Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

BOW: Training Language Models to Reason Over Plausible Next Words

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.13502 v3 pith:IFB5D6HK submitted 2025-06-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords coremodelsnext-wordrewardtrajectorybow-regcontextplausible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Next-word prediction (NWP) trains language models against a single observed continuation, even though many contexts admit multiple plausible next words. Recent RL-based next-word reasoning methods make this tension explicit: they reward a model for producing a rationale that supports one context-conditioned continuation, which can turn a pre-existing preference into a confident, self-justifying trajectory. We introduce BOW, an RL framework that instead trains models to produce self-contained, neutral, and comprehensive descriptions of the plausible next-word space. BOW's core reward is mediated by the generated trajectory. The policy conditions on the full context, but a frozen scorer assigns the core reward from the trajectory alone, without receiving the original context as a separate input. The trajectory may restate relevant context; the bottleneck is the missing direct context-to-scorer path in the core reward. BOW-Reg adds a lightweight breadth regularizer around this core term to discourage premature collapse. Across ten general reasoning benchmarks, BOW remains competitive with the original instruction models and often outperforms trained baselines. On both backbones, BOW-Reg achieves the highest SharedRef correctness and the lowest HoWN-Simple single-sense collapse. Human evaluation further shows that BOW-Reg elicits broader next-word reasoning trajectories, while intrinsic NWP results show that these trajectories remain predictive.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Likelihood scoring for continuations of mathematical text: a self-supervised benchmark with tests for shortcut vulnerabilities

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Presents a likelihood-based benchmark for equation-suffix prediction in technical papers with controls to detect shortcut vulnerabilities in model forecasts.

  2. Likelihood scoring for continuations of mathematical text: a self-supervised benchmark with tests for shortcut vulnerabilities

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark uses separate predictor and scorer LLMs to test whether forecast strings improve likelihood of hidden mathematical equation continuations, with controls that detect priming shortcuts.

  3. RECAP: Transparent Inference-Time Emotion Alignment for Medical Dialogue Systems

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    RECAP is an inference-time framework using cognitive appraisal theory to enhance emotional alignment and transparency in medical dialogue systems across model scales.

Pith tools