REVIEW 1 cited by
An overview of 11 proposals for building safe advanced AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper analyzes and compares 11 different proposals for building safe advanced AI under the current machine learning paradigm, including major contenders such as iterated amplification, AI safety via debate, and recursive reward modeling. Each proposal is evaluated on the four components of outer alignment, inner alignment, training competitiveness, and performance competitiveness, of which the distinction between the latter two is introduced in this paper. While prior literature has primarily focused on analyzing individual proposals, or primarily focused on outer alignment at the expense of inner alignment, this analysis seeks to take a comparative look at a wide range of proposals including a comparative analysis across all four previously mentioned components.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Unraveling Token Prediction Refinement and Identifying Essential Layers in Language Models
In GPT-2 multi-document QA, the layer gap between the first correct top-1 token prediction and its stable final form is larger when relevant information is in the middle of the context.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.