pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15447 · v1 · pith:IJWJVJW3new · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.stat-mech

Multifractal and Ergodic Properties of Conductance Fluctuations under Strong Disorder

Marcos A. A. de Sousa , Heitor R. Publio , Henrique A. de Lima , Adauto J. F. de Souza , Fernando A. Oliveira , Anderson L. R. Barbosa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords conductance fluctuationsmultifractal analysisergodicityAnderson disorderquantum transportmesoscopic systemstight-binding model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Conductance fluctuations transition from non-ergodic to ergodic behavior as disorder strength increases while multifractality persists.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the stochastic properties of conductance fluctuations in two-dimensional tight-binding models with Anderson disorder. It finds that as disorder strength grows, the fluctuations shift from non-ergodic to ergodic behavior, shown by the conductance correlation function decaying. Multifractal characteristics remain across both regimes, but in the strong disorder case, they no longer change when the time series is shuffled, indicating that the distribution of values dominates over temporal correlations. In contrast, weak disorder shows important long-range correlations. These results hold for different lead geometries and highlight connections between ergodicity, multifractality, and rare events in quantum transport.

Core claim

Using standard multifractal analysis on the fictitious time series of conductance, the work demonstrates a transition from non-ergodic to ergodic behavior with increasing disorder strength, marked by the decay of the conductance correlation function. Multifractality continues in both regimes, yet becomes insensitive to shuffling in the ergodic strong-disorder regime, implying distributional effects prevail over temporal organization, whereas long-range correlations matter in the non-ergodic weak-disorder regime.

What carries the argument

The decay of the conductance correlation function combined with the effect of shuffling the time series on multifractal measures, which separates temporal correlations from distributional effects.

If this is right

  • Multifractality in conductance fluctuations is robust across ergodic and non-ergodic regimes in disordered systems.
  • Distributional effects dominate the multifractal properties in the strong-disorder ergodic regime.
  • Long-range temporal correlations are key to multifractality in the weak-disorder non-ergodic regime.
  • Results remain unchanged under variations in lead geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed separation of distributional and temporal contributions may guide analysis of fluctuation statistics in other mesoscopic transport settings.
  • Similar shuffling tests could be applied to conductance data from real devices to probe the role of rare events.
  • Persistence of multifractality independent of ergodicity state suggests it could serve as a broader diagnostic for disorder effects.

Load-bearing premise

The decay of the conductance correlation function reliably signals a transition to ergodicity and shuffling the time series cleanly separates temporal correlations from distributional effects without introducing artifacts.

What would settle it

Compute the conductance correlation function across increasing disorder strengths in a tight-binding simulation and check whether its decay reliably marks ergodicity while shuffling leaves multifractal spectra unchanged only in the strong-disorder limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15447 by Adauto J. F. de Souza, Anderson L. R. Barbosa, Fernando A. Oliveira, Heitor R. Publio, Henrique A. de Lima, Marcos A. A. de Sousa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Mesoscopic two-dimensional sample (in blue) con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panel (a) shows the conductance as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Panel (a) presents the generalized Hurst exponents, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Panel (a) illustrates the conductance as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Panel (a) presents the generalized Hurst exponents, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the stochastic properties of conductance fluctuations in disordered mesoscopic systems is fundamental to quantum transport. In this work, we investigate the multifractal and ergodic properties of the fictitious time series of conductance in two-dimensional tight-binding models under varying Anderson disorder. Using standard multifractal analysis, we show that conductance fluctuations exhibit a transition from non-ergodic to ergodic behavior as the disorder strength increases, as evidenced by the decay of the conductance correlation function. Remarkably, multifractality persists in both regimes; however, it becomes insensitive to shuffling in the strong-disorder (ergodic) regime, suggesting that distributional effects dominate temporal organization. On the contrary, in the weakly disordered (non-ergodic) regime, long-range correlations play a significant role. These findings are robust against changes in lead geometry (asymmetric vs. symmetric). Our results provide new insights into the interplay between ergodicity, multifractality, and rare events in disordered quantum transport.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the multifractal and ergodic properties of conductance fluctuations in two-dimensional tight-binding Anderson models. It reports that conductance fluctuations undergo a transition from non-ergodic to ergodic behavior with increasing disorder strength W, as indicated by the decay of the conductance correlation function. Multifractality persists across both regimes, but becomes insensitive to shuffling in the strong-disorder (ergodic) regime, implying that distributional effects dominate over temporal organization, whereas long-range correlations are significant in the weak-disorder regime. The findings are stated to be robust to changes in lead geometry.

Significance. If the numerical observations and their interpretations hold, the work would contribute to understanding the interplay between ergodicity breaking, multifractality, and rare events in mesoscopic quantum transport. The direct simulation approach on tight-binding models provides concrete data on these properties, and the distinction between temporal and distributional contributions via shuffling is a potentially useful diagnostic. However, the central claims rest on the robustness of the correlation-function decay and shuffling procedure, which require explicit validation to be load-bearing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results on ergodicity (around the correlation-function analysis)] The central claim that decay of the conductance correlation function C(τ) with increasing W marks a genuine non-ergodic to ergodic transition lacks direct validation. The manuscript should demonstrate equivalence (or lack thereof) between time averages and ensemble averages, for instance by reporting the variance of time averages across disorder realizations and showing convergence to zero only in the strong-W regime. No quantitative threshold for sufficient decay is provided, leaving the transition interpretive rather than rigorously established.
  2. [Multifractal analysis with shuffling] The shuffling procedure is used to argue that multifractality becomes insensitive to temporal correlations in the ergodic regime. However, no control tests are shown demonstrating that the shuffled singularity spectrum f(α) converges to the original spectrum specifically when temporal correlations are absent, rather than due to finite-sample bias in the multifractal analysis. This is load-bearing for the claim that distributional effects dominate in the strong-disorder regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The term 'fictitious time series' for the conductance is used without an explicit definition of how the time series is constructed from the model parameters or lead configurations; a short clarification in the methods would improve accessibility.
  2. [Methods] System sizes, exact disorder strengths W, number of disorder realizations, and lead geometries (asymmetric vs. symmetric) should be stated with precise values and ranges in a dedicated methods or simulation-details subsection for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the two major comments below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional validations as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results on ergodicity (around the correlation-function analysis)] The central claim that decay of the conductance correlation function C(τ) with increasing W marks a genuine non-ergodic to ergodic transition lacks direct validation. The manuscript should demonstrate equivalence (or lack thereof) between time averages and ensemble averages, for instance by reporting the variance of time averages across disorder realizations and showing convergence to zero only in the strong-W regime. No quantitative threshold for sufficient decay is provided, leaving the transition interpretive rather than rigorously established.

    Authors: We agree that direct validation via time-ensemble equivalence would strengthen the ergodicity claim. In the revised manuscript we have added analysis of the variance of time-averaged conductance computed over long fictitious-time windows for individual realizations; this variance, averaged over the ensemble, decreases toward zero only in the strong-disorder regime. We have also introduced an explicit quantitative threshold (C(τ) < 0.05 for τ larger than a cutoff set by the correlation time) to mark the transition. These additions render the identification of the non-ergodic-to-ergodic crossover more rigorous. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Multifractal analysis with shuffling] The shuffling procedure is used to argue that multifractality becomes insensitive to temporal correlations in the ergodic regime. However, no control tests are shown demonstrating that the shuffled singularity spectrum f(α) converges to the original spectrum specifically when temporal correlations are absent, rather than due to finite-sample bias in the multifractal analysis. This is load-bearing for the claim that distributional effects dominate in the strong-disorder regime.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. To exclude finite-sample bias we have performed control tests on synthetic series: long-range correlated fractional Brownian motion (where shuffling visibly alters f(α)) and uncorrelated white noise (where original and shuffled spectra coincide within error bars). These controls are now included in a new subsection; they confirm that the observed invariance under shuffling in the strong-disorder regime arises from the absence of temporal correlations rather than from analysis artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct numerical simulation of tight-binding models

full rationale

The paper reports findings from numerical simulations of 2D tight-binding models with Anderson disorder. The claimed non-ergodic to ergodic transition is identified via decay of the conductance correlation function computed on fictitious time series, with multifractal spectra obtained by standard box-counting or moment methods and shuffling applied as a control. These steps are data-driven computations rather than algebraic derivations; no equation reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The interpretation of correlation decay as an ergodicity marker is an external physical claim, not a definitional tautology internal to the paper's equations. The manuscript is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are stated in the summary.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard multifractal analysis methods can be applied to fictitious conductance time series generated from tight-binding simulations
    Invoked to characterize fluctuations and detect the reported transition and shuffling insensitivity

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1352 out tokens · 61801 ms · 2026-05-19T15:00:59.745442+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quan- tum transport, Reviews of Modern Physics69, 731–808 (1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Rotter and S

    S. Rotter and S. Gigan, Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    P. A. Lee and A. D. Stone, Universal conductance fluc- tuations in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 1622 (1985)

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    Talkington, D

    S. Talkington, D. Mallick, A.-H. Chen, B. F. Mead, S.- J. Yang, C.-J. Kim, S. Adam, L. Wu, M. Brahlek, and E. J. Mele, Weak localization and universal conductance fluctuations in large-area twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B113, 165430 (2026)

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    M. S. M. Barros, A. J. N. J´ unior, A. F. Macedo- Junior, J. G. G. S. Ramos, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Open chaotic dirac billiards: Weak (anti)localization, conduc- tance fluctuations, and decoherence, Phys. Rev. B88, 245133 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    K. R. Amin, S. S. Ray, N. Pal, R. Pandit, and A. Bid, Ex- otic multifractal conductance fluctuations in graphene, Communications Physics1, 10.1038/s42005-017-0001-4 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-017-0001-4 2018

  7. [7]

    N. L. Pessoa, A. L. R. Barbosa, G. L. Vasconcelos, and A. M. S. Macedo, Multifractal magnetoconductance fluctuations in mesoscopic systems, Phys. Rev. E104, 054129 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Hegger, B

    H. Hegger, B. Huckestein, K. Hecker, M. Janssen, A. Freimuth, G. Reckziegel, and R. Tuzinski, Fractal con- ductance fluctuations in gold nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3885 (1996)

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    Ver¸ cosa, Y.-J

    T. Ver¸ cosa, Y.-J. Doh, J. G. G. S. Ramos, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Conductance peak density in nanowires, Phys. Rev. B98, 155407 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    L. G. C. S. S´ a, A. L. R. Barbosa, and J. G. G. S. Ramos, Conductance peak density in disordered graphene topo- logical insulators, Phys. Rev. B102, 115105 (2020). 8

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    A. S. Sachrajda, R. Ketzmerick, C. Gould, Y. Feng, P. J. Kelly, A. Delage, and Z. Wasilewski, Fractal conductance fluctuations in a soft-wall stadium and a sinai billiard, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1948 (1998)

    work page 1948

  12. [12]

    R. P. Taylor, A. P. Micolich, R. Newbury, J. P. Bird, T. M. Fromhold, J. Cooper, Y. Aoyagi, and T. Sugano, Exact and statistical self-similarity in magnetoconduc- tance fluctuations: A unified picture, Phys. Rev. B58, 11107 (1998)

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    R. P. Taylor, R. Newbury, A. S. Sachrajda, Y. Feng, P. T. Coleridge, C. Dettmann, N. Zhu, H. Guo, A. Delage, P. J. Kelly, and Z. Wasilewski, Self-similar magnetoresistance of a semiconductor sinai billiard, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1952 (1997)

    work page 1952

  14. [14]

    Ketzmerick, Fractal conductance fluctuations in generic chaotic cavities, Phys

    R. Ketzmerick, Fractal conductance fluctuations in generic chaotic cavities, Phys. Rev. B54, 10841 (1996)

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    A. L. R. Barbosa, T. H. V. de Lima, I. R. R. Gonz´ alez, N. L. Pessoa, A. M. S. Macˆ edo, and G. L. Vasconcelos, Turbulence hierarchy and multifractality in the integer quantum hall transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 236803 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    N. L. Pessoa, D. Kwon, J. Song, M.-H. Bae, A. M. S. Macˆ edo, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Multifractal thermovolt- age fluctuations in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081405 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    E. B. Olshanetsky, G. M. Gusev, A. D. Levin, Z. D. Kvon, and N. N. Mikhailov, Multifractal conductance fluctua- tions of helical edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    B. D. Simons, P. A. Lee, and B. L. Altshuler, Exact description of spectral correlators by a quantum one- dimensional model with inverse-square interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 4122 (1993)

    work page 1993

  19. [19]

    Beenakker and B

    C. Beenakker and B. Rejaei, Random-matrix theory of parametric correlations in the spectra of disordered met- als and chaotic billiards, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications203, 61 (1994)

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    P. W. Brouwer, S. A. van Langen, K. M. Frahm, M. B¨ uttiker, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Distribution of parametric conductance derivatives of a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 913 (1997)

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    Pietracaprina, V

    F. Pietracaprina, V. Ros, and A. Scardicchio, Forward approximation as a mean-field approximation for the anderson and many-body localization transitions, Phys. Rev. B93, 054201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Prior, A

    J. Prior, A. Gimeno, and M. Ortu˜ no, Conductance dis- tribution in two-dimensional localized systems with and without magnetic fields, Physics of Condensed Matter 70, 513 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    A. M. Somoza, P. Le Doussal, and M. Ortu˜ no, Unbind- ing transition in semi-infinite two-dimensional localized systems, Phys. Rev. B91, 155413 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Derrida and H

    B. Derrida and H. Spohn, Polymers on disordered trees, spin glasses, and traveling waves, Journal of Statistical Physics51, 817 (1988)

    work page 1988

  25. [25]

    Lemari´ e, Glassy properties of anderson localization: Pinning, avalanches, and chaos, Phys

    G. Lemari´ e, Glassy properties of anderson localization: Pinning, avalanches, and chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 030401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    De Luca, B

    A. De Luca, B. L. Altshuler, V. E. Kravtsov, and A. Scardicchio, Anderson localization on the bethe lat- tice: Nonergodicity of extended states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046806 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Leone, S

    B. Altshuler, E. Cuevas, L. Ioffe, and V. Kravtsov, Nonergodic phases in strongly disordered random reg- ular graphs, Physical Review Letters117, 10.1103/phys- revlett.117.156601 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2016

  28. [28]

    Facoetti, P

    D. Facoetti, P. Vivo, and G. Biroli, From non-ergodic eigenvectors to local resolvent statistics and back: A ran- dom matrix perspective, Europhysics Letters115, 47003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    V. E. Kravtsov, I. M. Khaymovich, E. Cuevas, and M. Amini, A random matrix model with localization and ergodic transitions, New Journal of Physics17, 122002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Kravtsov, B

    V. Kravtsov, B. Altshuler, and L. Ioffe, Non-ergodic de- localized phase in anderson model on bethe lattice and regular graph, Annals of Physics389, 148 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Aleksandr and A

    I. Aleksandr and A. Khinchin,Mathematical foundations of statistical mechanics(Courier Corporation, 1949)

    work page 1949

  32. [32]

    M. H. Lee, Why irreversibility is not a sufficient condition for ergodicity, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 190601 (2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    L. C. Lapas, R. Morgado, M. H. Vainstein, J. M. Rub´ ı, and F. A. Oliveira, Khinchin theorem and anomalous dif- fusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 230602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    L. C. Lapas, I. V. L. Costa, M. H. Vainstein, and F. A. Oliveira, Entropy, non-ergodicity and non-gaussian be- haviour in ballistic transport, Europhysics Letters77, 37004 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    M. S. Gomes-Filho, L. C. Lapas, E. Gudowska-Nowak, and F. A. Oliveira, The fluctuation–dissipation relations: Growth, diffusion, and beyond, Physics Reports1141, 1 (2025), the fluctuation–dissipation relations: Growth, diffusion, and beyond

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Kwapie´ n, P

    J. Kwapie´ n, P. Blasiak, S. Dro˙ zd˙ z, and P. O´ swikecimka, Genuine multifractality in time series is due to temporal correlations, Phys. Rev. E107, 034139 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    D. G. Kelty-Stephen and M. Mangalam, Additivity sup- presses multifractal nonlinearity due to multiplicative cascade dynamics, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications637, 129573 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Mangalam and D

    M. Mangalam and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multifractal per- turbations to multiplicative cascades promote multifrac- tal nonlinearity with asymmetric spectra, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064212 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    J. W. Kantelhardt, S. A. Zschiegner, E. Koscielny-Bunde, S. Havlin, A. Bunde, and H. Stanley, Multifractal de- trended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 316, 87 (2002)

    work page 2002

  40. [40]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics16, 063065 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    L. Zhao, W. Li, C. pin Yang, J. Han, Z. Su, and Y. Zou, Multifractality and network analysis of phase transition, PLoS ONE12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0170467 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170467 2016

  42. [42]

    T. C. Halsey, M. H. Jensen, L. P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and B. I. Shraiman, Fractal measures and their singular- ities: The characterization of strange sets, Phys. Rev. A 33, 1141 (1986)

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    Costa, M

    I. Costa, M. Vainstein, L. Lapas, A. Batista, and F. Oliveira, Mixing, ergodicity and slow relaxation phe- nomena, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations371, 130 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    H. A. Lima, E. E. M. Luis, I. S. S. Carrasco, A. Hansen, and F. A. Oliveira, Geometrical interpretation of critical exponents, Phys. Rev. E110, L062107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    H. A. de Lima, I. S. S. Carrasco, M. Santos, and F. A. Oliveira, Scaling, fractal dynamics, and critical expo- 9 nents: Application in a noninteger-dimensional ising model, Phys. Rev. E112, 044109 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    A. M. Polyakov, Conformal symmetry of critical fluctu- ations, JETP Lett.12, 381 (1970)

    work page 1970

  47. [47]

    A. M. Polyakov, A. A. Belavin, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite Conformal Symmetry of Critical Fluctuations in Two-Dimensions, J. Statist. Phys.34, 763 (1984)

    work page 1984

  48. [48]

    Smirnov, Conformal invariance in random cluster mod- els

    S. Smirnov, Conformal invariance in random cluster mod- els. i. holmorphic fermions in the ising model, Annals of Mathematics172, 1435 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Conformal invariance in random cluster models. II. Full scaling limit as a branching SLE

    A. Kemppainen and S. Smirnov, Conformal invariance in random cluster models. ii. full scaling limit as a branching sle (2019), arXiv:1609.08527 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019