Modified Fermions Tunneling Radiation from Non-stationary, Axially Symmetric Kerr Black Hole

Jin Pu; Kai Lin; Shu-Zheng Yang; Xiao-Tao Zu

arxiv: 1907.06218 · v1 · pith:IRF5WN4Tnew · submitted 2019-07-14 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Modified Fermions Tunneling Radiation from Non-stationary, Axially Symmetric Kerr Black Hole

Jin Pu , Kai Lin , Xiao-Tao Zu , Shu-Zheng Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords fermion tunnelingKerr black holeHawking radiationdeformed dispersion relationquantum gravitynon-stationary spacetimeHamilton-Jacobi equationangular parameters

0 comments

The pith

Modified fermion tunneling from non-stationary Kerr black holes produces Hawking temperature corrections that depend on the angular parameters of the event horizon.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper modifies the equation of motion for fermions using a deformed dispersion relation from quantum gravity and derives a corrected Hamilton-Jacobi equation via semiclassical approximation. It then applies this to the tunneling process across the event horizon of a non-stationary, axially symmetric Kerr black hole. The resulting expressions for the tunneling rate and Hawking temperature contain explicit dependence on the angular coordinates of the horizon. A reader would care because the result indicates that quantum-gravity effects on radiation are sensitive to the rotation and time dependence of the background spacetime rather than being universal.

Core claim

In the non-stationary axially symmetric Kerr background the correction of Hawking temperature and the tunneling rate are closely related to the angular parameters of the horizon of the black hole background.

What carries the argument

The modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation obtained from the deformed dispersion relation by semiclassical approximation, which is solved at the event horizon to extract the tunneling probability.

If this is right

The tunneling probability acquires extra factors proportional to the angular coordinates of the horizon.
The corrected Hawking temperature differs from the standard result by terms that vanish only when the angular parameters are zero.
The modification applies specifically to fermions and to non-stationary metrics; the stationary limit recovers the usual result only after the angular dependence is removed.
The same procedure yields a position-dependent temperature on the horizon surface.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The angular dependence could be tested by comparing radiation spectra from black holes with different spin parameters once Hawking radiation becomes observable.
Similar corrections might appear in other rotating, time-dependent geometries if the same deformed dispersion is used.
The result suggests that any semiclassical tunneling calculation that ignores the deformed relation will miss rotation-induced shifts in the spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The deformed dispersion relation from quantum gravity can be inserted directly into the fermion motion equation to produce a usable modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation in non-stationary Kerr spacetime.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the tunneling rate for a stationary Kerr black hole (zero time dependence) that still shows residual angular-parameter corrections would contradict the paper's claim that the corrections arise from the non-stationary character.

read the original abstract

In this paper, by applying the deformed dispersion relation in quantum gravity theory, we study the correction of fermions' tunneling radiation from non-stationary symmetric black holes. Firstly, the motion equation of fermions is modified in the gravitational spacetime. Based on the motion equation, the modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation has been obtained by a semiclassical approximation method. Then, the tunneling behavior of fermions at the event horizon of non-stationary symmetric Kerr black hole is investigated. Finally, the results show that in the non-stationary symmetric background, the correction of Hawking temperature and the tunneling rate are closely related to the angular parameters of the horizon of the black hole background.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Extends deformed-dispersion tunneling to non-stationary Kerr but inserts the flat-space relation into the curved Dirac equation without covariant derivation.

read the letter

The paper applies an existing deformed dispersion relation to fermion tunneling in the non-stationary Kerr background and reports that the corrected temperature and rate depend on the angular parameters of the horizon. That is the concrete output: a calculation that carries the method one step further in metric generality. The steps follow the usual pattern—modify the motion equation, take the semiclassical limit to a Hamilton-Jacobi equation, then extract the imaginary part of the action at the horizon. The result is internally consistent with the assumptions they state. What is new is simply the choice of spacetime; the framework itself is carried over from earlier stationary or spherically symmetric cases. The soft spot is the opening move. The deformed dispersion is introduced by direct substitution into the fermion equation in the dynamical metric. No derivation from a covariant curved-space operator is given, and the non-stationary character makes the identification of the tunneling contour and the absence of extra curvature corrections less obvious. If that substitution is accepted, the rest follows; if not, the corrections are formal rather than physically grounded. The citation pattern is standard for the tunneling literature and does not hide the dependence on prior work. This is a narrow technical extension aimed at readers already working on semiclassical Hawking radiation with quantum-gravity corrections. It is not a new framework or a first-principles derivation, but the calculation is the sort of incremental check that sometimes turns up in the journals. I would send it to referees so the community can decide whether the substitution step is acceptable or needs a more careful treatment of the Dirac operator in curved space.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that inserting a deformed dispersion relation from quantum gravity into the fermion motion equation in gravitational spacetime, followed by a semiclassical approximation to obtain a modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation, allows computation of fermion tunneling from the event horizon of a non-stationary, axially symmetric Kerr black hole; the resulting corrections to the Hawking temperature and tunneling rate are stated to depend on the angular parameters of the horizon.

Significance. If the central derivation is placed on a sound footing, the result would extend semiclassical tunneling calculations with quantum-gravity corrections to dynamical rotating black holes, potentially clarifying how horizon angular momentum enters the corrected emission spectrum. The work follows the standard WKB tunneling paradigm but supplies neither machine-checked proofs nor explicit parameter-free derivations.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and initial derivation] Abstract (steps 'Firstly' and 'Based on the motion equation'): the direct substitution of the flat-space deformed dispersion relation into the curved-space fermion equation of motion is performed without a covariant derivation from the Dirac operator in the non-stationary Kerr metric; no accounting is given for possible additional curvature or frame-dependent terms that would appear in a consistent curved-space deformation. This step is load-bearing for the modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation and all subsequent temperature corrections.
[Abstract and tunneling calculation] Abstract (final results on angular-parameter dependence): the claim that the corrected temperature and rate 'are closely related to the angular parameters of the horizon' rests on the validity of the modified action integral evaluated at the time-dependent horizon; the manuscript does not demonstrate that the chosen contour or the identification of the imaginary part remains consistent when the metric is non-stationary, which directly affects whether the angular dependence is an artifact of the substitution or a genuine physical effect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and constructive criticism. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to improve clarity and justification without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and initial derivation] Abstract (steps 'Firstly' and 'Based on the motion equation'): the direct substitution of the flat-space deformed dispersion relation into the curved-space fermion equation of motion is performed without a covariant derivation from the Dirac operator in the non-stationary Kerr metric; no accounting is given for possible additional curvature or frame-dependent terms that would appear in a consistent curved-space deformation. This step is load-bearing for the modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation and all subsequent temperature corrections.

Authors: We agree that the substitution follows the standard procedure used throughout the literature on deformed dispersion relations and Hawking radiation corrections rather than deriving a fully covariant curved-space version of the dispersion relation from the Dirac operator. This approximation is justified in the semiclassical WKB limit where higher-order curvature corrections are neglected, consistent with prior works on the topic. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly state this approximation and add references justifying the approach. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract and tunneling calculation] Abstract (final results on angular-parameter dependence): the claim that the corrected temperature and rate 'are closely related to the angular parameters of the horizon' rests on the validity of the modified action integral evaluated at the time-dependent horizon; the manuscript does not demonstrate that the chosen contour or the identification of the imaginary part remains consistent when the metric is non-stationary, which directly affects whether the angular dependence is an artifact of the substitution or a genuine physical effect.

Authors: The contour choice and extraction of the imaginary part of the action follow the standard residue theorem application around the horizon pole, as employed in multiple studies of fermion tunneling from dynamical black holes. The angular dependence arises directly from the Kerr metric's off-diagonal terms in the modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation. We will expand the tunneling calculation section to include an explicit justification of contour consistency for the non-stationary case. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a direct calculation from stated inputs

full rationale

The paper starts from an externally posited deformed dispersion relation, inserts it into the Dirac equation on the given Kerr background, applies the semiclassical WKB limit to obtain a modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation, and then computes the imaginary part of the action to extract a corrected temperature and tunneling rate. This chain produces a result that depends on the chosen dispersion and metric but does not reduce to self-definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in; the angular-parameter dependence is an output of the explicit integration, not an input. The derivation is therefore self-contained against its own assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the deformed dispersion relation and the semiclassical approximation method to derive the modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Deformed dispersion relation in quantum gravity theory
Used to modify the fermions' motion equation as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5642 in / 1223 out tokens · 28497 ms · 2026-05-24T21:42:02.190169+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

by applying the deformed dispersion relation ... modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation ... correction ... closely related to the angular parameters
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

P₀² = P⃗² + m² − (L P₀)^α P⃗² ... Rarita-Schwinger equation ... σ term

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, (1974) 30

work page 1974
[2]

S. W. Hawking, Commum. Math. Phys. 43, (1975) 199

work page 1975
[3]

S. P. Robinson, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (2005) 011303

work page 2005
[4]

Damoar, R

T. Damoar, R. Ruﬃni, Phys. Rev. D 14, (1976) 332

work page 1976
[5]

Sannan, Gen

S. Sannan, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 20, (1988) 239

work page 1988
[6]

Kraus, F

P. Kraus, F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 433, (1995) 403

work page 1995
[7]

M. K. Parikh, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, (2000) 5042

work page 2000
[8]

M. K. Parikh, arXiv:hep-th/0402166

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[9]

Hemming, E

S. Hemming, E. Keski-Vakkuri, Phys. Rev. D 64, (2001) 044006

work page 2001
[10]

Q. Q. Jiang, S. Q. Wu, X. Cai, Phys. Rev. D 75, (2007) 064029

work page 2007
[11]

S. Iso, H. Umetsu, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 74, (2006) 044017

work page 2006
[12]

A. J. M. Medved, Phys. Rev. D 66, (2002) 124009

work page 2002
[13]

J. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 638, (2006) 110

work page 2006
[14]

Srinivasan, T

K. Srinivasan, T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 60, (1999) 24007; S. Shankaranarayanan, T. Padmanabhan, K. Srinivasan, Class. Quantum Grav. 19, (2002) 2671

work page 1999
[15]

Banerjee and B

R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B 690, (2010) 83; R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B 675, (2009) 243; R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B 674, (2009) 218; R. Banerjee and S. K. Modak, JHEP 11 (2009) 073

work page 2010
[16]

Kerner, R

R. Kerner, R. B. Mann, Class. Quantum Grav. 25, (2008) 095014; R. Kerner, R. B. Mann, Phys. Lett. B 665, (2008) 277. 11

work page 2008
[17]

K. Lin, S. Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 79, (2009) 064035; Phys. Lett. B 674, (2009) 127; Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, (2009) 2061; Chinese Phys. B 20, (2011) 110403

work page 2009
[18]

S. K. Modak, Phys. Lett. B 671, (2009) 167

work page 2009
[19]

Sarkar and D

S. Sarkar and D. Kothawala, Phys. Lett. B 659, (2008) 683

work page 2008
[20]

S. W. Zhou and W. B. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 77, (2008) 104021

work page 2008
[21]

J. Hu, H. Yu, JHEP 1209, (2012) 062

work page 2012
[22]

C. K. Ding, M. J. Wang and J. L. Jing, Phys. Lett. B 676, (2009) 99

work page 2009
[23]

Mitra, Phys

P. Mitra, Phys. Lett. B 648, (2007) 240

work page 2007
[24]

E. T. Akhmedov, V. Akhmedova, D. Singleton, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 124

work page 2006
[25]

R. D. Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini and G . Zoccatelli, Phys. Lett. B 657, (2007) 107

work page 2007
[26]

S. H. Mehdipour, Phys. Rev. D 81, (2010) 124049

work page 2010
[27]

M. A. Rahman and M. I. Hossain, Phys. Lett. B 712, (2012) 1

work page 2012
[28]

G. P. Li, J. Pu, Q. Q. Jiang, X. T. Zu, Euro. Phys. J. C 77, (2017) 666; J. Pu, Y. Han, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, (2016) 5077; J. Pu, Y. Han, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, (2017) 2485; J. Pu, Y. Han, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, (2016) 2061

work page 2017
[29]

Z. W. Feng, H. L. Li, S. Z. Yang, X. T. Zu, Euro. Phys. J. C 76, (2016) 212

work page 2016
[30]

H. L. Li, Z. W. Feng, S. Z. Yang, X. T. Zu, Euro. Phys. J. C 78, (2018) 768

work page 2018
[31]

X. X. Zeng, D. Y. Chen, L. F. Li, Phys. Rev. D 91, (2015) 046005; X. X. Zeng, X. M. Liu, W. B. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, (2012) 1967; X. X. Zeng, W. B. Liu, arXiv:1106.0548; X. X. Zeng, S. W. Zhou, W. B. Liu, Chin. Phys. B 21, (2012) 090402

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[32]

Y. W. Han, X. X. Zeng, Y. Hong, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, (2019) 252; X. X. Zeng, L. F. Li, Adva. High Energy Phys. 2016, (2016) 6153435; X. M. Liu, H. B. Shao, X. X. Zeng, Adva. High Energy Phys. 2017, (2017) 6402101

work page 2019
[33]

Q. Q. Jiang, S. Q. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 647, (2007) 200; Q. Q. Jiang, X. Cai, JHEP 1011, (2010) 066; Q. Q. Jiang, D. Y. Chen, D. Wen, JCAP 1311, (2013) 027

work page 2007
[34]

S. Z. Yang, K. Lin. J. Li, Q. Q. Jiang, Adva. High Energy Ph ys. 2016, (2016) 7058764

work page 2016
[35]

Q. Q. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008) 044009; Phys. Lett. B 666, (2008) 517; Eur. Phys. J. C 72, (2012) 2012

work page 2008
[36]

S. Z. Yang, J. Chinese West Normal Univ.(Nat. Sci) 37, (2016) 126

work page 2016
[37]

S. Z. Yang, K. Lin, SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica a nd Astronomica 49, (2019) 12 019503

work page 2019
[38]

Amelino-Camelia, Int

G. Amelino-Camelia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, (2002) 35; G. Amelino-Camelia, New J. Phys. 6, (2004) 188

work page 2002
[39]

Magueijo and L

J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002) 190403; J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 67, (2003) 044017

work page 2002
[40]

J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 293, (1992) 37; J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and D. V. Nanopoulos, Chaos Solitons Fractals 10, (1999) 345; J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and A. S. Sakharov, Astropart. Phys. 20, (2004) 669

work page 1992
[41]

S. I. Kruglov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28, (2013) 1350014

work page 2013
[42]

Jacobson, S

T. Jacobson, S. Liberati and D. Mattingly, Nature 424, (2003) 1019

work page 2003
[43]

S. I. Kruglov, Phys. Lett. B 718, (2012) 228

work page 2012
[44]

Rarita and J

W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 60, (1941) 61. 13

work page 1941

[1] [1]

S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, (1974) 30

work page 1974

[2] [2]

S. W. Hawking, Commum. Math. Phys. 43, (1975) 199

work page 1975

[3] [3]

S. P. Robinson, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (2005) 011303

work page 2005

[4] [4]

Damoar, R

T. Damoar, R. Ruﬃni, Phys. Rev. D 14, (1976) 332

work page 1976

[5] [5]

Sannan, Gen

S. Sannan, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 20, (1988) 239

work page 1988

[6] [6]

Kraus, F

P. Kraus, F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 433, (1995) 403

work page 1995

[7] [7]

M. K. Parikh, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, (2000) 5042

work page 2000

[8] [8]

M. K. Parikh, arXiv:hep-th/0402166

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[9] [9]

Hemming, E

S. Hemming, E. Keski-Vakkuri, Phys. Rev. D 64, (2001) 044006

work page 2001

[10] [10]

Q. Q. Jiang, S. Q. Wu, X. Cai, Phys. Rev. D 75, (2007) 064029

work page 2007

[11] [11]

S. Iso, H. Umetsu, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 74, (2006) 044017

work page 2006

[12] [12]

A. J. M. Medved, Phys. Rev. D 66, (2002) 124009

work page 2002

[13] [13]

J. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 638, (2006) 110

work page 2006

[14] [14]

Srinivasan, T

K. Srinivasan, T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 60, (1999) 24007; S. Shankaranarayanan, T. Padmanabhan, K. Srinivasan, Class. Quantum Grav. 19, (2002) 2671

work page 1999

[15] [15]

Banerjee and B

R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B 690, (2010) 83; R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B 675, (2009) 243; R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B 674, (2009) 218; R. Banerjee and S. K. Modak, JHEP 11 (2009) 073

work page 2010

[16] [16]

Kerner, R

R. Kerner, R. B. Mann, Class. Quantum Grav. 25, (2008) 095014; R. Kerner, R. B. Mann, Phys. Lett. B 665, (2008) 277. 11

work page 2008

[17] [17]

K. Lin, S. Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 79, (2009) 064035; Phys. Lett. B 674, (2009) 127; Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, (2009) 2061; Chinese Phys. B 20, (2011) 110403

work page 2009

[18] [18]

S. K. Modak, Phys. Lett. B 671, (2009) 167

work page 2009

[19] [19]

Sarkar and D

S. Sarkar and D. Kothawala, Phys. Lett. B 659, (2008) 683

work page 2008

[20] [20]

S. W. Zhou and W. B. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 77, (2008) 104021

work page 2008

[21] [21]

J. Hu, H. Yu, JHEP 1209, (2012) 062

work page 2012

[22] [22]

C. K. Ding, M. J. Wang and J. L. Jing, Phys. Lett. B 676, (2009) 99

work page 2009

[23] [23]

Mitra, Phys

P. Mitra, Phys. Lett. B 648, (2007) 240

work page 2007

[24] [24]

E. T. Akhmedov, V. Akhmedova, D. Singleton, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 124

work page 2006

[25] [25]

R. D. Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini and G . Zoccatelli, Phys. Lett. B 657, (2007) 107

work page 2007

[26] [26]

S. H. Mehdipour, Phys. Rev. D 81, (2010) 124049

work page 2010

[27] [27]

M. A. Rahman and M. I. Hossain, Phys. Lett. B 712, (2012) 1

work page 2012

[28] [28]

G. P. Li, J. Pu, Q. Q. Jiang, X. T. Zu, Euro. Phys. J. C 77, (2017) 666; J. Pu, Y. Han, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, (2016) 5077; J. Pu, Y. Han, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, (2017) 2485; J. Pu, Y. Han, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, (2016) 2061

work page 2017

[29] [29]

Z. W. Feng, H. L. Li, S. Z. Yang, X. T. Zu, Euro. Phys. J. C 76, (2016) 212

work page 2016

[30] [30]

H. L. Li, Z. W. Feng, S. Z. Yang, X. T. Zu, Euro. Phys. J. C 78, (2018) 768

work page 2018

[31] [31]

X. X. Zeng, D. Y. Chen, L. F. Li, Phys. Rev. D 91, (2015) 046005; X. X. Zeng, X. M. Liu, W. B. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, (2012) 1967; X. X. Zeng, W. B. Liu, arXiv:1106.0548; X. X. Zeng, S. W. Zhou, W. B. Liu, Chin. Phys. B 21, (2012) 090402

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[32] [32]

Y. W. Han, X. X. Zeng, Y. Hong, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, (2019) 252; X. X. Zeng, L. F. Li, Adva. High Energy Phys. 2016, (2016) 6153435; X. M. Liu, H. B. Shao, X. X. Zeng, Adva. High Energy Phys. 2017, (2017) 6402101

work page 2019

[33] [33]

Q. Q. Jiang, S. Q. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 647, (2007) 200; Q. Q. Jiang, X. Cai, JHEP 1011, (2010) 066; Q. Q. Jiang, D. Y. Chen, D. Wen, JCAP 1311, (2013) 027

work page 2007

[34] [34]

S. Z. Yang, K. Lin. J. Li, Q. Q. Jiang, Adva. High Energy Ph ys. 2016, (2016) 7058764

work page 2016

[35] [35]

Q. Q. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008) 044009; Phys. Lett. B 666, (2008) 517; Eur. Phys. J. C 72, (2012) 2012

work page 2008

[36] [36]

S. Z. Yang, J. Chinese West Normal Univ.(Nat. Sci) 37, (2016) 126

work page 2016

[37] [37]

S. Z. Yang, K. Lin, SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica a nd Astronomica 49, (2019) 12 019503

work page 2019

[38] [38]

Amelino-Camelia, Int

G. Amelino-Camelia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, (2002) 35; G. Amelino-Camelia, New J. Phys. 6, (2004) 188

work page 2002

[39] [39]

Magueijo and L

J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002) 190403; J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 67, (2003) 044017

work page 2002

[40] [40]

J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 293, (1992) 37; J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and D. V. Nanopoulos, Chaos Solitons Fractals 10, (1999) 345; J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and A. S. Sakharov, Astropart. Phys. 20, (2004) 669

work page 1992

[41] [41]

S. I. Kruglov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28, (2013) 1350014

work page 2013

[42] [42]

Jacobson, S

T. Jacobson, S. Liberati and D. Mattingly, Nature 424, (2003) 1019

work page 2003

[43] [43]

S. I. Kruglov, Phys. Lett. B 718, (2012) 228

work page 2012

[44] [44]

Rarita and J

W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 60, (1941) 61. 13

work page 1941