Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Electron Temperature Gradients Regulate the Duration of Two-Stage Plasmasphere Refilling

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The field-aligned electron temperature gradient and initial/boundary temperature regulate how long each stage of plasmasphere refilling lasts, so small gradients can make refilling appear single-staged.

desk verdict A plausible new regulator for two-stage refilling, but the headline explanation leans on the regime the paper excludes and the model's least accurate stage. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18318 v1 pith:J7RAOPAQ submitted 2026-07-17 physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPphysics.plasm-ph

Jaden Fitzpatrick , Kausik Chatterjee , Naomi Maruyama , Xiangning Chu , Jacob Bortnik , Jerry Goldstein , Lauren Blum , Tyler Bishop This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-phastro-ph.EPphysics.plasm-ph
keywords plasmasphererefillingtwo-stageelectrontemperaturegradienthydrodynamicmodelinitial/boundaryspaceweatherstagesL=4fluxtube
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Model simulations of plasmasphere refilling after a geomagnetic storm, in which the electron temperature is allowed to vary in space and time, show that the field-aligned temperature gradient and the initial/boundary temperature together regulate the duration of both the early and late refilling stages. Multivariate second-degree polynomial regressions fit the simulated stage lengths with high correlation (R² = 99.2% for early, 98.4% for late). The direction of the dependence is consistent with a pressure-gradient argument: a steeper temperature gradient forces a steeper density gradient that slows refilling and lengthens both stages. Because the early stage can become very short under small gradients, the paper proposes that events observed as single-staged may actually be two-staged with an early stage too brief for the observation cadence.

What carries the argument

The central object is the field-aligned electron temperature gradient ∇T (reduced to a single value by assuming linear temperature variation with altitude, per the paper's adoption of Comfort 1996), together with the initial/boundary temperature T₀. In the hydrodynamic model, temperature is computed self-consistently from the electron energy equation with a constant heating rate Qe and fixed boundary temperature T₀, so each simulation produces a characteristic temperature profile. The paper then treats early- and late-stage durations as functions of ∇T and T₀, fitting second-degree polynomials and interpreting the result through the pressure-gradient identity ∂P/∂s = k[T ∂n/∂s + n ∂T/∂s].

What would settle it

A falsifier would be an observed refilling event with a well-resolved early stage and a measured flat temperature profile that nonetheless shows a long early stage, or, conversely, a steep-gradient event with a short early stage. Concretely: take the fitted polynomials, pick a pair (∇T, T₀) for which the early-stage length is predicted to be shorter than the Van Allen Probes' 4.5-9.0 h cadence, and check whether all such observed events indeed appear single-staged; a single well-resolved event with a short early stage despite a steep gradient would contradict the claimed dependence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the magnitude of the field-aligned electron temperature gradient ∇T and the initial/boundary temperature T₀ regulate the durations of the early and late stages of plasmasphere refilling. In 19 simulations of refilling of a depleted L=4 flux tube, varying only the heating rate and initial temperature, the early- and late-stage lengths each increase with ∇T, while increasing T₀ affects the two stages oppositely. Second-degree multivariate polynomial regressions capture this dependency with R² of 99.2% and 98.4%. The authors connect this to a pressure-gradient mechanism: a steeper ∂T/∂s requires a steeper density gradient to restore pressu

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central explanation of single-stage events rests on early-stage durations from a model the authors say is more accurate for late-time refilling, and on reducing the true temperature profile to a single linear gradient, an approximation they acknowledge is incorrect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the relationship holds, temperature structure becomes a predictor of whether a refilling event will show one or two stages.
  • Small field-aligned temperature gradients should produce short early stages, so events with flat temperature profiles should appear single-staged at typical observation cadences.
  • Geosynchronous surveys that average over day-long bins (e.g., Sojka & Wrenn 1985) would systematically miss early stages shorter than about 12 hours.
  • The fitted regressions give concrete functional forms for early- and late-stage durations in terms of ∇T and T₀ that can be tested against resolved observations.
  • The pressure-gradient mechanism ties stage duration to density-gradient steepening, making the temperature gradient a proxy for refilling timescale in space-weather modeling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implicit extension: if temperature gradients also regulate late-stage duration, then incorporating realistic spatiotemporal heating (diurnal, storm-time) would yield event-by-event predictions of refilling completion times, testable against multi-day observations.
  • The linear-gradient reduction of the temperature profile, though approximate, suggests that a single scalar (the base-to-top temperature difference) may be enough to categorize refilling regimes; a testable extension is to check whether mid-latitude versus equatorial heating differences correlate with the observed local-time dependence of two-stage occurrence in the Van Allen Probes survey.
  • Since the model treats electron and ion temperatures as equal and omits equatorial wave heating, the inferred dependence on ∇T may be stronger or weaker once these are included; a model variant with separate electron and ion temperatures would show whether the gradient effect is primarily an ambipolar-field effect or a pressure effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports controlled numerical experiments with a 1D hydrodynamic multi-ion plasmasphere refilling model that includes a spatiotemporally varying electron energy equation. Varying the initial/boundary temperature T0 and a spatially and time-uniform heating rate Qe, the authors retain 19 simulations for which the field-aligned electron temperature difference with altitude is at least 2000 K. They compute a single field-aligned temperature gradient ∇T by assuming linear altitude dependence (acknowledged to be incorrect) and then fit second-degree polynomials relating early- and late-stage refilling durations to ∇T and T0, obtaining R² = 99.2% and 98.4%. They argue that larger ∇T lengthens both stages via a pressure-gradient mechanism, and that sufficiently small gradients would shorten the early stage so that two-stage refilling becomes observably single-staged.

Significance. If the central claim holds, it offers a physically plausible explanation for the puzzling variability in two-stage refilling observations, including the 40% occurrence reported by Bishop et al. (2025). The strengths of the paper are its controlled simulation design, explicit statement of limitations, and the physical pressure-gradient argument in Eq. (2). However, the significance is tempered because the headline implication relies on extrapolation outside the analyzed parameter range and on the model's least accurate regime; the regression, while exhibiting high R², is not validated by uncertainty quantification or independent data. The paper is a useful hypothesis-generating model study but does not yet provide a robust quantitative prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3, Section 3] The multivariate second-degree polynomial regression includes six free parameters (constant, ∇T, T0, ∇T², ∇T·T0, T0²) fitted to only 19 simulation points. No parameter uncertainties, residual diagnostics, cross-validation, or alternative model comparison are provided. With this many parameters, high R² is not evidence against overfitting. The authors should report confidence intervals for the coefficients and for predicted stage durations, and show that a simpler linear or interaction model does not describe the data equally well. Since the central claim is that ∇T and T0 regulate the durations, this fit is the quantitative foundation and must be made robust.
  2. [Section 2 selection criterion; Section 3 Discussion] The analysis excludes simulations with |ΔT| < 2000 K as 'unrealistic,' but the proposed explanation of single-stage events depends on 'sufficiently small gradients' producing very short early-stage durations. The regression is therefore being extrapolated to a regime with zero data support. To make the claim load-bearing, the authors should either include a few small-gradient simulations (even if deemed less realistic) or explicitly state that the single-stage explanation is a qualitative prediction requiring future validation, and give an uncertainty estimate for the extrapolation.
  3. [Section 3 limitations] The manuscript states that the model 'is more accurate when describing late-time refilling as opposed to early-time refilling.' The interpretation of single-stage events relies entirely on early-stage durations being shortened by small ∇T. Since the quantity doing the explanatory work is the early-stage duration, and this is the model's least accurate output, the conclusion is currently unsupported. The authors should test sensitivity of early-stage durations to numerical parameters, boundary conditions, or closure assumptions, or restrict the claim to a qualitative suggestion.
  4. [Section 3 gradient proxy] The paper acknowledges the linear-altitude assumption for computing a single ∇T is 'incorrect,' and uses the final temperature profile, which is established within ~1 h. While the early stage lasts ~5 h, the gradient during the transient hour could differ from the final value. The authors should demonstrate insensitivity of the regression results to alternative gradient definitions (e.g., average over the early stage or actual profile shape), especially because the early-stage durations are the primary quantity for the single-stage explanation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Header, throughout] The header reads 'submitted toGeophysical Research Letters'; missing space. Similar missing spaces around 'T 0' and 'Q e' appear throughout the manuscript (e.g., Section 2).
  2. [Section 2] The rationale for the 2000 K threshold is not given; please specify which cited work (Rees & Roble, 1975; Comfort, 1996) sets this 'unrealistic' boundary and why.
  3. [Section 3, Fig. 3] The fit equations appear only in the figure; they should be reproduced in the text or Supporting Information so the coefficients and their units are unambiguous.
  4. [References] The reference 'Bishop, Blum, L., Chu, X., & Maruyama, N.' appears to have an incomplete author list; check formatting against journal style.
  5. [Section 3, citations] The in-text citation 'N. Singh and Torr (1990)' is inconsistent with the reference list entry 'Singh, N., & Torr, D. G.'; use a consistent style.
  6. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) would benefit from a sign convention for the heat-flux term and a definition of the coordinate s; s is defined only later in Eq. (2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: stage durations are independent model outputs; the regression is descriptive and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that field-aligned electron temperature gradient ∇T and initial/boundary temperature T0 regulate the durations of the early and late refilling stages. The stage lengths are not defined in terms of ∇T or T0; they are diagnosed from simulated equatorial concentration time series (e.g., the H+ concentration increasing for the second time at ~5 h and equilibrium at ~45 h in Fig. 1). ∇T is computed from the simulated final temperature profile, making it a correlated output rather than a definitional component of the stage-length diagnosis. The multivariate regression in Fig. 3 is an in-sample fit to the 19 simulation outputs; it is descriptive of those simulations, not a prediction of a held-out or otherwise independently measured quantity. The paper does not rename the fit as an external prediction, although the abstract's language that the regression 'demonstrated' regulation is stronger than the evidence supports. The single-stage explanation extrapolates to small-gradient cases that were excluded from the analyzed set ('the only results analyzed are from the 19 simulations where the absolute temperature difference with respect to altitude was at least 2000K'), and the authors concede the model is more accurate for late-time refilling and that the linear-altitude assumption is incorrect. These are external-validity and correctness concerns, not circularity. Self-citations to Fitzpatrick et al. (2026) and Chatterjee & Schunk (2019, 2020a) describe the model and its validation, but the manuscript also anchors the results to external observations and previous modeling (Lawrence et al., 1999; Su et al., 2001; Bishop et al., 2025; Wilson et al., 1992), so the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claim rests on regression coefficients fit to the same simulations that define both stage durations and gradient; no independent data validate these coefficients. T0 and Q_e are inputs chosen by hand from literature, not derived. The linear-gradient reduction and the ΔT threshold are ad hoc choices that shape the reported dependence.

free parameters (5)
  • Initial/boundary temperature T0
    Chosen from literature (3000-6000 K in 1000 K steps); swept across simulations; not fitted.
  • Heating rate Q_e
    Chosen from literature (~10^9 to 10^11 eV cm^-2 s^-1); constant in space and time; swept.
  • Regression coefficients for early-stage length = 6 coefficients, R^2=0.992
    Fit to 19 simulation outputs; not validated externally.
  • Regression coefficients for late-stage length = 6 coefficients, R^2=0.984
    Fit to 19 simulation outputs; not validated externally.
  • Selection threshold |ΔT| ≥ 2000 K = 2000 K
    Hand-chosen to exclude simulations deemed unrealistic; excludes small-gradient cases.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Electron and ion temperatures are equal (Te = Ti).
    Section 2: 'assuming that the temperature of each are equivalent.'
  • domain assumption Heating rate Q_e is constant in latitude and time.
    Section 2: 'Q_e is varied between simulations but is constant for all latitudes at all times.'
  • domain assumption Boundary and initial temperature T0 is time-independent.
    Section 2: 'only the flux tube boundaries remain at T0 for the duration of the simulation.'
  • domain assumption Electron energy equation (Eq. 1) from Khazanov et al. (1992), without loss terms, governs Te.
    Section 2, Eq. 1; text notes 'the model forgoes any loss terms as prescribed by Khazanov et al. (1992).'
  • domain assumption The plasma is a collisional Maxwellian electron population maintaining quasi-neutrality; hydrodynamic 1D transport.
    Section 2: electrons 'assumed to have a density to maintain quasi-neutrality and enough collisions to form a thermal, Maxwellian energy distribution.'
  • ad hoc to paper Temperature varies linearly with altitude for computing a single gradient ∇T.
    Section 3: 'we also assume temperature varies linearly with altitude as does Comfort (1996). Although this is incorrect... the assumption is made for an easier comparison.'
  • domain assumption The final temperature profile, reached within ~1 hour, is representative of the gradient throughout refilling.
    Section 3 and Fig. 2 caption: 'These temperature profiles set in within approximately one hour of refilling and persist for the remaining simulation time with minimal variation.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron Temperature Gradients Regulate the Duration of Two-Stage Plasmasphere Refilling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7RAOPAQ

@misc{pith2026260718318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron Temperature Gradients Regulate the Duration of Two-Stage Plasmasphere Refilling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7RAOPAQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18318}
}
read the original abstract

After geomagnetic storms erode the plasmasphere, cold ionospheric plasma flows along magnetic field lines to refill the depleted flux tubes. Previous studies have suggested that refilling undergoes two stages characterized by their distinct refilling rates; however, not all observations or models exhibit this feature, and a recent analysis indicates that only a subset of refilling events display two clear stages. In this study, we show that the magnitude of the field-aligned electron temperature gradient and initial/boundary temperature regulate the durations of both the early and late stages. Performing multivariate regressions from the results of simulating early and late-time refilling demonstrated that the length of each stage uniquely depends on the temperature gradient and initial/boundary temperature. These results suggest that variations in the temperature profile may explain why some refilling events appear single-staged in observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18318 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Top, Left) Equatorial concentration of H+, He+, and O+ over time. (Bottom, Left) The fraction of equatorial concentration composed of He+ and O+. (Right) Evolution of the electron temperature profile across latitude and time, with each colored line corresponding to a time designated by the color bar. The model’s newly developed capability to account for more realistic temperature variations (Fitzpatrick et al., 202… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Top): Total equatorial concentration (sum of H +, He +, and O +) vs time with T0 indicated by column and Qe designated by color. (Bottom): Al￾titude vs final electron temperature, which is also assumed to be the final ion temperature. These temperature profiles set in within approximately one hour of refilling and persist for the remaining simulation time with minimal variation, as seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Left) Early-time and (right) late-time refilling length as functions of ∇T and color designating T0. The circles correspond to results of particular refilling simulations, and the dashed lines are solutions at a given temperature to the multivariate second-degree polynomial regression fit (written out in the top-left of each plot) of the simulation results. the significantly high correlation coefficients R2 of 99.2… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    An. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2025JA034915 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2025ja034915 2026

  2. [2]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Effects of ion temperature anisotropy on the interhemispheric plasma transport during plasmaspheric refilling , volume =. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 1990 , pages =. doi:10.1029/GL017i007p00925 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/gl017i007p00925 1990

  3. [3]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Self‐consistent superthermal electron effects on plasmaspheric refilling , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1029/96JA03962 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/96ja03962 1997

  4. [4]

    and Maruyama, N

    Fitzpatrick, J and Chatterjee, K. and Maruyama, N. , month = may, year =. Dataset for ". doi:https://doi.org/10.25810/9vf2-1m93 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.25810/9vf2-1m93

  5. [5]

    Sandel, B. R. and Broadfoot, A. L. and Curtis, C. C. and King, R. A. and Stone, T. C. and Hill, R. H. and Chen, J. and Siegmund, O. H. W. and Raffanti, R. and Allred, David. D. and Turley, R. Steven. and Gallagher, D. L. , editor =. The. The. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4233-5_7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4233-5_7

  6. [6]

    Chatterjee, Kausik , year =. The. doi:https://doi.org/10.26076/3a18-9f56 , school =

    work page doi:10.26076/3a18-9f56

  7. [7]

    Journal of Geophysical Research , author =

    Formation of plasmapause, or magnetospheric plasma knee, by the combined action of magnetospheric convection and plasma escape from the tail , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research , author =. 1966 , pages =. doi:10.1029/JZ071i023p05669 , language =

    work page doi:10.1029/jz071i023p05669 1966

  8. [8]

    Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans , author =

    Modelling the high altitude electron temperature: a modified thermal conductivity , volume =. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0377-0265(01)00075-6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0377-0265(01)00075-6 2001

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Advances in Space Research , author =

    Thermal structure of the plasmasphere , volume =. Advances in Space Research , author =. 1996 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(95)00710-V , abstract =

    1996 doi

  2. [10]

    and Nagy, Andrew F

    Schunk, Robert W. and Nagy, Andrew F. , year =. Ionospheres: physics, plasma physics, and chemistry , isbn =

  3. [11]

    , year =

    Khazanov, George V. , year =. Kinetic. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6797-8 , language =

    doi

  4. [12]

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1323-4 , language =

    The. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1323-4 , language =

    doi

  5. [13]

    and Book, D.L

    Boris, J.P. and Book, D.L. , year =. Solution of. Methods in. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-460816-0.50008-7 , language =

    doi

  6. [14]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    A new source of the midlatitude ionospheric peak density structure revealed by a new. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1002/2015GL067312 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Global. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2024JA032587 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Temporal features of the refilling of a plasmaspheric flux tube , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1029/JA091iA12p13433 , abstract =

    1986 doi

  9. [17]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    State studies of. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.03.013 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  10. [18]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , author =

    The role of wave-particle interactions in cold and warm plasma heating , volume =. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1573386 , abstract =

    2025

  11. [19]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    A. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2024GL114582 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  12. [20]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    Collision frequencies and energy transfer electrons , volume =. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 1966 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(66)90024-9 , language =

    1966 doi

  13. [21]

    Banks, Peter , month = jul, year =. Charged

  14. [22]

    , year =

    Smith, G.D. , year =. Numerical

  15. [23]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Electron. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2025GL116864 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Analysis of the ionosphere‐plasmasphere transport of superthermal electrons, 1. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1992 , pages =. doi:10.1029/92JA00319 , abstract =

    1992 doi

  17. [25]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    Simulation of ionosphere-plasmasphere coupling taking into account ion inertia and temperature anisotropy , volume =. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 1984 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(84)90108-9 , abstract =

    1984 doi

  18. [26]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Analytic description of the electron temperature behavior in the upper ionosphere and plasmasphere , volume =. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 1992 , pages =. doi:10.1029/92GL01940 , abstract =

    1992 doi

  19. [27]

    Sandel, B R and Goldstein, J and Gallagher, D L and Spasojevic, M , year =. Extreme

  20. [28]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Longitudinal and seasonal variations in plasmaspheric electron density:. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2007JA012416 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  21. [29]

    Journal of Computational Physics , author =

    A flux preserving method of coupling first and second order equations to simulate the flow of plasma between the protonosphere and the ionosphere , volume =. Journal of Computational Physics , author =. 1980 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(80)90050-9 , language =

    1980 doi

  22. [30]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    A semikinetic model for early stage plasmasphere refilling: 1,. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1992 , pages =. doi:10.1029/91JA01459 , abstract =

    1992 doi

  23. [31]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Comparison of the. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2003JA009940 , abstract =

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    A comprehensive survey of plasmasphere refilling at geosynchronous orbit , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2000JA000441 , abstract =

    2001 doi

  25. [33]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics , author =

    Refilling process in the plasmasphere and its relation to magnetic activity , volume =. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0021-9169(88)90067-0 , language =

    1988 doi

  26. [34]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Refilling of geosynchronous flux tubes as observed at the equator by. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1985 , pages =. doi:10.1029/JA090iA07p06379 , abstract =

    1985 doi

  27. [35]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Comparison of hydrodynamic and semikinetic treatments for a plasma flow along closed field lines , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1994 , pages =. doi:10.1029/93JA03027 , abstract =

    1994 doi

  28. [36]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    Transport properties of the ionospheric electron gas , volume =. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 1970 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(70)90029-2 , abstract =

    1970 doi

  29. [37]

    Radio Science , author =

    Global. Radio Science , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2002RS002794 , abstract =

    2004 doi

  30. [38]

    Reviews of Geophysics , author =

    Electron temperatures in the. Reviews of Geophysics , author =. 1978 , pages =. doi:10.1029/RG016i003p00355 , abstract =

    1978 doi

  31. [39]

    Reviews of Geophysics , author =

    Observations and theory of the formation of stable auroral red arcs , volume =. Reviews of Geophysics , author =. 1975 , pages =. doi:10.1029/RG013i001p00201 , abstract =

    1975 doi

  32. [40]

    , year =

    Reames, Donald V. , year =. Solar. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50871-9 , language =

    doi

  33. [41]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Multistream hydrodynamic modeling of interhemispheric plasma flow , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1029/JA093iA12p14557 , abstract =

    1988 doi

  34. [42]

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , author =

    Geomagnetically induced currents during magnetic storms , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1109/27.902215 , abstract =

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    Earth, Planets and Space , author =

    On some features characterizing the plasmasphere–magnetosphere–ionosphere system during the geomagnetic storm of 27. Earth, Planets and Space , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s40623-019-1056-0 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Longitudinal. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. doi:10.1029/2018GL080122 , abstract =

    doi

  37. [45]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , author =

    Review of radiation belt relativistic electron losses , volume =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.019 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  38. [46]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , author =

    Plasma. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.910730 , abstract =

    2022

  39. [47]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    A semikinetic model for early stage plasmasphere refilling: 2,. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1992 , pages =. doi:10.1029/91JA02729 , abstract =

    1992 doi

  40. [48]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Ring current heating of the thermal electrons at solar maximum , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2000JA000088 , abstract =

    doi

  41. [49]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Nonlinear kinetic modeling of early stage plasmaspheric refilling , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1029/1999JA900104 , abstract =

    1999 doi

  42. [50]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Measurements of early and late time plasmasphere refilling as observed from geosynchronous orbit , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1029/1998JA900087 , abstract =

    1999 doi

  43. [51]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Measurement and modeling of the refilling plasmasphere during 2001 , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1002/2015JA022126 , abstract =

    2001 doi

  44. [52]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Simulation of. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2019GL082130 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    2013 , pages =

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1002/grl.50458 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    Space Weather , author =

    The. Space Weather , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1002/2017SW001780 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Sami2 is. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2000JA000035 , abstract =

    2000 doi

  48. [56]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Two‐stream modeling of plasmaspheric refilling , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1995 , pages =. doi:10.1029/95JA00081 , abstract =

    1995 doi

  49. [57]

    , year =

    Gringauz, K. , year =. The

  50. [58]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    What is a geomagnetic storm? , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 1994 , pages =. doi:10.1029/93JA02867 , abstract =

    1994 doi

  51. [59]

    doi:10.1029/2001GL014534 , abstract =

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =. doi:10.1029/2001GL014534 , abstract =

    doi

  52. [60]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Initial observations of thermal plasma composition and energetics from. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 1982 , pages =. doi:10.1029/GL009i009p00929 , abstract =

    1982 doi

  53. [61]

    Reviews of Geophysics , author =

    On what ionospheric workers should know about the plasmapause‐plasmasphere , volume =. Reviews of Geophysics , author =. 1973 , pages =. doi:10.1029/RG011i001p00133 , abstract =

    1973 doi

  54. [62]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    O ^. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1002/2015JA021795 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , author =

    The. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00155-1 , abstract =

    1997 doi

  56. [64]

    Edde, Byron , year =. Radar:

  57. [65]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2019JA026834 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    The. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2020JA028727 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  59. [67]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    Magnetospheric electron density long‐term (. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2011JA017274 , abstract =

    2012 doi

  60. [68]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , author =

    The impact of cold electrons and cold ions in magnetospheric physics , volume =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105599 , abstract =

    2021

  61. [69]

    Earth, Planets and Space , author =

    The development and validation of a ‘flux-corrected transport’ based solution methodology for the plasmasphere refilling problem following geomagnetic storms , volume =. Earth, Planets and Space , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s40623-020-01150-0 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2020JA028016 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Cause of plasmasphere corotation lag , volume =. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2003GL019164 , abstract =

    2004 doi

  64. [72]

    Planetary and Space Science , author =

    Dynamical behavior of thermal protons in the mid-latitude ionosphere and magnetosphere , volume =. Planetary and Space Science , author =. 1971 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(71)90104-8 , abstract =

    1971 doi

  65. [73]

    Nature , author =

    An extreme distortion of the. Nature , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature03116 , language =

    2004 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.