Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 87 references

Three-Dimensional Non-Foliated Fractional Quantum Hall Phases with Irrational Anyons in Twisted van der Waals Multilayers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Large-angle twisted van der Waals multilayers are claimed to stabilize non-foliated three-dimensional fractional quantum Hall liquids whose quasiparticles carry rational electric charges but irrational braiding statistics.

desk verdict A plausible, honestly presented variational proposal for 3D non-foliated FQH in twisted multilayers; the twist-to-t⊥ reduction and missing error bars keep the central stabilization claim conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13127 v1 pith:J3IL27LL submitted 2026-07-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Seyoung Jin , Hyeonseo Lim , Youngwook Kim , Gil Young Cho This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci MSC 81V7082D80 PACS 73.43.-f73.22.Pr
keywords three-dimensionalfractionalquantumHalleffecttwistedvanderWaalsmultilayersgeneralizedHalperinstatesirrationalanyonsinterlayercoherencenon-foliatedtopologicalorderMonteCarlotrialwavefunctionsplateau
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a stack of atomically thin layers rotated by a large angle relative to their neighbors is a realistic setting for intrinsically three-dimensional fractional quantum Hall physics. In a magnetic field, the twist suppresses the coherent interlayer hopping that normally turns a three-dimensional stack into a metal, while leaving strong Coulomb coupling between layers intact. By Monte Carlo comparison of 862 competing trial wavefunctions, the authors find that generalized Halperin states with interlayer quantum coherence win at fillings such as 1/7 and 1/9 per layer, and even survive at 1/2 at fields as low as a few tesla. These states are non-foliated—they cannot be decomposed into independent stacked two-dimensional quantum Hall layers—and their quasiparticles carry rational electric charges but irrational braiding statistics. If correct, this provides a concrete materials platform for three-dimensional topological order and irrational anyons.

What carries the argument

The generalized Halperin state (mnop): a trial wavefunction in which each layer hosts a Laughlin-type factor z^m and pairs of electrons in layers one, two, and three apart acquire Jastrow correlation factors z^n, z^o, z^p, creating coherent interlayer entanglement. The large twist angle enters as a small interlayer tunneling t⊥, which suppresses the metallic spontaneous-interlayer-coherent competitor; the infinite-component Chern-Simons theory then converts the K-matrix of the Halperin liquid into quasiparticle braiding phases, yielding irrational numbers.

What would settle it

Transport measurements in a stack of more than 20 alternating or helical twisted graphene layers at per-layer fillings 1/7 and 1/9 in fields of a few tesla: absence of the predicted quantized Hall conductance 2e²/7h (or 2e²/9h) with vanishing longitudinal resistance, or observation of metallic behavior instead, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the effective Hamiltonian of a large-angle twisted multilayer, with renormalized interlayer tunneling t⊥≈1.09–1.78 meV, favors generalized Halperin liquids over metallic spontaneous-interlayer-coherent states and over staged or crystalline competitors in experimentally accessible fields (B≲20 T). The winning states, for example (3110) at νL=1/7 and (3111) at νL=1/9, entangle Landau levels across multiple consecutive layers, and their quasiparticles have rational charges −e/7 or −e/9 but irrational self-statistical angles such as θ=π√(1/7 + 2√21/3). The infinite-component Chern-Simons analysis yields these statistics, and finite-layer ca

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats the whole effect of the twist as a single renormalized interlayer-tunneling number (t⊥≈1.09–1.78 meV) while keeping ideal two-dimensional Landau levels in each layer; if real large-angle twisted multilayers retain extra coherent hopping channels, broaden Landau levels, or reconstruct into moiré bands, the claimed energy ordering may fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At per-layer fillings νL=1/7 and 1/9, twisted alternating and helical multilayer graphene should show generalized Halperin ground states instead of the metallic interlayer-coherent phases that dominate untwisted graphite at the same fields.
  • The same states appear down to B≈3 T for alternating and ≈1 T for helical stacks, placing them within reach of existing high-field transport experiments.
  • Quasiparticles carry rational charges (for example −e/7) but irrational braiding phases, a signature impossible in strictly two-dimensional topological order.
  • For stacks of more than about 20 layers, the braiding statistics are within 0.1 rad of the infinite-layer limit, so relatively small multilayer spirals could already display the effect.
  • The qualitative phase diagram is stable under modest variation of short-range interaction parameters and carries over to twisted transition-metal dichalcogenides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental test would be measuring transport in a >20-layer alternating or helical twisted stack at νL=1/7: observation of a quantized Hall conductance 2e²/7h with vanishing longitudinal resistance would strongly support the Halperin assignment.
  • The predicted transition from metallic interlayer-coherent state to Halperin liquid as the twist angle increases implies that twist angle itself could serve as a tunable control parameter, with a critical interlayer tunneling somewhere between the graphite and twisted values.
  • Because irrational braiding angles form a dense set, realizing these phases could enable continuously tunable topological phase rotations; the authors hint at this possibility but do not demonstrate a concrete computational scheme.
  • The mechanism only requires suppressed interlayer hopping with preserved interlayer Coulomb coupling, so artificially stacked films with engineered twist angles—beyond the specific graphene and TMD materials modeled—could be viable platforms for the same physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that large-angle twisted van der Waals multilayers realize three-dimensional non-foliated fractional quantum Hall phases. The authors construct an effective Hamiltonian projected onto ideal zeroth Landau levels per layer (Coulomb, phenomenological short-range interactions, and a single renormalized interlayer tunneling t⊥), compare 862 trial wavefunctions by Monte Carlo, and find that generalized Halperin states with interlayer coherence are stabilized at fillings such as ν_L=1/7 and 1/9 in experimentally accessible fields, replacing the metallic SILC states that dominate Bernal graphite. Using infinite-component Chern-Simons theory, they compute quasiparticle charges and irrational braiding statistics and show finite-layer convergence for systems with more than 20 layers.

Significance. If the stabilization claim survives scrutiny, this is a significant advance: it would provide a concrete materials route to intrinsically three-dimensional topological order with non-foliated entanglement and irrational anyons. The paper's strengths are the systematic construction of a large variational space, explicit analytic formulas for the irrational statistics, and a robustness check against variations of the phenomenological parameters. The significance is conditional, however, because the material-specific conclusion rests on a strongly simplified one-parameter model of the twist and on Monte Carlo energy comparisons for which no error bars are reported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (1); Supplementary Table 5] The central material-specific prediction rests on reducing the entire twist effect to a uniform nearest-layer t⊥ while keeping ideal 2D Landau levels per layer. No band-structure or Landau-level-width calculation is provided for the finite twisted stack, and Fig. 3 reports only phase labels, not the variational energy differences. Since the moiré period at θ≈10° is ~1.4 nm while l_B≈8 nm at 10 T, the in-plane potential can broaden the zeroth Landau level and introduce additional interlayer channels. Please supply a microscopic estimate of the Landau-level width and compare it with the Halperin-vs-SILC energy gap; otherwise the stabilization claim is not tied to the actual material.
  2. [Methods, 'Monte Carlo calculation of energy'; Supplementary Note 6b] The Monte Carlo energies are evaluated with a cutoff M_eff calibrated only on decoupled stacks of 1/3 Laughlin states, and no statistical error bars are reported. The staging energies in Supplementary Note 2.6 also rely on the d≪R expansion. Because the phase boundaries in Fig. 3 are drawn from these energies, it is impossible to tell whether the Halperin-vs-SILC ordering is robust or within noise. Please report per-particle energies and energy differences with error estimates for the relevant states and fields, and a systematic M_eff-convergence study for the entangled and staged states.
  3. [Supplementary Note 6c; Fig. 2c-e] In valley-degenerate liquid cases the ground-state valley texture is fixed by the argument that the mean-field treatment overestimates the phenomenological interaction energy of the correlated liquids, rather than by direct computation. The representative Halperin phases in Fig. 2c–e and their V1–V3 energy contributions depend on this texture. This assumption is load-bearing and should be tested either by direct evaluation of all allowed valley textures or by demonstrating that the phase boundaries are invariant under them.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Results, Phase Diagrams] Fig. 3: the axes are not labeled in the manuscript text. Please specify what is plotted (e.g., d/l_B versus ν_L, or magnetic field versus filling) and what the gray regions denote.
  2. [Results, Phase Diagrams] The statement that the strong-field regime B≳100 T corresponds to d/l_B≳0.2 is quantitatively inconsistent: at B=100 T, l_B≈2.56 nm and d/l_B≈0.13; d/l_B=0.2 corresponds to B≈230 T. Please correct.
  3. [Supplementary Note 3c] The helical multilayer valley textures are said to depend on θ, with the calculation done for θ slightly less than 30°, while the main text quotes θ≳10° for the t⊥ values. Please clarify the angle range used in the phase diagrams.
  4. [Supplementary Note 2.1; main text Eq. (2)] The (mn/op) notation for states without local valley polarization is used in the main text and figures but defined only in the supplement. A one-sentence definition of the two-component form in the main text would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase diagram is a variational Monte Carlo result, the phenomenological parameters are calibrated to prior experiments external to this paper's target claim, and the irrational statistics are derived from an independent infinite-Chern-Simons theory.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that large-angle twisted van der Waals multilayers stabilize generalized Halperin states with irrational anyons—is not obtained by definition or by a self-citation loop. The phase diagram (Fig. 3) is the output of Monte Carlo energy comparisons over an explicit set of 862 trial wavefunctions; no predicted quantity is set equal to an input by construction. The effective model parameters in Eq. (1) are stated to be 'adopted from models known to reproduce the experimentally observed phase diagrams of large-angle twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene under strong magnetic fields [24–26, 39]' (Methods). Although refs. [24–26] include authors of the present paper, they report experimental observations, which are external evidence rather than unverified self-citation, and the predicted infinite-layer (3110)/(3111) states are distinct from the bilayer/trilayer phases used for calibration. The irrational braiding statistics in Eq. (3) are computed from the infinite Chern-Simons theory of ref. [7], an independent prior result, with the K-matrix as input; this is a derivation, not a renaming of the input. The acknowledged limitation in Supplementary Note 6c—that the ground-state valley texture is fixed by a mean-field overestimation argument—is an approximation affecting symmetry assignment, not the stability of the Halperin phases themselves. The skeptic's concern that the twist is reduced to a single renormalized t⊥, without a moiré-band or Landau-level-width calculation, is a physical correctness/robustness risk, not a circularity of the derivation chain. No step reduces a predicted observable to a fitted parameter or to the paper's own prior conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation depends on a small number of phenomenological inputs inherited from prior experiments/literature (t⊥; V1–V3), plus several modeling simplifications (LLL projection, twist-as-t⊥, periodic-layer extrapolation, variational closure). No new elementary particle, force, or conservation law is postulated; the exotic quasiparticles are pre-existing theoretical constructs from refs [7,10,11] applied to a new platform.

free parameters (2)
  • Interlayer tunneling t⊥ (Bernal / ATG / HTG) = 10 / 1.78 / 1.09 meV
    Central control parameter; taken from refs [43–45] (Supplementary Table 5). The entire twist effect is encoded in this reduced value.
  • Phenomenological short-range interactions V1, V2, V3 = V1×lB/d=0.0101493; V2×lB/d=0.507463/0.40597/0.314627; V3×lB/d=0.101493/0.202985/0.294328
    Chosen to reproduce experimentally observed phase diagrams in refs [24–26] (Supplementary Table 5); these are fits to prior experiments by overlapping authors.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Lowest Landau level projection with Haldane spherical geometry
    Used throughout; standard gauge and geometry for quantum Hall trial states (Methods; Supplementary Note 1).
  • domain assumption Large-angle twist enters only through reduced t⊥; interlayer intervalley tunneling and moiré band reconstruction are neglected
    Methods, Eq. (1) and Supplementary Table 5. This is the load-bearing simplification: the actual twist physics is reduced to one number.
  • domain assumption Spin degeneracy is completely lifted by the magnetic field
    Methods: 'We assume a sufficiently strong magnetic field such that the spin degeneracy is completely lifted.'
  • domain assumption Infinite-layer thermodynamics is obtained from a periodic NL-layer cell and 1/NL extrapolation
    Methods: Monte Carlo calculation of energy; Supplementary Note 6.
  • domain assumption Mean-field treatment of V1, V2, V3 is valid
    Methods: Mean-field theory with phenomenological short-range interactions; Supplementary Note 6c.
  • domain assumption Infinite-component Chern-Simons theory correctly gives quasiparticle statistics
    Supplementary Note 5 applies the theory of ref [7] to the Halperin states without re-derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The set of 862 trial wavefunctions spans the relevant competing phases
    Results: Competing States; Methods: Construction of Ansatz wavefunctions. Ground-state identification is variational and cannot exclude unlisted states.
  • ad hoc to paper Valley texture in degenerate mean-field cases is assigned by the authors' stated logic
    Supplementary Note 6c: in 'exceptions' the liquid ground state is unphysical due to infinite degeneracy, and the authors fix the texture 'following this logic' rather than by energy minimization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-Dimensional Non-Foliated Fractional Quantum Hall Phases with Irrational Anyons in Twisted van der Waals Multilayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J3IL27LL

@misc{pith2026260713127,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-Dimensional Non-Foliated Fractional Quantum Hall Phases with Irrational Anyons in Twisted van der Waals Multilayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J3IL27LL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13127}
}
read the original abstract

Three-dimensional fractional quantum Hall phases offer a route to intrinsically higher-dimensional topological order beyond simple stacks of two-dimensional quantum Hall liquids. Such phases can exhibit non-foliated, intrinsically three-dimensional entanglement structures, exponentially large topological degeneracies and quasiparticles with irrational braiding statistics. Their microscopic realization has remained elusive because Landau quantization in three dimensions generally leaves dispersive one-dimensional bands, favoring metallic and density-wave states over incompressible fractional liquids. Here we show that large-angle twisted van der Waals multilayers provide a practical route around this obstruction. Large twist angles suppress coherent interlayer tunneling through momentum mismatch, while the atomic-scale layer separation preserves strong interlayer Coulomb interactions. Using Monte Carlo calculations to compare the energies of an extensive set of 862 competing trial wavefunctions, we find that generalized Halperin states with quantum coherence extending across multiple consecutive layers are stabilized. In experimentally accessible magnetic-field regimes, these states replace the metallic spontaneous-interlayer-coherent phases that dominate conventional untwisted graphite-like multilayers. The resulting liquids realize non-foliated fractional quantum Hall order closely related to fractonic topological order, hosting quasiparticles with rational electric charges but irrational braiding statistics. Their large topological degeneracy and non-rational statistical phases may offer unconventional resources for quantum information storage and processing. Our results establish twisted van der Waals multilayers as a realistic materials platform for three-dimensional fractional Hall matter beyond conventional two-dimensional quantum Hall systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13127 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    von Klitzing, T

    K. von Klitzing, T. Chakraborty, P. Kim, V. Madhavan, X. Dai, J. McIver, Y. Tokura, L. Savary, D. Smirnova, A. M. Rey, C. Felser, J. Gooth, and X. Qi, 40 years of the quantum Hall effect, Nature Reviews Physics2, 397 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    B. I. Halperin, Quantized Hall conductance, current- carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2185 (1982)

    1982

  3. [3]

    B. I. Halperin, Statistics of quasiparticles and the hierar- chy of fractional quantized Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1583 (1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    B. I. Halperin, Possible states for a three-dimensional electron gas in a strong magnetic field, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics26, 1913 (1987)

    1913

  5. [5]

    Kohmoto, B

    M. Kohmoto, B. I. Halperin, and Y.-S. Wu, Diophantine equation for the three-dimensional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B45, 13488 (1992)

    1992

  6. [6]

    J. Seo, C. M. Guo, C. Putzke, X. Huang, B. H. Goodge, Y. C. Wong, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, Transport evidence for chiral surface states from three-dimensional Landau bands, Nature Physics22, 232 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    X. Ma, W. Shirley, M. Cheng, M. Levin, J. McGreevy, and X. Chen, Fractonic order in infinite-component Chern-Simons gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B105, 195124 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    B. J. Brown, D. Loss, J. K. Pachos, C. N. Self, and J. R. Wootton, Quantum memories at finite temperature, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045005 (2016)

    2016

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    Pretko, X

    M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, Fracton phases of matter, International Journal of Modern Physics A35, 2030003 (2020)

    2020

  2. [12]

    J. R. Wootton and J. K. Pachos, Universal quantum com- putation with abelian anyon models, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science270, 209 (2011), pro- ceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Quantum Physics and Logic (QPL 2009)

    2011

  3. [13]

    F. Qin, S. Li, Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, W. Zhang, D. Yu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Theory for the charge-density- wave mechanism of 3D quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 206601 (2020)

    2020

  4. [14]

    S. Li, C. M. Wang, Z. Z. Du, F. Qin, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, 3D quantum Hall effects and nonlinear Hall effect, npj Quantum Materials6, 96 (2021)

    2021

  5. [15]

    Gooth, S

    J. Gooth, S. Galeski, and T. Meng, Quantum-Hall physics and three dimensions, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 044501 (2023)

    2023

  6. [16]

    F. Tang, Y. Ren, P. Wang, R. Zhong, J. Schneeloch, S. A. Yang, K. Yang, P. A. Lee, G. Gu, Z. Qiao, and L. Zhang, Three-dimensional quantum Hall effect and metal–insulator transition inZrTe 5, Nature569, 537 (2019)

    2019

  7. [17]

    J.Yin, S.Slizovskiy, Y.Cao, S.Hu, Y.Yang, I.Lobanova, B. A. Piot, S.-K. Son, S. Ozdemir, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. S. Novoselov, F. Guinea, A. K. Geim, V. Fal’ko, and A. Mishchenko, Dimensional reduction, quantum Hall effect and layer parity in graphite films, Nature Physi...

    2019

  8. [18]

    G. A. Csáthy and J. K. Jain, Next-level composite fermions, Nature Physics15, 883 (2019)

    2019

  9. [19]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Unconventionalsuper- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  10. [20]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  11. [21]

    Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies- Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and P.Jarillo-Herrero,Strangemetalinmagic-anglegraphene with near Planckian dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076801 (2020)

    2020

  12. [22]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twistedMoTe2, Nature622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  13. [23]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.- Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  14. [24]

    D. Kim, B. Kang, Y.-B. Choi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G.-H. Lee, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Ro- bust interlayer-coherent quantum Hall states in twisted bilayer graphene, Nano Letters23, 163 (2023). 8

    2023

  15. [25]

    D. Kim, S. Jin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. H. Smet, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Observation of 1/3 fractional quantum Hall physics in balanced large angle twisted bi- layer graphene, Nature Communications16, 179 (2025)

    2025

  16. [26]

    D. Kim, G. Lee, N. Leconte, S. Jin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Jung, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Corre- lated interlayer quantum Hall state in large-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nano Letters26, 231 (2026)

    2026

  17. [27]

    Y. Zhao, C. Zhang, D. D. Kohler, J. M. Scheeler, J. C. Wright, P. M. Voyles, and S. Jin, Supertwisted spirals of layered materials enabled by growth on non-Euclidean surfaces, Science370, 442 (2020)

    2020

  18. [28]

    Z. Ji, Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, Z. Zhu, Y. Wang, W. Liu, G. Modi, E. J. Mele, S. Jin, and R. Agarwal, Opto- twistronic Hall effect in a three-dimensional spiral lattice, Nature634, 69 (2024)

    2024

  19. [29]

    Z.-J. Wang, X. Kong, Y. Huang, J. Li, L. Bao, K. Cao, Y. Hu, J. Cai, L. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Wu, Y. Zhang, F.Pang, Z.Cheng, P.Babor, M.Kolibal, Z.Liu, Y.Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Cui, K. Liu, H. Yang, X. Bao, H.-J. Gao, Z. Liu, W. Ji, F. Ding, and M.-G. Willinger, Conversion ofchirality...

    2024

  20. [30]

    Zhang, B

    Y. Zhang, B. Xie, Y. Yang, Y. Wu, X. Lu, Y. Hu, Y. Ding, J. He, P. Dong, J. Wang, X. Zhou, J. Liu, Z.-J. Wang, and J. Li, Extremely large magnetoresistance in twisted intertwined graphene spirals, Nature Communi- cations15, 6120 (2024)

    2024

  21. [31]

    Y. Kim, H. Yun, S.-G. Nam, M. Son, D. S. Lee, D. C. Kim, S. Seo, H. C. Choi, H.-J. Lee, S. W. Lee, and J. S. Kim, Breakdown of the interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 096602 (2013)

    2013

  22. [32]

    X. Qiu, R. Joynt, and A. H. MacDonald, Phase tran- sitions in a multiple quantum well in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B42, 1339 (1990)

    1990

  23. [33]

    F. J. Burnell, B. A. Bernevig, and D. P. Arovas, Sce- nario for fractional quantum Hall effect in bulk isotropic materials, Phys. Rev. B79, 155310 (2009)

    2009

  24. [35]

    W. N. Faugno, A. C. Balram, A. Wójs, and J. K. Jain, Theoretical phase diagram of two-component composite fermions in double-layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 085412 (2020)

    2020

  25. [36]

    A. H. MacDonald, Staging transitions in multiple- quantum-well systems, Phys. Rev. B37, 4792 (1988)

    1988

  26. [38]

    Schliemann, Correlation energy, quantum phase tran- sition, and bias potential effects in quantum Hall bilayers atν=1, Phys

    J. Schliemann, Correlation energy, quantum phase tran- sition, and bias potential effects in quantum Hall bilayers atν=1, Phys. Rev. B67, 035328 (2003)

    2003

  27. [39]

    B. M. Hunt, J. I. A. Li, A. A. Zibrov, L. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, M. Za- letel, R. C. Ashoori, and A. F. Young, Direct measure- ment of discrete valley and orbital quantum numbers in bilayer graphene, Nature Communications8, 948 (2017)

    2017

  28. [40]

    Alicea and M

    J. Alicea and M. P. A. Fisher, Graphene integer quan- tum Hall effect in the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic regimes, Phys. Rev. B74, 075422 (2006)

    2006

  29. [41]

    Kharitonov, Phase diagram for theν= 0quan- tum Hall state in monolayer graphene, Phys

    M. Kharitonov, Phase diagram for theν= 0quan- tum Hall state in monolayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B85, 155439 (2012)

    2012

  30. [42]

    Kharitonov, Canted antiferromagnetic phase of the ν=0quantum Hall state in bilayer graphene, Phys

    M. Kharitonov, Canted antiferromagnetic phase of the ν=0quantum Hall state in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 046803 (2012)

    2012

  31. [43]

    X. Lu, B. Xie, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, X. Kong, J. Li, F. Ding, Z.-J. Wang, and J. Liu, Magic momenta and three-dimensional Landau levels from a three- dimensional graphite moiré superlattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056601 (2024)

    2024

  32. [46]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted bilayerMoTe 2 andWSe 2, Phys. Rev. B108, 085117 (2023)

    2023

  33. [47]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T.Cao,andD.Xiao,Fractionalcherninsulatorintwisted bilayerMoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  34. [48]

    C.-E. Ahn, W. Lee, K. Yananose, Y. Kim, and G. Y. Cho, Non-abelian fractional quantum anomalous Hall states and first Landau level physics of the second moiré band of twisted bilayerMoTe 2, Phys. Rev. B110, L161109 (2024)

    2024

  35. [49]

    Chen, W.-W

    F. Chen, W.-W. Luo, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Robust non-abelian even-denominator fractional chern insulator in twisted bilayerMoTe 2, Nature Communications16, 2115 (2025)

    2025

  36. [50]

    C.-E. Ahn, D. Seo, G. Lee, Y. Kim, and G. Y. Cho, Su- perconductivity proximate to non-abelian fractional spin Hall insulator in twisted bilayerMoTe2, Nature Commu- nications 10.1038/s41467-026-73777-8 (2026)

    2026 doi

  37. [52]

    W. N. Faugno, A. J. Duthie, D. J. Wales, and J. K. Jain, Exotic bilayer crystals in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B97, 245424 (2018)

    2018

  38. [53]

    Three-Dimensional Non-Foliated Fractional Quantum Hall Phases with Irrational Anyons in Twisted van der Waals Multilayers

    D. J. Wales and S. Ulker, Structure and dynamics of spherical crystals characterized for the Thomson prob- lem, Phys. Rev. B74, 212101 (2006). Supplementary Information for “Three-Dimensional Non-Foliated Fractional Quantum Hall Phases with Irrational Anyons in Twisted van der...

    2006

  39. [54]

    Morf and B

    R. Morf and B. I. Halperin, Monte carlo evaluation of trial wavefunctions for the fractional quantized Hall effect: Spherical geometry, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter68, 391 (1987)

    1987

  40. [55]

    X. Qiu, R. Joynt, and A. H. MacDonald, Phase transitions in a multiple quantum well in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B42, 1339 (1990)

    1990

  41. [56]

    J. D. Naud, L. P. Pryadko, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional quantum Hall effect in infinite-layer systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5408 (2000)

    2000

  42. [57]

    J. Naud, L. P. Pryadko, and S. Sondhi, Notes on infinite layer quantum Hall systems, Nuclear Physics B594, 713 (2001)

    2001

  43. [58]

    F. J. Burnell, B. A. Bernevig, and D. P. Arovas, Scenario for fractional quantum Hall effect in bulk isotropic materials, Phys. Rev. B79, 155310 (2009)

    2009

  44. [59]

    Wen, Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states, Advances in Physics44, 405 (1995)

    X.-G. Wen, Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states, Advances in Physics44, 405 (1995)

    1995

  45. [60]

    W. N. Faugno, A. J. Duthie, D. J. Wales, and J. K. Jain, Exotic bilayer crystals in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245424 (2018)

    2018

  46. [61]

    A. C. Archer, K. Park, and J. K. Jain, Competing crystal phases in the lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 146804 (2013)

    2013

  47. [62]

    Pérez-Garrido and M

    A. Pérez-Garrido and M. A. Moore, Symmetric patterns of dislocations in Thomson’s problem, Phys. Rev. B60, 15628 (1999)

    1999

  48. [63]

    P. K. Mogensen and A. N. Riseth, Optim: A mathematical optimization package for Julia, Journal of Open Source Software 3, 615 (2018)

    2018

  49. [64]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM review 59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  50. [65]

    D. J. Wales and J. P. K. Doye, Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A101, 5111 (1997). 23

    1997

  51. [66]

    S. A. Trygubenko and D. J. Wales, A doubly nudged elastic band method for finding transition states, The Journal of Chemical Physics120, 2082 (2004)

  52. [67]

    D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization, Mathematical Programming 45, 503 (1989)

    1989

  53. [68]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical Optimization (Springer, 2006)

    2006

  54. [69]

    C. B. Hanna, J. C. Díaz-Vélez, and A. H. MacDonald, Broken-symmetry states in quantum Hall superlattices, Phys. Rev. B65, 115323 (2002)

    2002

  55. [70]

    Schliemann, Correlation energy, quantum phase transition, and bias potential effects in quantum Hall bilayers atν=1, Phys

    J. Schliemann, Correlation energy, quantum phase transition, and bias potential effects in quantum Hall bilayers atν=1, Phys. Rev. B67, 035328 (2003)

    2003

  56. [71]

    J. K. Jain,Composite Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  57. [72]

    Johansson et al., mpmath: a Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic (version 0.14) (2010), http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/

    F. Johansson et al., mpmath: a Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic (version 0.14) (2010), http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/

    2010

  58. [73]

    X. Qiu, R. Joynt, and A. H. MacDonald, Phases of the multiple quantum well in a strong magnetic field: Possibility of irrational charge, Phys. Rev. B40, 11943 (1989)

    1989

  59. [74]

    X. Lu, B. Xie, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, X. Kong, J. Li, F. Ding, Z.-J. Wang, and J. Liu, Magic momenta and three-dimensional Landau levels from a three-dimensional graphite moiré superlattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056601 (2024)

    2024

  60. [75]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, S. Raghu, and D. P. Arovas, Theory of the three-dimensional quantum Hall effect in graphite, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 146804 (2007)

    2007

  61. [76]

    J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Castro Neto, Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 256802 (2007)

    2007

  62. [77]

    D. Kim, S. Jin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. H. Smet, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Observation of 1/3 fractional quantum Hall physics in balanced large angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Communications16, 179 (2025)

    2025

  63. [78]

    Xuan and S

    F. Xuan and S. Y. Quek, Valley Zeeman effect and Landau levels in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033256 (2020)

    2020

  64. [79]

    Maduro, S

    L. Maduro, S. E. van Heijst, and S. Conesa-Boj, First-principles calculation of optoelectronic properties in 2D materials: The polytypicWS 2 case, ACS Physical Chemistry Au2, 191 (2022)

    2022

  65. [80]

    Finteis, M

    T. Finteis, M. Hengsberger, T. Straub, K. Fauth, R. Claessen, P. Auer, P. Steiner, S. Hüfner, P. Blaha, M. Vögt, M. Lux- Steiner, and E. Bucher, Occupied and unoccupied electronic band structure ofWSe2, Phys. Rev. B55, 10400 (1997)

    1997

  66. [81]

    Coehoorn, C

    R. Coehoorn, C. Haas, J. Dijkstra, C. J. F. Flipse, R. A. de Groot, and A. Wold, Electronic structure ofMoSe2,MoS 2, andWSe 2. i. band-structure calculations and photoelectron spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B35, 6195 (1987)

    1987

  67. [82]

    Gusakova, X

    J. Gusakova, X. Wang, L. L. Shiau, A. Krivosheeva, V. Shaposhnikov, V. Borisenko, V. Gusakov, and B. K. Tay, Electronic properties of bulk and monolayer tmds: Theoretical study within DFT framework (GVJ-2e method), physica status solidi (a)214, 1700218 (2017), https://onlineli...

    2017 doi

  68. [83]

    N. A. Pike, A. Dewandre, B. Van Troeye, X. Gonze, and M. J. Verstraete, Vibrational and dielectric properties of the bulk transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 063608 (2018)

    2018

  69. [84]

    Laturia, M

    A. Laturia, M. L. Van de Put, and W. G. Vandenberghe, Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk, npj 2D Materials and Applications2, 6 (2018)

    2018

  70. [85]

    Chang, H

    T.-R. Chang, H. Lin, H.-T. Jeng, and A. Bansil, Thickness dependence of spin polarization and electronic structure of ultra-thin films ofMoS2 and related transition-metal dichalcogenides, Scientific Reports4, 6270 (2014)

    2014

  71. [86]

    Alarab, J

    F. Alarab, J. Minár, P. Constantinou, D. Nafday, A. Pulkkinen, T. Schmitt, X. Wang, and V. N. Strocov, k-dependent modulation of intrinsic spin-orbit interaction inMoSe2 induced by proximity to amorphousPb, Nature Communications 17, 1076 (2025)

    2025

  72. [87]

    Oliva, T

    R. Oliva, T. Woźniak, F. Dybala, J. Kopaczek, P. Scharoch, and R. Kudrawiec, Hidden spin-polarized bands in semicon- ducting 2H-MoTe2, Materials Research Letters8, 75 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.1702113

    2020

  73. [88]

    B. M. Hunt, J. I. A. Li, A. A. Zibrov, L. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, M. Zaletel, R. C. Ashoori, and A. F. Young, Direct measurement of discrete valley and orbital quantum numbers in bilayer graphene, Nature Communications8, 948 (2017)

    2017

  74. [89]

    D. Kim, B. Kang, Y.-B. Choi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G.-H. Lee, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Robust interlayer-coherent quantum Hall states in twisted bilayer graphene, Nano Letters23, 163 (2023)

    2023

  75. [90]

    D. Kim, G. Lee, N. Leconte, S. Jin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Jung, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Correlated interlayer quantum Hall state in large-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nano Letters26, 231 (2026)

    2026

  76. [91]

    Alicea and M

    J. Alicea and M. P. A. Fisher, Graphene integer quantum Hall effect in the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic regimes, Phys. Rev. B74, 075422 (2006)

    2006

  77. [92]

    Kharitonov, Phase diagram for theν= 0quantum Hall state in monolayer graphene, Phys

    M. Kharitonov, Phase diagram for theν= 0quantum Hall state in monolayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B85, 155439 (2012)

    2012

  78. [93]

    Kharitonov, Canted antiferromagnetic phase of theν=0quantum Hall state in bilayer graphene, Phys

    M. Kharitonov, Canted antiferromagnetic phase of theν=0quantum Hall state in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 046803 (2012)

    2012

  79. [94]

    Sodemann and A

    I. Sodemann and A. H. MacDonald, BrokenSU(4)symmetry and the fractional quantum Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 126804 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.