REVIEW 2 cited by
Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The quality of training data is one of the crucial problems when a learning-centered approach is employed. This paper proposes a new method to investigate the quality of a large corpus designed for the recognizing textual entailment (RTE) task. The proposed method, which is inspired by a statistical hypothesis test, consists of two phases: the first phase is to introduce the predictability of textual entailment labels as a null hypothesis which is extremely unacceptable if a target corpus has no hidden bias, and the second phase is to test the null hypothesis using a Naive Bayes model. The experimental result of the Stanford Natural Language Inference (SNLI) corpus does not reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, it indicates that the SNLI corpus has a hidden bias which allows prediction of textual entailment labels from hypothesis sentences even if no context information is given by a premise sentence. This paper also presents the performance impact of NN models for RTE caused by this hidden bias.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Abductive Commonsense Reasoning
A new benchmark, ART, shows pre-trained language models are far behind humans at choosing and generating plausible explanations of everyday narrative observations.
-
Digital Gatekeepers: Exploring Large Language Model's Role in Immigration Decisions
GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 approximate human immigration preferences in a discrete choice experiment but exhibit systematic biases toward privileged nationalities and occupations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.