Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09638 v1 pith:J4TF2VFN submitted 2024-02-15 cs.LG cs.NE

Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Survey

classification cs.LG cs.NE
keywords optimizationsurveymulti-fidelitychallengescomputationalfidelityseveralaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world black-box optimization often involves time-consuming or costly experiments and simulations. Multi-fidelity optimization (MFO) stands out as a cost-effective strategy that balances high-fidelity accuracy with computational efficiency through a hierarchical fidelity approach. This survey presents a systematic exploration of MFO, underpinned by a novel text mining framework based on a pre-trained language model. We delve deep into the foundational principles and methodologies of MFO, focusing on three core components -- multi-fidelity surrogate models, fidelity management strategies, and optimization techniques. Additionally, this survey highlights the diverse applications of MFO across several key domains, including machine learning, engineering design optimization, and scientific discovery, showcasing the adaptability and effectiveness of MFO in tackling complex computational challenges. Furthermore, we also envision several emerging challenges and prospects in the MFO landscape, spanning scalability, the composition of lower fidelities, and the integration of human-in-the-loop approaches at the algorithmic level. We also address critical issues related to benchmarking and the advancement of open science within the MFO community. Overall, this survey aims to catalyze further research and foster collaborations in MFO, setting the stage for future innovations and breakthroughs in the field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constrained Bayesian Optimisation with Multiple Information Sources

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A multi-source extension of constrained Max-value Entropy Search for Bayesian optimization incorporates auxiliary data sources to improve early exploration and performance under constraints even with weak correlations.

  2. Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Data

    stat.ML 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Augmenting a high-fidelity GP's inputs with predictions from all low-fidelity surrogates improves accuracy and cuts cost versus cokriging and autoregressive multifidelity GPs on scarce-data problems.

  3. A Consistency-Centric Approach to Set-Based Optimization with Multiple Models of Unranked Fidelity

    stat.ML 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    S-BOMM identifies robust solutions via cross-model consistency in optimization problems with unranked-fidelity models, backed by probabilistic bounds and empirical tests.

  4. Optimization-Embedded Active Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Learning for Multi-Condition Airfoil Shape Optimization

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    Uncertainty-triggered multi-fidelity GPs inside a hybrid GA redesign a 12-parameter CST airfoil for two flight conditions with only ~10–15% RANS calls and large reported gains over generation 1.