Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Decision-making and Fuzzy Temporal Logic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.01970 v2 pith:J2CI3QWD submitted 2019-01-07 cs.AI econ.THmath.LO

classification cs.AIecon.THmath.LO
keywords timediscountingpreferenceriskbehaviorsdecision-makingdelayeffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper shows that the fuzzy temporal logic can model figures of thought to describe decision-making behaviors. In order to exemplify, some economic behaviors observed experimentally were modeled from problems of choice containing time, uncertainty and fuzziness. Related to time preference, it is noted that the subadditive discounting is mandatory in positive rewards situations and, consequently, results in the magnitude effect and time effect, where the last has a stronger discounting for earlier delay periods (as in, one hour, one day), but a weaker discounting for longer delay periods (for instance, six months, one year, ten years). In addition, it is possible to explain the preference reversal (change of preference when two rewards proposed on different dates are shifted in the time). Related to the Prospect Theory, it is shown that the risk seeking and the risk aversion are magnitude dependents, where the risk seeking may disappear when the values to be lost are very high.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation

    econ.GN 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using three extreme-outcome gambling problems, the paper finds that most people prefer the certain option and argues that time-averaged wealth growth, not expected value, drives these choices.

Pith tools