Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.14736 v3 pith:J3P74UFD submitted 2023-11-21 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords diversityinstructionqualitytuningdataperformancedatasetsqdit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent works have shown that by curating high quality and diverse instruction tuning datasets, we can significantly improve instruction-following capabilities. However, creating such datasets is difficult and most works rely on manual curation or proprietary language models. Automatic data curation is difficult as it is still not clear how we can define diversity for instruction tuning, how diversity and quality depend on one other, and how we can optimize dataset quality and diversity. To resolve these issue, we propose a new algorithm, Quality-Diversity Instruction Tuning (QDIT). QDIT provides a simple method to simultaneously control dataset diversity and quality, allowing us to conduct an in-depth study on the effect of diversity and quality on instruction tuning performance. From this study we draw two key insights (1) there is a natural tradeoff between data diversity and quality and (2) increasing data diversity significantly improves the worst case instruction following performance, therefore improving robustness. We validate the performance of QDIT on several large scale instruction tuning datasets, where we find it can substantially improve worst and average case performance compared to quality-driven data selection.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Efficient and Effective Alignment of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A thesis presenting Lion, WebR, LTE, BMC, and FollowBench, five empirical methods that together address LLM alignment data, training, and evaluation.

  2. ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning a Gemma model on a mix of seed, generated, and general instruction data (ArgInstruct) improves zero-shot performance on unseen computational argumentation tasks while preserving general NLP performance.

  3. Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Weighted Task Diversity allocates the annotation budget across tasks in inverse proportion to the base model's average confidence, improving MMLU and AlpacaEval scores with up to 80% fewer labels.

  4. A Penalty Goes a Long Way: Measuring Lexical Diversity in Synthetic Texts Under Prompt-Influenced Length Variations

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    PATTR adds a target-length penalty to the Type-Token Ratio, producing a lexical diversity score with tunable, reduced short-text bias for LLM synthetic data.

Pith tools