Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 65 references

Thermal $n$-Point Conformal Blocks in Four Dimensions from Oscillator Representations

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper derives an explicit q-series for the four-dimensional thermal n-point conformal block in the projection channel and shows it reduces to the vacuum (n+2)-point comb block at low temperature.

desk verdict A real computation of a restricted (equal-weight) thermal projection block in d=4, with honest checks, but the title and abstract overstate the scope and two key identities are asserted rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22974 v1 pith:IH4PWJXY submitted 2025-07-30 hep-th gr-qc

Martin Ammon , Jakob Hollweck , Tobias Hössel , Katharina Wölfl This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 11.25.Hf
keywords thermalconformalblocksprojectionchanneloscillatorrepresentationSU(2)Clebsch-GordancoefficientsBergmanspacefinitetemperatureCFTbootstrapspinnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Thermal correlation functions on the Euclidean cylinder $\mathbb{S}^1_\beta \times \mathbb{S}^3$ decompose into conformal blocks, and these blocks are the kinematic input needed to turn finite-temperature crossing equations into constraints on the one-point coefficients of a CFT. Until now, explicit thermal blocks in more than two dimensions were known only for one point. The paper establishes that for scalar external operators with scalar exchange, the $n$-point thermal block in the projection channel, where projectors onto each exchanged operator are inserted cyclically inside the trace, is a $q$-series whose terms are weighted SU(2) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, written compactly as (4.18). The same formula reproduces the known one-point block to order $q^{25}$ and degenerates, as $q\to0$, to the vacuum $(n+2)$-point comb-channel block. This matters because it turns higher-point thermal bootstrap from a program into a concrete, checkable computation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the weighted Bergman space $HL^2_\Delta(\mathbb{D}_4)$ of holomorphic functions on the symmetric space of the four-dimensional conformal group, with oscillator wavefunctions $\Omega(x;U_1,U_2^\dagger)$ built from determinant factors. The paper evaluates four-fold inner products of the basis polynomials $\phi^{j,m}_{a,b}(U)=\det^m(U)D^j_{a,b}(U)$ by decomposing $\mathbb{D}_4$ as $U=U_a\Xi U_b^\dagger$, which reduces the angular integrations to SU(2) Clebsch-Gordan sums. The resulting $(2,2)$-integral identity (C.25) is the engine that turns every gluing of oscillator wavefunctions into the $q$-series of weighted $T$-functions appearing in the block formula (4.18).

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the claimed $(1,2)$-integral identity (C.22) for non-diagonal quantum numbers such as $j_1=2$, $j_2=3$, $j_3=1$ and values of $m_i,a_i,b_i$ satisfying the selection rules, by direct quadrature over $\mathbb{D}_4$ with the measure (3.2), and compare against the Clebsch-Gordan product with normalization (C.21); any mismatch would invalidate the product expansion (C.24) and hence the block formulas (3.36) and (4.18).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a closed, computable expression for the thermal $n$-point conformal block in the projection (necklace) channel in four dimensions: $$$G^{{(n)}}$_{\mathrm{Proj.}}(q,X_1,\ldots,X_n)=$q^{{\Delta_1}}$\prod_{i=1}^n $r_i^{{\Delta_i-2\tilde\gamma_i}}$\sum_{(1),\ldots,(n)} $q^{{2(j_n+m_n)}}$\prod_{i=1}^n T_{(i-1),(i)}(\tilde\beta_{i-1},\tilde\gamma_{i-1},\tilde\alpha_i,\tilde\beta_i\,|\, X_{i-1}^{-1},X_i^T),$$ with the cyclic identification $X_0^{-1}=qX_n^{-1}$, for scalar external operators and scalar exchange. The $T$-functions are contractions of SU(2) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients weighted by Bergman-space normalization factors. The claim includes two structural limits: as $q\to0$ the formula becomes the vacuum $(n+2)$-point block in the comb channel, and for $n=1$ it matches the known thermal one-point block to order $q^{25}$. All of it is built from a single integral identity, the $(2,2)$-integral of the oscillator basis functions over $\mathbb{D}_4$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation rests on an unproved normalization identity (C.21) that fixes the coefficient of the $(1,2)$-integral; if that identity fails for some quantum numbers, all thermal and vacuum block formulas would be off, and the one-point check to order $q^{25}$ could miss it because it only probes diagonal Clebsch-Gordan combinations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thermal bootstrap equations for higher-point correlators on $\mathbb{S}^1_\beta\times\mathbb{S}^3$ can be written explicitly for scalar data, since the projection-channel blocks entering the expansion are now known.
  • The low-temperature limit gives a direct dictionary: every thermal $n$-point block contains the vacuum $(n+2)$-point comb block as its leading term, so vacuum data are automatically reproduced.
  • Because the blocks are weighted SU(2) spin-network series with terminating hypergeometric coefficients, numerical evaluation can reuse spin-network contraction algorithms rather than solving new Casimir differential equations.
  • The same construction extends to angular potentials by inserting simple phase factors on the magnetic quantum numbers, so twisted thermal boundary conditions are covered without additional machinery.
  • Setting one external dimension to zero reduces the blocks to lower-point blocks, giving a consistency hierarchy among the formulas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to evaluate the one-point block at higher order or with non-diagonal quantum numbers; if the normalization identity (C.21) is ever wrong, this is where it would show up.
  • If the $T$-functions admit generating functions analogous to the two-dimensional $\tau$-coefficients, the block could be resummed to access the high-temperature $q\to1$ limit for $n\ge2$, which the paper leaves open.
  • The same $(2,2)$-integral should allow spinning exchanges by promoting projectors to carry spin labels; the scalar-only restriction appears to be a computational choice, not a limitation of the oscillator setup.
  • These blocks make it possible to compute finite-temperature four-point functions by summing over an infinite set of four-point crossing constraints, which is the higher-dimensional analogue of the rationale for multipoint bootstrap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper defines and computes a class of thermal correlation functions on S^1_β × S^3 obtained by inserting n projectors P_{Δ_i} into the trace, evaluates the resulting integrals over the Bergman space on D_4 using expansions in SU(2) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, and writes the result (4.18) as a q-series of weighted SU(2) spin-network contractions. The authors verify the one-point case against the literature, study the q→0 limit to the vacuum comb block, and discuss angular potentials and a two-dimensional analog. A central caveat is that the projectors and gluing dimensions in (2.3), (4.16)–(4.17), and (3.25) are tied to the external operator dimensions, so the computed object is a diagonal/equal-weight subclass rather than the general scalar-exchange thermal n-point block advertised in the title.

Significance. The oscillator/graphical method and the D_4 integral evaluations are a useful step toward higher-point thermal blocks; the formulas are explicit, parameter-free, and supported by external checks for n = 1. If the equal-weight restriction is removed and the Casimir characterization is supplied, the approach would likely yield genuinely new results. As it stands, the novelty is narrower than claimed, but the technical core (weighted intertwiners, T-functions, the (2,2)-integral) is substantial and likely salvageable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.3); Section 4, Eqs. (4.16)–(4.18); Section 3, Eqs. (3.25), (3.32), (3.36)] The object computed in (4.18) is not the general thermal n-point conformal block with scalar exchange. In the defining trace (2.3) the i-th projector is P_{Δ_i}, and in the gluing (4.16)–(4.17) the Ω-wavefunction between U_i and U^†_{i+1} uses exponents formed from Δ_i and Δ_{i+1}; hence each internal line is fixed to the dimension of the adjacent external operator. A general necklace/block would contain independent internal dimensions δ_1,...,δ_n, for which the exponents would read α̃_i = (Δ_i + δ_i − δ_{i+1})/2, β̃_i = (δ_i + δ_{i+1} − Δ_i)/2, γ̃_i = (Δ_i + δ_{i+1} − δ_i)/2 and the overall q-power would be q^{δ_1}. The same restriction applies to the vacuum comb block (3.25)–(3.36) and therefore to the claimed q→0 limit. The title and abstract should be amended to state this equal-weight restriction, or the calculation should be generalized.
  2. [Section 2, Eqs. (2.9)–(2.10)] The paper explicitly omits the Casimir equation for the n-point thermal block. The one-point case is known to satisfy the Casimir equation, and for the vacuum comb block the authors assert (3.28) without proof. For (4.18) to be called a conformal block, the authors should either prove the relevant Casimir eigenvalue equations (with eigenvalues Δ_j(Δ_j−4) if their equal-weight choice is maintained) or explicitly state that 'conformal block' is used as a synonym for the projector-defined object (2.3). As written, the identification is not demonstrated.
  3. [Appendix C.2, Eqs. (C.19)–(C.21)] The normalization identity (C.21) is a nontrivial finite sum over Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and radial integrals; the text asserts it with 'one obtains' and no derivation. This identity fixes the (1,2)-integral (C.22), which in turn underlies the product expansion (C.24), the (2,2)-integral (C.25), and hence every block formula in Sections 3 and 4. A proof or precise reference is required; the absence of one is a load-bearing gap.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Footnote 2] There is a duplicated phrase 'proposed in proposed in [39–42]' that should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.18)] The sentence 'which in the case of i = 1, i − 1 evaluates as n and X^{-1}_{i−1} as qX^{-1}_n' is unclear; it should be restated as a cyclic-index convention, for example X^{-1}_0 ≡ q X^{-1}_n.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.38)–(3.39)] The reduction to an (n−1)-point block sets Δ_{i+1}=0 and Δ_{i−1}=Δ_i, which is a valid consistency check but not the general OPE limit; the notation in (3.39) also changes the projector labels without explaining the relabeling.
  4. [Abstract and Section 5] The abstract describes the expressions as 'a series of terminating hypergeometric functions'; since the sums over block indices are infinite, the phrase 'series of terminating hypergeometric functions' should be clarified to avoid implying that the full block is a finite sum.
  5. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.12)] The check 'up to O(q^{25})' is a numerical check; the authors should state the truncation order explicitly and indicate which sets of quantum numbers were included in the comparison.
  6. [Section 5, final paragraph] There is a typo in 'we have so far restricted ourselves so far to the scalar exchange'; the duplicated 'so far' should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the block formulae are direct parameter-free evaluations; the one self-citation supplies the oscillator framework, not the thermal result.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. The thermal n-point block is defined in Eq. (2.3) as a trace with scalar projectors P_{Δ_i}, and Eq. (4.18) is obtained by expanding the oscillator wavefunctions (4.16) and evaluating the D4 integrals using the (2,2)-integral (C.25). All coefficients are fixed by the normalization constants (3.10) and SU(2) Clebsch-Gordan data; no parameter is fitted to any target output. External checks anchor the result: the one-point block reproduces [24,26] up to O(q^25), the zero-point limit matches the character (4.15), and the q to 0 limit is internally consistent with the comb-block computation. The only self-citation, [43], supplies the oscillator representation framework that is reviewed and partially re-derived in Section 3.1; it does not assume the thermal n-point result. The unproved summation identity (C.21) is a normalization step internal to the integral computation and is not equivalent to any final block formula; it is a correctness risk, not a circular step. The skeptic's point about Eq. (4.17) fixing exchange weights to the adjacent external dimensions is a scope limitation: (4.18) computes the equal-weight specialization of the projection-channel block, not the most general scalar-exchange block, and the title and abstract overstate that generality. This does not make the derivation circular, because the computation evaluates exactly the object defined in Eq. (2.3).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the completeness of the Bergman-space basis (external, from [46]), the measure decomposition on D4 (external, based on [64]), standard SU(2) recoupling identities, and the paper's own definition of the projection-channel block with internal weights equal to external weights. No free parameters are fitted. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The base polynomials phi^{j,m}_{a,b} form a complete orthogonal basis of the weighted Bergman space HL^2_Delta(D4).
    Cited from [46,63]. Used in the reproducing kernel (3.12), the resolution of identity (2.5), the inner product (C.1), and the product expansion (C.24) that underlies all block computations.
  • standard math The decomposition of SU(2,2) elements and the measure on D4 given in (C.3)-(C.12) are valid.
    Based on [64]. This decomposition is the foundation for all radial and angular integral evaluations in appendix C, including the central (1,2)- and (2,2)-integrals.
  • standard math The SU(2) integration identities (B.12)-(B.14) for products of Wigner D-matrices are correct.
    Standard recoupling theory from [55]. Used to evaluate the angular integrals over U(2)/U(1)^2 in appendix C.2.
  • domain assumption The thermal n-point projection channel block is defined by (2.3) with each projector P_{Delta_i} projecting onto the representation of the adjacent external operator O_{Delta_i}.
    This fixes the internal exchanged weights to equal the external weights. The fully general necklace block with independent internal exchange dimensions is not treated, so this definition is a substantive restriction of the projection channel concept.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal $n$-Point Conformal Blocks in Four Dimensions from Oscillator Representations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IH4PWJXY

@misc{pith2026250722974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal $n$-Point Conformal Blocks in Four Dimensions from Oscillator Representations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IH4PWJXY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22974}
}
abstract

We define and compute the four-dimensional thermal $n$-point conformal block in the projection channel using oscillator representations on $\mathbb{S}^1_\beta \times \mathbb{S}^3$. This is done by evaluating a class of integrals over the homogeneous space $\mathbb{D}_4$ of the four-dimensional conformal group. We restrict ourselves to scalar external operators and scalar exchange. In the low-temperature limit, our result reduces correctly to the vacuum $(n+2)$-point block in the comb channel. The corresponding expressions can be written as a series of terminating hypergeometric functions or equivalently, a series of weighted SU(2) spin-networks. Alternatively, functions adapted to the SU(2,2) representation are introduced and some properties are discussed.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ferrara, A.F

    S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo and R. Gatto, Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion , Annals Phys. 76 (1973) 161

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    Polyakov, Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory , Zh

    A.M. Polyakov, Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66 (1974) 23

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    Rattazzi, V.S

    R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP 12 (2008) 031 [ 0807.0004]. 18That their τ -coefficients match ours in equation (D.13) can be checked by calculating their respective (exponential) generating functions. – 33 –

    arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    El-Showk, M.F

    S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025022 [ 1203.6064]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Hartman, D

    T. Hartman, D. Mazac, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Snowmass White Paper: The Analytic Conformal Bootstrap, in Snowmass 2021 , 2, 2022 [ 2202.11012]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Antunes, S

    A. Antunes, S. Harris, A. Kaviraj and V. Schomerus, Lining up a positive semi-definite six-point bootstrap, JHEP 24 (2020) 058 [ 2312.11660]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Harmonic Analysis in d-dimensional Superconformal Field Theory

    I. Buric, Harmonic Analysis in d-dimensional Superconformal Field Theory , SIGMA 17 (2021) 007 [2009.00393]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Harris, Sparsity in the numerical six-point bootstrap , 2507.00124

    S. Harris, Sparsity in the numerical six-point bootstrap , 2507.00124

    work page arXiv

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Rosenhaus, Multipoint Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel , JHEP 02 (2019) 142 [1810.03244]

    V. Rosenhaus, Multipoint Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel , JHEP 02 (2019) 142 [1810.03244]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Petkou and A

    A.C. Petkou and A. Stergiou, Dynamics of Finite-Temperature Conformal Field Theories from Operator Product Expansion Inversion Formulas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 071602 [1806.02340]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Iliesiu, M

    L. Iliesiu, M. Koloˇ glu, R. Mahajan, E. Perlmutter and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Conformal Bootstrap at Finite Temperature, JHEP 10 (2018) 070 [ 1802.10266]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Iliesiu, M

    L. Iliesiu, M. Kolo˘ glu and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising model at finite temperature, JHEP 12 (2019) 072 [ 1811.05451]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Karlsson, A

    R. Karlsson, A. Parnachev, V. Prilepina and S. Valach, Thermal stress tensor correlators, OPE and holography, JHEP 09 (2022) 234 [ 2206.05544]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Alday, M

    L.F. Alday, M. Kologlu and A. Zhiboedov, Holographic correlators at finite temperature, JHEP 06 (2021) 082 [ 2009.10062]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Dodelson, A

    M. Dodelson, A. Grassi, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Zhiboedov, Holographic thermal correlators from supersymmetric instantons , SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 116 [ 2206.07720]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Huang, R

    K.-W. Huang, R. Karlsson, A. Parnachev and S. Valach, Freedom near lightcone and ANEC saturation, JHEP 05 (2023) 065 [ 2210.16274]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Dodelson, C

    M. Dodelson, C. Iossa, R. Karlsson and A. Zhiboedov, A thermal product formula , JHEP 01 (2024) 036 [ 2304.12339]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Esper, K.-W

    C. Esper, K.-W. Huang, R. Karlsson, A. Parnachev and S. Valach, Thermal stress tensor correlators near lightcone and holography , JHEP 11 (2023) 107 [ 2306.00787]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Marchetto, A

    E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia and E. Pomoni, Sum rules & Tauberian theorems at finite temperature, JHEP 09 (2024) 044 [ 2312.13030]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Barrat, B

    J. Barrat, B. Fiol, E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia and E. Pomoni, Conformal line defects at finite temperature, SciPost Phys. 18 (2025) 018 [ 2407.14600]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Buri´ c, I

    I. Buri´ c, I. Gusev and A. Parnachev, Thermal holographic correlators and KMS condition , 2505.10277

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Barrat, E

    J. Barrat, E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia and E. Pomoni, Thermal Bootstrap for the Critical O(N) Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 211604 [ 2411.00978]. – 34 –

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Barrat, D.N

    J. Barrat, D.N. Bozkurt, E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia and E. Pomoni, The analytic bootstrap at finite temperature, 2506.06422

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Buric, F

    I. Buric, F. Russo, V. Schomerus and A. Vichi, Thermal one-point functions and their partial wave decomposition, JHEP 12 (2024) 021 [ 2408.02747]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Buri´ c, F

    I. Buri´ c, F. Mangialardi, F. Russo, V. Schomerus and A. Vichi, Heavy-Heavy-Light Asymptotics from Thermal Correlators , 2506.21671

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gobeil, A

    Y. Gobeil, A. Maloney, G.S. Ng and J.-q. Wu, Thermal Conformal Blocks , SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 015 [1802.10537]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Alkalaev and S

    K. Alkalaev and S. Mandrygin, One-point thermal conformal blocks from four-point conformal integrals, JHEP 10 (2024) 241 [ 2407.01741]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek, Recursive representation of the torus 1-point conformal block, JHEP 01 (2010) 063 [ 0911.2353]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kraus, A

    P. Kraus, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield, G.S. Ng and J.-q. Wu, Witten Diagrams for Torus Conformal Blocks, JHEP 09 (2017) 149 [ 1706.00047]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin, Recursive Representations of Arbitrary Virasoro Conformal Blocks, JHEP 04 (2019) 018 [ 1703.09805]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Alkalaev and V.A

    K.B. Alkalaev and V.A. Belavin, Holographic duals of large-c torus conformal blocks , JHEP 10 (2017) 140 [ 1707.09311]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Alkalaev and V

    K. Alkalaev and V. Belavin, More on Wilson toroidal networks and torus blocks , JHEP 11 (2020) 121 [2007.10494]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Alkalaev, S

    K. Alkalaev, S. Mandrygin and M. Pavlov, Torus conformal blocks and Casimir equations in the necklace channel, JHEP 10 (2022) 091 [ 2205.05038]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Alkalaev and S

    K. Alkalaev and S. Mandrygin, Torus shadow formalism and exact global conformal blocks , JHEP 11 (2023) 157 [ 2307.12061]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Pavlov, Global torus blocks in the necklace channel , Eur

    M. Pavlov, Global torus blocks in the necklace channel , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1026 [2302.10153]

    2023

  28. [36]

    Dolan and H

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 599 (2001) 459 [ hep-th/0011040]

    2001 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Dolan and H

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 491 [ hep-th/0309180]

    2004 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dolan and H

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results , 1108.6194

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Buric, S

    I. Buric, S. Lacroix, J.A. Mann, L. Quintavalle and V. Schomerus, From Gaudin Integrable Models to d-dimensional Multipoint Conformal Blocks , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 021602 [ 2009.11882]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Buric, S

    I. Buric, S. Lacroix, J.A. Mann, L. Quintavalle and V. Schomerus, Gaudin models and multipoint conformal blocks: general theory , JHEP 10 (2021) 139 [ 2105.00021]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Buric, S

    I. Buric, S. Lacroix, J.A. Mann, L. Quintavalle and V. Schomerus, Gaudin models and multipoint conformal blocks. Part II. Comb channel vertices in 3D and 4D , JHEP 11 (2021) 182 [2108.00023]. – 35 –

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Buric, S

    I. Buric, S. Lacroix, J.A. Mann, L. Quintavalle and V. Schomerus, Gaudin models and multipoint conformal blocks III: comb channel coordinates and OPE factorisation , JHEP 06 (2022) 144 [2112.10827]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Ammon, J

    M. Ammon, J. Hollweck, T. H¨ ossel and K. W¨ olfl,Conformal Blocks in Two and Four Dimensions from Oscillator Representations , 2406.19436

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Besken, S

    M. Besken, S. Datta and P. Kraus, Quantum thermalization and Virasoro symmetry , J. Stat. Mech. 2006 (2020) 063104 [ 1907.06661]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Luscher and G

    M. Luscher and G. Mack, Global Conformal Invariance in Quantum Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 41 (1975) 203

    1975

  38. [46]

    Calixto and E

    M. Calixto and E. Perez-Romero, Extended MacMahon-Schwinger’s Master Theorem and Conformal Wavelets in Complex Minkowski Space , arXiv e-prints (2010) arXiv:1002.3498 [1002.3498]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fortin, W

    J.-F. Fortin, W. Ma and W. Skiba, Higher-Point Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel , JHEP 07 (2020) 213 [ 1911.11046]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Parikh, A multipoint conformal block chain in d dimensions, JHEP 05 (2020) 120 [1911.09190]

    S. Parikh, A multipoint conformal block chain in d dimensions, JHEP 05 (2020) 120 [1911.09190]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Dolan, Character formulae and partition functions in higher dimensional conformal field theory, J

    F.A. Dolan, Character formulae and partition functions in higher dimensional conformal field theory, J. Math. Phys. 47 (2006) 062303 [ hep-th/0508031]

    2006 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Gozzini, A high-performance code for EPRL spin foam amplitudes , Class

    F. Gozzini, A high-performance code for EPRL spin foam amplitudes , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 225010 [ 2107.13952]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Dona and G

    P. Dona and G. Sarno, Numerical methods for EPRL spin foam transition amplitudes and Lorentzian recoupling theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 (2018) 127 [ 1807.03066]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Dona and P

    P. Dona and P. Frisoni, How-to Compute EPRL Spin Foam Amplitudes , Universe 8 (2022) 208 [2202.04360]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    https://github.com/Jutho/TensorOperations.jl, 10.5281/zenodo.3245496

    Devos, Lukas, and Van Damme, Maarten and Haegeman, Jutho, Tensoroperations.jl, (10, 2023). https://github.com/Jutho/TensorOperations.jl, 10.5281/zenodo.3245496

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    Perlmutter, Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form , JHEP 08 (2015) 088 [ 1502.07742]

    E. Perlmutter, Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form , JHEP 08 (2015) 088 [ 1502.07742]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Varshalovich, A.N

    D.A. Varshalovich, A.N. Moskalev and V.K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, WORLD SCIENTIFIC (1988), 10.1142/0270, [https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/0270]

    1988 doi

  48. [56]

    Fortin, W.-J

    J.-F. Fortin, W.-J. Ma and W. Skiba, Seven-point conformal blocks in the extended snowflake channel and beyond , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 125007 [ 2006.13964]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Fortin, W.-J

    J.-F. Fortin, W.-J. Ma and W. Skiba, Six-point conformal blocks in the snowflake channel , JHEP 11 (2020) 147 [ 2004.02824]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Benjamin, J

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri and D. Simmons-Duffin, Universal asymptotics for high energy CFT data , JHEP 03 (2024) 115 [ 2306.08031]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Shaghoulian, Modular forms and a generalized Cardy formula in higher dimensions , Phys

    E. Shaghoulian, Modular forms and a generalized Cardy formula in higher dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 126005 [ 1508.02728]. – 36 –

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, J. Kruthoff, B. Michel, E. Shaghoulian and M. Shyani, Universality of sparse d >2 conformal field theory at large N , JHEP 03 (2017) 067 [ 1610.06186]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ruehl, Lorentz group and harmonic analysis , W

    W. Ruehl, Lorentz group and harmonic analysis , W. A. Benjamin, Inc. (1970)

    1970

  54. [62]

    M¨ akinen,Introduction to SU(2) Recoupling Theory and Graphical Methods for Loop Quantum Gravity, 1910.06821

    I. M¨ akinen,Introduction to SU(2) Recoupling Theory and Graphical Methods for Loop Quantum Gravity, 1910.06821

    1910 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Calixto and E

    M. Calixto and E. P´ erez-Romero,Extended MacMahon–schwinger’s master theorem and conformal wavelets in complex minkowski space , Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 31 (2011) 143

    2011

  56. [64]

    R¨ uhl,Distributions on minkowski space and their connection with analytic representations of the conformal group , Commun

    W. R¨ uhl,Distributions on minkowski space and their connection with analytic representations of the conformal group , Commun. Math. Phys. 27 (1972) 53

    1972

  57. [65]

    Martin-Dussaud, A Primer of Group Theory for Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin-foams , Gen

    P. Martin-Dussaud, A Primer of Group Theory for Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin-foams , Gen. Rel. Grav. 51 (2019) 110 [ 1902.08439]. – 37 –

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.