Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Model Fusion through Bayesian Optimization in Language Model Fine-Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.06710 v2 pith:J3NWZQI2 submitted 2024-11-11 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelbayesianfine-tuningoptimizationfusionmodelsacrossdownstream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fine-tuning pre-trained models for downstream tasks is a widely adopted technique known for its adaptability and reliability across various domains. Despite its conceptual simplicity, fine-tuning entails several troublesome engineering choices, such as selecting hyperparameters and determining checkpoints from an optimization trajectory. To tackle the difficulty of choosing the best model, one effective solution is model fusion, which combines multiple models in a parameter space. However, we observe a large discrepancy between loss and metric landscapes during the fine-tuning of pre-trained language models. Building on this observation, we introduce a novel model fusion technique that optimizes both the desired metric and loss through multi-objective Bayesian optimization. In addition, to effectively select hyperparameters, we establish a two-stage procedure by integrating Bayesian optimization processes into our framework. Experiments across various downstream tasks show considerable performance improvements using our Bayesian optimization-guided method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian Optimization for Enhanced Language Models: Optimizing Acquisition Functions

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A bilevel Bayesian optimization strategy pairing EI and UCB acquisition functions improves RoBERTa fine-tuning by up to 2.7 percent on a subset of GLUE tasks, but the results lack statistical validation.

Pith tools