Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 77 references

High-temperature simulation of the Raman spectra of the isotopologues $^{13}$C$^{16}$O$_2$ and $^{16}$O$^{13}$C$^{18}$O

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The SU1(2) × U(3) × SU2(2) algebraic model of CO2, with polarizability derivatives fitted only to the principal isotopologue, reproduces the high-temperature Raman spectra of 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O, and attributes differences between two…

desk verdict Useful new data and a plausible rotational correction, but the paper overstates agreement and does not support its conclusion about anisotropic scattering. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06739 v1 pith:IWQFSZWX submitted 2026-08-07 physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph

Eduardo Suárez , Christian Ostertag-Henning , Miguel Carvajal , Renato Lemus This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph PACS 33.20.Fb33.15.Mt
keywords RamanspectroscopycarbondioxideisotopologuesalgebraicvibrationalmodelmeanpolarizabilitytransitionmomentsBorn-Oppenheimertransferabilityro-vibrationalcorrectionshigh-temperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that Raman intensities are transferable across carbon dioxide isotopologues: polarizability derivatives fitted once to the most abundant isotopologue, combined with algebraic vibrational wave functions, are enough to simulate the high-temperature Raman spectra of 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O. The simulations agree with experiment for the transition moments, a 298 K spectrum, and 570 K spectra, with root-mean-square residuals of $0.130$ and $0.108$ in units of $10^{-42}\,\mathrm{CV}^{-1}\mathrm{m}^2$ in the two moment tables. The paper also claims to explain why two independent 570 K measurements look different: one records rotational structure on top of the vibrational bands, the other does not, and this difference comes from rotational energy corrections, not from anisotropic scattering. If correct, one calibrated polarizability surface plus isotope-specific wave functions would be a practical route to Raman-based isotope analysis of CO2 at flame and reservoir temperatures.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dynamical group SU1(2) × U(3) × SU2(2), in which the two stretching modes are described by SU(2) ladder operators built from Morse-type anharmonic oscillators and the degenerate bending by the U(3) model with a fixed boson number. Vibrational eigenstates are built in a local basis, projected onto $D_{\infty h}$ symmetry, and diagonalized with a polyad-preserving Hamiltonian. The intensity machinery is the mean polarizability $\bar{\alpha}$ expanded in curvilinear coordinates to cubic order, realized algebraically through canonical and anharmonic mappings; its derivatives, such as $(\partial\bar{\alpha}/\partial S_g)_0$, are fit parameters determined once from 42 experimental transition moments of the main isotopologue and transferred to other isotopologues under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. The simulation uses the isotropic differential-cross-section formula and applies the key correction $(B_{\nu'}-B_\nu)[J(J+1)-\ell^2]$ to the Raman shift, so state-dependent rotational constants broaden and shift the computed lines.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment on the same isotopic mixture at a single temperature, with integration time varied from 300 s to 50 minutes and all other conditions fixed, would settle the claim: if longer acquisition does not grow the rotational structure around 1380.46 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$ and the other discrepant line, the rotational explanation fails. A separate check is a polarized Raman measurement that isolates the anisotropic contribution; if the depolarized component contributes more than the few percent the authors assume, the dismissal of anisotropic scattering would be wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SU1(2) × U(3) × SU2(2) dynamical-group description of CO2, whose stretching modes are Morse-like SU(2) oscillators and whose bending is a U(3) model, yields vibrational wave functions of spectroscopic quality, with root-mean-square deviations of $0.06$ and $0.07~\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$ for the two isotopologues. When the mean polarizability is expanded in curvilinear coordinates through cubic terms and its derivatives are fitted to 42 experimental transition moments of the principal isotopologue, the same derivatives produce transition moments for 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O that mostly agree within experimental uncertainty. The visible mismatches at 1275.03 and 1380.46 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$ are then traced to the omission of rotational structure: adding the diagonal term $(B_{\nu'}-B_\nu)[J(J+1)-\ell^2]$ to the Raman shifts, without changing the wave functions, transforms the simulated band shapes and intensities into the measured ones. From this the authors conclude that the difference between the two experimental spectra reflects rotational content, not anisotropic scattering, and that a faithful Raman simulation needs the rotational energy structure at least through diagonal corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The explanation of the experimental discrepancy assumes that the only relevant difference between the earlier 570 K spectrum and the authors' 500 K and 650 K spectra is acquisition time and therefore how much rotational structure is recorded; if temperature, pressure, sample composition, or calibration differ between the measurements, the conclusion that rotational energy corrections rather than anisotropic scattering produce the line shapes would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same fitted polarizability derivatives, combined with wave functions for any of the nine isotopologues, allow Raman spectra to be predicted for species with sparse experimental data, including the rare symmetric isotopologues.
  • Raman simulations intended for quantitative comparison should include diagonal rotational corrections to transition energies even when the wave functions are computed in the rigid-rotor approximation.
  • Anisotropic scattering, previously suggested as a major source of error in CO2 Raman simulations, is argued to contribute less than about five percent and is not needed to explain the tested spectra.
  • The two discrepant spectral features are explained by band-specific rotational-constant differences: a wide interval in $B_\nu$ produces a broad band, a narrow interval a sharp peak, so intensity mismatches can be diagnosed from rotational constants alone.
  • Transition moments computed for hot bands up to 21,400 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$ extend the energy range over which Raman thermometry calibrations for CO2 could be constructed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transferability claim holds, the same fit could be used to simulate the Raman spectra of 13C18O2 and 17O13C18O, for which vibrational term values are sparse, making the model a predictive tool rather than an interpolation scheme; the paper does not report those spectra yet.
  • The acquisition-time explanation implies a directly testable prediction: recording the same gas at the same temperature with integration times from 300 s to 50 minutes should show rotational branches growing in; the paper's two experiments also differ in temperature, so a controlled time series would separate the two variables.
  • A natural next step is to promote the rotational constants to state-dependent fitted values from a full ro-vibrational effective Hamiltonian; the authors note that line positions would then sit exactly on the experimental peaks.
  • The method could be combined with spatial-resolution Raman measurements to map carbon isotope ratios in heterogeneous gas samples, an application the paper cites as motivation but does not pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports simulations of the Raman spectra of 12C16O2, 13C16O2, and 16O13C18O using vibrational wave functions from the SU1(2)×U(3)×SU2(2) algebraic model, with mean-polarizability derivatives fitted to 42 experimental transition moments of the principal isotopologue. The simulations are compared with experimental spectra from Álvarez et al. (Ref. [61]) and with new measurements at 500 and 650 K. The authors argue that the discrepancy between the 570 K spectrum of Ref. [61] and their simulated spectra arises from rotational structure rather than from anisotropic scattering, and conclude that the model provides transferable Raman intensities for CO2 isotopologues.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a practical route to predicting high‑temperature Raman spectra of CO2 isotopologues from a fit to the principal isotopologue, with applications to isotope‑ratio measurements and combustion diagnostics. The comparison of predicted transition moments for 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O with the independent experimental moments in Tables 2 and 3 is a genuine cross‑check, not a fit to the target data, because the derivatives are determined from the principal isotopologue. The inclusion of diagonal ro‑vibrational energy corrections is a useful methodological improvement for spectral shape. However, the strongest conclusion—that the observed experimental differences are due to rotational structure and that anisotropic contributions are unimportant—is not established by the evidence presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5, Fig. 6 and §6] The claim that the discrepancy between the 570 K spectrum of Ref. [61] and the authors' spectra is due to rotational structure, rather than to anisotropic scattering, is not supported by the evidence. The two experiments differ in temperature (570 K vs 500/650 K), pressure (1 MPa in the new capillary vs unspecified in Ref. [61]), sample composition, and instrumentation; any of these can alter line contours. The only demonstration of the rotational mechanism is the narrow 1375–1385 cm⁻¹ window in Fig. 6; no full‑window fit or residual is reported for the 1200–1460 cm⁻¹ spectrum of Ref. [61]. Moreover, the statement that a 300 s × 3 acquisition records only the 'most probable events provided by the vibrational transitions' while a 50 min acquisition detects ro‑vibrational transitions is not a mechanism: longer integration improves signal‑to‑noise but does not gate out rotational transitions. Finally, the conclusion that anisotropic contributions are 'not so important' is reached without computing or fitting any anisotropic term; the new spectra are unpolarized, so both isotropic and anisotropic parts contribute, and agreement with an isotropic‑only model does not by itself rule out a significant anisotropic component.
  2. [§5, Fig. 1 and abstract] The abstract's claim of 'excellent agreement with experiment' is overstated. The simulation for 12C16O2 at 1780 K shows 'significant discrepancies in the intensities ... in the range 1360–1500 cm⁻¹' as explicitly acknowledged in §5. Tables 2 and 3 also contain residuals that exceed the experimental uncertainty by a large factor: Table 2 band 13 (|2000⟩→|3000⟩) has Δ = −4.19 with σ = 3.00, band 19 (|1200⟩→|1400⟩) has Δ = −3.95 with σ = 0.54, and Table 3 band g has Δ = 2.12 with σ = 0.79. These outliers are not discussed in the text and undermine the statement that the transition moments are 'well determined.'
  3. [§3, Eq. (23) and Table 1] The polarizability expansion is truncated at cubic terms with only the five derivatives listed in Table 1, and the sufficiency of this truncation is assumed without justification. In particular, the anisotropic part of the polarizability is omitted entirely, so the model cannot by itself distinguish isotropic from anisotropic contributions. The conclusion in §6 that anisotropic effects are smaller than suggested in Ref. [68] is therefore not a result of the present calculation; at minimum, the authors should explicitly state that this conclusion is conditional on the assumed expansion and on the neglect of anisotropy.
  4. [§5, Fig. 7 and Eq. (22)] The ro‑vibrational stick spectrum in Fig. 7 is computed with a maximum rotational quantum number Jmax = 100, but no justification is given for this cutoff or for the neglect of the J‑dependent Boltzmann factor beyond the diagonal energy correction in Eq. (26). The improvement in Fig. 6 is demonstrated only in a narrow spectral window; a quantitative comparison over the full 1200–1460 cm⁻¹ range, with residuals or an R² measure, is needed to support the claim of a 'remarkable improvement.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4] Equation (1) of the experimental setup contains apparent encoding errors: '25 ţm' and '−133 řC' should read '25 µm' and '−133 °C'.
  2. [§6 vs. §1–§3] The dynamical group is written as 'SU1(2) × SU(3) × SU2(2)' in §6 but as 'SU1(2) × U(3) × SU2(2)' throughout the rest of the paper; please make the notation consistent.
  3. [Table 2 and Table 3] The tables state that the rms deviation is calculated using 'the definition given in Eq. (22) of Ref. [60]', but the formula is not reproduced in this manuscript and Ref. [60] is a preprint on SSRN; please provide the explicit definition of the rms residual.
  4. [§5] The sentence 'the experimental spectrum of Álvarez et al. display the transition lines' should be 'displays', and the grammatical errors in the third paragraph of §5 ('we readily identify our simulations closely fitted') should be corrected.
  5. [Figure 3 caption] The caption does not specify which simulated spectrum (red or blue) corresponds to which isotopologue in the left display; the labeling should be defined explicitly in the caption.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Target-isotopologue Raman intensities are a genuine transferability cross-check; only the principal-isotopologue test reuses its own fit data, and the rotational-structure conclusion is under-supported but not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, Figure 1 (principal-isotopologue simulation test)]
    "As a test of our model, we simulate in the rigid-rotor approximation the Raman spectrum of 12C16O2 at 1780 K and compare it with the experimental spectrum reported in Fig. 3 of Ref. [57]."

    The polarizability derivatives in Table 1 were fitted to 42 experimental transition moments reported for the principal isotopologue in Refs. [57,64,65] over 1200–4700 cm−1. The Figure 1 comparison then evaluates a simulated 1780 K spectrum of the same isotopologue against the experimental spectrum published in the same Ref. [57]. Because the most intense bands in that spectrum are governed by the very moments used in the fit, the agreement is to a significant degree a restatement of the fit residual rather than an independent prediction. The transferability claim for 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O is not affected, since no Ref. [61] moments enter the fit.

full rationale

The central isotopologue prediction is not circular: the transition moments for 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O are computed from polarizability derivatives fitted exclusively to principal-isotopologue experimental moments (Refs. [57,64,65]), combined with vibrational wave functions from prior fits to vibrational term values (Refs. [54,55,56]); the experimental moments of Ref. [61] are used only for comparison, not in the fit. Tables 2 and 3 are therefore a genuine cross-check. The principal-isotopologue 1780 K comparison in Figure 1 is the one place where the fitted data source and the test spectrum coincide, making that particular 'test' partly a consistency check; this is a real but limited reduction. The paper relies heavily on same-group citations for the model and the fitting protocol (Refs. [54,55,56,60]), but those citations point to fits of external experimental term values and moments, so they are not empty self-reference; no uniqueness theorem is imported. The conclusion that the 570 K discrepancy is rotational structure and that anisotropic scattering is unimportant rests on a comparison at different temperature, pressure, and SNR, with no anisotropic calculation; that is a correctness/epistemic weakness, not a circularity. Overall, the main claim retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends on a small set of polarizability derivatives fitted to the principal isotopologue, effective Hamiltonian parameters fitted to vibrational term values in three earlier papers by the same group, and a set of modeling choices about the polarizability expansion, line profiles, and the interpretation of the two experiments. No fundamentally new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Mean polarizability derivatives (d alpha/dSg, d2 alpha/dSg2, d2 alpha/dSu2, d2 alpha/dS+d-, d3 alpha/dSg dS+ dS-) = 3.22 (10^-30 CV^-1 m), 2.56, 0.47, 0.23 (10^-20 CV^-1), 1.77 (10^-10 CV^-1 m^-1)
    Fitted to 42 experimental transition moments of 12C16O2 from Refs [57,64,65]; used for all isotopologues via the Born-Oppenheimer assumption.
  • Effective Hamiltonian parameters for vibrational wave functions = Not listed in this paper
    Fitted to vibrational term values in Refs [54,55,56]; the wave functions used here inherit these fits.
  • Gaussian line profile FWHM = 0.7 cm^-1 for vibrational simulations, 0.24 cm^-1 for ro-vibrational simulations
    Chosen to represent experimental resolution; different values are used in different figures, which affects visual agreement.
  • Maximum rotational quantum number Jmax = 100
    Chosen cutoff for the ro-vibrational stick spectrum in Figure 7; intensity convergence with J is not demonstrated.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation: polarizability derivatives with respect to isotopically invariant coordinates are identical for all isotopologues.
    Invoked in Section 3 to transfer derivatives fitted for 12C16O2 to 13C16O2 and 16O13C18O.
  • ad hoc to paper The mean polarizability expansion truncated at cubic terms, keeping only the listed terms in Eq. (23), is sufficient for all transitions considered.
    The expansion omits symmetry-allowed terms such as S_g^3 and S_g S_u^2; the outliers in Tables 2 and 3 may reflect this truncation.
  • domain assumption The effective Hamiltonian retains only polyad-conserving terms and neglects potential dependence on momenta.
    Standard effective Hamiltonian approximation, introduced in Section 2 around Eqs. (5) and (10).
  • domain assumption The vibrational wave functions from Refs [54,55,56] are accurate enough for Raman intensity calculations.
    The wave functions are obtained from fits with RMS deviations of 0.06 and 0.07 cm^-1; the paper assumes these errors are small compared to intensity errors.
  • domain assumption The rigid-rotor approximation for wave functions, with rotational corrections applied only to energies, is adequate for the spectral shapes.
    Stated in Sections 5 and 6; the paper argues that diagonal rotational corrections suffice without ro-vibrational coupling in the wave functions.
  • ad hoc to paper The difference between the Alvarez et al. spectrum and the authors' spectrum is due to rotational structure captured by longer acquisition time, not to temperature or sample differences.
    Used in Sections 5 and 6 to explain the discrepancy and to conclude anisotropic effects are small; supported by only one spectral window and visual comparison.
  • domain assumption The HITRAN2024 partition function is accurate for these isotopologues at the relevant temperatures.
    Z(T) is taken from HITRAN2024 product approximation, stated in Section 3 after Eq. (22).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-temperature simulation of the Raman spectra of the isotopologues $^{13}$C$^{16}$O$_2$ and $^{16}$O$^{13}$C$^{18}$O." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IWQFSZWX

@misc{pith2026260806739,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-temperature simulation of the Raman spectra of the isotopologues $^13$C$^16$O$_2$ and $^16$O$^13$C$^18$O},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IWQFSZWX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06739}
}
abstract

Recently, experimental Raman spectra of the isotopologues $^{13}$C$^{16}$O$_2$ and $^{16}$O$^{13}$C$^{18}$O at high temperature have been reported. Separately, a reliable approach for obtaining vibrational wave functions for most isotopologues has been proposed. These descriptions, based on the $SU_1(2)\times U(3)\times SU_2(2)$ dynamical group, provide spectroscopic-quality fits to vibrational term values with root-mean-square deviations of $0.06$ and $0.07~\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$, respectively. Using the resulting wave functions, we simulate the Raman spectra of both species by evaluating transition moments of the mean polarizability, represented as an expansion in curvilinear coordinates up to cubic terms within the same algebraic framework. The difference of two independent experimental Raman spectra under comparable temperature conditions is analyzed with the help of the simulations provided by our model. The resulting simulations show excellent agreement with experiment, reinforcing the reliability of the model, while the estimated transition moments are also consistent with experimental values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06739 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental Raman spectra (top panel, in blue) compared with the pure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental (top panel, in black) and simulated (bottom panel, in red) Raman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. At the left display, the experimental (top panel, in black) and simulated (bottom panel) Raman spectra for 13C 16O2 (red lines) and 16O13C 18O (blue lines) isotopologues at T = 570 K are compared. At the right a zoom is displayed. The experimental data were taken from Ref. [61]. Wavenumber shifts were calculated using vibrational energies from Ref. [55, 56], assuming Gaussian peak profiles with a FWHM of 0.7 cm−1 … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the experimental Raman spectrum reported in Ref. [61] at T = 570 K (top panel) and the spectrum obtained in this work at T = 500 K (bottom left) and T = 650 K (bottom right). Although the spectra were not recorded at the same temperature, they exhibi…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the experimental (upper panels, black lines) Raman spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between the experimental Raman spectrum from Ref. [61] (top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ro-vibrational stick spectrum of the 13C 16O2 isotopologue, with line intensities calculated using Eq. (22) with a maximum rotational quantum number of Jmax = 100, for bands 14 and 15 listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulated (bottom panel) and experimental Raman spectra (top panel) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [60]

    Suárez, C

    E. Suárez, C. Ostertag-Henning, M. Carvajal, R. Lemus, Correlation between normal character and Raman intensities of isotopologues of carbon dioxide (2026). doi:10.2139/ssrn.5719545

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.5719545 2026

  2. [61]

    doi:10.1016/j.jms.2007.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jms.2007.03.005 2007

  3. [68]

    J. Lill, A. Dreizler, G. Magnotti, D. Geyer, Accurate simulation of spontaneous Raman scattering of CO 2 for high-temperature diagnos- tics, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 330 (2025) 109223. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109223. 34

    arXiv 2025

  4. [1]

    Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure II

    G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure II. Infrared and Raman Spectra, D. Van Nostrand Company, 1945. 25

    work page 1945

  5. [2]

    Gordon, L

    I. Gordon, L. Rothman, R. Hargreaves, R. Hashemi, E. Karlovets, F. Skinner, E. Conway, C. Hill, R. Kochanov, Y. Tan, P. Wciso, A. Finenko, K. Nelson, P. Bernath, M. Birk, V. Boudon, A. Cam- pargue, K. Chance, A. Coustenis, B. Drouin, J. Flaud, R. Gamache, J. Hodges, D. Jacquemart, E. Mlawer, A. Nikitin, V. Perevalov, M. Rotger, J. Tennyson, G. Toon, H. Tr...

    arXiv 2022

  6. [3]

    Kassi, K

    S. Kassi, K. Song, A. Campargue, High sensitivity CW-cavity ring down spectroscopy of 12CO2 near 1.35 µm (I): line positions, Journal of Quan- titative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 110 (17) (2009) 1801 1814. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.04.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.04.010 2009

  7. [4]

    Mandin, Interpretation of the CO 2 absorption bands observed in the Venus infrared spectrum between 1 and 2.5 µm, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 67 (1-3) (1977) 304 321

    J.-Y. Mandin, Interpretation of the CO 2 absorption bands observed in the Venus infrared spectrum between 1 and 2.5 µm, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 67 (1-3) (1977) 304 321. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(77)90044- 3

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-2852(77)90044- 1977

  8. [5]

    K. Song, S. Kassi, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, A. Campargue, High sensitivity CW-cavity ring down spectroscopy of 12CO2 near 1.35 µm (II): New observations and line intensities modeling, Journal of Quan- titative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 111 (3) (2010) 332 344. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.09.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.09.004 2010

Show all 77 references
  1. [6]

    Karlovets, S

    E. Karlovets, S. Kassi, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, A. Campargue, High sensitivity cavity ring down spectroscopy of carbon dioxide in the 1.19- 26 1.26 µm region, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 144 (2014) 137 153. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.04.001

    2014 doi

  2. [7]

    Karlovets, A

    E. Karlovets, A. Sidorenko, P. ermák, D. Mondelain, S. Kassi, V. Perevalov, A. Campargue, The 13CO2 absorption spectrum by CRDS near 1.74 µm, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 354 (2018) 54 59. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2018.10.003

    2018 doi

  3. [8]

    R. Toth, L. Brown, C. Miller, V. M. Devi, D. C. Benner, Self-broadened widths and shifts of 12C16O2: 4750-7000 cm −1, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 239 (2) (2006) 243 271. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2006.08.003

    2006 doi

  4. [9]

    De Ghellinck D’Elseghem Vaernewijck, S

    X. De Ghellinck D’Elseghem Vaernewijck, S. Kassi, M. Her- man, 17O12C17O and 18O12C17O overtone spectroscopy in the 1.64 µm region, Chemical Physics Letters 514 (1-3) (2011) 29 31. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.08.025

    2011 doi

  5. [10]

    Perevalov, S

    B. Perevalov, S. Kassi, V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, A. Campargue, High sensitivity CW-CRDS spectroscopy of 12C16O2, 16O12C17O and 16O12C18O between 5851 and 7045 cm −1: Line positions analysis and critical review of the current databases, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy 252 ...

    2008 doi

  6. [11]

    Weirauch, A

    G. Weirauch, A. Campargue, Spectroscopy and intensity measurements of the 3ν1 + 3ν3 tetrad of 12CO2 and 13CO2, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy 207 (2) (2001) 263 268. doi:10.1006/jmsp.2001.8342

    2001

  7. [12]

    Petrova, A

    T. Petrova, A. Solodov, A. Solodov, O. Lyulin, Y. Borkov, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, Measurements of CO 2 line parameters in the 9250- 9500 cm −1 and 10,700-10,860 cm −1 regions, Journal of Quantita- tive Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 164 (2015) 109 116. doi:10.1016/j.jqs...

    2015 doi

  8. [13]

    P. Kang, J. Wang, G.-L. Liu, Y. Sun, Z.-Y. Zhou, A.-W. Liu, S.-M. Hu, Line intensities of the 30011 e 00001e band of 12C16O2 by laser-locked cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 207 (2018) 1 7. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.013

    2018 doi

  9. [14]

    J. S. Li, G. Durry, J. Cousin, L. Joly, B. Parvitte, P. H. Flamant, F. Gib- ert, V. Zéninari, Tunable diode laser measurement of pressure-induced 27 shift coefficients of CO 2 around 2.05 µm for Lidar application, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 112 (...

    2011

  10. [15]

    K.-F. Song, Y. Lu, Y. Tan, B. Gao, A.-W. Liu, S.-M. Hu, High sensitivity cavity ring down spectroscopy of CO 2 overtone bands near 790 nm, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 112 (5) (2011) 761 768. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.11.006

    2011 doi

  11. [16]

    Y. G. Borkov, D. Jacquemart, O. Lyulin, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, Infrared spectroscopy of 17O- and 18O- enriched carbon dioxide: Line positions and intensities in the 3200-4700 cm −1 region. global mod- eling of the line positions of 16O12C17O and 17O12C17O, Journal of Quanti...

    2014 doi

  12. [17]

    Weirauch, G

    G. Weirauch, G. Wumaier, A. Campargue, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, J.- L. Teffo, The 2ν1+5ν3 triad of 12CO2, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 198 (1) (1999) 187 188. doi:10.1006/jmsp.1999.7942

    1999

  13. [18]

    Karlovets, A

    E. Karlovets, A. Campargue, D. Mondelain, S. Kassi, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, High sensitivity cavity ring down spectroscopy of 18O en- riched carbon dioxide between 5850 and 7000 cm −1: Part II-analysis and theoretical modeling of the 12C18O2, 13C18O2 and 16O13C18O spec- tra,...

    2014 doi

  14. [19]

    Campargue, D

    A. Campargue, D. Bailly, J.-L. Teffo, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, The ν1 + 5ν3 dyad of 12CO2 and 13CO2, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 193 (1) (1999) 204 212. doi:10.1006/jmsp.1998.7718

    1999

  15. [20]

    Karlovets, P

    E. Karlovets, P. ermák, D. Mondelain, S. Kassi, A. Campargue, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, Analysis and theoretical modeling of the 18O enriched carbon dioxide spectrum by CRDS near 1.74 µm, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 217 (2018) 73 85

    2018

  16. [21]

    Yurchenko, T

    S. Yurchenko, T. M. Mellor, R. S. Freedman, J. Tennyson, ExoMol line lists-XXXIX. ro-vibrational molecular line list for CO 2, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (4) (2020) 5282 5291. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1874. 28

    2020 doi

  17. [22]

    Karlovets, A

    E. Karlovets, A. Campargue, D. Mondelain, S. Béguier, S. Kassi, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, High sensitivity cavity ring down spectroscopy of 18O enriched carbon dioxide between 5850 and 7000 cm −1: I. anal- ysis and theoretical modeling of the 16O12C18O spectrum, Journal of Qua...

    2013 doi

  18. [23]

    Karlovets, A

    E. Karlovets, A. Campargue, D. Mondelain, S. Kassi, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, High sensitivity cavity ring down spectroscopy of 18O enriched carbon dioxide between 5850 and 7000 cm −1: Part III-analysis and theoretical modeling of the 12C17O2, 16O12C17O, 17O12C18O, 16O13C17O a...

    2014 doi

  19. [24]

    ermák, E

    P. ermák, E. Karlovets, D. Mondelain, S. Kassi, V. Perevalov, A. Cam- pargue, High sensitivity CRDS of CO 2 in the 1.74 µm transparency window. a validation test for the spectroscopic databases, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 207 (2018) 95 103. doi...

    2018 doi

  20. [25]

    Tan, X.-Q

    Y. Tan, X.-Q. Zhao, A.-W. Liu, S.-M. Hu, O. Lyulin, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, Cavity ring-down spectroscopy of CO 2 overtone bands near 830 nm, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Trans- fer 165 (2015) 22 27. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.06.010

    2015 doi

  21. [26]

    B. M. Elliott, K. Sung, C. E. Miller, FT-IR spectra of 17O-enriched CO2 in the ν3 region: High accuracy frequency calibration and spectro- scopic constants for 16O12C17O, 17O12C17O, and 17O12C18O, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 304 (2014) 1 11. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2014.08.001

    2014 doi

  22. [27]

    R. Toth, L. Brown, C. Miller, V. M. Devi, D. C. Benner, Line strengths of 12C16O2: 4550-7000 cm −1, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 239 (2) (2006) 221 242. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2006.08.001

    2006 doi

  23. [28]

    Garnache, A

    A. Garnache, A. Liu, L. Cerutti, A. Campargue, Intracavity laser ab- sorption spectroscopy with a vertical external cavity surface emitting laser at 2.3 µm: Application to water and carbon dioxide, Chemical Physics Letters 416 (1-3) (2005) 22 27. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2005.09.028. 29

    2005 doi

  24. [29]

    R. Toth, C. Miller, L. Brown, V. M. Devi, D. C. Benner, Line positions and strengths of 16O12C18O, 18O12C18O and 17O12C18O between 2200 and 7000 cm −1, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 243 (1) (2007) 43

    2007

  25. [30]

    Serdyukov, L

    V. Serdyukov, L. Sinitsa, A. Lugovskoi, Y. Borkov, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, LED-based fourier transform spectroscopy of 16O12C18O and 12C18O2 in the 11,260-11,430 cm −1 range, Journal of Quanti- tative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 177 (2016) 145 151. doi:10.1016/j.jqsr...

    2016 doi

  26. [31]

    Y. Ding, P. Macko, D. Romanini, V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, J.-L. Teffo, S.-M. Hu, A. Campargue, High sensitivity CW-cavity ringdown and fourier transform absorption spectroscopies of 13CO2, Journal of Molecu- lar Spectroscopy 226 (2) (2004) 146 160. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.03.009

    2004 doi

  27. [32]

    De Ghellinck D’Elseghem Vaernewijck, S

    X. De Ghellinck D’Elseghem Vaernewijck, S. Kassi, M. Her- man, 17O12C17O and 18O12C17O spectroscopy in the 1.6 µm region, Molecular Physics 110 (21-22) (2012) 2665 2671. doi:10.1080/00268976.2012.705346

    2012

  28. [33]

    Perevalov, V

    B. Perevalov, V. Perevalov, A. Campargue, A (nearly) complete ex- perimental linelist for 13C16O2, 16O13C18O, 16O13C17O, 13C18O2 and 17O13C18O by high-sensitivity CW-CRDS spectroscopy between 5851 and 7045 cm −1, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 109 ...

    2008 doi

  29. [34]

    R. Toth, L. Brown, C. Miller, V. Malathy Devi, D. Benner, Spectro- scopic database of CO 2 line parameters: 4300-7000 cm −1, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 109 (6) (2008) 906

    2008

  30. [35]

    Karlovets, I

    E. Karlovets, I. Gordon, L. Rothman, R. Hashemi, R. Hargreaves, G. Toon, A. Campargue, V. Perevalov, P. ermák, M. Birk, G. Wagner, J. Hodges, J. Tennyson, S. Yurchenko, The update of the line positions and intensities in the line list of carbon dioxide for the HITRAN2020 spect...

    2021

  31. [36]

    B. M. Elliott, K. Sung, C. E. Miller, FT-IR spectra of 18O-, and 13C-enriched CO 2 in the ν3 region: High accuracy frequency cali- bration and spectroscopic constants for 16O12C18O, 18O12C18O, and 16O13C16O, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 312 (2015) 78 86. doi:10.1016/j.jms...

    2015 doi

  32. [37]

    Y. Ding, A. Campargue, E. Bertseva, S. Tashkun, V. Perevalov, Highly sensitive absorption spectroscopy of carbon dioxide by ICLAS-VeCSEL between 8800 and 9530 cm −1, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 231 (2) (2005) 117 123. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.12.008

    2005 doi

  33. [38]

    Y. Ding, V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, J.-L. Teffo, A.-W. Liu, S.-M. Hu, 16O13C18O: High-resolution absorption spectrum between 4000 and 9500 cm −1 and global fitting of vibration-rotational line posi- tions, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 222 (2) (2003) 276 283. doi:10.1016/j.jm...

    2003 doi

  34. [39]

    Perevalov, S

    V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, K. Song, A. Campargue, Global modeling of 16O12C17O and 16O12C18O absolute line intensities in the 1.35 µm region, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 263 (2) (2010) 183 185. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2010.08.004

    2010 doi

  35. [40]

    Campargue, K

    A. Campargue, K. Song, N. Mouton, V. Perevalov, S. Kassi, High sen- sitivity CW-cavity ring down spectroscopy of five 13CO2 isotopologues of carbon dioxide in the 1.26-1.44 µm region (I): Line positions, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 111 (5) (2010) 659

    2010

  36. [41]

    V. R. Stull, P. J. Wyatt, G. N. Plass, Vibrational energies of the CO 2 molecule, The Journal of Chemical Physics 37 (6) (1962) 1442 1445. doi:10.1063/1.1733302

    1962 doi

  37. [42]

    Majcherova, P

    Z. Majcherova, P. MacKo, D. Romanini, V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, J.- L. Teffo, A. Campargue, High-sensitivity CW-cavity ringdown spec- troscopy of 12CO2 near 1.5 µm, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 230 (1) (2005) 1 21. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.09.011

    2005 doi

  38. [43]

    Perevalov, S

    B. Perevalov, S. Kassi, D. Romanini, V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, A. Cam- pargue, Global effective hamiltonians of 16O13C17O and 16O13C18O 31 improved from CW-CRDS observations in the 5900-7000 cm −1 re- gion, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 241 (1) (2007) 90 100. doi:10.1016/j....

    2007 doi

  39. [44]

    Huang, D

    X. Huang, D. W. Schwenke, S. A. Tashkun, T. J. Lee, An isotopic- independent highly accurate potential energy surface for CO 2 isotopo- logues and an initial 12C16O2 infrared line list, The Journal of Chemical Physics 136 (12) (2012). doi:10.1063/1.3697540

    2012 doi

  40. [45]

    Remigi, M.-L

    S. Remigi, M.-L. Frezzotti, A. L. Rizzo, R. Esposito, R. J. Bodnar, A. Sandoval-Velasquez, A. Aiuppa, Spatially resolved CO 2 carbon stable isotope analyses at the microscale using Raman spectroscopy, Scientific Reports 13 (1) (2023). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44903-z

    2023 doi

  41. [46]

    S. Cui, W. Wang, C. Cheng, Y. Yao, C. Qin, Q. Sun, Ra- man quantitative measurement for carbon isotopic composition of CO 2: Theory and method, Chemical Geology 585 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120570

    2021

  42. [47]

    W. Lu, X. Wang, Q. Wan, W. Hu, I.-M. Chou, Y. Wan, In situ Raman spectroscopic measurement of the 13C/12C ratio in CO 2: Experimental calibrations on the effects of fluid pressure, temperature and composi- tion, Chemical Geology 615 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121201

    2023

  43. [48]

    Deckert, T

    V. Deckert, T. Deckert-Gaudig, M. Diegel, I. Götz, L. Langelüddecke, H. Schneidewind, G. Sharma, P. Singh, P. Singh, S. Trautmann, M. Zeis- berger, Z. Zhang, Spatial resolution in Raman spectroscopy, Faraday Discuss. 177 (2015) 9–20. doi:10.1039/C5FD90014J

    2015 doi

  44. [49]

    Sanchez-Castellanos, R

    M. Sanchez-Castellanos, R. Lemus, M. Carvajal, F. Pérez-Bernal, The potential energy surface of CO 2 from an algebraic approach, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 112 (2012) 3498–3507. doi:doi.org/10.1002/qua.24141

    2012 doi

  45. [50]

    Suárez, O

    E. Suárez, O. Guzmán-Juárez, R. Lemus, A general local algebraic approach for molecules with normal mode behavior: Application to FCN, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1244 (2025) 115069. doi:10.1016/j.comptc.2025.115069

    2025

  46. [51]

    Suárez, O

    E. Suárez, O. Guzmán-Juárez, R. Lemus, Description of vibrational ex- citations of the OCS molecule using a local algebraic approach, Journal 32 of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 340 (2025) 109432. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2025.109432

    2025

  47. [52]

    E. S. O Guzmán-Juárez, R. Lemus, A study of n2o vibrational in the framework of an algebraic approach, Journal of Quan- titative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 348 (2026) 109704. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2025.109704

    2026

  48. [53]

    O. G.-J. E. Suárez, R. Lemus, A study of vibrational excitations in a series of isotopologues of nitrous osidein the framework of an algebraic approach, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 360 (2026) 109958. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2026.109958

    2026

  49. [54]

    Bermudez-Montaña, R

    M. Bermudez-Montaña, R. Lemus, F. Pérez-Bernal, M. Carvajal, Comprehensive vibrational analysis of CO 2 based on a polyad- preserving model, The European Physical Journal D 71 (6) (2017) 147. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2017-80178-6

    2017 doi

  50. [55]

    Bermúdez-Montaña, M

    M. Bermúdez-Montaña, M. Rodríguez-Arcos, M. Carvajal, C. Ostertag- Henning, R. Lemus, Algebraic vibrational description of the sym- metric isotopologues of CO 2, Chemical Physics 557 (2022) 111481. doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2022.111481

    2022

  51. [56]

    Bermúdez-Montaña, M

    M. Bermúdez-Montaña, M. Rodríguez-Arcos, M. Carvajal, C. Ostertag- Henning, R. Lemus, A spectroscopic description of asymmetric isotopo- logues of CO2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 127 (2023) 6357–

    2023

  52. [57]

    Álvarez, G

    C. Álvarez, G. Tejeda, J. M. Fernández, Experimental Polarizability Transition Moments of CO 2 for Excited Vibrational States, Molecules 29 (21) (2024) 5103. doi:10.3390/molecules29215103

    2024 doi

  53. [58]

    Lemus, M

    R. Lemus, M. Sánchez-Castellanos, F. Pérez-Bernal, J. M. Fernández, M. Carvajal, Simulation of the Raman spectra of CO 2: Bridging the gap between algebraic models and experimental spectra, The Journal of Chemical Physics 141 (5) (2014). doi:10.1063/1.4889995

    2014 doi

  54. [59]

    BermúdezMontaña, M

    M. BermúdezMontaña, M. Carvajal, F. PérezBernal, R. Lemus, An algebraic alternative for the accurate simulation of CO 2 Ra- man spectra, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 51 (3) (2020) 569–583. doi:10.1002/jrs.5801. 33

    2020 doi

  55. [62]

    Halonen, Highly excited states and local modes, in: P

    L. Halonen, Highly excited states and local modes, in: P. Jensen, P. R. Bunker (Eds.), Computational Molecular Spectroscopy, Wiley, Chich- ester, 2000, pp. 325–364

    2000

  56. [63]

    R. R. Gamache, B. Vispoel, J. Tennyson, S. N. Yurchenko, O. L. Polyansky, I. E. Gordon, R. J. Hargreaves, X. Huang, Partition sums for molecules and their isotopologues for HITRAN2024, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 345 (2025) 109568. doi:10.1016/j...

    2025

  57. [64]

    Tejeda, B

    G. Tejeda, B. Maté, S. Montero, Overtone Raman spectrum and molec- ular polarizability surface of CO 2, The Journal of Chemical Physics 103 (2) (1995) 568–576. doi:10.1063/1.470091

    1995 doi

  58. [65]

    Chrysos, I

    M. Chrysos, I. A. Verzhbitskiy, F. Rachet, A. P. Kouzov, The isotropic remnant of the CO 2 near-fully depolarized Raman 2 ν3 overtone, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134 (10) (2011). doi:10.1063/1.3557820

    2011 doi

  59. [66]

    Álvarez, G

    C. Álvarez, G. Tejeda, J. Fernández, Experimental polarizability tran- sition moments of 13CO2 and 16O13C18O for high-temperature applica- tions, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 356 (2026). doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2026.109875

    2026

  60. [67]

    A. V. Sepman, V. V. Toro, A. V. Mokhov, H. B. Levinsky, Determination of temperature and concentrations of main components in flames by fitting measured Raman spectra, Applied Physics B 112 (2013) 35–47. doi:10.1007/s00340-013-5389-2

    2013 doi

  61. [69]

    Rothman, R

    L. Rothman, R. Hawkins, R. Wattson, R. Gamache, Energy levels, in- tensities, and linewidths of atmospheric carbon dioxide bands, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 48 (5-6) (1992) 537–566. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(92)90119-O

    1992 doi

  62. [70]

    C. E. Miller, M. A. Montgomery, R. M. Onorato, C. Johnstone, T. P. Mc- Nicholas, B. Kovaric, L. R. Brown, Near infrared spectroscopy of carbon dioxide. II: 16O13C16O and 16O13C18O line positions, Journal of Molecu- lar Spectroscopy 228 (2) (2004) 355–374. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.07.013

    2004 doi

  63. [71]

    Papineau, M

    N. Papineau, M. Péalat, Numerical simulation of the coherent anti- stokes Raman scattering spectrum of CO 2, The Journal of Chemical Physics 79 (1983) 5758–5768. doi:10.1063/1.445763

    1983 doi

  64. [72]

    Robert, Y

    S. Robert, Y. Borkov, J. Vander Auwera, R. Drummond, A. Mahieux, V. Wilquet, A. Vandaele, V. Perevalov, S. Tashkun, J. Bertaux, Assignment and rotational analysis of new absorption bands of carbon dioxide isotopologues in Venus spectra, Journal of Quan- titative Spectroscopy a...

    2013 doi

  65. [76]

    Cerezo, A

    J. Cerezo, A. Bastida, A. Requena, J. Zúñiga, Rovibrational energies, partition functions and equilibrium fractionation of the CO 2 isotopo- logues, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 233–251. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.06.003

    2014 doi

  66. [674]

    doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.11.013

    2009 doi

  67. [921]

    doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.12.004

    2007 doi

  68. [1419]

    doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.030

    2011 doi

  69. [6376]

    doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c00890

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.