Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Training and Prediction Data Discrepancies: Challenges of Text Classification with Noisy, Historical Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.04019 v1 pith:ISMDEYY5 submitted 2018-09-11 cs.IR cs.CLcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.IRcs.CLcs.LGstat.ML
keywords datahistoricalpredictionclassificationdatasetsnoisyperformancetext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Industry datasets used for text classification are rarely created for that purpose. In most cases, the data and target predictions are a by-product of accumulated historical data, typically fraught with noise, present in both the text-based document, as well as in the targeted labels. In this work, we address the question of how well performance metrics computed on noisy, historical data reflect the performance on the intended future machine learning model input. The results demonstrate the utility of dirty training datasets used to build prediction models for cleaner (and different) prediction inputs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools