resonator waveguides connected by an atom with nonreciprocal transition effect. Our work opens up a route to design atom-mediated nonreciprocal devices in a wide range of physical systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08323 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (Color online) The transition probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. (Color online) Schematic of two 1D semi-infinite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

[1]

Einstein, On the quantum theory of radiation, Phys

A. Einstein, On the quantum theory of radiation, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917)

work page 1917
[2]

(7) The eﬃciency for nonreciprocity transport can be de- scribed by the the scattering ﬂow [ 53–56]Il′l for a single photon from CR W-l to CR W-l′ (l = a,b )

with ∆ a = ∆ b = 0 as ~Heﬀ =Jab |a⟩ ⟨b| +Jba |b⟩ ⟨a| −iΓ a |a⟩ ⟨a| −iΓ b |b⟩ ⟨b|, (6) and the interaction Hamiltonian Hint between the 0th cavity modes and the three-level atom is described by Hint =gaa0 |a⟩ ⟨g| +gbb0 |b⟩ ⟨g| +gaa† 0 |g⟩ ⟨a| +gbb† 0 |g⟩ ⟨b|. (7) The eﬃciency for nonreciprocity transport can be de- scribed by the the scattering ﬂow [ 53–56...

work page
[3]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Ampliﬁcation via Reservoir Engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

The system can be described by the total Hamiltonian under the rotat- ing wave approximation Htot = ∑ l=a,b Hl + ~Heﬀ +Hint

Here ga (gb) is the coupling strength between CR W-a (CR W-b) and the transition |a⟩ ↔ |g⟩ (|b⟩ ↔ | g⟩) with frequency ω ag (ω bg). The system can be described by the total Hamiltonian under the rotat- ing wave approximation Htot = ∑ l=a,b Hl + ~Heﬀ +Hint. Here, in the rotating reference frame with respect to Hrot =ω ag ( ∑ ja† jaj + |a⟩ ⟨a| ) +ω bg ( ∑ j...

work page
[5]

M. O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

work page 1997
[6]

K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic mag - netism and reservoir engineering, Nature Phys. 13, 465 (2017)

work page 2017
[7]

X. W. Xu and Y. Li, Optical nonreciprocity and optome- chanical circulator in three-mode optomechanical systems , Phys. Rev. A 91, 053854 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

X. W. Xu, Y. Li, A. X. Chen, and Y. X. Liu, Nonrecipro- cal conversion between microwave and optical photons in electro-optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023827 (2016)

work page 2016

Show all 68 references

[9]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Non-reciprocal quantum interactions and devices via autonomous feed-forward, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013837 (2017)

2017
[10]

Tian and Z

L. Tian and Z. Li, Nonreciprocal quantum-state conver- sion between microwave and optical photons, Phys. Rev. A 96, 013808 (2017)

2017
[11]

Ruesink, M.-A

F. Ruesink, M.-A. Miri, A. Al` u, and E. Verhagen, Non- reciprocity and magnetic-free isolation based on optome- chanical interactions. Nat. Commun. 7, 13662 (2016)

2016
[12]

G. A. Peterson, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Demonstration of eﬃ- cient nonreciprocity in a microwave optomechanical cir- cuit, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031001 (2017)

2017
[13]

N. R. Bernier, L. D. T´ oth, A. Koottandavida, A. Nun- nenkamp, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, Nonrecipro- cal reconﬁgurable microwave optomechanical circuit, Nat. Commun. 8, 604 (2017)

2017
[14]

Barzanjeh, M

S. Barzanjeh, M. Wulf, M. Peruzzo, M. Kalaee, P. B. Dieterle, O. Painter, and J. M. Fink, Mechanical On-Chip Microwave Circulator, Nature Commun. 8, 953 (2017)

2017
[15]

J. Koch, A. A. Houck, K. L. Hur, and S. M. Girvin, Time- reversal-symmetry breaking in circuit-QED-based photon lattices, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043811 (2010)

2010
[16]

R. O. Umucalılar and I. Carusotto, Artiﬁcial gauge ﬁeld for photons in coupled cavity arrays, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043804 (2011)

2011
[17]

Y. P. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Y. Xue, W. L. Yang, Y. Hu, and Y. Wu, Realizing and characterizing chiral photon ﬂow in a circuit quantum electrodynamics necklace, Sci. Rep. 5, 8352 (2015)

2015
[18]

F. X. Sun, D. Mao, Y. T. Dai, Z. Ficek, Q. Y. He, and Q. H. Gong, Phase control of entanglement and quantum steering in a three-mode optomechanical system, New J. Phys. 19, 123039 (2017)

2017
[19]

S. J. M. Habraken, K. Stannigel, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and P. Rabl, Continuous mode cooling and phonon routers for phononic quantum networks, New J. Phys. 14, 115004 (2012)

2012
[20]

A. Seif, W. DeGottardi, K. Esfarjani, and M. Hafezi, Thermal management and non-reciprocal control of phonon ﬂow via optomechanics, Nat. Commun. 9, 1207 (2018)

2018
[21]

Schmidt, S

M. Schmidt, S. Kessler, V. Peano, O. Painter, and F. Marquardt, Optomechanical creation of magnetic ﬁelds for photons on a lattice, Optica 2, 635 (2015)

2015
[22]

Peano, C

V. Peano, C. Brendel, M. Schmidt, and F. Marquardt, Topological Phases of Sound and Light, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031011 (2015)

2015
[23]

Peano, M

V. Peano, M. Houde, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Topological Quantum Fluctuations and Traveling Wave Ampliﬁers, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041026 (2016)

2016
[24]

Peano, M

V. Peano, M. Houde, C. Brendel, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Topological phase transitions and chiral inelas- tic transport induced by the squeezing of light, Nat. Com- mun. 7, 10779 (2016)

2016
[25]

Minkov and V

M. Minkov and V. Savona, Haldane quantum Hall eﬀect for light in a dynamically modulated array of resonators, Optica 3, 200 (2016)

2016
[26]

Brendel, V

C. Brendel, V. Peano, O. Painter, and F. Marquardt, Snowﬂake phononic topological insulator at the nanoscale, Phys. Rev. B 97, 020102(R) (2018)

2018
[27]

M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Szameit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature (London) 496, 196 (2013)

2013
[28]

Hafezi, E

M. Hafezi, E. A. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and J. M. Tay- lor, Robust optical delay lines with topological protectio n, Nature Phys. 7, 907 (2011)

2011
[29]

K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Realizing eﬀective magnetic ﬁeld for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic mod- ulation, Nature Photon. 6, 782 (2012)

2012
[30]

L. D. Tzuang, K. Fang, P. Nussenzveig, S. Fan, and M. Lipson, Non-reciprocal phase shift induced by an eﬀective magnetic ﬂux for light, Nature Photon. 8, 701 (2014)

2014
[31]

K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconﬁgurable Josephson Circulator/Directional Ampliﬁer, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015)

2015
[32]

J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum Reser- voir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions, Phys. 6 Rev. Lett. 77, 4728 (1996)

1996
[33]

X. Xu, T. Purdy, and J. M. Taylor, Cooling a Harmonic Oscillator by Optomechanical Modiﬁcation of Its Bath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 223602 (2017)

2017
[34]

Kienzler, H.-Y

D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Le- upold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, J. P. Home, Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering, Science 347, 53 (2015)

2015
[35]

Miranowicz, J

A. Miranowicz, J. Bajer, M. Paprzycka, Y. X. Liu, A. M. Zagoskin, and F. Nori, State-dependent photon block- ade via quantum-reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033831 (2014)

2014
[36]

C. J. Yang, J. H. An, W. L. Yang, and Y. Li, Genera- tion of stable entanglement between two cavity mirrors by squeezed-reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062311 (2015)

2015
[37]

X. B. Yan, Enhanced output entanglement with reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053831 (2017)

2017
[38]

P. Rabl, A. Shnirman, and P. Zoller, Generation of squeezed states of nanomechanical resonators by reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. B 70, 205304 (2004)

2004
[39]

M. J. Woolley and A. A. Clerk, Two-mode squeezed states in cavity optomechanics via engineering of a single reservoir, Phys. Rev. A 89, 063805 (2014)

2014
[40]

See Supplementary Material at http://xxx for detailed derivations
[41]

Barfuss, J

A. Barfuss, J. K¨ olbl, L. Thiel, J. Teissier, M. Kasper- czyk, and P. Maletinsky, Non-reciprocal coherent dy- namics of a single spin under closed-contour interaction, arXiv:1802.04824v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv
[42]

Kr´ al and M

P. Kr´ al and M. Shapiro, Cyclic Population Transfer in Quantum Systems with Broken Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 183002 (2001)

2001
[43]

Kr´ al, I

P. Kr´ al, I. Thanopulos, M. Shapiro, and D. Cohen, Two-Step Enantio-Selective Optical Switch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 033001 (2003)

2003
[44]

Y. Li, C. Bruder, and C. P. Sun, Generalized Stern- Gerlach Eﬀect for Chiral Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130403 (2007)

2007
[45]

Patterson and J

D. Patterson and J. M. Doyle, Sensitive Chiral Analysis via Microwave Three-Wave Mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 023008 (2013)

2013
[46]

Patterson, M

D. Patterson, M. Schnell, and J. M. Doyle, Enantiomer- speciﬁc detection of chiral molecules via microwave spec- troscopy, Nature (London) 497, 475 (2013)

2013
[47]

Eibenberger, J

S. Eibenberger, J. Doyle, and D. Patterson, Enantiomer - Speciﬁc State Transfer of Chiral Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 123002 (2017)

2017
[48]

C. Ye, Q. Zhang, and Y. Li, Real single-loop cyclic three - level conﬁguration of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063401 (2018)

2018
[49]

Y. X. Liu, J. Q. You, L. F. Wei, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Optical Selection Rules and Phase-Dependent Adi- abatic State Control in a Superconducting Quantum Cir- cuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087001 (2005)

2005
[50]

J. E. Mooij, T. P. Orlando, L. Levitov, L. Tian, C. H. van der Wal, and S. Lloyd, Josephson persistent-current qubit, Science 285, 1036 (1999)

1999
[51]

J. R. Maze, A. Gali, E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. Trifonov, E. Kaxiras, and M. D. Lukin, Properties of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: the group theoretic approach, New J. Phys. 13, 025025 (2011)

2011
[52]

Dobrovitski, G

V. Dobrovitski, G. Fuchs, A. Falk, C. Santori, and D. Awschalom, Quantum Control over Single Spins in Dia- mond, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 23 (2013)

2013
[53]

E. R. MacQuarrie, T. A. Gosavi, N. R. Jungwirth, S. A. Bhave, and G. D. Fuchs, Mechanical Spin Control of Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 227602 (2013)

2013
[54]

Barfuss, J

A. Barfuss, J. Teissier, E. Neu, A. Nunnenkamp, and P. Maletinsky, Strong mechanical driving of a single electron spin, Nature Phys. 11, 820 (2015)

2015
[55]

L. Zhou, L. P. Yang, Y. Li, and C. P. Sun, Quantum Routing of Single Photons with a Cyclic Three-Level Sys- tem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 103604 (2013)

2013
[56]

Z. H. Wang, L. Zhou, Y. Li, and C. P. Sun, Controllable single-photon frequency converter via a one-dimensional waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053813 (2014)

2014
[57]

X. W. Xu, A. X. Chen, Y. Li, and Yu-xi Liu, Single-photon nonreciprocal transport in one-dimensiona l coupled-resonator waveguides, Phys. Rev. A 95, 063808 (2017)

2017
[58]

X. W. Xu, A. X. Chen, Y. Li, and Yu-xi Liu, Nonrecip- rocal single-photon frequency converter via multiple semi - inﬁnite coupled-resonator waveguides, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053853 (2017)

2017
[59]

A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum ground state and single-phonon con- trol of a mechanical resonator, Nature (London) 464, 697 (2010)

2010
[60]

Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits, Science 358, 199 (2017)

2017
[61]

Manenti, A

R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves, Nat. Commun. 8, 975 (2017)

2017
[62]

Ripka, H

F. Ripka, H. K¨ ubler, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, A room- temperature single-photon source based on strongly in- teracting Rydberg atoms, Science 362, 446 (2018)

2018
[63]

A. R. Hamann, C. M¨ uller, M. Jerger, M. Zanner, J. Combes, M. Pletyukhov, M. Weides, T. M. Stace, and A. Fedorov, Nonreciprocity Realized with Quantum Non- linearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123601 (2018)

2018
[64]

M. W. Johnson, M. H. S. Amin, S. Gildert, T. Lanting, F. Hamze, N. Dickson, R. Harris, A. J. Berkley, J. Johansson, P. Bunyk, E. M. Chapple, C. Enderud, J. P. Hilton, K. Karimi, E. Ladizinsky, N. Ladizinsky, T. Oh, I. Perminov, C. Rich, M. C. Thom, E. Tolkacheva, C. J. S. Trun...

2011
[65]

Huang, A

R. Huang, A. Miranowicz, J. Q. Liao, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal Photon Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 153601 (2018)

2018
[66]

X. W. Xu, Y. J. Zhao, H. Wang, H. Jing, and A. X. Chen, Nonreciprocal photon blockade via quadratic optomechan- ical coupling, arXiv:1809.07596 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[67]

B. Li, R. Huang, X. W. Xu, A. Miranowicz, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal unconventional photon blockade in a spin- ning optomechanical system, Photonics Res. 7, 000630 (2019)

2019
[68]

Nonreciprocal transition bet ween two nondegenerate energy levels

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010). 1 Supplementary Material for “Nonreciprocal transition bet ween two nondegenerate energy levels” Xun-Wei Xu1, Yan-Jun Zhao 2, Hui Wang 3, Ai-Xi Chen 4, 1, and Yu-xi Liu 5, 6 1 Depa...

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Einstein, On the quantum theory of radiation, Phys

A. Einstein, On the quantum theory of radiation, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917)

work page 1917

[2] [2]

(7) The eﬃciency for nonreciprocity transport can be de- scribed by the the scattering ﬂow [ 53–56]Il′l for a single photon from CR W-l to CR W-l′ (l = a,b )

with ∆ a = ∆ b = 0 as ~Heﬀ =Jab |a⟩ ⟨b| +Jba |b⟩ ⟨a| −iΓ a |a⟩ ⟨a| −iΓ b |b⟩ ⟨b|, (6) and the interaction Hamiltonian Hint between the 0th cavity modes and the three-level atom is described by Hint =gaa0 |a⟩ ⟨g| +gbb0 |b⟩ ⟨g| +gaa† 0 |g⟩ ⟨a| +gbb† 0 |g⟩ ⟨b|. (7) The eﬃciency for nonreciprocity transport can be de- scribed by the the scattering ﬂow [ 53–56...

work page

[3] [3]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Ampliﬁcation via Reservoir Engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [4]

The system can be described by the total Hamiltonian under the rotat- ing wave approximation Htot = ∑ l=a,b Hl + ~Heﬀ +Hint

Here ga (gb) is the coupling strength between CR W-a (CR W-b) and the transition |a⟩ ↔ |g⟩ (|b⟩ ↔ | g⟩) with frequency ω ag (ω bg). The system can be described by the total Hamiltonian under the rotat- ing wave approximation Htot = ∑ l=a,b Hl + ~Heﬀ +Hint. Here, in the rotating reference frame with respect to Hrot =ω ag ( ∑ ja† jaj + |a⟩ ⟨a| ) +ω bg ( ∑ j...

work page

[5] [5]

M. O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

work page 1997

[6] [6]

K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic mag - netism and reservoir engineering, Nature Phys. 13, 465 (2017)

work page 2017

[7] [7]

X. W. Xu and Y. Li, Optical nonreciprocity and optome- chanical circulator in three-mode optomechanical systems , Phys. Rev. A 91, 053854 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

X. W. Xu, Y. Li, A. X. Chen, and Y. X. Liu, Nonrecipro- cal conversion between microwave and optical photons in electro-optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023827 (2016)

work page 2016