Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

Investigating the universality of five-point QCD scattering amplitudes at high energy

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that two-loop five-point QCD amplitudes in the high-energy limit are described by universal building blocks plus predictable subleading-colour multi-reggeon exchanges, and extracts the two-loop central-emission…

desk verdict The first NNLL 2-to-3 MRK prediction and the first two-loop central-emission vertex: a strong, honest extraction whose main soft spot is an unproven power-counting assumption about multi-W evolution. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14050 v2 pith:IJWUYZSZ submitted 2024-11-21 hep-ph hep-th

Federico Buccioni , Fabrizio Caola , Federica Devoto , Giulio Gambuti This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords multi-ReggekinematicsQCDscatteringamplitudesnext-to-next-to-leadinglogarithmicaccuracyreggeonscentral-emissionvertexuniversalityN=4superYang-Millsfive-parton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies $2\to 3$ quark and gluon scattering in multi-Regge kinematics, where the final particles are strongly ordered in rapidity. Using an effective description in which the exchanged objects are reggeon fields, it predicts these five-point amplitudes to next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) order and compares the prediction with the exact two-loop QCD amplitudes expanded in that limit. It finds that the full-colour results are reproduced by universal objects together with subleading-colour contributions from multiple reggeon exchanges, so the apparent non-universality at NNLL is a predictable effect rather than a breakdown of factorisation. This makes possible the first extraction of the two-loop vertex that controls central-rapidity gluon emission, in both QCD and $N=4$ super Yang-Mills.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $W$ field, a signature-odd reggeon field in the effective theory used in this paper, whose rapidity evolution is controlled by the gluon Regge trajectory $\tau_g$ and whose same-rapidity two-point function is free. The argument works by expanding the amplitude in this field: one-$W$ exchange builds the factorised Regge-pole chain, while three-$W$ exchanges generate the multi-reggeon contributions. The load-bearing identity is the NNLL decomposition of eq. (4.16), in which the amplitude splits into a universal single-$W$ chain and a manifestly subleading-colour bracket involving colour operators $T^2_{\sigma_1\sigma_2}$; matching this decomposition to the full two-loop amplitude and subtracting infrared poles yields the finite two-loop vertex $\hat U^{(2)}_{\lambda}$ that is reported for QCD and $N=4$ super Yang-Mills.

What would settle it

A direct two-loop calculation of the rapidity evolution (anomalous dimension) of the three-reggeon $WWW$ state would settle the question: if it is non-zero at two loops, the extracted $\hat U^{(2)}_{\lambda}$ would absorb those evolution effects and the universality interpretation would need revision. The paper does not provide this calculation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the two-loop, signature-odd $2\to 3$ amplitude in multi-Regge kinematics can be written exactly as a factorised single-reggeon chain, built from Regge trajectories, impact factors, and the central-emission vertex, plus explicit $\pi^2$ contributions from multi-$W$ (three-reggeon) exchanges, and that this reproduces the infrared-subtracted full-colour QCD amplitude. The single-reggeon chain contains a universal two-loop vertex $\hat U^{(2)}_{\lambda}$, given in eqs. (4.38) and (4.41), that was previously unknown; once it is extracted, every other term in the NNLL prediction is either a known quantity or a predicted subleading-colour multi-$W$ contribution. The authors therefore claim that the apparent non-universality seen at NNLL in the full amplitudes is fully accounted for by terms they can predict, and that the universal vertex is the last missing ingredient for NNLL signature-odd multi-Regge amplitudes at any multiplicity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the rapidity evolution of the three-reggeon (multi-$W$) intermediate state starts only at three loops, so it does not affect the two-loop vertex extraction; the paper justifies this by analogy with the one-loop case rather than by an explicit computation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The extracted two-loop central-emission vertex completes the set of universal ingredients needed for NNLL signature-odd multi-Regge predictions, so future higher-multiplicity two-loop amplitudes can be checked against it.
  • The subleading-colour multi-$W$ terms are shown to account for all flavour dependence of the apparent non-universality at NNLL, meaning no new unknown process-dependent function is required at this order.
  • The $N=4$ super Yang-Mills two-loop vertex equals the leading-transcendental part of the QCD vertex, so the maximal-transcendentality relation holds for this building block as well.
  • Within the framework used here, combining the extracted single-gluon vertex with the known two-gluon emission vertex should make fully universal NNLL predictions for $n$-point multi-Regge amplitudes possible in principle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's five-point extraction, the same two-loop vertex should appear in the multi-Regge limit of six-point QCD amplitudes once they are computed, giving an independent test of its universality.
  • Beyond the paper's two-loop order, the deferred rapidity evolution of the three-reggeon state is the most plausible place for the universality picture to be revised; if that evolution begins at two loops, the extracted vertex would absorb those effects.
  • Beyond the paper's explicit results, the simplicity of the $N=4$ vertex suggests that it may obey a differential equation in the transverse variables $z$ and $\bar z$, which would provide a separate consistency check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies 2 -> 3 QCD scattering amplitudes in multi-Regge kinematics at two loops. It expands the known full-colour five-parton amplitudes of ref. [71] in the MRK limit using pentagon-function expansions, defines IR-finite remainders, and compares the result with predictions from the Balitsky/JIMWLK effective theory. At one loop the paper reproduces all signature components from universal impact factors, Regge trajectories and a one-loop central-emission vertex; at two loops it predicts the odd-odd amplitude up to NNLL in terms of known quantities plus multi-W (three-reggeon) exchange contributions and one unknown two-loop vertex U^(2), which is then extracted from the full amplitude. The same procedure is applied to N = 4 sYM, giving the new two-loop result in eq. (4.41).

Significance. If the central interpretation is correct, this is an important step for the Regge limit of QCD: it shows that the apparent non-universality of two-loop MRK amplitudes at NNLL is accounted for by calculable subleading-colour multi-W exchanges, and it provides the first two-loop central-emission vertex in QCD and N = 4 sYM. The paper contains several strong validation elements: direct comparison with the N = 4 sYM amplitudes of ref. [69], agreement with the one-loop Lipatov vertex of refs. [41,42] to O(epsilon^2), independent agreement on multi-W contributions communicated in ref. [105], and reproduction of the subleading-colour partonic-channel dependence. The results are distributed in ancillary files, and the finite remainders are remarkably simple and free of spurious singularities. The extraction of U^(2) is honest in that it is defined as the remainder after subtracting predicted terms; this means the odd-odd NNLL amplitude is not fully ab initio, but the NLL components and the multi-W components are checked independently.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.5, eqs. (3.66)-(3.73)] The neglect of rapidity evolution of the three-W intermediate states is load-bearing for the extraction of U^(2) in eqs. (4.38) and (4.41), yet the only justification offered is the sentence 'in analogy with the NLL case at one loop, the evolution starts at three loops so it does not affect our two-loops analysis.' This is not a computation. The power counting should be spelled out: the JIMWLK Hamiltonian is O(alpha_s), so an insertion on a three-W state generates O(alpha_s^3 L) relative to the two-loop three-W contribution, but the statement in Section 3.1 that n -> n+2 transitions are suppressed by 'at least one power of alpha_s' relative to n -> n transitions leaves room for 1W -> 3W transitions at O(alpha_s^2 L), which would appear at two-loop NLL order. Please either prove by explicit action of the evolution Hamiltonian on the three-W state that no O(alpha_s^2 L) or O(alpha_s^2 L^0) evolution effect contributes, or state the precise counting and reconcile it with Section 3.1. If such an effect existed, U^(2) would absorb it and the interpretation of U^(2) as the universal two-loop central-emission vertex would need to be revised.
  2. [Section 4.4, eqs. (4.38)-(4.41) and Section 5] The extracted finite remainder Uhat^(2) is a scheme-dependent object: it depends on the finite-remainder subtraction in eqs. (4.34)-(4.35), on the reabsorption of the leading-colour multi-W component in eq. (4.15), and on the scales mu and rho. The relation of this Uhat^(2) to the conventional two-loop Lipatov/central-emission vertex is not established; the paper itself notes in Section 5 that a rigorous proof of the relation is lacking. Given the abstract's claim that the paper extracts 'the universal vertex that controls the emission of the central-rapidity gluon', please either provide the two-loop relation to the standard vertex along the lines of eq. (4.42), or explicitly qualify that the extracted object is the scheme-dependent EFT coefficient U defined here, not the standard Lipatov vertex.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.5, ref. [105]] The independent check against ref. [105] is described only as private correspondence ('We have corresponded with the authors and found agreement'). Since the validation narrative includes this as a key check, the reader cannot assess what was compared. Please document the compared quantities in an appendix or table, or cite a public version where the comparison is shown.
  2. [Section 3.5, text after eq. (3.66)] The sentence 'the Regge trajectory tau_g expanded to three loops (though the latter only enters starting from the three-loop level)' is confusing: for the two-loop amplitude the two-loop trajectory is required in eq. (4.9), while the three-loop trajectory enters only in the three-loop amplitude. Please rephrase to distinguish the order of the trajectory from the loop order of the amplitude.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4.1] The phrase 'predict these amplitudes for the first time to NNLL' overstates what is done for the odd-odd two-loop amplitude, since U^(2) is extracted from the same full amplitudes rather than predicted. The body of the paper is careful about this distinction; the abstract and introduction should be qualified accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: the two-loop vertex is extracted from the known amplitude after an independent check of the predicted terms, and the universality claim is supported by cross-channel comparisons.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper's central claim is not circular. Section 3 builds NNLL predictions from the Balitsky/JIMWLK formalism using the Regge trajectory and impact factors taken from 2-to-2 amplitudes, the one-loop vertex W^(1) from the known literature, and multi-W coefficients K^(2) computed directly from two-dimensional integrals in Section 3.5 and Appendix D. The unknown two-loop vertex U^(2) is then explicitly extracted from the difference between the factorised expression (4.16) and the explicit MRK amplitude, not presented as a first-principles derivation: the text states that the direct calculation of the multi-W coefficients 'leaves only W(2) undetermined and allows us to compute it by matching the corresponding explicit UV-renormalised MRK amplitude' (Section 4.1). This is an honest extraction. The validation has independent content: predicted terms are checked before the extraction, and Section 4.5 reports that the subleading-colour multi-W terms reproduce the differences between partonic channels in sub-amplitudes where single-W and multi-W contributions do not mix, so no fitted parameter forces that agreement. Self-citations to refs. [30,31,71] are normal use of prior computations and input amplitudes, not load-bearing appeals to authority. One genuine caveat is the unproven power-counting assertion in Section 3.5 that rapidity evolution of the three-W intermediate state 'starts at three loops'; if false it would contaminate U^(2), but this is a correctness risk rather than a circularity, since the paper does not define U^(2) in terms of that assertion and no equation reduces to its own input. The N=4 result in eq. (4.41) is obtained by projecting the QCD result with a stated maximal-transcendentality argument, not by renaming a known quantity. No equation in the paper equals its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The W fields and reggeons are effective degrees of freedom from earlier literature. The extracted U(2) is a new universal function but it is defined as the remainder of an exact amplitude, not an independent postulated entity.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Balitsky/JIMWLK dilute-field expansion and the W-field redefinition of ref. [44] correctly describe MRK amplitudes up to NNLL (Secs. 3.1 and 3.5).
    The central predictions are built on this effective theory; the paper extends but does not re-derive its foundations.
  • domain assumption Rapidity evolution of multi-W states does not contribute at two loops (Sec. 3.5).
    Used to drop evolution of the 3-W intermediate states; asserted by power counting but not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption The two-loop full-colour five-point amplitudes of ref. [71] are correct and are valid external input (Sec. 2.3).
    The MRK expansion and extraction rely on these published amplitudes, which share some authors with this paper.
  • domain assumption Maximal transcendentality relates QCD and N=4 sYM ingredients, so the N=4 vertex is obtained by projecting QCD onto its leading-transcendental part (Sec. 4.4).
    Used to extract U(2) in N=4 sYM without a direct independent calculation; the paper verifies the property at amplitude level for the gg channel.
  • standard math The standard IR factorization of two-loop amplitudes with Z_IR from ref. [94] is valid in MRK (Sec. 2.4).
    Finite remainders and the IR-subtracted vertex definitions rest on this factorization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating the universality of five-point QCD scattering amplitudes at high energy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IJWUYZSZ

@misc{pith2026241114050,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating the universality of five-point QCD scattering amplitudes at high energy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IJWUYZSZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14050}
}
abstract

We investigate $2 \to 3$ QCD scattering amplitudes in multi-Regge kinematics, i.e. where the final partons are strongly ordered in rapidity. In this regime amplitudes exhibit intriguing factorisation properties which can be understood in terms of effective degrees of freedom called \emph{reggeons}. Working within the Balitsky/JIMWLK framework, we predict these amplitudes for the first time to next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic order, and compare against the limit of QCD scattering amplitudes in full colour and kinematics. We find that the latter can be described in terms of universal objects, and that the apparent non-universality arising at NNLL comes from well-defined and under-control contributions that we can predict. Thanks to this observation, we extract for the first time the universal vertex that controls the emission of the central-rapidity gluon, both in QCD and $N = 4$ super Yang-Mills.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spacelike-Collinear Scattering by the Method of Regions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The kinematic factorisation-violating part of the two-loop spacelike-collinear splitting amplitude comes entirely from a single hidden region with soft and Glauber loop momenta.

  2. New results on small-x resummation for splitting functions

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A closed-form all-order expression for the qg anomalous dimension, plus new all-order results for the LL gluon anomalous dimension and the finite qg/gg Green functions, derived and implemented in HELL 4.0.

  3. The Two-Loop Lipatov Vertex in QCD

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The two-loop Reggeon-gluon-Reggeon (Lipatov) vertex in QCD is determined in dimensional regularization through finite terms and expressed in single-valued polylogarithms.

  4. Low-energy theory of jet processes and PDF factorization

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-loop Glauber contribution to low-energy soft-collinear matrix elements exactly cancels the collinear factorization-violating terms, so DGLAP running and PDF factorization are consistent with super-leading logarithms.

  5. Regge factorization of tree-level QCD amplitudes using a minimal set of lightcone variables

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    All tree-level QCD multi-Regge emission vertices with up to four final-state partons are extracted in a minimal lightcone-variable frame and collected in the MREV Mathematica library.

  6. New evidence for the rapidity evolution in Mueller-Navelet dijet production: BFKL, Sudakov, and RG-invariance

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new matching of NLO BFKL resummation with high-energy factorization and Sudakov effects describes Mueller-Navelet dijet data and attributes the large-rapidity decorrelation to BFKL dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [69]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, Multi-Regge Limit of the Two-Loop Five-Point Amplitudes in N = 4 Super Yang-Mills and N = 8 Supergravity, JHEP 10 (2020) 188 [ 2003.03120]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [105]

    Abreu, G

    S. Abreu, G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Regge poles and cuts and the Lipatov vertex, PoS LL2024 (2024) 085

    2024

  3. [71]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, F. Devoto, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, Five-parton scattering in QCD at two loops , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094025 [2311.09870]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Fadin, E.A

    V.S. Fadin, E.A. Kuraev and L.N. Lipatov, On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories, Phys. Lett. B 60 (1975) 50

    1975

  5. [2]

    Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov

    L.N. Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23 (1976) 338

    1976

  6. [3]

    Kuraev, L.N

    E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov and V.S. Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory, Sov. Phys. JETP 44 (1976) 443

    1976

  7. [4]

    Kuraev, L.N

    E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov and V.S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199

    1977

  8. [5]

    Balitsky and L.N

    I.I. Balitsky and L.N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 (1978) 822. – 55 –

    1978

Show all 106 references
  1. [6]

    Fadin and L.N

    V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov, BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation , Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 127 [ hep-ph/9802290]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Ciafaloni and G

    M. Ciafaloni and G. Camici, Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation , Phys. Lett. B 430 (1998) 349 [ hep-ph/9803389]

    1998 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Kotikov and L.N

    A.V. Kotikov and L.N. Lipatov, NLO corrections to the BFKL equation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories , Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 19 [ hep-ph/0004008]

    2000 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Jaroszewicz, Gluonic Regge Singularities and Anomalous Dimensions in QCD , Phys

    T. Jaroszewicz, Gluonic Regge Singularities and Anomalous Dimensions in QCD , Phys. Lett. B 116 (1982) 291

    1982

  5. [10]

    Catani, M

    S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni and F. Hautmann, High-energy factorization and small x heavy flavor production, Nucl. Phys. B 366 (1991) 135

    1991

  6. [11]

    Altarelli, R.D

    G. Altarelli, R.D. Ball and S. Forte, Factorization and resummation of small x scaling violations with running coupling , Nucl. Phys. B 621 (2002) 359 [ hep-ph/0109178]

    2002 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Ciafaloni, D

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, D. Colferai, G.P. Salam and A.M. Stasto, Extending QCD perturbation theory to higher energies , Phys. Lett. B 576 (2003) 143 [ hep-ph/0305254]

    2003 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Mueller and H

    A.H. Mueller and H. Navelet, An Inclusive Minijet Cross-Section and the Bare Pomeron in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 727

    1987

  9. [14]

    Del Duca and C.R

    V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Dijet production at large rapidity intervals , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4510 [ hep-ph/9311290]

    1994 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Stirling, Production of jet pairs at large relative rapidity in hadron hadron collisions as a probe of the perturbative pomeron , Nucl

    W.J. Stirling, Production of jet pairs at large relative rapidity in hadron hadron collisions as a probe of the perturbative pomeron , Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 56 [ hep-ph/9401266]

    1994 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Andersen, V

    J.R. Andersen, V. Del Duca, S. Frixione, C.R. Schmidt and W.J. Stirling, Mueller-Navelet jets at hadron colliders , JHEP 02 (2001) 007 [ hep-ph/0101180]

    2001 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Colferai, F

    D. Colferai, F. Schwennsen, L. Szymanowski and S. Wallon, Mueller Navelet jets at LHC - complete NLL BFKL calculation , JHEP 12 (2010) 026 [ 1002.1365]

    2010 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Ducloue, L

    B. Ducloue, L. Szymanowski and S. Wallon, Confronting Mueller-Navelet jets in NLL BFKL with LHC experiments at 7 TeV , JHEP 05 (2013) 096 [ 1302.7012]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Caporale, D.Y

    F. Caporale, D.Y. Ivanov, B. Murdaca and A. Papa, Mueller–Navelet jets in next-to-leading order BFKL: theory versus experiment , Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3084 [ 1407.8431]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Andersen and J.M

    J.R. Andersen and J.M. Smillie, Multiple Jets at the LHC with High Energy Jets , JHEP 06 (2011) 010 [ 1101.5394]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Andersen, B

    J.R. Andersen, B. Duclou´ e, C. Elrick, H. Hassan, A. Maier, G. Nail et al., HEJ 2.2: W boson pairs and Higgs boson plus jet production at high energies , 2303.15778

    arXiv

  17. [22]

    Golec-Biernat, L

    K. Golec-Biernat, L. Motyka and T. Stebel, Forward drell-yan and backward jet production as a probe of the bfkl dynamics , Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (2018)

    2018

  18. [23]

    Celiberto, D.Y

    F.G. Celiberto, D.Y. Ivanov, M.M.A. Mohammed and A. Papa, High-energy resummed distributions for the inclusive higgs-plus-jet production at the lhc , The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021)

    2021

  19. [24]

    Celiberto, Hunting bfkl in semi-hard reactions at the lhc , The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021)

    F.G. Celiberto, Hunting bfkl in semi-hard reactions at the lhc , The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021)

    2021

  20. [25]

    Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy Physics , Cambridge – 56 – Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (7, 2023), 10.1017/9781009403269

    P.D.B. Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy Physics , Cambridge – 56 – Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (7, 2023), 10.1017/9781009403269

    2023 doi

  21. [26]

    Ioffe, V.S

    B.L. Ioffe, V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov, Quantum chromodynamics: Perturbative and nonperturbative aspects, Cambridge Univ. Press (2010), 10.1017/CBO9780511711817

    2010 doi

  22. [27]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and M.I. Kotsky, Gluon Regge trajectory in the two loop approximation, Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 593 [ hep-ph/9605357]

    1996 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Henn and B

    J.M. Henn and B. Mistlberger, Four-Gluon Scattering at Three Loops, Infrared Structure, and the Regge Limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 171601 [ 1608.00850]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Del Duca, R

    V. Del Duca, R. Marzucca and B. Verbeek, The gluon Regge trajectory at three loops from planar Yang-Mills theory , JHEP 01 (2022) 149 [ 2111.14265]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, Three-Loop Gluon Scattering in QCD and the Gluon Regge Trajectory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 212001 [2112.11097]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [31]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Disentangling the Regge Cut and Regge Pole in Perturbative QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 132001 [ 2112.11098]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Fadin and R

    V.S. Fadin and R. Fiore, Quark contribution to the gluon-gluon - reggeon vertex in QCD , Phys. Lett. B 294 (1992) 286

    1992

  28. [33]

    Fadin and L.N

    V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov, Radiative corrections to QCD scattering amplitudes in a multi - Regge kinematics , Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 259

    1993

  29. [34]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and A. Quartarolo, Radiative corrections to quark quark reggeon vertex in QCD , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2265 [ hep-ph/9310252]

    1994 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Z. Bern, V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, The Infrared behavior of one loop gluon amplitudes at next-to-next-to-leading order , Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 168 [ hep-ph/9810409]

    1998 arXiv

  31. [36]

    Del Duca and C.R

    V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Virtual next-to-leading corrections to the impact factors in the high-energy limit , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4069 [ hep-ph/9711309]

    1998 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore, M.I. Kotsky and A. Papa, The Gluon impact factors , Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 094005 [ hep-ph/9908264]

    2000 arXiv

  33. [38]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering in the high-energy limit , JHEP 06 (2017) 016 [ 1701.05241]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [39]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and A. Quartarolo, Quark contribution to the reggeon - reggeon - gluon vertex in QCD , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 5893 [ hep-th/9405127]

    1994 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and M.I. Kotsky, Gribov’s theorem on soft emission and the reggeon-reggeon - gluon vertex at small transverse momentum , Phys. Lett. B 389 (1996) 737 [hep-ph/9608229]

    1996 arXiv

  36. [41]

    Del Duca and C.R

    V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Virtual next-to-leading corrections to the Lipatov vertex , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074004 [ hep-ph/9810215]

    1999 arXiv

  37. [42]

    Fadin, M

    V.S. Fadin, M. Fucilla and A. Papa, One-loop Lipatov vertex in QCD with higher ϵ-accuracy, JHEP 04 (2023) 137 [ 2302.09868]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [43]

    Byrne, V

    E.P. Byrne, V. Del Duca, L.J. Dixon, E. Gardi and J.M. Smillie, One-loop central-emission vertex for two gluons in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory , JHEP 08 (2022) 271 [2204.12459]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [44]

    Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093 [ 1309.6521]

    S. Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093 [ 1309.6521]. – 57 –

    2015 arXiv

  40. [45]

    Del Duca and E.W.N

    V. Del Duca and E.W.N. Glover, The High-energy limit of QCD at two loops , JHEP 10 (2001) 035 [ hep-ph/0109028]

    2001 arXiv

  41. [46]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea and L. Vernazza, High-energy QCD amplitudes at two loops and beyond , Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 233 [ 1311.0304]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [47]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea and L. Vernazza, Analyzing high-energy factorization beyond next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, JHEP 02 (2015) 029 [ 1409.8330]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [48]

    Balitsky, Operator expansion for high-energy scattering , Nucl

    I. Balitsky, Operator expansion for high-energy scattering , Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 99 [hep-ph/9509348]

    1996 arXiv

  44. [49]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert, The BFKL equation from the Wilson renormalization group , Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 415 [ hep-ph/9701284]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [50]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert, The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high density regime , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 014014 [hep-ph/9706377]

    1998 arXiv

  46. [51]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner and H. Weigert, The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Gluon evolution at finite parton density , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 014015 [hep-ph/9709432]

    1998 arXiv

  47. [52]

    Kovner, J.G

    A. Kovner, J.G. Milhano and H. Weigert, Relating different approaches to nonlinear QCD evolution at finite gluon density , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 114005 [ hep-ph/0004014]

    2000 arXiv

  48. [53]

    Weigert, Unitarity at small Bjorken x , Nucl

    H. Weigert, Unitarity at small Bjorken x , Nucl. Phys. A 703 (2002) 823 [ hep-ph/0004044]

    2002 arXiv

  49. [54]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L.D. McLerran, Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. 1., Nucl. Phys. A 692 (2001) 583 [ hep-ph/0011241]

    2001 arXiv

  50. [55]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L.D. McLerran, The Renormalization group equation for the color glass condensate , Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001) 133 [ hep-ph/0102009]

    2001 arXiv

  51. [56]

    Ferreiro, E

    E. Ferreiro, E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. McLerran, Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. 2. , Nucl. Phys. A 703 (2002) 489 [ hep-ph/0109115]

    2002 arXiv

  52. [57]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, J. Reichel and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit to high loop orders , JHEP 08 (2020) 116 [ 2006.01267]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [58]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Climbing three-Reggeon ladders: four-loop amplitudes in the high-energy limit in full colour , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L111501 [2012.00613]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [59]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit and the soft anomalous dimension through four loops , JHEP 03 (2022) 053 [2111.10664]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [60]

    Fadin and L.N

    V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov, Reggeon cuts in QCD amplitudes with negative signature , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 439 [ 1712.09805]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [61]

    Fadin, Three-Reggeon cuts in QCD amplitudes , EPJ Web Conf

    V.S. Fadin, Three-Reggeon cuts in QCD amplitudes , EPJ Web Conf. 222 (2019) 03006

    2019

  57. [62]

    Fadin, Three-Reggeon Cuts in QCD Amplitudes , Phys

    V.S. Fadin, Three-Reggeon Cuts in QCD Amplitudes , Phys. Atom. Nucl. 84 (2021) 100

    2021

  58. [63]

    Fadin, Peculiarities of Regge cuts in QCD , 9, 2024 [ 2409.01698]

    V.S. Fadin, Peculiarities of Regge cuts in QCD , 9, 2024 [ 2409.01698]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [64]

    Rothstein and I.W

    I.Z. Rothstein and I.W. Stewart, An Effective Field Theory for Forward Scattering and Factorization Violation, JHEP 08 (2016) 025 [ 1601.04695]. – 58 –

    2016 arXiv

  60. [65]

    Rothstein and M

    I.Z. Rothstein and M. Saavedra, Relations Between Anomalous Dimensions in the Regge Limit, 2410.06283

    arXiv

  61. [66]

    Moult, S

    I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway and I.W. Stewart, Anomalous dimensions from soft Regge constants, JHEP 05 (2023) 025 [ 2207.02859]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [67]

    A. Gao, I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway and I.W. Stewart, A collinear perspective on the Regge limit, JHEP 05 (2024) 328 [ 2401.00931]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [68]

    Abreu, L.J

    S. Abreu, L.J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng, The two-loop five-point amplitude in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121603 [ 1812.08941]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, Three-loop helicity amplitudes for quark-gluon scattering in QCD , JHEP 12 (2022) 082 [ 2207.03503]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [72]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita and V. Sotnikov, Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. II. The quark channels , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094024 [2311.18752]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [73]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert and V. Sotnikov, Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. I. The gluon channel , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094023 [2311.10086]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Gehrmann, J.M

    T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti, Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes, JHEP 10 (2018) 103 [ 1807.09812]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov, Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles, JHEP 20 (2020) 167 [ 2009.07803]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, Two-Loop Helicity Amplitudes for Diphoton Plus Jet Production in Full Color , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 262001 [2105.04585]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, All Master Integrals for Three-Jet Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 041603 [ 1812.11160]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma, AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow , Comput. Phys. Commun. 283 (2023) 108565 [ 2201.11669]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Vermaseren, New features of FORM , math-ph/0010025

    J.A.M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM , math-ph/0010025

    arXiv

  73. [80]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren, FORM version 4.2 , 1707.06453

    arXiv

  74. [81]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Two loop master integrals for gamma* — > 3 jets: The Planar topologies, Nucl. Phys. B 601 (2001) 248 [ hep-ph/0008287]

    2001 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Two loop master integrals for gamma* – > 3 jets: The Nonplanar topologies, Nucl. Phys. B 601 (2001) 287 [ hep-ph/0101124]

    2001 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Numerical evaluation of two-dimensional harmonic polylogarithms, Comput. Phys. Commun. 144 (2002) 200 [ hep-ph/0111255]. – 59 –

    2002 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Studerus, Reduze-Feynman Integral Reduction in C++, Comput.Phys.Commun

    C. Studerus, Reduze-Feynman Integral Reduction in C++, Comput.Phys.Commun. 181 (2010) 1293 [ 0912.2546]

    2010 arXiv

  78. [85]

    von Manteuffel and C

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction , 1201.4330

    arXiv

  79. [86]

    Klappert and F

    J. Klappert and F. Lange, Reconstructing rational functions with FireFly , Comput. Phys. Commun. 247 (2020) 106951 [ 1904.00009]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Klappert, F

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierh¨ ofer and J. Usovitsch, Integral Reduction with Kira 2.0 and Finite Field Methods , 2008.06494

    2008 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Bauer, A

    C.W. Bauer, A. Frink and R. Kreckel, Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language , J. Symb. Comput. 33 (2002) 1 [cs/0004015]

    2002 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Ferguson and D

    H. Ferguson and D. Bailey, A polynomial time, numerically stable integer relation algorithm, RNR Technical Report RNR-91-032 (1992)

    1992

  83. [90]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat, PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses , JHEP 08 (2019) 135 [1904.07279]

    2019 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Peraro, FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031 [ 1905.08019]

    T. Peraro, FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031 [ 1905.08019]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order , Phys

    S. Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order , Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [ hep-ph/9802439]

    1998 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Aybat, L.J

    S.M. Aybat, L.J. Dixon and G.F. Sterman, The Two-loop soft anomalous dimension matrix and resummation at next-to-next-to leading pole , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 074004 [hep-ph/0607309]

    2006 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2009) 081 [ 0903.1126]

    2009 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea, Infrared singularities in QCD amplitudes , Nuovo Cim. C 32N5-6 (2009) 137 [ 0908.3273]

    2009 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Korchemsky and A.V

    G.P. Korchemsky and A.V. Radyushkin, Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order, Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 342

    1987

  90. [97]

    Moch, J.A.M

    S. Moch, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case, Nucl. Phys. B 688 (2004) 101 [ hep-ph/0403192]

    2004 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Ravindran, J

    V. Ravindran, J. Smith and W.L. van Neerven, Two-loop corrections to Higgs boson production, Nucl. Phys. B 704 (2005) 332 [ hep-ph/0408315]

    2005 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Moch, J.A.M

    S. Moch, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, The Quark form-factor at higher orders , JHEP 08 (2005) 049 [ hep-ph/0507039]

    2005 arXiv

  93. [100]

    S. Moch, J. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, Three-loop results for quark and gluon form-factors , Phys. Lett. B 625 (2005) 245 [ hep-ph/0508055]

    2005 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Bartels, High-energy behaviour in a non-abelian gauge theory (ii)

    J. Bartels, High-energy behaviour in a non-abelian gauge theory (ii). first corrections to tn→m beyond the leading ln s approximation, Nuclear Physics B 175 (1980) 365

    1980

  95. [102]

    Del Duca and L.J

    V. Del Duca and L.J. Dixon, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 15: The multi-Regge limit, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443016 [ 2203.13026]. – 60 –

    2022 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Bartels, L.N

    J. Bartels, L.N. Lipatov and A. Sabio Vera, BFKL Pomeron, Reggeized gluons and Bern-Dixon-Smirnov amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 045002 [ 0802.2065]

    2009 arXiv

  97. [104]

    https://zenodo.org/records/14196297

  98. [106]

    Becher, P

    T. Becher, P. Hager, S. Jaskiewicz, M. Neubert and D. Schwienbacher, Factorization restoration through Glauber gluons , 2408.10308. – 61 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.