Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05755 v2 pith:IYUM3WIV submitted 2025-04-08 cs.HC cs.AIecon.GNq-fin.EC

Unraveling Human-AI Teaming: A Review and Outlook

classification cs.HC cs.AIecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords human-aiteamteamingresearchagentschallengesdecision-makinggaps
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing at an unprecedented pace, with clear potential to enhance decision-making and productivity. Yet, the collaborative decision-making process between humans and AI remains underdeveloped, often falling short of its transformative possibilities. This paper explores the evolution of AI agents from passive tools to active collaborators in human-AI teams, emphasizing their ability to learn, adapt, and operate autonomously in complex environments. This paradigm shifts challenges traditional team dynamics, requiring new interaction protocols, delegation strategies, and responsibility distribution frameworks. Drawing on Team Situation Awareness (SA) theory, we identify two critical gaps in current human-AI teaming research: the difficulty of aligning AI agents with human values and objectives, and the underutilization of AI's capabilities as genuine team members. Addressing these gaps, we propose a structured research outlook centered on four key aspects of human-AI teaming: formulation, coordination, maintenance, and training. Our framework highlights the importance of shared mental models, trust-building, conflict resolution, and skill adaptation for effective teaming. Furthermore, we discuss the unique challenges posed by varying team compositions, goals, and complexities. This paper provides a foundational agenda for future research and practical design of sustainable, high-performing human-AI teams.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?

    cs.HC 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analysis of 53 human-AI team papers yields five distinct clusters (AI Assistant, Ad-hoc Dependency, Ad-hoc Forced Dependency, Paired Equanimity, Group Equanimity) based on psychological team characteristics.

  2. A Simple Solution to Improving Human Supervision of Algorithms: Evidence from Smart Vending

    cs.HC 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A randomized field experiment finds that limiting downward overrides to two per machine reduces inventory by 1.28% without sales loss by prompting workers to select higher-value SKUs for intervention.