REVIEW 1 cited by
Ethical Reasoning over Moral Alignment: A Case and Framework for In-Context Ethical Policies in LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this position paper, we argue that instead of morally aligning LLMs to specific set of ethical principles, we should infuse generic ethical reasoning capabilities into them so that they can handle value pluralism at a global scale. When provided with an ethical policy, an LLM should be capable of making decisions that are ethically consistent to the policy. We develop a framework that integrates moral dilemmas with moral principles pertaining to different foramlisms of normative ethics, and at different levels of abstractions. Initial experiments with GPT-x models shows that while GPT-4 is a nearly perfect ethical reasoner, the models still have bias towards the moral values of Western and English speaking societies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Deontological Keyword Bias: The Impact of Modal Expressions on Normative Judgments of Language Models
LLMs systematically treat modal words like 'must' as evidence of obligation even in non-obligatory contexts, more strongly than humans, and a few-shot plus reasoning prompt can lower the rate of such judgments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.