Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Two approaches for the gravitational self force in black hole spacetime: Comparison of numerical results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0810.2530 v2 pith:IUMOK76K submitted 2008-10-14 gr-qc

Two approaches for the gravitational self force in black hole spacetime: Comparison of numerical results

classification gr-qc
keywords numericalgaugeresultsspacetimeanalysesblackcomparisonforce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recently, two independent calculations have been presented of finite-mass ("self-force") effects on the orbit of a point mass around a Schwarzschild black hole. While both computations are based on the standard mode-sum method, they differ in several technical aspects, which makes comparison between their results difficult--but also interesting. Barack and Sago [Phys. Rev. D {\bf 75}, 064021 (2007)] invoke the notion of a self-accelerated motion in a background spacetime, and perform a direct calculation of the local self force in the Lorenz gauge (using numerical evolution of the perturbation equations in the time domain); Detweiler [Phys. Rev. D {\bf 77}, 124026 (2008)] describes the motion in terms a geodesic orbit of a (smooth) perturbed spacetime, and calculates the metric perturbation in the Regge--Wheeler gauge (using frequency-domain numerical analysis). Here we establish a formal correspondence between the two analyses, and demonstrate the consistency of their numerical results. Specifically, we compare the value of the conservative $O(\mu)$ shift in $u^t$ (where $\mu$ is the particle's mass and $u^t$ is the Schwarzschild $t$ component of the particle's four-velocity), suitably mapped between the two orbital descriptions and adjusted for gauge. We find that the two analyses yield the same value for this shift within mere fractional differences of $\sim 10^{-5}$--$10^{-7}$ (depending on the orbital radius)--comparable with the estimated numerical error.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    New 5.5PN and 6.5PN tail-of-tail terms for the non-geodesic EOB potential and the second-order self-force redshift of eccentric binaries, through e^12 and p_r^12.

  2. Tidal perturbations of an extreme mass ratio inspiral around a Kerr black hole

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    A closed-form Kerr metric under slow quadrupolar tides yields spin-dependent tidal shifts of the ISCO and light ring, with larger shifts for retrograde orbits around fast-spinning holes.