Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Privacy Vulnerabilities in Marginals-based Synthetic Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05506 v2 pith:IJY5ACDZ submitted 2024-10-07 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords datainformationmama-miaalgorithmalgorithmsattackprivacysynthetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

When acting as a privacy-enhancing technology, synthetic data generation (SDG) aims to maintain a resemblance to the real data while excluding personally-identifiable information. Many SDG algorithms provide robust differential privacy (DP) guarantees to this end. However, we show that the strongest class of SDG algorithms--those that preserve \textit{marginal probabilities}, or similar statistics, from the underlying data--leak information about individuals that can be recovered more efficiently than previously understood. We demonstrate this by presenting a novel membership inference attack, MAMA-MIA, and evaluate it against three seminal DP SDG algorithms: MST, PrivBayes, and Private-GSD. MAMA-MIA leverages knowledge of which SDG algorithm was used, allowing it to learn information about the hidden data more accurately, and orders-of-magnitude faster, than other leading attacks. We use MAMA-MIA to lend insight into existing SDG vulnerabilities. Our approach went on to win the first SNAKE (SaNitization Algorithm under attacK ... $\varepsilon$) competition.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ensembling Membership Inference Attacks Against Tabular Generative Models

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No single membership inference attack dominates across tabular generative models, and unsupervised ensembles of attacks achieve better average rankings.

Pith tools