Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Classical Benchmarks for Variational Quantum Eigensolver Simulations of the Hubbard Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.00836 v2 pith:IT5BBFEI submitted 2024-08-01 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

classification quant-phcond-mat.str-el
keywords modelhubbardquantumvariationalaccuracyclassicalgroundsolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Simulating the Hubbard model is of great interest to a wide range of applications within condensed matter physics, however its solution on classical computers remains challenging in dimensions larger than one. The relative simplicity of this model, embodied by the sparseness of the Hamiltonian matrix, allows for its efficient implementation on quantum computers, and for its approximate solution using variational algorithms such as the variational quantum eigensolver. While these algorithms have been shown to reproduce the qualitative features of the Hubbard model, their quantitative accuracy in terms of producing true ground state energies and other properties, and the dependence of this accuracy on the system size and interaction strength, the choice of variational ansatz, and the degree of spatial inhomogeneity in the model, remains unknown. Here we present a rigorous classical benchmarking study, demonstrating the potential impact of these factors on the accuracy of the variational solution of the Hubbard model on quantum hardware, for systems with up to $32$ qubits. We find that even when using the most accurate wavefunction ans\"{a}tze for the Hubbard model, the error in its ground state energy and wavefunction plateaus for larger lattices, while stronger electronic correlations magnify this issue. Concurrently, spatially inhomogeneous parameters and the presence of off-site Coulomb interactions only have a small effect on the accuracy of the computed ground state energies. Our study highlights the capabilities and limitations of current approaches for solving the Hubbard model on quantum hardware, and we discuss potential future avenues of research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking a wide range of optimisers for solving the Fermi-Hubbard model using the variational quantum eigensolver

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 372-instance numerical benchmark of VQE for Fermi-Hubbard finds Momentum and Adam with finite differences achieve the best accuracy, while SPSA and CMAES minimize function calls.

  2. Leveraging Quantum Layers in Classical Neural Networks

    quant-ph 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid quantum-classical CNN for causality classification works only with a Pauli XYZ feature map, and deeper quantum ansatzes appear to act as implicit regularizers in single-run experiments.

Pith tools