Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 2 cited by

Perturbation-theory approach for predicting vibronic selectivity by entangled-photon-pair absorption

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A second-order perturbation expression with finite-time interaction and no resonance approximations reproduces the complete Schrödinger-equation dynamics of vibronic excitation by ultrabroadband frequency-entangled photons, and a Gaussian…

desk verdict A genuine analytic advance for ETPA vibronic selectivity, but the 'same predictions' claim is overstatement—the paper's own figures show systematic deviations and no error metric is supplied. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12402 v2 pith:J5WCIZRK submitted 2024-12-16 quant-ph

C. D. Rodriguez-Camargo , H. O. Gestsson , C. Nation , A. R. Jones , A. Olaya-Castro This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords entangledtwo-photonabsorptionvibronicselectivitysecond-orderperturbationtheoryfrequency-entangledphotonsFranck-CondonfactorsMorsepotentialdiatomicSchmidtnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a carefully built second-order perturbation theory, which keeps the light-matter interaction at finite duration and avoids resonance approximations, reproduces the vibronic population dynamics of a diatomic molecule driven by ultrabroadband frequency-entangled photon pairs. The analytical result matches numerical solutions of the full Schrödinger equation for the same model, at far lower computational cost, and explains why entangled photons sharpen excitation of a chosen vibrational level. The insight matters because previous analytic treatments of entangled two-photon absorption either neglected vibrational structure or used approximations incompatible with finite broadband pulses, leaving discrepancies between theory and experiment unexplained. If the claim holds, fast analytic predictions replace heavy numerics for this class of molecular models and isolate the physical factors that control quantum-enhanced vibrational selectivity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the symmetrized Gaussian joint spectral amplitude of the photon pair, $\psi_{\mathrm{sym}}(k,k')$ from Eqs. (9)-(11), with width $\sigma_s = \kappa\sigma$ controlling the degree of energy anticorrelation from uncorrelated ($\kappa=1$) to strongly entangled ($\kappa\to 0.05$). On the molecular side, the machinery is the Franck-Condon approximation for a three-electronic-level Morse-potential diatomic (Na$_2$), which supplies the products $F_\nu F_{\nu\alpha}$. The derivation itself is second-order perturbation theory in the interaction picture that keeps the time integrals finite from $-t_0$ to $t$ and evaluates the frequency integrals exactly, yielding rapidly convergent series of error functions and hypergeometric functions. Within the final amplitudes, the Gaussian $\zeta_\alpha$ is the mechanism that selects the target level: as $\sigma_s$ decreases, this envelope narrows onto $\omega_{e\alpha}$ and suppresses all other vibrational levels. The transition matrix $\Theta_{\nu\alpha} = F_\nu F_{\nu\alpha}\zeta_\alpha$ then encodes which intermediate-state paths survive, and the paper uses it as a predictive diagnostic for choosing experimental resonance conditions.

What would settle it

Measure the joint spectral amplitude of an actual entangled-photon source, feed it into Eq. (48) in place of the Gaussian $\psi_{\mathrm{sym}}$, and compare the predicted vibrational populations with the populations measured for a diatomic molecule such as Na$_2$; if the Gaussian model's predictions disagree with the measured-spectrum-based predictions beyond the stated small relative error, the central claim that the analytic expression reproduces exact dynamics for real sources fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is Eq. (48): a closed-form second-order perturbation expression for the amplitude of exciting vibrational level $\alpha$ of the excited electronic state, valid for finite interaction times and with no resonant or far-resonant approximation. From it, the authors extract the selectivity envelope $\zeta_\alpha = \exp[-(2k_0-\omega_{e\alpha})^2/(4\sigma_s^2)]$, a Gaussian centred on the target level's energy $\omega_{e\alpha}$ relative to the pair's total central energy $2k_0$, whose width shrinks with the correlation parameter $\sigma_s$. Combining $\zeta_\alpha$ with the Franck-Condon products $F_\nu F_{\nu\alpha}$ defines the transition matrix $\Theta_{\nu\alpha}$, which the paper shows quantifies how strongly each path through intermediate level $\nu$ contributes and predicts which vibrational levels win as entanglement increases. The authors demonstrate that for the Na$_2$ model this reproduces the exact numerical dynamics of [64] up to small relative error that decreases with entanglement, and that high selectivity can be reached at intermediate correlations when the target level has favourable Franck-Condon factors (here $\alpha$ between 7 and 10). They also interpret the structure of the expressions as showing that uncorrelated two-photon absorption is a product of two one-photon steps, while entangled-photon absorption is a weighted average of two differentiated one-photon transitions modulated by this Gaussian envelope.

Load-bearing premise

The entire prediction rests on modelling the entangled-photon source by a single symmetrized Gaussian joint spectral amplitude of width $\sigma_s = \kappa\sigma$; a real spontaneous parametric down-conversion source with different phase matching, pump bandwidth, or spectral impurities would not obey this spectral shape, and the predicted enhancement factor could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Entangled-photon vibronic populations for this class of diatomic models can be computed from the analytic expressions (41) and (48) instead of solving the discretized Schrödinger equations, cutting memory and time by roughly three and two orders of magnitude respectively.
  • The selectivity envelope $\zeta_\alpha$ makes the dependence explicit: vibrational targeting is controlled by the correlation width $\sigma_s$, the target level's energy relative to $2k_0$, and the Franck-Condon landscape, so the same formula can be used to choose which molecule and which level to address.
  • Uncorrelated two-photon absorption is shown to factor as a product of single-photon steps, while entangled-photon absorption is a weighted average of two one-photon transitions, with the weighting set by the Gaussian envelope and the degree of correlation.
  • High vibrational selectivity does not require maximum entanglement: for targets with strong Franck-Condon factors ($\alpha$ between 7 and 10 for Na$_2$), intermediate correlation degrees already give substantial enhancement.
  • The transition matrix $\Theta$ provides a design tool for experiments, indicating which resonance frequencies and which intermediate vibrational paths maximise the population of a desired excited state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the Gaussian JSA assumption is the untested fulcrum; replacing $\psi_{\mathrm{sym}}(k,k')$ with a measured spontaneous parametric down-conversion joint spectrum in Eq. (48) would turn this analytic framework into a quantitative tool for real sources, and would likely change the predicted enhancement factors.
  • Editorial inference: the reported linear dependence of the target-level steady population on the Schmidt number (and nonlinear dependence on entanglement entropy) suggests that the Schmidt number, not entropy, is the practical control parameter for vibronic selectivity; this could be tested by preparing biphoton states with the same Schmidt number but different spectral shapes.
  • Editorial inference: the selectivity factor should survive in modified form when Herzberg-Teller vibronic coupling is included, since it enters through the same two-photon amplitude; extending Eqs. (48) to non-Condon couplings would show whether vibrational selectivity persists in molecules where Franck-Condon products are not dominant.
  • Editorial inference: because the analytic expression requires no resonance assumption, it should be directly testable with short-pulse entangled-photon experiments on Na$_2$ or similar diatomics, where the predicted Gaussian narrowing of the excitation spectrum as $\sigma_s$ decreases could be observed as a function of pump bandwidth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper revisits the two-step vibronic excitation model of Oka (Phys. Rev. A 97, 063859) for Na2 driven by ultrabroadband photon pairs. The authors carry out second-order perturbation theory in the light-matter interaction, retaining finite-time integration and avoiding resonance approximations, and obtain closed-form expressions for the populations of excited vibrational levels for uncorrelated photons (Eq. (41)) and for symmetrized Gaussian frequency-entangled photons (Eq. (48)). They compare these expressions with numerical solutions of the full Schrödinger equations (54)-(56) for correlation degrees σs = σ, 0.5σ, 0.25σ, 0.1σ, and 0.05σ, and define a Gaussian selectivity factor ζα (Eq. (49)) and a transition matrix Θ (Eq. (58)) that connect photon correlation, target vibrational level, and Franck-Condon factors. The paper reports roughly three orders of magnitude memory savings and two orders of magnitude time savings relative to the numerical solver, and uses the analytic expressions to scan resonance scenarios and correlation strengths.

Significance. The analytic derivation is transparent, contains no fitted parameters, and is benchmarked against an independent numerical solution of the Schrödinger equations, which is a genuine strength. If the agreement with the numerical solver is quantified and shown to be accurate in the regime used for the selectivity predictions, Eqs. (41) and (48) would be a fast and physically interpretable surrogate for exact dynamics of this model, and the ζα/Θ analysis is a useful, falsifiable design tool. The current manuscript, however, asserts agreement more strongly than the displayed evidence supports, since the authors themselves enumerate three systematic discrepancies in Section IV and no error metric is supplied.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV; Figs. 3-4; abstract] The abstract and Section IV state that Eqs. (41) and (48) 'make the same predictions' as the numerical solution of the complete Schrödinger equation, but Section IV immediately lists three systematic disagreements: a steeper transient rise for every level, narrower Gaussian features with different maxima, and a small spurious α=12 peak in the uncorrelated case. No quantitative error metric is provided anywhere in the manuscript, so the claimed agreement is not yet established. Please add a validation subsection reporting per-level relative errors (e.g., steady-state and time-integrated L2 errors) as functions of σs and α, and use those numbers to specify the regime in which the analytic expressions may serve as a quantitative surrogate for the numerical solver.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 3, α=12] The spurious Gaussian peak for α=12 in the perturbative result is not a cosmetic difference: it changes the predicted ordering of vibronic populations in the uncorrelated and weakly correlated regimes, which is exactly the ordering on which the selectivity analysis of Figs. 5 and 8 relies. Please identify whether this artifact comes from the truncation of the series in Eq. (44) (or Eqs. (C1)-(C10)), from the finite-time treatment, or from a genuine physical term, and verify that the selectivity rankings and the conclusions of Section IV are unaffected once the error is controlled.
  3. [Appendix C; Eqs. (44), (C1)-(C10)] The analytic expressions depend on infinite series over Appell and generalized hypergeometric functions, but the manuscript never specifies the truncation order, numerical tolerance, or convergence criterion used to generate the population curves. Without these details the benchmark against the Schrödinger solver and the runtime/memory comparison in Figs. 10 and 11 cannot be reproduced independently. Please report the series parameters and, ideally, demonstrate convergence by showing results for increasing truncation orders.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Data Availability] The Data Availability section names a Github project but provides no URL, repository name, or commit hash, so the code and datasets cannot currently be located; please supply a persistent link or DOI.
  2. [Figs. 3-4] The time axis is labelled rσ throughout Section IV and the figure captions, but rσ is never defined; if it denotes the dimensionless time σ(t-t0), please define it in the text.
  3. [Eq. (48)] Eq. (48) writes the prefactor with γ while the derivation uses γs; the relation γs = √γ makes the two equivalent, but the notation should be harmonized to avoid confusion.
  4. [Section IV, Fig. 7] The assertion of a linear relation between steady-state targeted population and Schmidt number rests on five σs values with no error bars or fit statistics; please add residuals or rephrase as a monotone trend.
  5. [Eqs. (57)-(58)] The selectivity factor in Eq. (57) and the transition matrix in Eq. (58) are distilled from the approximate amplitude in Eq. (48); the authors should state that these are diagnostic quantities within the perturbative framework rather than an independent check of the approximation.
  6. [Section V] The phrase 'more than 25 x 10^6 coupled differential equations [57]' appears to cite Ref. [57] (Oka 2011), but the comparison target of this paper is Ref. [64]; please check the citation.
  7. [Introduction] 'In particularly' should be 'In particular'.
  8. [Section II A, Eqs. (9)-(11)] The paper's quantitative predictions are tied to the symmetrized Gaussian JSA; the authors discuss extensions in the outlook but should state prominently in the main text that real SPDC phase-matching and spectral impurities may change the predicted enhancement factors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analytical amplitudes are derived from the stated JSA/Morse model, use no fitted parameters, and are benchmarked against an independent numerical solution of the full Schrodinger equations.

full rationale

The central PT result, Eqs. (41) and (48), is obtained by inserting the stated two-photon JSA (Eqs. (7)-(11)) and the Franck-Condon/Morse Hamiltonian (Eqs. (16)-(28)) into the second-order Dyson expansion (Eq. (35)). This is a genuine derivation: the expression is not set equal to a target quantity, and the parameters gamma, sigma, sigma_s, Morse constants, and Franck-Condon factors are fixed inputs borrowed from Oka (Ref. [64]), not adjusted to reproduce the benchmark. The benchmark, the numerical solution of Eqs. (54)-(56), is an independent full-Schrodinger calculation of the same model, so the claim that the PT expressions 'make the same predictions' is a comparison claim rather than a tautology. The selectivity factor zeta_alpha (Eq. (49)) and transition matrix Theta (Eq. (58)) are read off from the derived amplitude (Eq. (48)); they are explanatory decompositions, not independently fitted predictions that feed back into the calculation. The paper does contain accuracy concerns: Section IV explicitly lists steeper PT slopes, narrower Gaussian features, and a spurious alpha=12 peak, and no per-level error table is provided; the Data Availability statement also omits a URL or commit hash. These are correctness/reproducibility shortcomings, not circularity. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, and no ansatz smuggled in as an external result. The derivation is self-contained against an external numerical benchmark, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard field quantization and a Morse/Franck-Condon molecular model, plus three model choices that are not independently validated here: the specific symmetrized JSA shape, equal vibronic couplings, and the extension of frequency integrals to infinity. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Correlation width ratio kappa = sigma_s / sigma = Scanned: 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.1, 0.05
    Chosen by hand to represent entanglement strength; controls every selectivity prediction but is not fitted to data.
  • Central photon energy 2k0 = 4.0024 eV for main scan, plus 3.8831 eV and 4.1614 eV
    Set to resonance with chosen target vibrational levels; governs which vibrational levels are selected.
  • Light-matter coupling gamma = 6 MHz
    Input taken from Oka's benchmark model; sets the absolute population scale but cancels in the selectivity ratio of Eq. (59).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Continuous-mode quantum optics with a one-dimensional field and Gaussian single-photon wave packets
    Used in Section II A, Eqs. (1) to (10), to define the photon field and the joint spectral amplitude.
  • domain assumption Molecular model with Morse potentials, Franck-Condon approximation, only g-to-m-to-e transitions, equal couplings for all vibronic transitions, and no vibrational relaxation or direct g-to-e absorption
    Stated in Section II B-C and encoded in Eq. (28); needed for the algebraic factorization of the perturbation amplitude.
  • domain assumption The symmetrized Gaussian-correlated JSA with normalization N is the physical biphoton state
    Defined in Eqs. (9) to (11) and (46) to (47); all ETPA predictions for correlated photons depend on this spectral shape.
  • domain assumption Frequency integrals may be extended to plus or minus infinity
    Invoked before Eq. (40); justified only when the pulse bandwidth is much smaller than the central frequency, and no pole prescription is discussed.
  • domain assumption Second-order perturbation truncation and rapid convergence of the hypergeometric series in Appendix C
    Used throughout Section III and Appendix C; no convergence proof or error bound is given for the infinite series.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbation-theory approach for predicting vibronic selectivity by entangled-photon-pair absorption." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J5WCIZRK

@misc{pith2026241212402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbation-theory approach for predicting vibronic selectivity by entangled-photon-pair absorption},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J5WCIZRK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12402}
}
read the original abstract

Using second-order perturbation theory in the light-matter interaction, we derive an analytical approximation for the vibronic populations of a diatomic system excited by ultrabroadband frequency entangled photons and evaluate the population dynamics for different degrees of entanglement between photon pairs. Our analytical approach makes the same predictions as previously derived via numerical solutions of the complete Schr\"odinger equation [H. Oka, Physical Review A 97, 063859 (2018)], with the added advantage of providing clear physical insights into the vibronic selectivity as a function of the degree of photon correlations while requiring significantly reduced computational effort. Specifically, our analytical expression for the probability of vibronic excitation includes a factor which predicts the enhancement of vibrational selectivity as a function of the degree correlation between the entangled photon pairs, the targeted vibrational energy level, and the vibrational molecular structure encoded in the Franck-Condon factors. Our results illustrate the importance of going beyond the usual approximations in second-order perturbation theory to capture the relevance of the vibrational structure of the molecular system of interest in order to gain a deeper understanding of the possible quantum-enhancement provided by the interaction between quantum light and matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12402 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of the physical system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Envelope Gaussian function which establish selectivity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Population probability of the first 23 excited levels for: a) Uncorrelated photons; b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Continued from Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Behaviour the transition matrices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of the population of targeted excited sub-level with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Selectivity for each energy level in resonance with the central [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Behaviour of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Computational consumption of the numerical method de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Computational consumption of the analytical method. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Population dynamics of intermediate states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Population dynamics of intermediate states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimization of two-photon absorption for three-level atom

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The optimal two-photon state for perfect excitation of a three-level ladder atom is the time-reversed spontaneously emitted field, with entanglement set by the lifetime ratio.

  2. Enhancing Spectroscopy and Microscopy with Emerging Methods in Photon-Correlation and Quantum Illumination

    physics.optics 2025-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review consolidating photon-correlation and quantum-illumination techniques for nanoscale spectroscopy and microscopy, with attention to detector and source limitations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    −(k0−ωmν)2 4σ2 # + exp

    Quantum dynamics To compare the results from Perturbation Theory, we solve numerically the complete Schr¨odinger equation d dt|Ψ(t)⟩ =−i ˆH|Ψ(t)⟩, (52) where|Ψ(t)⟩ is a superposition state given by |Ψ(t)⟩ = 1√ 2 Z dk Z dk′ψ(2p) sym (k, k′, t)ˆa†(k)ˆa†(k′)|0⟩|g0⟩ + X ν Z dkψ(1pm)(k,ν, t)ˆa†(k)|0⟩|mν⟩ + X ν′ ψ(e)(ν′, t)|0⟩|eν′⟩, (53) where ψ(2p) sym (k, k′,...

  2. [2]

    Pirandola, J

    S. Pirandola, J. Eisert, C. Weedbrook, A. Furusawa, and S. L. Braunstein, Advances in quantum teleportation, Nature photon- ics 9, 641 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    X.-M. Hu, Y . Guo, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Progress in quantum teleportation, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 339 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Ursin, F

    R. Ursin, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, T. Scheidl, M. Lindenthal, B. Blauensteiner, T. Jennewein, J. Perdigues, P. Trojek, et al. , Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km, Nature physics 3, 481 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    Zou, Quantum entanglement and its application in quantum communication, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series , V ol

    N. Zou, Quantum entanglement and its application in quantum communication, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series , V ol. 1827 (IOP Publishing, 2021) p. 012120

    2021

  6. [6]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 045006 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Pirandola, U

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunan- dar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, et al., Advances in quantum cryptography, Advances in optics and photonics 12, 1012 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Pezz `e, A

    L. Pezz `e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    Polino, M

    E. Polino, M. Valeri, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Photonic quantum metrology, A VS Quantum Science2 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    M. A. Taylor and W. P. Bowen, Quantum metrology and its application in biology, Physics Reports 615, 1 (2016), quantum metrology and its application in biology

    2016

  3. [11]

    G. B. Lemos, V . Borish, G. D. Cole, S. Ramelow, R. Lap- kiewicz, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum imaging with undetected photons, Nature 512, 409 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Lahiri, R

    M. Lahiri, R. Lapkiewicz, G. B. Lemos, and A. Zeilinger, The- ory of quantum imaging with undetected photons, Phys. Rev. A 92, 013832 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    A. Vega, E. A. Santos, J. Fuenzalida, M. Gilaberte Basset, T. Pertsch, M. Gr¨afe, S. Saravi, and F. Setzpfandt, Fundamental resolution limit of quantum imaging with undetected photons, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033252 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Barreto Lemos, M

    G. Barreto Lemos, M. Lahiri, S. Ramelow, R. Lapkiewicz, and W. N. Plick, Quantum imaging and metrology with undetected photons: tutorial, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 39, 2200 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nature Pho- tonics 12, 724 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Schlawin and S

    F. Schlawin and S. Mukamel, Two-photon spectroscopy of ex- citons with entangled photons, The Journal of chemical physics 139, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4848739 (2013)

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Richter and S

    M. Richter and S. Mukamel, Ultrafast double-quantum- coherence spectroscopy of excitons with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013820 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Fujihashi, K

    Y . Fujihashi, K. Miwa, M. Higashi, and A. Ishizaki, Probing exciton dynamics with spectral selectivity through the use of quantum entangled photons, The Journal of Chemical Physics 159, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0169768 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    A. M. Zheltikov and M. O. Scully, Photon entanglement for life-science imaging: rethinking the limits of the possible, Physics-Uspekhi 63, 698 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    W. Zong, R. Wu, S. Chen, J. Wu, H. Wang, Z. Zhao, G. Chen, R. Tu, D. Wu, Y . Hu,et al., Miniature two-photon microscopy for enlarged field-of-view, multi-plane and long-term brain imaging, Nature methods 18, 46 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    A. R. Guzman, M. R. Harpham, O. S ¨uzer, M. M. Haley, and T. G. Goodson III, Spatial control of entangled two-photon ab- sorption with organic chromophores, Journal of the American Chemical Society 132, 7840 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Upton, M

    L. Upton, M. Harpham, O. Suzer, M. Richter, S. Mukamel, and T. Goodson III, Optically excited entangled states in organic molecules illuminate the dark, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry Letters 4, 2046 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Varnavski, C

    O. Varnavski, C. Gunthardt, A. Rehman, G. D. Luker, and T. Goodson III, Quantum light-enhanced two-photon imaging of breast cancer cells, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Let- ters 13, 2772 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045008 (2016). 20

    2016

  18. [26]

    Varnavski, B

    O. Varnavski, B. Pinsky, and T. Goodson III, Entangled photon excited fluorescence in organic materials: an ultrafast coinci- dence detector, The journal of physical chemistry letters 8, 388 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    G. Kang, K. Nasiri Avanaki, M. A. Mosquera, R. K. Burdick, J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, T. Goodson III, and G. C. Schatz, Efficient modeling of organic chromophores for entangled two- photon absorption, Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, 10446 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    R. K. Burdick, O. Varnavski, A. Molina, L. Upton, P. Zimmer- man, and T. Goodson III, Predicting and controlling entangled two-photon absorption in diatomic molecules, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 122, 8198 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Eshun, O

    A. Eshun, O. Varnavski, J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, R. K. Bur- dick, and T. Goodson III, Entangled photon spectroscopy, Ac- counts of Chemical Research 55, 991 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Szoke, H

    S. Szoke, H. Liu, B. P. Hickam, M. He, and S. K. Cushing, Entangled light–matter interactions and spectroscopy, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8, 10732 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Schlawin, K

    F. Schlawin, K. E. Dorfman, and S. Mukamel, Entangled two- photon absorption spectroscopy, Accounts of chemical research 51, 2207 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Mukamel, M

    S. Mukamel, M. Freyberger, W. Schleich, M. Bellini, A. Za- vatta, G. Leuchs, C. Silberhorn, R. W. Boyd, L. L. S ´anchez- Soto, A. Stefanov, M. Barbieri, A. Paterova, L. Krivitsky, S. Shwartz, K. Tamasaku, K. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, V . San- doghdar, M. Raymer, A. Marcus, O. Varn...

    2020

  25. [33]

    B. Gu, D. Keefer, F. Aleotti, A. Nenov, M. Garavelli, and S. Mukamel, Photoisomerization transition state manipulation by entangled two-photon absorption, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 118, e2116868118 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Landes, M

    T. Landes, M. Allgaier, S. Merkouche, B. J. Smith, A. H. Mar- cus, and M. G. Raymer, Experimental feasibility of molecular two-photon absorption with isolated time-frequency-entangled photon pairs, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033154 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    H.-B. Fei, B. M. Jost, S. Popescu, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Entanglement-induced two-photon transparency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1679 (1997)

    1997

  28. [36]

    Lissandrin, B

    F. Lissandrin, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V . Sergienko, and M. C. Te- ich, Quantum theory of entangled-photon photoemission, Phys. Rev. B 69, 165317 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Varnavski and T

    O. Varnavski and T. Goodson III, Two-photon fluorescence mi- croscopy at extremely low excitation intensity: The power of quantum correlations, Journal of the American Chemical Soci- ety 142, 12966 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Javanainen and P

    J. Javanainen and P. L. Gould, Linear intensity dependence of a two-photon transition rate, Phys. Rev. A 41, 5088 (1990)

    1990

  31. [39]

    W. L. Peticolas, Multiphoton spectroscopy, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 18, 233 (1967)

    1967

  32. [40]

    J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, O. Calder ´on-Losada, M. Nu ˜nez Portela, and A. Valencia, Entangled two pho- ton absorption cross section on the 808 nm region for the common dyes zinc tetraphenylporphyrin and rhodamine b, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 121, 7869 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Eshun, Z

    A. Eshun, Z. Cai, M. Awies, L. Yu, and T. Goodson III, Inves- tigations of thienoacene molecules for classical and entangled two-photon absorption, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 122, 8167 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Tabakaev, A

    D. Tabakaev, A. Djorovi ´c, L. La V olpe, G. Gaulier, S. Ghosh, L. Bonacina, J.-P. Wolf, H. Zbinden, and R. T. Thew, Spatial properties of entangled two-photon absorption, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 183601 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Tabakaev, M

    D. Tabakaev, M. Montagnese, G. Haack, L. Bonacina, J.-P. Wolf, H. Zbinden, and R. T. Thew, Energy-time-entangled two- photon molecular absorption, Phys. Rev. A103, 033701 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, O. Varnavski, B. A. Palfey, and T. Goodson III, Two-photon excitation of flavins and flavopro- teins with classical and quantum light, Journal of the American Chemical Society 140, 14562 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    M. He, B. P. Hickam, N. Harper, and S. K. Cushing, Experimen- tal upper bounds for resonance-enhanced entangled two-photon absorption cross section of indocyanine green, The Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 094305 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Landes, B

    T. Landes, B. J. Smith, and M. G. Raymer, Limitations in fluorescence-detected entangled two-photon-absorption exper- iments: Exploring the low- to high-gain squeezing regimes, Phys. Rev. A 110, 033708 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    B. P. Hickam, M. He, N. Harper, S. Szoke, and S. K. Cush- ing, Single-photon scattering can account for the discrepancies among entangled two-photon measurement techniques, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 4934 (2022), pMID: 35635002

    2022

  40. [48]

    K. M. Parzuchowski, A. Mikhaylov, M. D. Mazurek, R. N. Wil- son, D. J. Lum, T. Gerrits, C. H. Camp, M. J. Stevens, and R. Jimenez, Setting bounds on entangled two-photon absorp- tion cross sections in common fluorophores, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 044012 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    B. E. A. Saleh, B. M. Jost, H.-B. Fei, and M. C. Teich, Entangled-photon virtual-state spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3483 (1998)

    1998

  42. [50]

    Pe ˇrina, B

    J. Pe ˇrina, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Multiphoton absorp- tion cross section and virtual-state spectroscopy for the entan- gled n-photon state, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3972 (1998)

    1998

  43. [51]

    B. E. A. Saleh, A. Joobeur, and M. C. Teich, Spatial e ffects in two- and four-beam interference of partially entangled bipho- tons, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3991 (1998)

    1998

  44. [52]

    de J Le ´on-Montiel, J

    R. de J Le ´on-Montiel, J. Svozil ´ık, L. J. Salazar-Serrano, and J. P. Torres, Role of the spectral shape of quantum correla- tions in two-photon virtual-state spectroscopy, New Journal of Physics 15, 053023 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Schlawin and A

    F. Schlawin and A. Buchleitner, Theory of coherent control with quantum light, New Journal of Physics 19, 013009 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    E. G. Carnio, A. Buchleitner, and F. Schlawin, How to optimize the absorption of two entangled photons, SciPost Phys. Core 4, 028 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    B. R. Mollow, Two-photon absorption and field correlation functions, Phys. Rev. 175, 1555 (1968)

    1968

  48. [56]

    Chen and S

    F. Chen and S. Mukamel, Entangled two-photon absorption with Brownian-oscillator fluctuations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 074303 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    M. G. Raymer, T. Landes, and A. H. Marcus, Entangled two- photon absorption by atoms and molecules: A quantum optics tutorial, The Journal of Chemical Physics 155, 081501 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Oka, Selective two-photon excitation of a vibronic state by correlated photons, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 124313 (2011)

    H. Oka, Selective two-photon excitation of a vibronic state by correlated photons, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 124313 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Oka, Control of vibronic excitation using quantum- correlated photons, The Journal of chemical physics 135, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3654136 (2011)

    H. Oka, Control of vibronic excitation using quantum- correlated photons, The Journal of chemical physics 135, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3654136 (2011)

    2011 doi

  52. [60]

    Lever, S

    F. Lever, S. Ramelow, and M. G¨uhr, Effects of time-energy cor- relation strength in molecular entangled photon spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053844 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    Schlawin and S

    F. Schlawin and S. Mukamel, Matter correlations induced by 21 coupling to quantum light, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013830 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Varnavski, S

    O. Varnavski, S. K. Giri, T.-M. Chiang, C. J. Zeman IV , G. C. Schatz, and T. Goodson III, Colors of entangled two-photon absorption, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2307719120 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Landes, M

    T. Landes, M. G. Raymer, M. Allgaier, S. Merkouche, B. J. Smith, and A. H. Marcus, Quantifying the enhancement of two- photon absorption due to spectral-temporal entanglement, Opt. Express 29, 20022 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    H. Oka, Enhanced and selective two-photon excitation of molecular vibronic states using entangled photons, Photosyn- ergetic Responses in Molecules and Molecular Aggregates , 43 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Oka, Enhanced vibrational-mode-selective two-step excita- tion using ultrabroadband frequency-entangled photons, Phys

    H. Oka, Enhanced vibrational-mode-selective two-step excita- tion using ultrabroadband frequency-entangled photons, Phys. Rev. A 97, 063859 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Loudon, The quantum theory of light , 3rd ed

    R. Loudon, The quantum theory of light , 3rd ed. (Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2000)

    2000

  59. [67]

    Dayan, Theory of two-photon interactions with broadband down-converted light and entangled photons, Phys

    B. Dayan, Theory of two-photon interactions with broadband down-converted light and entangled photons, Phys. Rev. A 76, 043813 (2007)

    2007

  60. [68]

    K. J. Blow, R. Loudon, S. J. D. Phoenix, and T. J. Shepherd, Continuum fields in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A 42, 4102 (1990)

    1990

  61. [69]

    D. J. Santos, R. Loudon, and F. J. Fraile-Pel ´aez, Contin- uum states and fields in quantum optics, American Journal of Physics 65, 126 (1997)

    1997

  62. [70]

    Migdall, S

    A. Migdall, S. V . Polyakov, J. Fan, and J. C. Bienfang, Single- photon generation and detection: physics and applications (Academic Press, 2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    M. H. Rubin, D. N. Klyshko, Y . H. Shih, and A. V . Sergienko, Theory of two-photon entanglement in type-ii optical paramet- ric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A50, 5122 (1994)

    1994

  64. [72]

    A. V . Sergienko, Y . H. Shih, and M. H. Rubin, Experimental evaluation of a two-photon wave packet in type-ii parametric downconversion, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 859 (1995)

    1995

  65. [73]

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y . Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpi- cosecond time intervals between two photons by interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987)

    1987

  66. [74]

    Y . H. Shih, A. V . Sergienko, M. H. Rubin, T. E. Kiess, and C. O. Alley, Two-photon entanglement in type-ii parametric down- conversion, Phys. Rev. A50, 23 (1994)

    1994

  67. [75]

    B. Gu, S. Sun, F. Chen, and S. Mukamel, Photoelectron spec- troscopy with entangled photons; enhanced spectrotemporal resolution, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2300541120 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Ekert and P

    A. Ekert and P. L. Knight, Entangled quantum systems and the Schmidt decomposition, American Journal of Physics 63, 415 (1995)

    1995

  69. [77]

    Ac ´ın, A

    A. Ac ´ın, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jan ´e, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Generalized schmidt decomposition and classifi- cation of three-quantum-bit states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000)

    2000

  70. [78]

    Sperling and W

    J. Sperling and W. V ogel, The schmidt number as a universal entanglement measure, Physica Scripta 83, 045002 (2011)

    2011

  71. [79]

    C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Continuous fre- quency entanglement: Effective finite hilbert space and entropy control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000)

    2000

  72. [80]

    M. E. Carrington, R. Kobes, G. Kunstatter, D. Ostapchuk, and G. Passante, Geometric measures of entanglement and the schmidt decomposition, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 43, 315302 (2010)

    2010

  73. [81]

    Fedorov and N

    M. Fedorov and N. Miklin, Schmidt modes and entanglement, Contemporary Physics 55, 94 (2014)

    2014

  74. [82]

    P. M. Morse, Diatomic molecules according to the wave me- chanics. ii. vibrational levels, Phys. Rev. 34, 57 (1929)

    1929

  75. [83]

    Rosen and P

    N. Rosen and P. M. Morse, On the vibrations of polyatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. 42, 210 (1932)

    1932

  76. [84]

    T. E. Sharp and H. M. Rosenstock, Franck—Condon Factors for Polyatomic Molecules, The Journal of Chemical Physics41, 3453 (1964)

    1964

  77. [85]

    Baumert, M

    T. Baumert, M. Grosser, R. Thalweiser, and G. Gerber, Fem- tosecond time-resolved molecular multiphoton ionization: The na2 system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3753 (1991)

    1991

  78. [86]

    Magnier, P

    S. Magnier, P. Milli´e, O. Dulieu, and F. Masnou-Seeuws, Poten- tial curves for the ground and excited states of the Na2 molecule up to the (3s+5p) dissociation limit: Results of two different ef- fective potential calculations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 7113 (1993)

    1993

  79. [87]

    J. P. Zayner and T. R. Sosnick, Factors that control the chem- istry of the lov domain photocycle, PloS one 9, e87074 (2014)

    2014

  80. [88]

    Lindner and A

    F. Lindner and A. Diepold, Optogenetics in bacteria– applications and opportunities, FEMS Microbiology Reviews 46, fuab055 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    A. Losi, K. H. Gardner, and A. M ¨oglich, Blue-light receptors for optogenetics, Chemical reviews 118, 10659 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Kundu, P

    S. Kundu, P. P. Roy, G. R. Fleming, and N. Makri, Franck–condon and herzberg–teller signatures in molecular ab- sorption and emission spectra, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry B 126, 2899 (2022), pMID: 35389662

    2022

  83. [91]

    P. P. Roy, S. Kundu, N. Makri, and G. R. Fleming, Interfer- ence between franck–condon and herzberg–teller terms in the condensed-phase molecular spectra of metal-based tetrapyrrole derivatives, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 7413 (2022), pMID: 35929598

    2022

  84. [92]

    Y . Qian, X. Li, A. R. Harutyunyan, G. Chen, Y . Rao, and H. Chen, Herzberg–teller e ffect on the vibrationally resolved absorption spectra of single-crystalline pentacene at finite tem- peratures, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 124, 9156 (2020), pMID: 33103890

    2020

  85. [93]

    Oka, Highly-e fficient entangled two-photon absorption with the assistance of plasmon nanoantenna, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 48, 115503 (2015)

    H. Oka, Highly-e fficient entangled two-photon absorption with the assistance of plasmon nanoantenna, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 48, 115503 (2015)

    2015

  86. [94]

    Oka, Generation of broadband ultraviolet frequency- entangled photons using cavity quantum plasmonics, Scientific Reports 7, 8047 (2017)

    H. Oka, Generation of broadband ultraviolet frequency- entangled photons using cavity quantum plasmonics, Scientific Reports 7, 8047 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    Oka, Generation of broadband frequency-entangled pho- tons using plasmon nanoantenna, Applied Physics Letters 103, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826646 (2013)

    H. Oka, Generation of broadband frequency-entangled pho- tons using plasmon nanoantenna, Applied Physics Letters 103, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826646 (2013)

    2013 doi

  88. [96]

    Rusak, J

    E. Rusak, J. Straubel, P. Gladysz, M. G ¨oddel, A. Kedziorski, M. K¨uhn, F. Weigend, C. Rockstuhl, and K. Slowik, Enhance- ment of and interference among higher order multipole transi- tions in molecules near a plasmonic nanoantenna, Nature com- munications 10, 5775 (2019)

    2019

  89. [97]

    S. I. Jahromi and K. Slowik, Multiphoton absorption enhance- ment by graphene–gold nanostructure, Opt. Lett. 49, 3914 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    Izadshenas and K

    S. Izadshenas and K. Slowik, Molecular saturation deter- mines distinct plasmonic enhancement scenarios for two- photon absorption signal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14859 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.14859 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.