Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LQR through the Lens of First Order Methods: Discrete-time Case

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.08921 v2 pith:IGJ4H3KK submitted 2019-07-21 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

classification eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC
keywords gradientdescentflowsnaturalflowpropertyquasi-newtonalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the Linear-Quadratic-Regulator (LQR) problem in terms of optimizing a real-valued matrix function over the set of feedback gains. Such a setup facilitates examining the implications of a natural initial-state independent formulation of LQR in designing first order algorithms. It is shown that this cost function is smooth and coercive, and provide an alternate means of noting its gradient dominated property. In the process, we provide a number of analytic observations on the LQR cost when directly analyzed in terms of the feedback gain. We then examine three types of well-posed flows for LQR: gradient flow, natural gradient flow and the quasi-Newton flow. The coercive property suggests that these flows admit unique solutions while gradient dominated property indicates that the corresponding Lyapunov functionals decay at an exponential rate; we also prove that these flows are exponentially stable in the sense of Lyapunov. We then discuss the forward Euler discretization of these flows, realized as gradient descent, natural gradient descent and the quasi-Newton iteration. We present stepsize criteria for gradient descent and natural gradient descent, guaranteeing that both algorithms converge linearly to the global optima. An optimal stepsize for the quasi-Newton iteration is also proposed, guaranteeing a $Q$-quadratic convergence rate--and in the meantime--recovering the Hewer algorithm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hidden Star-Convexity in Policy Optimization for Gain-Scheduled LQR: Extended Version

    math.OC 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For gain-scheduled LQR, the cost is exactly star-convex about the optimum under a covariance-substituted gradient, and a single mismatch ratio below one certifies linear convergence of gradient descent.

  2. Minimizing Smooth Kurdyka-{\L}ojasiewicz Functions via Generalized Descent Methods: Convergence Rate and Complexity

    math.OC 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Descent methods obeying f(x_{k+1}) ≤ f(x_k) − ρ‖∇f(x_k)‖^θ converge linearly when θ equals the inverse KL exponent, with a unified rate/complexity analysis.

Pith tools