Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Imitating Graph-Based Planning with Goal-Conditioned Policies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.11166 v1 pith:IHY5HVOR submitted 2023-03-20 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords goal-conditionedgraph-basedplanningpoliciespolicytaskslearninglong-horizon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, graph-based planning algorithms have gained much attention to solve goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) tasks: they provide a sequence of subgoals to reach the target-goal, and the agents learn to execute subgoal-conditioned policies. However, the sample-efficiency of such RL schemes still remains a challenge, particularly for long-horizon tasks. To address this issue, we present a simple yet effective self-imitation scheme which distills a subgoal-conditioned policy into the target-goal-conditioned policy. Our intuition here is that to reach a target-goal, an agent should pass through a subgoal, so target-goal- and subgoal- conditioned policies should be similar to each other. We also propose a novel scheme of stochastically skipping executed subgoals in a planned path, which further improves performance. Unlike prior methods that only utilize graph-based planning in an execution phase, our method transfers knowledge from a planner along with a graph into policy learning. We empirically show that our method can significantly boost the sample-efficiency of the existing goal-conditioned RL methods under various long-horizon control tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Closing the Gap between TD Learning and Supervised Learning with $Q$-Conditioned Maximization

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GCReinSL adds Q-conditioned maximization to supervised offline RL, using normalizing flows to estimate goal-reaching probabilities and expectile regression to condition actions on the best in-distribution value, impro...

Pith tools