Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Fluctuation force induced by quenched random polarizations

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Frozen random electric dipoles create a fluctuation force that can beat Casimir attraction and help levitate nanoscale slabs.

desk verdict Clean, usable extension of the quenched-charge program to frozen dipoles, with transparent power laws and a real repulsion criterion; soft only in the white-noise idealization that the asymptotics already control. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26747 v1 pith:IK7C5UWY submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atom-ph

Bing-Sui Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atom-ph
keywords quencheddipolardisorderfluctuationforcerelaxorferroelectricsCasimir-Lifshitznanolevitationpolarnanoregionsatom-surface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Materials such as relaxor ferroelectrics can be overall neutral yet contain electric dipoles frozen in place, unable to fluctuate with temperature. This paper shows that those quenched random polarizations still generate a measurable fluctuation force between surfaces and on nearby atoms. For two semi-infinite slabs the bulk-disorder pressure falls as one over separation cubed and the surface-disorder pressure as one over separation to the fourth; the corresponding forces on an atom fall one power faster. The force grows linearly with the mean-square dipole density and, when the dielectric constants satisfy the usual Dzyaloshinskii–Lifshitz–Pitaevskii ordering, can be repulsive, reinforcing nanolevitation. The results give designers of microactuators and flexoelectric devices a concrete way to decide when dipolar disorder must be counted alongside ordinary Casimir forces.

What carries the argument

Disorder-averaged electrostatic energy of frozen polarizations written with the layered electrostatic Green function, regularized by subtracting the infinite-separation contribution; the force follows by differentiating with respect to gap width, and the atom force is recovered by rarefying one slab into a dilute gas of polarizable atoms.

What would settle it

Measure the force or pressure between a relaxor-ferroelectric slab and a dielectric counter-surface (or an atom above it) at separations of hundreds of nanometers to microns and check whether the observed magnitude tracks the independently measured mean-square polarization and follows the predicted ℓ^{-3} or ℓ^{-4} decay.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At zero temperature, quenched bulk (surface) dipolar disorder produces a fluctuation pressure between coplanar semi-infinite slabs that scales as ℓ^{-3} (ℓ^{-4}) and a force on a neutral atom that scales as ℓ^{-4} (ℓ^{-5}); both are linear in the mean-square quenched dipole moment per unit volume (area) and can be repulsive when ε₁ < ε_m < ε₂ (or the reverse), thereby enhancing nanolevitation under the Dzyaloshinskii–Lifshitz–Pitaevskii condition.

Load-bearing premise

The frozen dipoles are treated as completely uncorrelated white noise once the gap exceeds the few-nanometer size of a polar nanoregion; any lingering spatial correlations would change the power laws and prefactors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dipolar-disorder forces must be budgeted alongside Casimir forces in stiction calculations for devices that use relaxor ferroelectrics or dipole glasses.
  • Choosing dielectrics that obey ε₁ < ε_m < ε₂ turns the disorder force repulsive and can stabilize nanolevitation.
  • A thin film of bulk disorder on a substrate crosses over from bulk-like ℓ^{-3} pressure to surface-like ℓ^{-4} pressure once the gap exceeds the film thickness.
  • The same formulas let an experimentalist decide, from measured permittivity and mean-square polarization alone, whether the disorder force is negligible at a given separation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If polar-nanoregion correlations remain finite at device-relevant gaps, the white-noise power laws would soften, offering a spectroscopic route to extract the correlation length from force data.
  • The same image-dipole mechanism should generate a fluctuation torque on anisotropic or patterned dipolar surfaces, a natural extension not calculated here.
  • Partially annealed dipoles at higher temperature would add a thermal channel that could reverse the sign or alter the scaling relative to the purely quenched case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the zero-temperature fluctuation forces arising from quenched, non-thermally-fluctuating random electric dipoles (bulk or surface) in layered dielectrics. Using continuum electrostatics, Fourier-space Green functions, disorder averaging over a white-noise correlator, and ℓ→∞ regularization, it obtains closed-form results for the pressure between coplanar slabs and the force on a neutral atom above a slab. Bulk (surface) disorder yields pressures decaying as ℓ^{-3} (ℓ^{-4}) and atom forces as ℓ^{-4} (ℓ^{-5}), both linear in the mean-square dipole density Γ_B (Γ_S). The slab-slab force can be repulsive when the static dielectric contrast satisfies ε1 < εm < ε2 (or the reverse), thereby potentially enhancing nanolevitation under the Dzyaloshinskii-Lifshitz-Pitaevskii condition. Thin-film asymptotics recover the surface formulas, and numerical illustrations compare magnitudes with ideal Casimir/Casimir-Polder bounds.

Significance. The work cleanly extends the established theory of quenched monopolar charge disorder to the dipolar case relevant to relaxor ferroelectrics and adsorbed polar molecules. The analytic power laws, dielectric-contrast sign rule, and rarefaction construction for the atom force are internally consistent and immediately usable by experimentalists once Γ_B or Γ_S is measured. The possible reinforcement of repulsive Casimir-Lifshitz forces under the DLP condition is a concrete, falsifiable implication for microactuator and nanolevitation design. Strengths include closed-form Green functions (App. A), explicit regularization (App. B), and verified thin-film limits (App. C).

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V, Abstract] Section V and the abstract claim that the quenched dipolar force “can serve to enhance the nanolevitation effect” under the DLP condition. While the static dielectric-contrast rule for the sign of P_SS^(B) (Eq. 11) parallels the DLP criterion, the paper never evaluates the sum of the disorder pressure and a realistic Lifshitz pressure (frequency-dependent ε(iξ)) for any concrete material triad. The enhancement statement should either be supported by at least one such combined estimate or be softened to a qualitative possibility.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (8); Section V] The white-noise correlator (Eq. 8) and the continuum treatment are justified only for separations ≫ polar-nanoregion size (~10 nm). The numerical comparisons in Figs. 4–6 extend down to ℓ ~ 10^{-4}–10^{-3} cm, which is safe, but the text should state more explicitly the lower bound on ℓ below which finite-range correlations or discrete PNR structure would modify both the power laws and the prefactors.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section I] The organizational paragraph at the end of the Introduction states that results appear in Section V and the summary also in Section V; the summary is actually Section VI. Correct the numbering.
  2. [Section V, Figs. 4–6] Figures 4–6 as rendered in the manuscript source contain garbled axis labels and legends (e.g., “××-”, “”). Ensure the production version has clean, publication-quality labels and units.
  3. [Sections III–V] The conversion factors between cgs and SI (pressure ×0.1, force ×10^{-5}) are stated repeatedly; a single clear statement in Section II or III would suffice.
  4. [Section V, Ref. [47]] Reference [47] supplies the representative Γ_B; a brief remark that the value is an order-of-magnitude estimate (rms polarization and PNR size both sample-dependent) would help readers gauge uncertainty in the numerical curves.
  5. [Front matter] PACS numbers line is left blank; supply appropriate codes or remove the line.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: forces follow from electrostatic energy averaged over a stated white-noise quenched ensemble; ϐ_B/ϐ_S are external inputs, not fitted outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained classical continuum electrostatics. The energy (Eq. 3) is the standard bilinear form in polarizations and the electrostatic Green function; the quenched statistics (Eqs. 8, 24) are stated assumptions (zero mean, δ-correlated, strength ϐ_B or ϐ_S); the Green functions are solved from the Poisson equation with dielectric boundary conditions (App. A); divergences are removed by the standard ℓ o∞ subtraction (App. B); atom forces are obtained by the textbook rarefaction limit. The reported power laws (ℓ^{-3}/ℓ^{-4} slab pressure, ℓ^{-4}/ℓ^{-5} atom force), linearity in ϐ_B/ϐ_S, thin-film recovery ϐ_S=ϐ_B d (App. C), and sign controlled by Li_2(R_m1 R_m2)/R_m2 under the DLP dielectric ordering all follow by direct evaluation of those integrals. ϐ_B and ϐ_S enter as free material parameters (estimated from external rms-polarization literature, not fitted to the force itself). Self-citations to prior monopolar-disorder papers supply methodological background and comparison, not a load-bearing uniqueness claim that forces the dipolar answer. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on classical electrostatics in layered dielectrics, a white-noise model of quenched dipolar disorder, and the standard rarefaction procedure that converts slab-slab results into atom-slab forces. No new particles or forces are postulated; Γ_B/Γ_S are phenomenological inputs taken from material measurements.

free parameters (3)
  • Γ_B (mean-square quenched dipole moment per unit volume) = 4.4×10^{-8} esu/cm (representative)
    Overall scale of bulk-disorder forces; taken as a free material parameter and set to representative values (4.4e-8 or 4.4e-9 esu/cm) drawn from rms polarization data on PLZT/PMN for the numerical plots.
  • Γ_S (mean-square quenched dipole moment per unit area)
    Overall scale of surface-disorder forces; likewise a free phenomenological density.
  • film thickness d = 10^{-6}–10^{-5} cm
    Controls the bulk-to-surface cross-over; varied by hand in plots (10^{-6} cm, 10^{-5} cm).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Electrostatic energy of polarizations is (1/2)∫ P_i ∇_i ∇'_j G P_j with the layered dielectric Green function satisfying −∇·[ε(r)∇G]=4πδ(r−r′).
    Classical continuum electrostatics; invoked from Sec. II onward.
  • domain assumption Quenched dipoles obey zero mean and δ-correlated second moment: P_i(r)P_j(r′)=δ_ij δ(r−r′) Γ (bulk or surface).
    Models the glassy disordered phase of relaxors below T_VF; Eq. (8) and Eq. (24).
  • domain assumption Correlation length of polar nanoregions is negligible compared with gap/atom-surface separations of interest (≳100 nm).
    Justifies the white-noise correlator; stated in Sec. III.
  • domain assumption Zero temperature: thermal dipolar fluctuations are frozen out.
    Title and introduction; restricts the calculation to the glassy state.
  • standard math Rarefaction: replacing a dielectric slab by a dilute gas of polarizable atoms (ε≈1+4π n α_0) converts slab-slab energy into atom-slab energy.
    Standard Lifshitz procedure; used in Secs. III.C–D and IV.C–D.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuation force induced by quenched random polarizations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IK7C5UWY

@misc{pith2026260726747,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuation force induced by quenched random polarizations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IK7C5UWY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26747}
}
abstract

We investigate the zero-temperature behavior of the fluctuation force induced by random electric dipoles that are frozen into a material and incapable of fluctuating thermally. Examples of such materials are relaxor ferroelectrics. In terms of the setup and geometry, we focus on a layered system comprising two coplanar semi-infinite slabs separated by a distance $\ell$ as well as a system comprising a neutral atom in the vacuum located at a distance $\ell$ above the surface of a semi-infinite slab. For both systems, we consider the cases where the quenched random dipolar disorder occurs inside the bulk as well as on the surface of the slabs. In all of these cases, we find that the bulk (surface) dipolar disorder-induced fluctuation force grows with the mean square quenched electric dipole moment per unit volume (area). The bulk (surface) dipolar disorder-induced fluctuation pressure between two semi-infinite single-layered slabs decays with $\ell^{-3}$ ($\ell^{-4}$), whereas the bulk (surface) dipolar disorder-induced fluctuation force on an atom in the vacuum near a slab containing the disorder decays with $\ell^{-4}$ ($\ell^{-5}$). We also find that the quenched dipolar disorder-induced fluctuation force between two coplanar slabs can be repulsive and serve to enhance the ``nanolevitation effect" in a three-layered dielectric system that obeys the Dzyaloshinskii-Lifshitz-Pitaevskii condition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26747 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) A pair of coplanar semi-infinite single-layered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) A pair of coplanar slabs separated by a vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) A disorder-free single-layered slab (layer 2) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Behavior of the fluctuation pressure (in Pa, ver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Behavior of the magnitude of the force (N) acting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Critical review: adhe- sion in surface micromechanical structures

    R. Maboudian and R. T. Howe, “Critical review: adhe- sion in surface micromechanical structures.”J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B15, 1 (1997)

    1997

  2. [2]

    Bordag et al.,Advances in the Casimir Effect(1st edition) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 2009

    M. Bordag et al.,Advances in the Casimir Effect(1st edition) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 2009

    2009

  3. [3]

    The theory of molecular attractive forces 15 between solids

    E. M. Lifshitz, “The theory of molecular attractive forces 15 between solids.”Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.29, 94–110 (1955); English translationSov. Phys. JETP2, 73–83 (1956)

    1955

  4. [4]

    The influence of re- tardation on the London-van der Waals forces

    H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, “The influence of re- tardation on the London-van der Waals forces.”Phys. Rev.73, 360 (1948)

    1948

  5. [5]

    Quantum electrodynamics near an interface. II

    J. M. Wylie and J. E. Sipe, “Quantum electrodynamics near an interface. II.”Phys. Rev. A32, 2030 (1985)

  6. [6]

    Atom-wall interaction

    D. Bloch and M. Ducloy, “Atom-wall interaction.”Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 91 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    Atom-surface physics: A review

    A. Laliotis, B.-S. Lu, M. Ducloy, and D. Wilkowski, “Atom-surface physics: A review.”A VS Quantum Sci.3, 043501 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Macro- scopic variations of surface potentials of conductors

    J. B. Camp, T. W. Darling, and R. E. Brown, “Macro- scopic variations of surface potentials of conductors.”J. Appl. Phys.69, 7126 (1991)

    1991

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Forces and force gradients due to patch fields and contact-potential differences

    C. C. Speake, “Forces and force gradients due to patch fields and contact-potential differences.”Class. Quantum Grav.13, A291 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    Electrostatic effect due to patch poten- tials between closely spaced surfaces

    J. Ke et al., “Electrostatic effect due to patch poten- tials between closely spaced surfaces.”Phys. Rev. D107, 065009 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Forces between conducting surfaces due to spatial variations of surface potential

    C. C. Speake and C. Trenkel, “Forces between conducting surfaces due to spatial variations of surface potential.” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 160403 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    Modeling electrostatic patch ef- fects in Casimir force measurements

    R. O. Behunin et al., “Modeling electrostatic patch ef- fects in Casimir force measurements.”Phys. Rev. A85, 012504 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Elec- trostatic interaction due to patch potentials on smooth conducting surfaces

    C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo, and F. D. Mazzitelli, “Elec- trostatic interaction due to patch potentials on smooth conducting surfaces.”Phys. Rev. A88, 062501 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Kelvin probe force microscopy of metallic surfaces used in Casimir force measurements

    R. O. Behunin et al., “Kelvin probe force microscopy of metallic surfaces used in Casimir force measurements.” Phys. Rev. A90, 062115 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Quenched charge disorder and Coulomb interactions

    A. Naji and R. Podgornik, “Quenched charge disorder and Coulomb interactions.”Phys. Rev. E72, 041402 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Electrostatic disorder- induced interactions in inhomogeneous dielectrics

    R. Podgornik and A. Naji, “Electrostatic disorder- induced interactions in inhomogeneous dielectrics.”Eu- rophys. Lett.74, 712 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Sample-to- sample fluctuations of electrostatic forces generated by quenched charge disorder

    D. S. Dean, A. Naji, and R. Podgornik, “Sample-to- sample fluctuations of electrostatic forces generated by quenched charge disorder.”Phys. Rev. E83, 011102 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Coulomb interactions between disor- dered charge distributions

    D. S. Dean et al., “Coulomb interactions between disor- dered charge distributions” (inElectrostatics of Soft and Disordered Matter, edited by J. Dobnikar, D. S. Dean, A. Naji, and R. Podgornik (Pan Stanford Publishing, 2014)) (https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3515)

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Electromagnetic fluctuation-induced interactions in randomly charged slabs

    V. Rezvani et al., “Electromagnetic fluctuation-induced interactions in randomly charged slabs.”J. Chem. Phys.137, 114704 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Nonmonotoic fluctuation-induced interactions between dielectric slabs carrying charge dis- order

    J. Sarabadani et al., “Nonmonotoic fluctuation-induced interactions between dielectric slabs carrying charge dis- order.”J. Chem. Phys.133, 174702 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Fluctuation-Induced Interaction between Randomly Charged Dielectrics

    A. Naji et al., “Fluctuation-Induced Interaction between Randomly Charged Dielectrics.”Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 060601 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Atom-surface interaction induced by quenched monopolar charge disorder

    B.-S. Lu, “Atom-surface interaction induced by quenched monopolar charge disorder.”Phys. Rev. A112, 042812 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    The physisorption mechanism of SO 2 on graphitized carbon

    S. J. Tan, D. D. Do and J. W. Chew, “The physisorption mechanism of SO 2 on graphitized carbon.”Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 21463 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Adsorption of polar molecules on diamond-like carbon films with differ- ent trapped charge densities

    P. Jaroenapibal, E. Seekumbor, N. Triroj, “Adsorption of polar molecules on diamond-like carbon films with differ- ent trapped charge densities.”Diamond & Related Ma- terials65, 125 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    An Effective Potential for Adsorption of Polar Molecules on Graphite

    X. Zhao and J. K. Johnson, “An Effective Potential for Adsorption of Polar Molecules on Graphite.”Molecular Simulation31, 1 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    Visualizing spontaneous ph- ysisorption of non-chargedπ-conjugated polymers onto neutral surfaces of spherical silica in nonpolar solvents

    A. Nakao and M. Fujiki, “Visualizing spontaneous ph- ysisorption of non-chargedπ-conjugated polymers onto neutral surfaces of spherical silica in nonpolar solvents.” Polymer Journal47, 434 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Paraelec- tricity and ferroelectricity due to hydroxyl ions in alkali halides; paraelectric cooling

    W. K¨ anzig, H. R. Hart, Jr., and S. Roberts, “Paraelec- tricity and ferroelectricity due to hydroxyl ions in alkali halides; paraelectric cooling.”Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 543 (1964)

    1964

  20. [28]

    Glassy polarization behav- ior in ferroelectric compounds Pb(Mg 1/3Nb2/3)O3 and Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3

    G. Burns and F. H. Dacol, “Glassy polarization behav- ior in ferroelectric compounds Pb(Mg 1/3Nb2/3)O3 and Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3.”Solid State Communications48, 853 (1983)

    1983

  21. [29]

    Dipole glass and ferroelectricity in random-site electric dipole systems

    B. E. Vugmeister and M. D. Glinchuk, “Dipole glass and ferroelectricity in random-site electric dipole systems.” Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 993 (1990)

    1990

  22. [30]

    Recent progress in relaxor ferroelectrics with perovskite structure

    A. A. Bokov and Z.-G. Ye, “Recent progress in relaxor ferroelectrics with perovskite structure.”Journal of Ma- terials Science41, 31 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Nanopolar Structure in Sr xBa1?xNb2O6 Sin- gle Crystals Tuned by Sr/Ba Ratio and Investigated by Piezoelectric Force Microscopy

    V. V. Shvartsman, W. Kleemann, T. Lukasiewicz and J. Dec, “Nanopolar Structure in Sr xBa1?xNb2O6 Sin- gle Crystals Tuned by Sr/Ba Ratio and Investigated by Piezoelectric Force Microscopy.”Phys. Rev. B77, 054105 (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    Mesoscale Domains and Nature of the Relaxor State by Piezore- sponse Force Microscopy

    V. V. Shvartsman, B. Dkhil and A. Kholkin, “Mesoscale Domains and Nature of the Relaxor State by Piezore- sponse Force Microscopy.”Annual Review of Materials Research43, 423 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Li Concentration Dependence of Di- electric Responses of Quantum Relaxor K 1−xLixTaO3

    H. Yokota et al., “Li Concentration Dependence of Di- electric Responses of Quantum Relaxor K 1−xLixTaO3.” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.46, 7167 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Origin of the crossover between a freez- ing and a structural transition at low concentration in the relaxor ferroelectric K1−xLixTaO3

    L. Cai et al., “Origin of the crossover between a freez- ing and a structural transition at low concentration in the relaxor ferroelectric K1−xLixTaO3.”Phys. Rev. B91, 134106 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    SrTiO 3: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 K

    K. A. M¨ uller and H. Burkard, “SrTiO 3: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 K.”Phys. Rev. B19, 3593 (1979)

    1979

  28. [36]

    Disorder and thermal transport in undoped KTaO3

    B. Salce, J. L. Gavril and L. V. Boatner, “Disorder and thermal transport in undoped KTaO3.”J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter6, 4077 (1994)

    1994

  29. [37]

    Characterisation of PZT thin film micro-actuators using a silicon micro-force sensor

    F. F. C. Duval et al., “Characterisation of PZT thin film micro-actuators using a silicon micro-force sensor.”Sen- sors and Actuators A: Physical133, 35 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    Design and Modeling of Piezoelectric Nanofilm Actuators for Low-Voltage Pow- ered Microrobots

    J. Lin, Z. Chen and Q. Liu, “Design and Modeling of Piezoelectric Nanofilm Actuators for Low-Voltage Pow- ered Microrobots.”Micromachines17, 434 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    PMN-PT piezoelectric material and related applications in silicon-integrated devices like mi- croactuators and energy harvesters

    I. A. Ivan et al., “PMN-PT piezoelectric material and related applications in silicon-integrated devices like mi- croactuators and energy harvesters.”IEEE International Semiconductor Conference1, 149 (2011). IEEE Interna- tional Semiconductor Conference, CAS?11., Oct 2011, Sin...

    2011

  32. [40]

    Enhanced flexoelectric properties in sodium bismuth titanate-based lead-free relaxor ferroelectrics by inducing polar nanoregions

    C. Yi et al., “Enhanced flexoelectric properties in sodium bismuth titanate-based lead-free relaxor ferroelectrics by inducing polar nanoregions.”J. Appl. Phys.137, 034101 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Nonresonant Casimir-Polder repulsion with a monolayer topological insulator

    B.-S. Lu, “Nonresonant Casimir-Polder repulsion with a monolayer topological insulator.”Europhysics Let- 16 ters150, 46001 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Relaxor ferroelectrics: an overview

    L. Eric Cross, “Relaxor ferroelectrics: an overview.”Fer- roelectrics151, 305 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    Crystalline ferroelectrics with glassy polarization behavior

    G. Burns and F. H. Dacol, “Crystalline ferroelectrics with glassy polarization behavior.”Phys. Rev. B28, 2527 (1983)

    1983

  36. [44]

    Ef- fect of temperature variations on equilibrium distances in levitating parallel dielectric plates interacting through Casimir forces

    V. Esteso, S. Carretero-Palacios, and H. M ´ ıguez, “Ef- fect of temperature variations on equilibrium distances in levitating parallel dielectric plates interacting through Casimir forces.”J. Appl. Phys.119, 144301 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    General theory of van der Waals forces

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, “General theory of van der Waals forces.”Sov. Phys. Usp.4, 153 (1961)

    1961

  38. [46]

    Relaxor Ferroelectrics

    L. E. Cross, “Relaxor Ferroelectrics.”Ferroelectrics76, 241 (1987)

    1987

  39. [47]

    Here, we have based our representative values for Γ B on the measured root mean square (rms) polarization values published in the literature. Taking a representative value of the rms polarization as 0.70 C/m 2 [43] and assuming that a polar nanoregion (PNR) has a size of 10 nm...

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.