Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking Synthetic Tabular Data: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.01908 v1 pith:IXUUIA2G submitted 2025-04-02 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords dataframeworksyntheticbenchmarkingensuringevaluationmetricsprivacy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating the quality of synthetic data remains a key challenge for ensuring privacy and utility in data-driven research. In this work, we present an evaluation framework that quantifies how well synthetic data replicates original distributional properties while ensuring privacy. The proposed approach employs a holdout-based benchmarking strategy that facilitates quantitative assessment through low- and high-dimensional distribution comparisons, embedding-based similarity measures, and nearest-neighbor distance metrics. The framework supports various data types and structures, including sequential and contextual information, and enables interpretable quality diagnostics through a set of standardized metrics. These contributions aim to support reproducibility and methodological consistency in benchmarking of synthetic data generation techniques. The code of the framework is available at https://github.com/mostly-ai/mostlyai-qa.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TabQueryBench: A Query-Centric Benchmark for Synthetic Tabular Data

    cs.DB 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Across 49 datasets and 11 generators, distance-based fidelity overstates synthetic tabular quality: best query-centric score is only 0.75, with systematic failures on high-cardinality support, local conditionals, and ...

Pith tools