Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

What is mass in desitterian physics?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-th/0309104 v1 pith:JAVJCHWV submitted 2003-09-10 hep-th

What is mass in desitterian physics?

classification hep-th
keywords masssitterapproachconnexiondefinitionfieldgrouphand
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the present paper we discuss the relevance for de Sitter fields of the mass and spin interpretation of the parameters appearing in the theory. We show that these apparently conceptual interrogations have important consequences concerning the field theories. Among these, it appeared that several authors were using masses which they thought to be different, but which corresponded to a common unitary irreducible representation (UIR), hence to identical physicals systems. This could actually happen because of the arbitrariness of their mass definition in the de Sitter (dS) space. The profound cause of confusion however is to be found in the lack of connexion between the group theoretical approach on the one hand, and the usual field equation (in local coordinates) approach on the other hand. This connexion will be established in the present paper and by doing so we will get rid of any ambiguity by giving a consistent and univocal definition of a "mass" term uniquely defined with respect to a specific UIR of the de Sitter group.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Classical conformal invariance and superhorizon dynamics in de Sitter

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Standard SdSET power counting fails for classically conformal φ⁴; leading superhorizon modes must be read from the two-loop anomalous dimension of the two-point function.

  2. Thermodynamics of homogeneous Universes: de Sitter, Bonnor-Melvin and static Einstein

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Three homogeneous universes with distinct matter content obey the same thermodynamic equation for energy density, implying vanishing cosmological constant in vacuum.

  3. Thermodynamics of homogeneous Universes: de Sitter, Bonnor-Melvin and static Einstein

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    De Sitter, Bonnor-Melvin-Λ and static Einstein universes share the same thermodynamic energy-density equation despite dissimilar matter fields, yielding zero cosmological constant in Minkowski vacuum.