Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 121 references

Foundational Structure of Local Amplitudes in Quantum Gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that, given seven stated axioms, local quantum-gravity amplitudes built purely from boundary symmetry data, a projector, and two vacuum states satisfy Ward identities and charge conservation in causal diamonds.

desk verdict A clean algebraic skeleton for local amplitudes in causal diamonds, with the existence of the vacuum states as the load-bearing but unproven input; worth refereeing, but only as a framework proposal. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09679 v1 pith:IPI7VAWM submitted 2025-08-13 gr-qc quant-ph

Charalampos Theofilis , Wolfgang Wieland This is my paper
classification gr-qcquant-ph PACS 04.60.-m
keywords quantumgravitylocalamplitudescausaldiamondsnullhypersurfacescornersymmetriesedgemodesgeneralizedprojectorWardidentities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out a theory-independent recipe for local quantum-gravity amplitudes: instead of a global wave function or an asymptotic S-matrix, the primitive object is a transition amplitude for a causal diamond built from slabs of null geometry. Each null slab carries a kinematical Hilbert space that factorizes into an interior piece and two corner pieces (edge modes), and the proposed amplitudes arise purely from contracting boundary states with a generalized projector onto physical states and with two special vacuum states — an edge vacuum at the tips of the diamond and a bulk vacuum that intertwines the corner symmetry algebras. The central result is that, under seven stated axioms, the resulting amplitude satisfies Ward identities and local charge conservation: a symmetry flux crossing a null face acts on the amplitude exactly like the corresponding corner charge, and the charges at the two corners of the diamond match. If any concrete model can realize the axioms, quantum-gravity predictions for finite spacetime regions would follow from boundary symmetry data alone, and would connect to the soft-graviton Ward-identity structure known at null infinity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized projector $P$ onto physical states, defined by the flux-balance constraints $C_\xi = Q_\xi[C_+] - Q_\xi[C_-] - H_\xi[N] = 0$; it commutes with the corner charges and intertwines the edge symmetries. Two states carry the rest of the argument: the edge vacuum $T^A$, a singlet (a state every corner charge annihilates) representing a corner shrinking to a point, and the bulk vacuum $|\Omega^A_{A'}\rangle$, a physical state intertwining the corner symmetry algebras at the two ends of the slab. The amplitude (47) is the contraction of these objects in a causal-diamond pattern, and the Ward identities follow from sliding constraint insertions through the p

What would settle it

In a concrete model — say the auxiliary conformal field theory of null-cone quantization, or a spinfoam model on a fixed two-complex — write the unitary representation of the corner symmetry algebra on the boundary Hilbert space and check whether a non-zero edge vacuum annihilated by all corner charges exists, and whether a physical bulk vacuum satisfying (45)–(46) exists. For infinite-dimensional algebras such as $\mathrm{Diff}(S^2)$ or Virasoro algebras at non-zero central charge such invariant states are generically absent; finding none in any model would show the axioms are unsatisfiable,

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under axioms (i)–(vii), the paper claims that the amplitude (47) — in- and out-states contracted with the projector $P$ and the vacua $T^A$, $|\Omega^A_{A'}\rangle$ — satisfies the Ward identities (51)–(52) and the corner charge-conservation law (55): flux through a null face acts on the amplitude exactly like the corner charge at that face's tip, and the two tips' charges match up to a parallel transport $h$. The proof is index bookkeeping: $P$ solves the flux-balance constraints $C_\xi = Q_\xi[C_+] - Q_\xi[C_-] - H_\xi[N]=0$ and intertwines the edge symmetries; $T^A$ is a corner-algebra singlet; $|\Omega^A_{A'}\rangle$ is a physical intertwiner between the corner algebras, so constraint in

Load-bearing premise

The construction stands or falls on the assumed existence of two states, stated in equations (44)–(46) and axioms (vi)–(vii): an edge vacuum $T^A$ annihilated by every corner charge, and a bulk vacuum $|\Omega^A_{A'}\rangle$ that solves the flux-balance constraints and intertwines the two corner symmetry algebras; if a corner symmetry algebra admits no such invariant states, the amplitude (47) is undefined or trivial.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Local quantum-gravity probabilities for processes inside a causal diamond become computable from boundary symmetry data alone — corner charges, fluxes, and the two vacua — with no global wave function and no asymptotic S-matrix.
  • Corner charges $Q_\xi[C_\pm]$ are physical observables (they commute with the projector), so the charge-conservation identity (55) identifies boundary charges as the natural observable content of the local theory, in the same role soft charges play at null infinity.
  • The null-boundary constraint algebra is a genuine Lie algebra, so the projector $P$ is a well-defined averaging over symmetries, avoiding the structure-function problem that obstructs quantizing the spacelike constraint algebra.
  • Spinfoam models, group field theory, and null-cone quantization all realize the projector in concrete ways (a sum over surfaces or a CFT $n$-point function), giving candidate models in which axioms (i)–(vii) can be verified or refuted.
  • As the diamond grows toward null infinity, the local charge-conservation law reproduces the structure of the soft-graviton Ward identities, linking the finite-region amplitude program to the perturbative S-matrix framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The axioms are satisfiable only if the corner symmetry algebra admits invariant states; for infinite-dimensional algebras such as diffeomorphisms of a two-sphere or Virasoro algebras at non-zero central charge, unitary representations generically contain no non-zero invariant vectors. A concrete model would therefore either select special algebras and representations or expose the axioms as empty
  • Read as a finite-region holographic recipe, the construction encodes everything between the two corners in boundary data, since the bulk enters only through the projector and vacuum intertwiners. A direct test would be 2+1 gravity, where the projector is known exactly and the amplitudes (47) can be compared with the standard amplitudes for a null-bounded region.
  • If corner charges are observables, the physical Hilbert space of a diamond splits into charge superselection sectors, and (55) forces the in- and out-data to live in matching sectors; this superselection structure is not spelled out in the paper but follows from the identities it proves.
  • The paper itself concedes (Section 5) that it is 'deliberately vague' about how the axioms are realized in practice; the proposal is best read as a consistency condition that candidate quantum-gravity constructions must satisfy rather than as a construction, and the axioms' main risk is that no real model satisfies them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an axiomatic, top-down framework for constructing local transition amplitudes in quantum gravity on causal diamonds bounded by null surfaces. The authors review timeless quantum mechanics and covariant phase space, then define a kinematical Hilbert space factorized into corner edge modes and bulk radiative modes. The physical Hilbert space is obtained by a generalized projector implementing flux-balance constraints. The central result is the amplitude formula (47), built from projectors P and assumed vacuum states T^A and |Ω^A_{A'}⟩, and the claim that this amplitude satisfies Ward identities (51), (52) and local charge conservation (55). The paper concludes by discussing possible realizations through CFT data and spinfoam/GFT constructions.

Significance. If the axioms can be realized, the paper provides a clean structural template for local gravitational amplitudes: the amplitude is a tensor contraction of a generalized projector with vacuum intertwiners, and the Ward identities follow transparently from the stated axioms. The derivation is algebraic and easy to follow, and the paper avoids fitted parameters. Its main value is as a synthesis and blueprint, connecting null-surface edge modes, flux-balance laws, and timeless amplitudes. The main weakness is that the existence of the edge vacuum T^A and bulk vacuum |Ω^A_{A'}⟩, Eqs. (44)–(46), is assumed rather than established; for the infinite-dimensional corner algebras the paper names (Diff(S^2), Virasoro-type, jet-bundle extensions), such invariant or intertwining states need not exist in unitary representations. Thus the central result is conditional on a non-trivial existence problem.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Eqs. (44)–(46); §4.3 Axioms (vi)–(vii)] The load-bearing assumption is the existence of T^A and |Ω^A_{A'}⟩ satisfying (44)–(46). The paper explicitly defers realization to [11] and future work, but this is not a minor gap. For the corner symmetry algebras mentioned (Diff(S^2), Virasoro-type, jet-bundle extensions), unitary representations generically contain no nonzero invariant vector, and group-averaging typically yields distributional states outside the kinematical Hilbert space. Similarly, (46) requires a normalizable solution of the quantum constraints with the flux-balance operator equal to the charge difference; if zero lies in the continuous spectrum, no such Ω exists in K↑. Since (47)–(55) use T and Ω as ordinary Hilbert-space intertwiners, failure of existence makes the amplitude undefined or identically zero and the Ward identities vacuous. The authors should either provide a concrete model satisfying (44)–(46) or s
  2. [§4.2, Eqs. (35)–(40); §2, Eqs. (4)–(5)] The functional-analytic status of the generalized projector is not addressed. P is said to map into possibly non-normalizable elements of the algebraic dual, yet the amplitude (47) and Ward identities use ⟨γ|P|Ω⟩ as ordinary matrix elements and move charges through P using (37)–(43). This requires a specification of dense domains, adjoints, and the convergence of the infinite sums/integrals over A,A′ in (25) and (47). The DeWitt notation in footnote 9 deliberately suppresses these issues, but they become load-bearing when the corner algebra is infinite-dimensional and the charges Qξ are unbounded. The authors should state the domain assumptions under which (47)–(55) are well-defined.
  3. [End of §4.3, Eq. (55)] Equation (55), local charge conservation, is a central advertised result but is asserted rather than derived: the text says only 'In the same way, it is easy to show'. Given that the derivation of (54) is already intricate and relies on the parallel-transport map h and the vacuum annihilation (44), the proof of (55) should be written out. In particular, it must be shown how Qξ[C+in] on the in-state is transported through the projector and the bulk vacuum to Q_{hξ}[C+out] on the out-state, using (45), (46), and (49)–(50). Without this, the charge-conservation claim is not substantiated.
  4. [§4.3 Axioms (iii),(v), Eqs. (37)–(38), (51)–(52)] The Ward identities (51)–(52) are to a large extent unpackings of the axioms rather than independent dynamical predictions. The projector P is defined by (37)–(38) to annihilate the constraint Cξ = Q[C+] − Q[C−] − H, and Ω is assumed by (46) to satisfy the same flux-balance condition. Consequently, moving Hξ through P and using the vacuum conditions produces (51) and (52) almost immediately. This is not an error, but the paper should state explicitly that the identities are consequences of the construction, and clarify in the discussion of Section 5 what additional predictive content, if any, the framework has beyond these built-in constraints. The comparison with soft-graviton theorems in the conclusion should be qualified accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3] In the sentence defining the null slab, '∂N = C+ ∪ C−1−' appears to contain a typo; it should presumably read C+ ∪ C−.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (24) and Axiom (i)] The notation for the dual relation between KC+ and KC− is inconsistent: earlier KC− = K*_{C+}, while Axiom (i) says KC+ = K†_{C−}. These are equivalent only under the inner-product identification, which should be stated.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (35)–(36)] The same symbol |γA A′⟩ is used for the state and its projected image; this makes the definition of P hard to read. Use a different symbol, e.g. P|γ⟩ = |γ phys⟩.
  4. [References] References [26] and [77] are the same paper (Donnelly–Freidel), as are [66] and [102] (Perez) and [92] and [108] (Giacomini–Castro-Ruiz–Brukner). Please consolidate.
  5. [Figure 4 caption] The caption describes N′in as attached to 'the outgoing null surface Nin' and N′out to 'the infalling null surface Nout'. This is confusing; clarify which auxiliary slab is glued to which boundary and whether 'in'/'out' refer to the slab orientation or the causal future.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Ward identities and charge conservation are restatements of the projector and vacuum axioms; the amplitude contraction pattern itself is a genuine construction.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.3, Axiom (v) and Eq. (51)]
    "Given these assumptions, we obtain A(Hξ[Nin]γ(in) → γ(out)) = A(Qξ[C+in]γ(in) → γ(out)). (51)"

    Axiom (v) defines P as a projector onto the solution space of the constraints, i.e. P Cξ = CξP = 0, with Cξ = Qξ[C+] − Qξ[C−] − Hξ[N] (Axiom (iii)). Eq. (48) obtains the left side by moving Hξ through P using the projector condition (37)–(38). The right side is then just the charge part of the same constraint, with the Q− term killed by the assumed edge-vacuum condition (44). The Ward identity is therefore the constraint equation written in amplitude form; it is an input of the projector definition, not an independent prediction.

  2. self definitional [Section 4.3, Eq. (55) with Axioms (vi)–(vii)]
    "In the same way, it is easy to show that the amplitudes realise local charge conservation at the corner, where the future and past states intersect, i.e. A(Qξ[C+in]γ(in) → γ(out)) = A(γ(in) → Qh[C+in→C+out]ξ[C+out]γ(out)). (55)"

    This identity follows by using the assumed intertwining property (45) of the bulk vacuum and the assumed annihilation (44) of the edge vacuum, together with the projector-invariance (42)–(43). These are precisely the properties that make T and Ω intertwiners; (55) is a direct transcription of those assumed intertwiner relations into a matrix element. It does not test the construction against new data; it restates the axioms in amplitude language.

full rationale

The paper is transparently an axiomatic, top-down framework: the amplitude (47) is a new contraction pattern, and the gluing construction of Figure 4 has independent content. However, the two advertised results—Ward identities (51)/(52) and local charge conservation (55)—are not independent predictions. Axiom (v) already states that the projector annihilates the constraints, and Axioms (vi)–(vii) already state that the edge and bulk vacua are singlets/intertwiners. The derivations in (48)–(54) unpack these axioms by moving Hξ through P and using the vacuum properties; no new physical input enters. This is a mild form of circularity-by-construction: the results are equivalent to the defining equations of P, T, and Ω. There are no fitted parameters, no external benchmarks, and no load-bearing self-citation loop. The unproven existence of the vacua (44)–(46), deferred to ref. [11] and future work, is a genuine gap in realizability, but because the paper labels these as axioms rather than deriving them, it is a completeness risk rather than a circular step. Overall score 6 reflects that the central consistency claims reduce to the axioms, while the amplitude construction itself remains a genuine proposal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 3 invented entities

No numbers are fitted. The construction rests on seven structural axioms, the most fragile being the existence of the edge and bulk vacua and the projector. These are assumed, and the paper defers concrete realization to other work.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Kinematical Hilbert space factorization K_N = K_C+ tensor K_N tensor K_C- (equation 24).
    Structural axiom: bulk radiative and corner edge modes factorize; no derivation from an underlying Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Existence of a generalized projector P onto physical states satisfying equations (35) through (43).
    Defines the physical Hilbert space by annihilating constraints; imported from timeless and spinfoam formalisms.
  • ad hoc to paper Edge vacuum T^A exists and is annihilated by all corner charges Q_xi[C_+-] (equation 44).
    No proof is given for infinite-dimensional corner symmetry algebras; this assumption is essential for removing corners in amplitude (47).
  • ad hoc to paper Bulk vacuum |Omega^A_{A'}> exists, solves all constraints, and intertwines corner charges (equations 45 and 46).
    Physical intertwiner connecting in and out sectors; existence is not demonstrated in a concrete model.
  • domain assumption Constraint algebra C_xi = Q_xi[C_+] minus Q_xi[C_-] minus H_xi[N] = 0, with charges commuting with the projector (equations 37, 38, 42, 43).
    Quantum version of the Noether flux-balance law from the covariant phase space formalism.
  • domain assumption Parity swap operator Pi with Pi^2 = 1, commuting with constraints, and decomposition K_N = K^up plus K^down (equations 26 and 30).
    Discrete symmetry relating outgoing and infalling slabs; needed for the causal diamond amplitude pattern.
  • domain assumption Diffeomorphic gluing of auxiliary null slabs identifies the in and out boundaries with the same abstract null surface (Figure 4).
    Makes the contraction pattern in equation (47) well defined.
invented entities (3)
  • Edge vacuum state T^A
    purpose: Acts as a singlet under corner symmetry charges and removes the two corners of the causal diamond in amplitude (47).
    Postulated no-geometry state; no construction or falsifiable prediction is provided.
  • Bulk vacuum state |Omega^A_{A'}>
    purpose: Intertwines corner charges and anchors the in and out sectors of the amplitude (47).
    Postulated physical state solving all constraints; independent evidence is not given.
  • Generalized projector P
    purpose: Maps kinematical boundary states to physical states and defines the physical inner product.
    A formal operator whose existence and domain properties are assumed rather than derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Foundational Structure of Local Amplitudes in Quantum Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IPI7VAWM

@misc{pith2026250809679,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Foundational Structure of Local Amplitudes in Quantum Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IPI7VAWM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09679}
}
read the original abstract

There has been recently renewed interest in the quantisation of gravity by considering local subsystems on light-like hypersurfaces. The main purpose of this paper is to present a theory-independent perspective on these developments assuming only basic knowledge of quantum theory and general relativity. In addition, we present a top-down approach to constructing local amplitudes in causal diamonds. The fundamental building block is a slab of light-like geometry (e.g. a segment of a light cone embedded into spacetime). Each slab is a three-dimensional light-like hypersurface bounded by two cuts, its past and future corners. After briefly reviewing the timeless formalism of quantum theory, we equip each null slab a with a kinematical Hilbert space that factorizes into constituents associated to the three-dimensional interior and its two corners. Upon assuming the existence of vacuum states for the bulk and boundary symmetries and a fundamental projector onto physical states, we explain how to introduce local amplitudes by contracting boundary states according to the pattern of a causal diamond. Finally, we show that the resulting local transition amplitudes satisfy Ward identities and charge conservation for the underlying symmetries. The paper closes with a summary and discussion for how different approaches to quantum gravity can realise our proposal in practice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09679 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A diffeomorphism φ, which becomes the identity outside of a small (four-dimensional) neigh￾bourhood that surrounds a compact domain D ⊂ Σ. The diffeomorphism maps a spatial Cauchy surface Σ into a new surface φ(Σ). For an observer placed in the causal future (past) of D, the initial data at Σ and φ(Σ) characterise the same physical state. In a background-invariant theory, the two configurations are gauge equivalent … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The diffeomorphism φ deforms a three-dimensional null hypersurface N ⊂ M into a new hypersurface φ(N) ⊂ M that is no longer null. No matter how small this diffeomorphism is, the new surface φ(N) contains data that is not available on N. Therefore, the motion on phase space that takes initial data on N to φ(N) cannot be a classical canonical transformation (unitary transformation in quantum theory). the left, the dat… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Index conventions for boundary states distinguish the two orientation of the null slab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: We consider a causal diamond whose boundary is divided into past and future null hypersurfaces [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 86 linked inside Pith

  1. [11]

    Quantum Geometry of the Light Cone: Fock Representation and Spectrum of Radiated Power,

    W. Wieland, “Quantum Geometry of the Light Cone: Fock Representation and Spectrum of Radiated Power,”arXiv:2504.10802. 18

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory,”Phys. Rev. 160 (Aug, 1967) 1113–1148

    1967

  3. [2]

    Ashtekar,Lectures on Non-Pertubative Canonical Gravity

    A. Ashtekar,Lectures on Non-Pertubative Canonical Gravity. World Scientific, 1991

    1991

  4. [3]

    Kiefer,Quantum Gravity

    C. Kiefer,Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  5. [4]

    Thiemann,Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity

    C. Thiemann,Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  6. [5]

    Rovelli,Quantum Gravity

    C. Rovelli,Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

    2008

  7. [6]

    Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems,

    B. Dittrich, “Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems,” Gen. Rel. Grav.39 (2007) 1891–1927, arXiv:gr-qc/0411013

    arXiv 2007

  8. [7]

    The symplectic 2-form for gravity in terms of free null initial data,

    M. P. Reisenberger, “The symplectic 2-form for gravity in terms of free null initial data,” Class. Quant. Grav.30 (2013) 155022, arXiv:1211.3880

    arXiv 2013

Show all 121 references
  1. [8]

    Integrable structures and the quantization of free null initial data for gravity,

    A. Fuchs and M. P. Reisenberger, “Integrable structures and the quantization of free null initial data for gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.34 (2017), no. 18, 185003, arXiv:1704.06992

    2017 arXiv

  2. [9]

    The Poisson brackets of free null initial data for vacuum general relativity,

    M. P. Reisenberger, “The Poisson brackets of free null initial data for vacuum general relativity,”Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018), no. 18, 185012, arXiv:1804.10284

    2018 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Fock representation of gravitational boundary modes and the discreteness of the area spectrum,

    W. Wieland, “Fock representation of gravitational boundary modes and the discreteness of the area spectrum,”Ann. Henri Poincaré18 (2017) 3695–3717, arXiv:1706.00479

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    New boundary variables for classical and quantum gravity on a null surface,

    W. Wieland, “New boundary variables for classical and quantum gravity on a null surface,” Class. Quantum Grav.34 (2017) 215008, arXiv:1704.07391

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Causal diamonds in (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity,

    R. Andrade e Silva and T. Jacobson, “Causal diamonds in (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D107 (2023), no. 2, 024033,arXiv:2203.10084

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Entropy of causal diamond ensembles,

    T. Jacobson and M. R. Visser, “Entropy of causal diamond ensembles,”SciPost Phys. 15 (2023), no. 1, 023,arXiv:2212.10608

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Quantum Mechanics of a Spherically Symmetric Causal Diamond in Minkowski Spacetime,

    M. W. Bub, T. He, P. Mitra, Y. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, “Quantum Mechanics of a Spherically Symmetric Causal Diamond in Minkowski Spacetime,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 12, 121501,arXiv:2408.11094

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Corner symmetry and quantum geometry,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and W. Wieland, “Corner symmetry and quantum geometry,” inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, L. M. Cosimo Bambi and I. Shapiro, eds. Springer, 2023.arXiv:2302.12799

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Quantum geometry of the null cone,

    W. Wieland, “Quantum geometry of the null cone,”arXiv:2401.17491

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Evidence for Planck luminosity bound in quantum gravity,

    W. Wieland, “Evidence for Planck luminosity bound in quantum gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav. 42 (2025), no. 6, 06LT01

    2025

  11. [19]

    Quantum null geometry and gravity,

    L. Ciambelli, L. Freidel, and R. G. Leigh, “Quantum null geometry and gravity,” JHEP 12 (2024) 028, arXiv:2407.11132

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Null infinity as an open Hamiltonian system,

    W. Wieland, “Null infinity as an open Hamiltonian system,”JHEP 04 (2021) 095, arXiv:2012.01889

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Carrollian-holographic Derivation of BMS Flux-balance Laws,

    A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. Marios Petropoulos, and M. Vilatte, “Carrollian-holographic Derivation of BMS Flux-balance Laws,” arXiv:2505.00077

  14. [22]

    Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 7, 071602, arXiv:2202.04702

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    The Problem of Time and its Quantum Resolution,

    M. S. Klinger and R. G. Leigh, “The Problem of Time and its Quantum Resolution,” arXiv:2504.00152

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Quasilocal mass in general relativity,

    M.-T. Wang and S.-T. Yau, “Quasilocal mass in general relativity,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 021101, arXiv:0804.1174

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in GR: A Review Article,

    L. B. Szabados, “Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in GR: A Review Article,”Living Rev. Rel.7 (2004) 4

    2004

  18. [27]

    Gravitational dressing, soft charges, and perturbative gravitational splitting,

    S. B. Giddings, “Gravitational dressing, soft charges, and perturbative gravitational splitting,”Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 12, 126001, arXiv:1903.06160

    2019 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Edge modes as dynamical frames: charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories,

    S. Carrozza, S. Eccles, and P. A. Hoehn, “Edge modes as dynamical frames: charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories,”arXiv:2205.00913

    arXiv

  20. [29]

    Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin, “Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,” JHEP 07 (2025) 063, arXiv:2412.15502. 19

    2025 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Metriplectic geometry for gravitational subsystems,

    V. Kabel and W. Wieland, “Metriplectic geometry for gravitational subsystems,” Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 6, 064053,arXiv:2206.00029

    2022 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Wave Function of the Universe,

    J. Hartle and S. Hawking, “Wave Function of the Universe,”Phys.Rev. D28 (1983) 2960–2975

    1983

  23. [32]

    Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,

    R. B. Griffiths, “Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Journal of Statistical Physics36 (1984), no. 1, 219–272

    1984

  24. [33]

    Schlick,Gesetz, Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit

    M. Schlick,Gesetz, Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Gerold & Co, Vienna, 1948

    1948

  25. [34]

    The Cauchy problem on a characteristic cone for the Einstein equations in arbitrary dimensions,

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat, P. T. Chrusciel, and J. M. Martin-Garcia, “The Cauchy problem on a characteristic cone for the Einstein equations in arbitrary dimensions,” Annales Henri Poincare12 (2011) 419–482, arXiv:1006.4467

    2011 arXiv

  26. [35]

    The Many ways of the characteristic Cauchy problem,

    P. T. Chrusciel and T.-T. Paetz, “The Many ways of the characteristic Cauchy problem,” Class. Quant. Grav.29 (2012) 145006, arXiv:1203.4534

    2012 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Characteristic gluing withΛ: 1. Linearised Einstein equations on four-dimensional spacetimes,

    P. T. Chruściel and W. Cong, “Characteristic gluing withΛ: 1. Linearised Einstein equations on four-dimensional spacetimes,”Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math. 1 (2024), no. 2, 689–796,arXiv:2212.10052

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    The characteristic gluing problem for the Einstein equations and applications,

    S. Aretakis, S. Czimek, and I. Rodnianski, “The characteristic gluing problem for the Einstein equations and applications,”Duke Math. J.174 (2025), no. 2, 355–402, arXiv:2107.02441

    2025 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Krasnov,Formulations of General Relativity: Gravity, Spinors and Differential Forms

    K. Krasnov,Formulations of General Relativity: Gravity, Spinors and Differential Forms. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2020

    2020

  30. [39]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992

    1992

  31. [40]

    First order gravity on the light front,

    S. Alexandrov and S. Speziale, “First order gravity on the light front,”Phys. Rev. D 91 (Mar, 2015) 064043

    2015

  32. [41]

    Hypersurface-deformation algebroids and effective spacetime models,

    M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, U. Buyukcam, and F. D’Ambrosio, “Hypersurface-deformation algebroids and effective spacetime models,”Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 10, 104032,arXiv:1610.08355

    2016 arXiv

  33. [42]

    How commutators of constraints reflect the spacetime structure,

    C. Teitelboim, “How commutators of constraints reflect the spacetime structure,” Annals of Physics79 (1973), no. 2, 542–557

    1973

  34. [43]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. Misner,The dynamics of general relativity, ch. 7, pp. 227–264. Wiley, New York, 1962.arXiv:gr-qc/0405109v1

    1962 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Geometrodynamics regained,

    S. A. Hojman, K. Kuchař, and C. Teitelboim, “Geometrodynamics regained,” Annals of Physics96 (1976), no. 1, 88–135

    1976

  36. [45]

    Isenberg,The Initial Value Problem in General Relativity, pp

    J. Isenberg,The Initial Value Problem in General Relativity, pp. 303–321. 2014. arXiv:1304.1960

    2014 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Gravitational SL(2,R) algebra on the light cone,

    W. Wieland, “Gravitational SL(2,R) algebra on the light cone,”JHEP 07 (2021) 057, arXiv:2104.05803

    2021 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Null Raychaudhuri: Canonical Structure and the Dressing Time,

    L. Ciambelli, L. Freidel, and R. G. Leigh, “Null Raychaudhuri: Canonical Structure and the Dressing Time,”arXiv:2309.03932. 20

    arXiv

  39. [48]

    Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity,

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, “Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity,” Nuclear Physics B442 (1995), no. 3, 593–619,arXiv:gr-qc/9411005

    1995 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Emergence of Riemannian Quantum Geometry,

    H. M. Haggard, J. Lewandowski, and H. Sahlmann, “Emergence of Riemannian Quantum Geometry,” inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro, eds. Springer, 2023.arXiv:2302.02840

    2023 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Quantum theory of geometry I.: Area operators,

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Quantum theory of geometry I.: Area operators,” Class. Quant. Grav.14 (1997) A55–A82, arXiv:gr-qc/9602046

    1997 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Flux-area operator and black hole entropy,

    G. J. Fernando Barbero, J. Lewandowski, and E. J. S. Villasenor, “Flux-area operator and black hole entropy,”Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 044016, arXiv:0905.3465

    2009 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables,

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, “Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables,”Phys. Rev. D27 (Jun, 1983) 2885–2892

    1983

  44. [53]

    Quantum mechanics without time: A model,

    C. Rovelli, “Quantum mechanics without time: A model,”Phys. Rev. D42 (Oct,

  45. [54]

    Forget time,

    C. Rovelli, “Forget time,”Found. Phys. 41 (2011) 1475–1490, arXiv:0903.3832

    2011 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Topological quantum field theories,

    M. Atiyah, “Topological quantum field theories,”Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 68 (1989) 175–186

    1989

  47. [56]

    (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,

    E. Witten, “(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,”Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46

    1988

  48. [57]

    Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions

    S. Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  49. [58]

    Quantum gravity as topological quantum field theory,

    J. W. Barrett, “Quantum gravity as topological quantum field theory,”J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6161–6179, arXiv:gr-qc/9506070

    1995 arXiv

  50. [59]

    A ’General boundary’ formulation for quantum mechanics and quantum gravity,

    R. Oeckl, “A ’General boundary’ formulation for quantum mechanics and quantum gravity,”Phys. Lett. B575 (2003) 318–324, arXiv:hep-th/0306025

    2003 arXiv

  51. [60]

    General boundary quantum field theory: Foundations and probability interpretation,

    R. Oeckl, “General boundary quantum field theory: Foundations and probability interpretation,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.12 (2008), no. 2, 319–352, arXiv:hep-th/0509122

    2008 arXiv

  52. [61]

    A positive formalism for quantum theory in the general boundary formulation,

    R. Oeckl, “A positive formalism for quantum theory in the general boundary formulation,” Found. Phys. 43 (2013) 1206–1232, arXiv:1212.5571

    2013 arXiv

  53. [62]

    A local and operational framework for the foundations of physics,

    R. Oeckl, “A local and operational framework for the foundations of physics,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.23 (2019), no. 2, 437–592,arXiv:1610.09052

    2019 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Functional Schrodinger equation for scalar QED,

    C. Kiefer, “Functional Schrodinger equation for scalar QED,”Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 2044–2056

    1992

  55. [64]

    Schrödinger-Feynman quantization and composition of observables in general boundary quantum field theory,

    R. Oeckl, “Schrödinger-Feynman quantization and composition of observables in general boundary quantum field theory,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.19 (2015) 451–506, arXiv:1201.1877

    2015 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Quantization of systems with temporally varying discretization I: Evolving Hilbert spaces,

    P. A. Höhn, “Quantization of systems with temporally varying discretization I: Evolving Hilbert spaces,”J. Math. Phys.55 (2014) 083508, arXiv:1401.6062

    2014 arXiv

  57. [67]

    Quantum correlations with no causal order,

    O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, “Quantum correlations with no causal order,” Nature Communications3 (2012), no. 1, 1092

    2012

  58. [68]

    Witnessing causal nonseparability,

    M. Araújo, C. Branciard, F. Costa, A. Feix, C. Giarmatzi, and v. Brukner, “Witnessing causal nonseparability,”New J. Phys.17 (2015), no. 10, 102001, arXiv:1506.03776

    2015 arXiv

  59. [69]

    The operator tensor formulation of quantum theory,

    L. Hardy, “The operator tensor formulation of quantum theory,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 370 (2012), no. 1971, 3385–3417,arXiv:1201.4390

    2012 arXiv

  60. [70]

    The Covariant Phase Space Of Asymptotically Flat Gravitational Fields,

    A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli, and O. Reula, “The Covariant Phase Space Of Asymptotically Flat Gravitational Fields,” inMechanics, Analysis and Geometry: 200 Years after Lagrange, M. Francaviglia and D. Holm, eds. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990

    1990

  61. [71]

    A General definition of ‘conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity,

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “A General definition of ‘conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity,”Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 084027, arXiv:gr-qc/9911095

    2000 arXiv

  62. [72]

    Covariant phase space with boundaries,

    D. Harlow and J.-q. Wu, “Covariant phase space with boundaries,”Journal of High Energy Physics2020 (2020), no. 10, 146

    2020

  63. [73]

    Boundary effects in General Relativity with tetrad variables,

    R. Oliveri and S. Speziale, “Boundary effects in General Relativity with tetrad variables,” arXiv:1912.01016

    1912 arXiv

  64. [74]

    4d Lorentzian Holst action with topological terms,

    D. J. Rezende and A. Perez, “4d Lorentzian Holst action with topological terms,” Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 064026, arXiv:0902.3416

    2009 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Edge states in gravity and black hole physics,

    A. P. Balachandran, L. Chandar, and A. Momen, “Edge states in gravity and black hole physics,”Nucl. Phys. B461 (1996) 581–596, arXiv:gr-qc/9412019

    1996 arXiv

  66. [76]

    Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole,

    S. Carlip, “Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole,”Phys. Rev. D 51 (Jan, 1995) 632–637

    1995

  67. [77]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,” arXiv:1601.04744

    arXiv

  68. [78]

    Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems,

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings, “Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems,”Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 10, 104038, arXiv:1607.01025

    2016 arXiv

  69. [79]

    The observer’s ghost: notes on a field space connection,

    H. Gomes and A. Riello, “The observer’s ghost: notes on a field space connection,” JHEP 05 (2017) 017, arXiv:1608.08226

    2017 arXiv

  70. [80]

    Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories,

    A. J. Speranza, “Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories,” JHEP 02 (2018) 021, arXiv:1706.05061

    2018 arXiv

  71. [81]

    Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity,

    M. Geiller, “Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B924 (2017) 312–365, arXiv:1703.04748

    2017 arXiv

  72. [82]

    Gravity Edges Modes and Hayward Term,

    T. Takayanagi and K. Tamaoka, “Gravity Edges Modes and Hayward Term,” JHEP 02 (2020) 167, arXiv:1912.01636

    2020 arXiv

  73. [83]

    Bundle geometry of the connection space, covariant Hamiltonian formalism, the problem of boundaries in gauge theories, and the dressing field method,

    J. François, “Bundle geometry of the connection space, covariant Hamiltonian formalism, the problem of boundaries in gauge theories, and the dressing field method,” Journal of High Energy Physics2021 (2021), no. 3, 225, arXiv:2010.01597. 22

    2021 arXiv

  74. [84]

    Gravitational edge modes: from Kac–Moody charges to Poincaré networks,

    L. Freidel, E. R. Livine, and D. Pranzetti, “Gravitational edge modes: from Kac–Moody charges to Poincaré networks,”Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019), no. 19, 195014,arXiv:1906.07876

    2019 arXiv

  75. [85]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti, “Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,”JHEP 11 (2020) 026, arXiv:2006.12527

    2020 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, and P.-C. Pai, “Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (Apr, 2022) 171302, arXiv:2111.13181

    2022 arXiv

  77. [87]

    Extended corner symmetry, charge bracket and Einstein’s equations,

    L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti, and S. Speziale, “Extended corner symmetry, charge bracket and Einstein’s equations,”JHEP 09 (2021) 083, arXiv:2104.12881

    2021 arXiv

  78. [88]

    Gravitational edge modes, coadjoint orbits, and hydrodynamics,

    W. Donnelly, L. Freidel, S. F. Moosavian, and A. J. Speranza, “Gravitational edge modes, coadjoint orbits, and hydrodynamics,”JHEP 09 (2021) 008, arXiv:2012.10367

    2021 arXiv

  79. [89]

    Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,

    C. Goeller, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin, “Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,” arXiv:2206.01193

    arXiv

  80. [90]

    Linking Edge Modes and Geometrical Clocks in Linearized Gravity,

    K. Giesel, V. Kabel, and W. Wieland, “Linking Edge Modes and Geometrical Clocks in Linearized Gravity,”arXiv:2410.17339

  81. [91]

    Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics,

    L. Loveridge, T. Miyadera, and P. Busch, “Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics,”Foundations of Physics48 (2018), no. 2, 135–198

    2018

  82. [92]

    Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,”Nature Commun. 10 (2019), no. 1, 494,arXiv:1712.07207

    2019 arXiv

  83. [93]

    Relativistic Quantum Reference Frames: The Operational Meaning of Spin,

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, “Relativistic Quantum Reference Frames: The Operational Meaning of Spin,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019), no. 9, 090404, arXiv:1811.08228

    2019 arXiv

  84. [94]

    A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework,

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Hoehn, F. Giacomini, and E. Castro-Ruiz, “A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework,” Quantum 4 (2020) 225, arXiv:1809.00556

    2020 arXiv

  85. [95]

    The Trinity of Relational Quantum Dynamics,

    P. A. Höhn, A. R. Smith, and M. P. Lock, “The Trinity of Relational Quantum Dynamics,” arXiv:1912.00033

    1912 arXiv

  86. [96]

    Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transformations,

    E. Castro-Ruiz and O. Oreshkov, “Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transformations,” arXiv:2110.13199

    arXiv

  87. [97]

    Asymptotic higher spin symmetries I: covariant wedge algebra in gravity,

    N. Cresto and L. Freidel, “Asymptotic higher spin symmetries I: covariant wedge algebra in gravity,”Lett. Math. Phys.115 (2025), no. 2, 39,arXiv:2409.12178

    2025 arXiv

  88. [98]

    Asymptotic Higher Spin Symmetries II: Noether Realization in Gravity,

    N. Cresto and L. Freidel, “Asymptotic Higher Spin Symmetries II: Noether Realization in Gravity,”arXiv:2410.15219

  89. [99]

    CarrollianL w1+∞ representation from twistor space,

    L. Donnay, L. Freidel, and Y. Herfray, “CarrollianL w1+∞ representation from twistor space,”SciPost Phys. 17 (2024), no. 4, 118,arXiv:2402.00688

    2024 arXiv

  90. [100]

    Orbit method for Quantum Corner Symmetries,

    G. Neri and L. Varrin, “Orbit method for Quantum Corner Symmetries,” 23 arXiv:2507.10683

    arXiv

  91. [101]

    Zakopane lectures on loop gravity,

    C. Rovelli, “Zakopane lectures on loop gravity,”PoS QGQGS2011 (2011) 003, arXiv:1102.3660

    2011 arXiv

  92. [102]

    The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity,

    A. Perez, “The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.16 (2013), no. 3,arXiv:1205.2019

    2013 arXiv

  93. [103]

    The strange equation of quantum gravity,

    C. Rovelli, “The strange equation of quantum gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015), no. 12, 124005,arXiv:1506.00927

    2015 arXiv

  94. [104]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018.arXiv:1703.05448

    2018 arXiv

  95. [105]

    Sub-subleading soft gravitons: New symmetries of quantum gravity?,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Sub-subleading soft gravitons: New symmetries of quantum gravity?,”Phys. Lett. B764 (2017) 218–221, arXiv:1605.09094

    2017 arXiv

  96. [106]

    Sub-subleading soft graviton theorem from asymptotic Einstein’s equations,

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu, “Sub-subleading soft graviton theorem from asymptotic Einstein’s equations,”JHEP 05 (2022) 186, arXiv:2111.15607

    2022 arXiv

  97. [107]

    Implementation of the Quantum Equivalence Principle,

    L. Hardy, “Implementation of the Quantum Equivalence Principle,” inProgress and Visions in Quantum Theory in View of Gravity, F. Finster, D. Giulini, J. Kleiner, and J. Tolksdorf, eds., pp. 189–220. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020

    2020

  98. [108]

    Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,”Nature Communications 10 (2019), no. 1, 494

    2019

  99. [109]

    Partition functions and topology changing amplitudes in the 3-D lattice gravity of Ponzano and Regge,

    H. Ooguri, “Partition functions and topology changing amplitudes in the 3-D lattice gravity of Ponzano and Regge,”Nucl. Phys. B382 (1992) 276–304, arXiv:hep-th/9112072

    1992 arXiv

  100. [110]

    The Ponzano-Regge model,

    J. W. Barrett and I. Naish-Guzman, “The Ponzano-Regge model,”Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 155014, arXiv:0803.3319

    2009 arXiv

  101. [111]

    Spin foam models and the classical action principle,

    L. Freidel and K. Krasnov, “Spin foam models and the classical action principle,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1999) 1183–1247, arXiv:hep-th/9807092

    1999 arXiv

  102. [112]

    LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter,

    J. Engle, E. Livine, and C. Rovelli, “LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter,” Nucl. Phys. B799 (2008) 136–149, arXiv:0711.0146

    2008 arXiv

  103. [113]

    Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity,

    J. Engle, R. Pereira, and C. Rovelli, “Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B798 (2008) 251–290, arXiv:0708.1236v1

    2008 arXiv

  104. [114]

    Rovelli and F

    C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 11, 2014

    2014

  105. [115]

    The continuum limit of loop quantum gravity - a framework for solving the theory,

    B. Dittrich, “The continuum limit of loop quantum gravity - a framework for solving the theory,” inLoop Quantum Gravity, The First Thirty Years, A. Abhay and J. Pullin, eds., vol. 4. World Scientific, 2017.arXiv:1409.1450

    2017 arXiv

  106. [116]

    Coarse Graining Spin Foam Quantum Gravity—A Review,

    S. Steinhaus, “Coarse Graining Spin Foam Quantum Gravity—A Review,”Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 295, arXiv:2007.01315

    2020 arXiv

  107. [117]

    Effective Spin Foam Models for 24 Four-Dimensional Quantum Gravity,

    S. K. Asante, B. Dittrich, and H. M. Haggard, “Effective Spin Foam Models for 24 Four-Dimensional Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020), no. 23, 231301, arXiv:2004.07013

    2020 arXiv

  108. [118]

    Spin foams, Refinement limit and Renormalization,

    S. K. Asante, B. Dittrich, and S. Steinhaus, “Spin foams, Refinement limit and Renormalization,” arXiv:2211.09578

    arXiv

  109. [119]

    Spinfoam Models for Quantum Gravity,

    E. R. Livine, “Spinfoam Models for Quantum Gravity,” inEncyclopedia of Mathematical Physics (Second Edition), R. Szabo and M. Bojowald, eds., pp. 507–519. Academic Press, Oxford, second edition ed., 2025

    2025

  110. [120]

    Discrete and continuum third quantization of Gravity,

    S. Gielen and D. Oriti, “Discrete and continuum third quantization of Gravity,” in Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical Advances in the Search for a Unified Framework, pp. 41–64. 2012.arXiv:1102.2226

    2012 arXiv

  111. [121]

    Editorial for the Special Issue

    S. Carrozza, S. Gielen, and D. Oriti, “Editorial for the Special Issue ”Progress in Group Field Theory and Related Quantum Gravity Formalisms”,”Universe 6 (2020), no. 1, 19,arXiv:2001.08428

    2020 arXiv

  112. [122]

    Oriti,Group field theory and loop quantum gravity., pp

    D. Oriti,Group field theory and loop quantum gravity., pp. 125–151. World Scientific, 2017

    2017

  113. [123]

    The group field theory approach to quantum gravity,

    D. Oriti, “The group field theory approach to quantum gravity,” inApproaches to Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. 25

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.