Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On Autonomous Agents in a Cyber Defence Environment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.07388 v1 pith:INVQQEMX submitted 2023-09-14 cs.CR

On Autonomous Agents in a Cyber Defence Environment

classification cs.CR
keywords agentcyberautonomouschallengealgorithmscagedefencedefensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous Cyber Defence is required to respond to high-tempo cyber-attacks. To facilitate the research in this challenging area, we explore the utility of the autonomous cyber operation environments presented as part of the Cyber Autonomy Gym for Experimentation (CAGE) Challenges, with a specific focus on CAGE Challenge 2. CAGE Challenge 2 required a defensive Blue agent to defend a network from an attacking Red agent. We provide a detailed description of the this challenge and describe the approaches taken by challenge participants. From the submitted agents, we identify four classes of algorithms, namely, Single- Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), Hierarchical DRL, Ensembles, and Non-DRL approaches. Of these classes, we found that the hierarchical DRL approach was the most capable of learning an effective cyber defensive strategy. Our analysis of the agent policies identified that different algorithms within the same class produced diverse strategies and that the strategy used by the defensive Blue agent varied depending on the strategy used by the offensive Red agent. We conclude that DRL algorithms are a suitable candidate for autonomous cyber defence applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FORGE: Self-Evolving Agent Memory With No Weight Updates via Population Broadcast

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FORGE is a staged population protocol that evolves prompt-injected memory (Rules, Examples, or Mixed) for ReAct agents via reflection and broadcast, yielding 1.7-7.7× gains over zero-shot and 29-72% over Reflexion on ...

  2. Context, Reasoning, and Hierarchy: A Cost-Performance Study of Compound LLM Agent Design in an Adversarial POMDP

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    In CybORG CAGE-2, programmatic state abstraction improves mean return up to 76% over raw observations while adding deliberation tools to hierarchies degrades performance up to 3.4x and increases token use.

  3. Building Better Environments for Autonomous Cyber Defence

    cs.CR 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    A workshop synthesis provides a decomposition framework for RL-cyber environment interfaces and best-practice guidelines for training and evaluating autonomous cyber defence agents.