Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Pareto Set Identification With Posterior Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04939 v1 pith:JAWDKJZ5 submitted 2024-11-07 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords samplingidentificationparetoposteriorpotentiallypsipsaimsalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of identifying the best answer among a collection of items having real-valued distribution is well-understood. Despite its practical relevance for many applications, fewer works have studied its extension when multiple and potentially conflicting metrics are available to assess an item's quality. Pareto set identification (PSI) aims to identify the set of answers whose means are not uniformly worse than another. This paper studies PSI in the transductive linear setting with potentially correlated objectives. Building on posterior sampling in both the stopping and the sampling rules, we propose the PSIPS algorithm that deals simultaneously with structure and correlation without paying the computational cost of existing oracle-based algorithms. Both from a frequentist and Bayesian perspective, PSIPS is asymptotically optimal. We demonstrate its good empirical performance in real-world and synthetic instances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymptotically Optimal Linear Best Feasible Arm Identification with Fixed Budget

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper claims a posterior-sampling algorithm achieves the optimal error exponent for fixed-budget linear best feasible arm identification, but the proof has scaling and direction errors.

  2. Best Group Identification in Multi-Objective Bandits

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors formalize Best Group Identification in multi-objective bandits and give elimination algorithms with upper and lower sample-complexity bounds for Pareto and linear objectives.

Pith tools